Advertisement

The Journal of Physiological Sciences

, Volume 69, Issue 2, pp 211–222 | Cite as

Ivabradine preserves dynamic sympathetic control of heart rate despite inducing significant bradycardia in rats

  • Toru KawadaEmail author
  • Shuji Shimizu
  • Kazunori Uemura
  • Yohsuke Hayama
  • Hiromi Yamamoto
  • Toshiaki Shishido
  • Takuya Nishikawa
  • Masaru Sugimachi
Original Paper
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Ivabradine is a selective bradycardic agent that inhibits hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels. HCN channels play a key role in mediating the positive chronotropic response to sympathetic nerve stimulation (SNS). We examined whether ivabradine would interfere with dynamic sympathetic control of heart rate (HR). The effect of intravenous ivabradine (2 mg/kg, n = 7) or metoprolol (10 mg/kg, n = 6) on the transfer function from SNS to HR was examined in anesthetized rats. Ivabradine preserved the asymptotic dynamic gain of the HR transfer function and nearly doubled the asymptotic dynamic gain of the transfer function from SNS to the R–R interval. In contrast, metoprolol abolished dynamic sympathetic control of HR. Preserved dynamic sympathetic control of HR, with coexisting bradycardia, may contribute to some of the beneficial effects of ivabradine previously reported in clinical application.

Keywords

Metoprolol Transfer function Sympathetic stimulation 

Notes

Author contributions

TK and MS, conception and design of the study; TK performed the experiment and analyzed the data; TK, SS, KU, YH, HY, TS, TN, and MS, discussed and interpreted the results. TK and MS, drafting and revising the manuscript. All authors have read the final version of the manuscript and approved its submission to the Journal of Physiological Sciences.

Compliance with ethical standards

Research involving human participants and/or animals

Animals used in the present study were cared for in strict accordance with the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Animals in the Field of Physiological Sciences, which has been approved by the Physiological Society of Japan. The Animal Subjects Committee at the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center reviewed and approved the experimental protocols.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (JSPS KAKENHI Grant number 18K10695).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Vinogradova TM, Lyashkov AE, Zhu W, Ruknudin AM, Sirenko S, Yang D, Deo S, Barlow M, Johnson S, Caffrey JL, Zhou YY, Xiao RP, Cheng H, Stern MD, Maltsev VA, Lakatta EG (2006) High basal protein kinase A-dependent phosphorylation drives rhythmic internal Ca2+ store oscillations and spontaneous beating of cardiac pacemaker cells. Circ Res 98:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liao Z, Lockhead D, Larson ED, Proenza C (2010) Phosphorylation and modulation of hyperpolarization-activated HCN4 channels by protein kinase A in the mouse sinoatrial node. J Gen Physiol 136:247–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DiFrancesco D, Borer JS (2007) The funny current: cellular basis for the control of heart rate. Drugs 67(Suppl 2):15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hjalmarson Å (2007) Heart rate: an independent risk factor in cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J Suppl 9(Suppl F):F3–F7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swedberg K, Komajda M, Böhm M, Borer JS, Ford I, Dubost-Brama A, Lerebours G, Tavazzi L, SHIFT Investigators (2010) Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet 376:875–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yamamoto H, Kawada T, Shimizu S, Uemura K, Inagaki M, Kakehi K, Iwanaga Y, Fukuda K, Miyamoto T, Miyazaki S, Sugimachi M (2018) Ivabradine does not acutely affect open-loop baroreflex static characteristics and spares sympathetic heart rate control in rats. Int J Cardiol 257:255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heusser K, Tank J, Brinkmann J, Schroeder C, May M, Großhennig A, Wenzel D, Diedrich A, Sweep FC, Mehling H, Luft FC, Jordan J (2016) Preserved autonomic cardiovascular regulation with cardiac pacemaker inhibition: a crossover trial using high-fidelity cardiovascular phenotyping. J Am Heart Assoc 5:e002674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nakahara T, Kawada T, Sugimachi M, Miyano H, Sato T, Shishido T, Yoshimura R, Miyashita H, Inagaki M, Alexander J Jr, Sunagawa K (1999) Neuronal uptake affects dynamic characteristics of heart rate response to sympathetic stimulation. Am J Physiol 277:R140–R146Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berger RD, Saul JP, Cohen RJ (1989) Transfer function analysis of autonomic regulation. I. Canine atrial rate response. Am J Physiol 256:H142–H152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawada T, Ikeda Y, Sugimachi M, Shishido T, Kawaguchi O, Yamazaki T, Alexander J Jr, Sunagawa K (1996) Bidirectional augmentation of heart rate regulation by autonomic nervous system in rabbits. Am J Physiol 271:H288–H295Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mizuno M, Kawada T, Kamiya A, Miyamoto T, Shimizu S, Shishido T, Smith SA, Sugimachi M (2010) Dynamic characteristics of heart rate control by the autonomic nervous system in rats. Exp Physiol 95:919–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shoukas AA, Callahan CA, Lash JM, Haase EB (1991) New technique to completely isolate carotid sinus baroreceptor regions in rats. Am J Physiol 260:H300–H303Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sato T, Kawada T, Miyano H, Shishido T, Inagaki M, Yoshimura R, Tatewaki T, Sugimachi M, Alexander J Jr, Sunagawa K (1999) New simple methods for isolating baroreceptor regions of carotid sinus and aortic depressor nerves in rats. Am J Physiol 276:H326–H332Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dias da Silva VJ, Tobaldini E, Rocchetti M, Wu MA, Malfatto G, Montano N, Zaza A (2015) Modulation of sympathetic activity and heart rate variability by ivabradine. Cardiovasc Res 108:31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gardiner SM, Kemp PA, March JE, Bennett T (1995) Acute and chronic cardiac and regional haemodynamic effects of the novel bradycardic agent, S16257, in conscious rats. Br J Pharmacol 115:579–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Di Verniero CA, Silberman EA, Mayer MA, Opezzo JA, Taira CA, Höcht C (2008) In vitro and in vivo pharmacodynamic properties of metoprolol in fructose-fed hypertensive rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 51:532–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bendat JS, Piersol AG (2010) Random data. Analysis and measurement procedures, 4th edn. Wiley, New JerseyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Glantz SA, Slinker BK (2001) Primer of applied regression and analysis of variance, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Uemura K, Inagaki M, Zheng C, Kawada T, Li M, Fukumitsu M, Sugimachi M (2017) Acute ivabradine treatment reduces heart rate without increasing atrial fibrillation inducibility irrespective of underlying vagal activity in dogs. Heart Vessels 32:484–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chobanyan-Jürgens K, Heusser K, Duncker D, Veltmann C, May M, Mehling H, Luft FC, Schröder C, Jordan J, Tank J (2018) Cardiac pacemaker channel (HCN4) inhibition and atrial arrhythmogenesis after releasing cardiac sympathetic activation. Sci Rep 8:7748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mohrman DE, Heller LJ (2010) Cardiovascular physiology 7th edn. A LANGE medical book. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 24–25Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alig J, Marger L, Mesirca P, Ehmke H, Mangoni ME, Isbrandt D (2009) Control of heart rate by cAMP sensitivity of HCN channels. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:12189–12194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schweizer PA, Duhme N, Thomas D, Becker R, Zehelein J, Draguhn A, Katus HA, Koenen M (2010) cAMP sensitivity of HCN pacemaker channels determines basal heart rate but is not critical for autonomic rate control. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 3:542–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miyamoto T, Kawada T, Yanagiya Y, Akiyama T, Kamiya A, Mizuno M, Takaki H, Sunagawa K, Sugimachi N (2008) Contrasting effects of presynaptic α2-adrenergic autoinhibition and pharmacologic augmentation of presynaptic inhibition on sympathetic heart rate control. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295:H1855–H1866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Monfredi O, Maltsev VA, Lakatta EG (2013) Modern concepts concerning the origin of the heartbeat. Physiology (Bethesda) 28:74–92Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Doan TN, Stephans K, Ramirez AN, Glazebrook PA, Andresen MC, Kunze DL (2004) Differential distribution and function of hyperpolarization-activated channels in sensory neurons and mechanosensitive fibers. J Neurosci 24:3335–3343CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Physiological Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cardiovascular DynamicsNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular CenterOsakaJapan
  2. 2.Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of MedicineKindai UniversityOsakaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Research PromotionNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular CenterOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations