Advertisement

Food Security

, Volume 11, Issue 5, pp 1135–1152 | Cite as

An assessment of the global food security index

  • Meital Izraelov
  • Jacques SilberEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Several measures of food insecurity, whether at the household or at the national level, have been introduced during the past two or three decades. Some concentrate on the determinants of food security while other emphasize more the consequences of food insecurity. The main focus of this paper is on the food security indicators introduced by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), the Global Food Security Index (GFSI). The paper has two goals. It first checks whether the set of weights selected by the panel of experts of the EIU plays a crucial role in the ranking of countries by level of food security. Then it examines to what extent the ranking of countries given by the GFSI is sensitive to the list of indicators selected. The empirical analysis conducted, based on statistical techniques such as principal components and efficiency analysis, led us to conclude that both the weights selected and the choice of indicators give a reasonable ranking of countries by level of their food security.

Keywords

Data envelopment analysis Food and agriculture organization Food security Global food security index Principal components analysis Stochastic production frontier 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aigner, D., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, G., Crawford, I., & Leicester, A. (2008). Efficiency analysis and the lower convex Hull approach. In N. Kakwani & J. Silber (Eds.), Quantitative Approaches to Multidimensional Poverty Measurement (pp. 176–191).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, G., Crawford, I., & Leicester, A. (2011). Welfare rankings from multivariate data, a nonparametric approach. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 247–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett, C. B. (2010). Measuring food insecurity. Science, 327, 825–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Battese, G. E., & Corra, G. S. (1977). Estimation of a production frontier model: With application to the pastoral zones of eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 21, 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cafiero, C. (2013). What do we really know about food security. Working paper 18861. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carletto, C., Zezza, A., & Banerjee, R. (2013). Towards better measurement of household food security: Harmonizing indicators and the role of household surveys. Global Food Security, 2, 30–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes (1978) "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units 429–44.Google Scholar
  9. Coates, J. (2013). Build it back better: Deconstructing food security for improved measurement and action. Global Food Security, 2, 188–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coelli, T. (1992). A computer program for frontier production function estimation: Version frontier 2.0. Economic Letters, 39, 29–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coelli, T., Prasada Rao, D. S., & Battese, G. E. (1998). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Boston: Kluwe Academic Publichers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. P., O'Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. De Haen, H., Klasen, S., & Qaim, M. (2011). What do we really know? Metrics for food security and undernutrition. Food Policy, 36, 760–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutsch, J., & Silber, J. (2005). Measuring multidimensional poverty: An empirical comparison of various approaches. Review of Income and Wealth, 51(1), 145–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deutsch, J., Silber, J., & Verme, P. (2012). On social exclusion in Macedonia: Measurement and determinants", chapter 7. In C. Ruggeri Laderchi & S. Savastano editors (Eds.), Poverty and Exclusion in the Western Balkans. New Directions in Measurement and Policy (pp. 99–116). Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Deutsch, J., Dumas, A., & Silber, J. (2013). Estimating an educational production function for five countries of Latin America on the basis of the PISA data. Economics of Education Review, 36, 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deutsch, J., Dumas, A., & Silber, J. (2019). School externalities and scholastic performance: An efficiency analysis. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 102–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. EIU (The Economist Intelligence Unit). (2015). Global food security index 2015. An annual measure of the state of global food security. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited.Google Scholar
  19. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of Royal Statistics Society, Series A, CXX, 120, 253–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. H. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data – Or tears: An application to education enrollments in sates of India. Demography, 38(1), 115–132.Google Scholar
  21. Filmer, D., & Scott, K. (2012). Assessing asset indices. Demography, 49, 359–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freudenberg, M. (2003). Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment. In OECD science, technology and industry working papers, 2003/16. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  23. Green, W. H. (1992). LIMDEP version 6.0: User’s manual and reference guide. New York: Econometric Software Inc.Google Scholar
  24. Hamelin, A.-M., Habicht, J.-P., & Beaudry, M. (1999). Food insecurity: Consequences for the household and broader social implications. The Journal of Nutrition, 129(2), 525S–528S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heady, D., & Ecker, O. (2013). Rethinking the measurement of food security: From first principles to best practice. Food Security, 5, 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ike, C. U., Jacobs, P. T., & Kelly, C. (2017). A multidimensional approach to measuring household food security in Taraba state, Nigeria: Comparing key indicators. Development in Practice, 27(2), 234–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ivanovic, B. (1977). Classification theory. Belgrade: Institute for Industrial Economics.Google Scholar
  28. Jacobs, R., P. Smith and M. Goddard (2004) Measuring Performance: An examination of composite performance indicators. Technical paper series 29, Center for Health Economics, University of yok, York, UK.Google Scholar
  29. Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (1999). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (Fourth ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, A. D., Ngure, F. M., Pelto, G., & Young, S. L. (2013). What are we assessing when we measure food security? A compendium and review of current metrics. Advances in Nutrition, 4(5), 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kakwani, N., & Son, H. H. (2015). Measuring food insecurity: Global estimates. ECINEQ (Society for the Study of economic inequality) working paper (pp. 2015–2370).Google Scholar
  32. Lovell, C. A. K., Richardson, S., Travers, P., & Wood, L. (1994). Resources and Functionings: A new view of inequality in Australia. In W. Eichhorn (Ed.), Models and measurement of welfare and inequality. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Maričić, M., Bulajic, M., Dobrota, M. and V. Jeremic (2016) “Redesigning the Global Food Security Index: A Multivariate Composite I-Distance Indicator Approach. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics 4(1), Special Issue: 69–86.Google Scholar
  34. Meeusen, W., & van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimates from cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18, 435–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Munda, G. (2012). Choosing aggregation rules for composite indicators. Social Indicators Research, 109, 337–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Munda, G., & Nardo, M. (2009). Noncompensatory/nonlinear composite indicators for ranking countries: A defensible setting. Applied Economics, 41(12), 1513–1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building. Ispra: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen.Google Scholar
  38. O.E.C.D. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators. In Methodology and user guide. Paris: O.E.C.D.Google Scholar
  39. OECD (2013) PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Pangaribowo, E. H., Gerber, N., & Torero, M. (2013). Food and nutrition security indicators: A review. Working paper 108. Bonn: Center for Development Research (ZEF).Google Scholar
  41. Pérez-Escamilla, R., Gubert, M. B., Rogers, B., & Hromi-Fiedler, A. (2017). Food security measurement and governance: Assessment of the usefulness of diverse food insecurity indicators for policy makers. Global Food Security, 14, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pinstrup-Andersen, P. (2009). Food security: Definition and measurement. Food Security, 1, 5–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rabar, D. (2017). An overview of data envelopment analysis application in studies on the socio-economic performance of OECD countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 1770–1784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ram, R. (1982). Composite indices of physical quality of life, basic needs fulfilment and income: A principal components analysis. Journal of Development Economics, 11, 227–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ramos, X., & Silber, J. (2005). On the application of efficiency analysis to the study of the dimensions of human development. Review of Income and Wealth, 51(2), 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Richmond, J. (1974). Estimating the efficiency of production. International Economic Review, 15(2), 515–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Saisana, M., A. Saltelli and S. Tarantola (2005) “Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 168, Part 2: 307–323.Google Scholar
  48. Santeramo, F. G. (2014). On the composite indicators for food security: Decisions matter! MPRA paper 58955. Germany: University Library of Munich.Google Scholar
  49. Santeramo, F. G. (2015a). Food security composite indices: Implication for policy and practice. Development in Practice, 25(4), 594–600.Google Scholar
  50. Santeramo, F. G. (2015b). On the composite indicators for food security: Decisions matter! Food Reviews International, 31(1), 63–73.Google Scholar
  51. Sen, A. K. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, M. D., Rabbitt, M. P., & Coleman-Jensen, A. (2017). Who are the World’s Food insecure? New Evidence from the Food and Agriculture Organization’s Food Insecurity Experience Scale. World Development, 93(C), 402–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thomas, A.-C., D’Hombres, B., Casubolo, C., Kayitakire, F., & Saisana, M. (2017). The use of the global food security index to inform the situation in food insecure countries. European Commission, Technical Report of the Joint Research Centre, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  54. Webb, P., Coates, J., Frongillo, E. A., Lorge, B., Swindale, A., & Bilinsky, P. (2006). Measuring household food insecurity: Why It's so important and yet so difficult to do. The Journal of Nutrition, 136(5), 1404S–1408S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wineman, A. (2016). Multidimensional household food security measurement in rural Zambia. Agrekon, 55(3), 278–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Society for Plant Pathology and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clalit General Health ServicesInternal Auditor’s OfficeTel AvivIsrael
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsBar-Ilan UniversityRamat GanIsrael
  3. 3.LISEREsch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg
  4. 4.Tuscan Interuniversity Centre, Advanced Statistics for Equitable and Sustainable DevelopmentCentro Camilo DagumPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations