Conservation agriculture in western China increases productivity and profits without decreasing resilience
This study examined the economic and risk effects of conservation agriculture (CA) in western China using nine years of data from an agronomic field experiment and a case study for a typical crop-livestock farm. A CA system of a wheat-pea rotation with no-tillage and stubble retention was compared with the current practice of the same rotation but with conventional tillage and stubble removal. Risk was examined by computing the resistance and resilience of grain yields to climate shocks at the field scale, along with calculating the stability of yields and profits at the field and farm scale. Climate shocks were defined using the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Resistance indicated the proximity of grain yields during a climate shock to average yields. Resilience indicated the rate of return towards average grain yields after a climate shock. At the field scale, CA increased grain yields by an average of 19.6% and increased profits without negatively affecting resistance or resilience. At the farm scale, CA increased profits by an average of 5%, increased the stability of profits by 33%, and reduced labor demands. Despite these gains, the adoption of CA in western China remains low. Results suggest that at present the private gains to farmers are not large enough to encourage the more widespread adoption of CA. Therefore, because CA also produces public benefits for conservation of the environment such as reduced erosion, financial incentives may be considered to assist CA adoption in specific farming systems.
KeywordsCereal-legume rotation, Crop-livestock system, Gansu, Resistance, Risk JEL classification O33, Q5
Lingling Li provided the data from the agronomic field experiment used in this study. This study benefited from discussions with William Bellotti. The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Ministry of Science and Technology of China, Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China, and Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science helped to fund the data collection for this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declared no conflict of interest.
- Bhim, A. & Karthik, N. (2011). Ecological economics of soil erosion: a review of the current state of knowledge. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1219(1), 134−152.Google Scholar
- Corbeels, M., Sakyi, R. K., Kühne, R. F. & Whitbread, A. (2014). Meta-analysis of crop responses to conservation agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. CCAFS Report No. 12. Copenhagen: CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS). https://ccafs.cgiar.org/publications/meta-analysis-crop-responses-conservation-agriculture-sub-saharan-africa#.VuhsqOIrKCg [accessed October 17, 2016]Google Scholar
- Fan, S., Pandya-Lorch, R., Yosef, S., Fritschel, H. & Zseleczky, L. (2014). The way forward for building resilience. In Resilience for food and nutrition security (Eds S. Fan, R. Pandya-Lorch and S. Yosef). Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).Google Scholar
- FAO (2018). FAOSTAT. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data [accessed July 11, 2018]
- Giller, K. E., Andersson, J. A., Corbeels, M., Kirkegaard, J., Mortensen, D., Erenstein, O., & Vanlauwe, B. (2015). Beyond Conservation Agriculture. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6.Google Scholar
- Homann-Kee Tui, S., Valbuena, D., Masikati, P., Descheemaeker, K., Nyamangara, J., Claessens, L., Erenstein, O., van Rooyen, A. & Nkomboni, D. (2015). Economic trade-offs of biomass use in crop-livestock systems: Exploring more sustainable options in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems, 134, 48−60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huang, G. B., Zhang, R. Z., Li, G. D., Li, L. L., Chan, K. Y., Heenan, D. P., Chen, W., Unkovich, M. J., Robertson, M. J., Cullis, B. R., & Bellotti, W. D. (2008). Productivity and sustainability of a spring wheat-field pea rotation in a semi-arid environment under conventional and conservation tillage systems. Field Crops Research, 107(1), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kassam, A., Friedrich, T., Derpsch, R., & Kienzle, J. (2015). Overview of the worldwide spread of conservation agriculture. Field Actions Science Reports. The Journal of Field Actions, 8, 1–11.Google Scholar
- Komarek, A. M., Li, L. & Bellotti, W. D. (2015b). Whole-farm economic and risk effects of conservation agriculture in a crop-livestock system in western China. Agricultural Systems, 137(0), 220−226.Google Scholar
- Paten, A. M. (2008). Managment of livestock nutrition under subsistence farming conditions in Eastern Gansu Province, China. Bachelor of Science (Animal Science) thesis. In School of Agriculture, Food and Wine Adelaide: The University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
- Sahlu, T., Goetsch, A. L., Luo, J., Nsahlai, I. V., Moore, J. E., Galyean, M. L., Owens, F. N., Ferrell, C. L., & Johnson, Z. B. (2004). Nutrient requirements of goats: developed equations, other considerations and future research to improve them. Small Ruminant Research, 53(3), 191–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Thierfelder, C., Chivenge, P., Mupangwa, W., Rosenstock, T. S., Lamanna, C., & Eyre, J. X. (2017). How climate-smart is conservation agriculture (CA)? – its potential to deliver on adaptation, mitigation and productivity on smallholder farms in southern Africa. Food Security, 9(3), 537–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang, Q., Shen, Y., Nan, Z. B., Whish, J., Bell, L. & Bellotti, W. D. (2010). Production and nutritive value of alternative annual forage crop options in a rainfed region of western China. In 15th Agronomy Conference, Food Security from Sustainable Agriculture (Ed H. C. Dove, R. A.). New Zealand: Lincoln.Google Scholar