Advertisement

Food Security

, Volume 10, Issue 6, pp 1325–1336 | Cite as

Access to agricultural land in peri-urban spaces: social mobilisation and institutional frameworks in Rome and Valencia

  • Pedro Cerrada-SerraEmail author
  • Luca Colombo
  • Dionisio Ortiz-Miranda
  • Stefano Grando
Original Paper

Abstract

Urban and peri-urban agriculture have gained worldwide momentum within the framework of the renewed food and nutrition security agenda. This has a special significance for Mediterranean cities, due to their traditional strong links with their agricultural surroundings. However, the renewed dynamism of peri-urban agriculture is constrained by the limited access to farmland of new farmers or already installed farmers. This paper explores how socio-political movements that aim to renew local food systems and introduce new models of urban-peri-urban governance are revitalising the debate on access to peri-urban farmland. A comparative analysis was conducted in two Mediterranean metropolitan areas (Rome in Italy and Valencia in Spain), in which different policy frameworks shape the conditions of access to farmland. Despite the institutional differences between these two cases, the results show that, for the organisations involved in these movements, facilitating access to farmland is now a crucial challenge in achieving their multiple objectives. The paper also addresses the supportive role (and the constraints) of the local authorities in facilitating access to farmland for those producers willing to adopt alternative business models that can give rise to the transition towards more democratic and sustainable local food systems.

Keywords

Social movements Access to land Peri-urban agriculture Mediterranean Europe Sustainable local food systems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is part of the project “Assessment of the impact of global drivers of change on Europe’s food security” (TRANSMANGO), granted by the EU under 7th Framework Programme; theme KBBE.2013.2.5-01; Grant agreement no: 613532.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Allen, A. (2003). Environmental planning and management of the periurban interface: Perspectives on an emerging field. Environment and Urbanization, 15(1), 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badami, M. G., & Ramankutty, N. (2015). Urban agriculture and food security: A critique based on an assessment of urban land constraints. Global Food Security, 4, 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blay-Palmer, A., Santini, G., Dubbeling, M., Renting, H., Taguchi, M., & Giordano, T. (2018). Validating the City region food system approach: Enacting inclusive, Transformational City region food systems. Sustainability, 10(5), 1680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borras, S.M, Jr., Seufert, P, Backes, S, Fyfe, D, Herre, R, Michele, L, & Mills, E. (2016). Land Grabbing and Human Rights: the Involvement of European Corporate and Financial Entities in Land Grabbing outside the European Union. European Union, Policy Department, Directorate-General for External Policies.  https://doi.org/10.2861/338205
  5. CRAT (2011). Vertenza per la salvaguardia dell'Agro Romano - Terre pubbliche ai giovani agricoltori. http://www.aiab.it/images/stories/UfficioStampa/vertenzagroromano.pdf. Accessed July 2017.
  6. Duke, J., & Aull-Hyde, R. (2002). Identifying public preferences for land preservation using the analytic hierarchy process. Ecological Economics, 42, 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eigenbrod, C., & Gruda, N. (2015). Urban vegetable for food security in cities. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 35(2), 483–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Environmental Agency (1995). Europe's environment - the Dobris assessment. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  9. FAO (2014). Growing greener cities in Latin America and the Caribbean. A FAO report on urban and peri-urban agriculture in the region. Rome.Google Scholar
  10. Forster, T. & Getz-Escudero A (2014). City regions as landscapes for people, food and nature. EcoAgriculture Partners, on behalf of the Landscapes for People, Food and Nature Initiative. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  11. Franco, J., Monsalve, S., & Borras, S. (2015). Democratic land control and human rights. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 15, 66–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Galli, M., Lardon, S., Marraccini, E., & Bonari, E. (Eds.). (2010). Agricultural management in peri-urban areas. Italy: FeliciEditore. Ghezzano.Google Scholar
  13. Gallico, L. &Groppo, P. (2015). VGGT as a Tool for Improving Access to Land and the Responsible Management of Natural Resources: Based on the Experience of Lazio Region and Rome Municipality. FAO - Land and Water Division (NRL), Rome.Google Scholar
  14. Gómez Ferri, J. (2004). Los movimientos ciudadanos de defensa y activación del patrimonio en Valencia: los casos del barrio del Cabanyal y la ILP per l’Horta. In Coordinadora de defensa del Rincón-Ecologistas en Acción. Experiencias sociales innovadoras y participativas. El Rincón + 10. (pp. 157–205).Google Scholar
  15. Knowd, I., Mason, D., & Docking, A. (2006). Urban agriculture: The new frontier. Paper presented at the Planning for Food Seminar, 21 June 2006. Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  16. Lovell, S. T. (2010). Multifunctional urban agriculture for sustainable land use planning in the United States. Sustainability, 2, 2499–2522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Munton, R. (2009). Rural land ownership in the United Kingdom: Changing patterns and future possibilities for land use. Land Use Policy, 26, S54–S61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Opitz, I., Berges, R., Piorr, A., & Krikser, T. (2016). Contributing to food security in urban areas: Differences between urban agriculture and peri-urban agriculture in the global north. Agriculture and Human Values, 33(2), 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Paül, V., & McKenzie, F. H. (2013). Peri-urban farmland conservation and development of alternative food networks: Insights from a case-study area in metropolitan Barcelona (Catalonia, Spain). Land Use Policy, 30(1), 94–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Péron, J. Y., & Geoffriau, E. (2007). Characteristics and sustainable development of peri-urban vegetable production in Europe. ActaHorticulturae, (762), 159–170.Google Scholar
  21. Piorr, A., Ravetz, J., & Tosics, I. (Eds.). (2011). Peri-urbanisation in Europe: Towards European policies to sustain urban–rural futures. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen, Forest and Landscape.Google Scholar
  22. Schmid, O., Moschitz, H., Dubbeling, M., Fritschi, R., Jahrl, I. &Wiskerke, H. (2015). Governance for urban food systems – Recommendations from SUPURBFOOD project. http://archive.harper-adams.ac.uk/events/ifsa-conference/papers/5/5.6%20Schmid.pdf. Accessed July 2017.
  23. Sonnino, R. (2009). Feeding the city: Towards a new research and planning agenda. International Planning Studies , 14(4), 425–435.Google Scholar
  24. Soriano, V. (2015). La huerta de Valencia un paisaje menguante. Amazon.Google Scholar
  25. Soulard, C. T., Valette, E., Perrin, C., Abrantes, P. C., Anthopoulou, T., Benjaballah, O., et al. (2017). Peri-urban agro-ecosystems in the Mediterranean: Diversity, dynamics, and drivers. Regional Environmental Change, 1–12.Google Scholar
  26. Vervoort, J.,Helfgott, A. & Lord, S. (2016) TRANSMANGO Deliverable 3.2: Scenarios Methodology Framework and Training Guide.Google Scholar
  27. Wästfelt, A., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Reclaiming localisation for revitalising agriculture: A case study of peri-urban agricultural change in Gothenburg, Sweden. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 172–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wekerle, G. R., & Classens, M. (2015). Food production in the city: (re) negotiating land, food and property. Local Environment, 20(10), 1175–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zasada, I. (2011). Multifunctional peri-urban agriculture—A review of societal demands and the provision of goods and services by farming. Land Use Policy, 28(4), 639–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. and International Society for Plant Pathology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Social SciencesUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Italian Foundation for Research in Organic and Biodynamic Agriculture (Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca in Agricoltura Biologica e Biodinamica–FIRAB)RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations