Advertisement

Enhancement of electroencephalogram activity in the theta-band range during unmatched olfactory-taste stimulation

  • Saori Maeda
  • Hiroshi YoshimuraEmail author
Original Paper
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate how odor stimulation affects taste perception. Electroencephalogram (EEG) signals were measured from the frontal region of the head in normal, healthy subjects, and frequency analyses were performed. Each odor stimulation was delivered while the subject was tasting chocolate, using chocolate paste as the odorant for ‘matched odor stimulation,’ and garlic paste for ‘unmatched odor stimulation.’ Differences in EEG signals appeared between the matched and unmatched arms of the study. Comparison of the frequencies of EEGs captured under the condition of unmatched odor stimulation with those captured under the condition of matched odor stimulation showed that the occupancy rate of the theta-frequency band under the condition of unmatched odor stimulation was higher than that under the condition of matched odor stimulation. Interestingly, a negative correlation existed between the occupancy rate of the theta-frequency band and the subjective feeling of chocolate sweetness. The present findings suggest that when humans receive odors that do not match with the foods being consumed, subjective feelings are disturbed and theta-band brain activity is increased while the unmatched information is cross-checked.

Keywords

Electroencephalogram Fast Fourier Transform analysis Smell Taste Theta 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr. T. Akamatsu, T. Hasegawa, C. Yao, H. Y. Miyachi; Kanayama for experimental assistance. This study was partially supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research C 22590966), and was partially supported by the Research Clusters Program of Tokushima University.

Author contribution

HY contributed to the experimental design of the research, and drafted the manuscript. SM and HY performed experiments, and analyzed and interpreted the data.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    de Araujo IET, Rolls ET, Kringelbach ML, McGlone F, Phillips N (2003) Taste olfactory convergence, and the representation of the pleasantness of flavor, in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci 18:2059–2068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rolls ET (2005) Taste, olfactory, and food texture processing in the brain, and the control of food intake. Physiol Behav 85:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lemon CH, Katz DB (2007) The neural processing of taste. BMC Neurosci 8[Suppl 3]:S5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilson DA, Sullivan RM (2011) Cortical processing of odor objects. Neuron 72:506–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soudry Y, Lemogne C, Malinvaud D, Consoli SM, Bonfils P (2011) Olfactory system and emotion: common substrates. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 128:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kadohisa M (2013) Effects of odor on emotion, with implications. Front Syst Neurosci 7:1–6 (Article 66)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    LeDoux JE (2000) Emotion circuits in the brain. Annu Rev Neurosci 23:155–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dolan RJ (2002) Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science 298:1191–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mériau K, Isabell Wartenburger I, Kazzer P, Prehn K, Lammers CH, van der Meer E, Villringer A, Heekerena HR (2006) A neural network reflecting individual differences in cognitive processing of emotions during perceptual decision making. NeuroImage 33:1016–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Djordjevic J, Zatorre RJ, Jones-Gotman M (2004) Odor-induced changes in taste perception. Exp Brain Res 159:405–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prescott J, Johnstone V, Francis J (2004) Odor–taste interactions: effects of attentional strategies during exposure. Chem Senses 29:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Small DM, Prescott J (2005) Odor/taste integration and the perception of flavor. Exp Brain Res 166:345–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spence C (2015) Multisensory flavor perception. Cell 161:24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hornung DE, Enns MP (1987) Odor–taste mixtures. Ann N Y Acad Sci 510:86–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Macht M, Dettmer D (2006) Everyday mood and emotions after eating a chocolate bar or an apple. Appetite 46:332–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meier BP, Noll SW, Molokwu OJ (2017) The sweet life: the effect of mindful chocolate consumption on mood. Appetite 108:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Inanaga K (1998) Fontal midline theta rhythm and mental activity. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 52:555–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Klimesch W, Freunberger R, Sauseng P, Gruber W (2008) A short review of slow phase synchronization and memory: evidence for control processes in different memory systems? Brain Res 1235:31–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mitchell DJ, McNaughton N, Flanagan D, Kirk IJ (2008) Frontal–midline theta from the perspective of hippocampal ‘‘theta’’. Prog Neurobiol 86:156–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yoshimura H, Morimoto S, Okuro M, Segami N, Kato N (2010) Evaluations of dementia by EEG frequency analysis and psychological examination. J Physiol Sci 60:383–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Başar E (2012) A review of alpha activity in integrative brain function: Fundamental physiology, sensory coding, cognition and pathology. Int J Psychophysiol 86:1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bojanowski V, Hummel T (2012) Retronasal perception of odors. Physiol Behav 107:484–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Voirol E, Daget N (1986) Comparative study of nasal and retronasal olfactory perception. Food Sci Technol 19:316–319Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heilmann S, Hummel T (2004) A new method for comparing orthonasal and retronasal olfaction. Behav Neurosci 118:412–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yoshimura H, Honjo M, Sugai T, Kawabe M, Kaneyama K, Segami N, Kato N (2011) Influences of audio-visual environments on feelings of deliciousness during having sweet foods: an electroencephalogram frequency analysis study. Nutritional Neurosci 14:210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    LaBar KS, Cabeza R (2006) Cognitive neuroscience of emotional memory. Nature Rev Neurosci 7:54–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Welge-Lüssen A, Husner A, Wolfensberger M, Hummel T (2009) Influence of simultaneous gustatory stimuli on orthonasal and retronasal olfaction. Neurosci Lett 454:124–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sasaki K, Nambu A, Tsujimoto T, Matsuzaki R, Kyuhou S, Gemba H (1996a) Studies on integrative functions of the human frontal association cortex with MEG. Cogn Brain Res 5:165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sasaki K, Tsujimoto T, Nishikawa S, Nishitani N, Ishihara T (1996b) Frontal mental theta wave recorded simultaneously with magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography. Neurosci Res 26:79–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gevins A, Smith ME, McEvoy L, Yu D (1997) High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. Cereb Cortex 7:374–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Asada H, Fukuda Y, Tsunoda S, Yamaguchi M, Tonoike M (1999) Frontal midline theta rhythms reflect alternative activation of prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex in humans. Neurosci Lett 274:29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kubota Y, Sato W, Toichi M, Murai T, Okada T, Hayashi A, Sengoku A (2001) Frontal midline theta rhythm is correlated with cardiac autonomic activities during the performance of an attention demanding meditation procedure. Cogn Brain Res 11:281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Small DM, Voss J, Mak YE, Simmons KB, Parrish T, Gitelman D (2004) Experience-dependent neural integration of taste and smell in the human brain. J Neurophysiol 92:1892–1903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kaplan R, Bush D, Bonnefond M, Bandettini PA, Barnes GR, Doeller CF, Burgess N (2014) Medial prefrontal theta phase coupling during spatial memory retrieval. Hippocampus 24:656–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Trimper JB, Stefanescu RA, Manns JR (2014) Recognition memory and theta-gamma interactions in the hippocampus. Hippocampus 24:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Backus AR, Schoffelen JM, Szebényi S, Hanslmayr S, Doeller CF (2016) Hippocampal-prefrontal theta oscillations support memory integration. Curr Biol 26:450–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gordon JA (2011) Oscillations and hippocampal–prefrontal synchrony. Curr Opin Neurobiol 21:486–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stella F, Treves A (2011) Associative memory storage and retrieval: involvement of theta oscillations in hippocampal information processing. Neural Plast 2011:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Siapas AG, Lubenov EV, Wilson MA (2005) Prefrontal phase locking to hippocampal theta oscillations. Neuron 46:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Igarashi KM (2015) Plasticity in oscillatory coupling between hippocampus and cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol 35:163–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cohen MX (2011) Error-related medial frontal theta activity predicts cingulate-related structural connectivity. NeuroImage 55:1373–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Physiological Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular Oral Physiology, Institute of Biomedical SciencesThe Tokushima University Graduate SchoolTokushimaJapan
  2. 2.Department of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Health CareBAIKA Women’s UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations