Advertisement

Food Security

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 881–896 | Cite as

Linking system perspectives with user perspectives to identify adoption barriers to food security innovations for smallholder farmers – evidence from rural Tanzania

  • Anett KuntoschEmail author
  • Bettina König
Original Paper
  • 273 Downloads

Abstract

Food insecurity remains a persistent problem, affecting one-third of Tanzania’s population. Mutually reinforcing factors that make the situation more acute include high human population growth combined with the impacts of climate change affecting agricultural productivity. This situation explains why the development and implementation of solutions to improve food security in Tanzania continues to receive substantial attention from scholars, NGOs, practitioners, government and associated bodies. Among researchers and practitioners, innovation is discussed as one possible and widely accepted pathway for improving food security. However, evidence shows that the adoption of innovations that have a potential to improve food security status, such as improved seed, fertilizer, better cooking stoves or mechanization, remains low in Tanzania. To enhance understanding about why innovations are not always successfully adopted, we took an innovation system perspective that included three analytical steps: (1) description of system arrangements on a meso- and macro level, (2) the description of farmers’ motivation for adoption or rejection on a micro-level, and (3) an integration of findings from both levels to identify entry points for purposeful intervention. This paper applied that framework to the empirical examples of two innovations, improved cooking stoves (ICS) and fertilizer micro-dosing (FMD) combined with improved soil and crop management techniques for small-scale subsistence-farmer groups in Tanzania. These interventions were part of the Trans-SEC research project. We show how system constraints, such as hampered communication and interaction across levels, had an impact on the way innovations could be implemented by farmers and how this leads to specific adoption decisions, given conditions of not-knowing or insufficient information. From these two case studies we conclude that most technical based innovations are associated with process aspects (in the case of fertilizer micro-dosing) or social aspects (with stoves).

Keywords

Multilevel perspective Adoption behavior Innovation processes Smallholder farmers 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) for funding of the Trans-SEC project. We thank the project team in Tanzania for organization of fieldwork, N. Laizer for translation and I. J. Kalogho and B. Lyamuya for their excellent facilitation of farmer group interviews on-site.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acevedo, M. F., Harvey, D. R., & Palis, F. G. (2018). Food security and the environment: Interdisciplinary research to increase productivity while exercising environmental conservation. Global Food Security, 16, 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akroyd, S., & Smith, L. (2007). Review of public spending to agriculture, a joint DFID / World Bank study. UK: Oxford Policy Management.Google Scholar
  3. Alarcon, D., & Bodouroglou, C. (2011). Agricultural innovation for food security and environmental sustainability in the context of the recent economic crisis: Why a gender perspective? World Economic and Social Survey, 2011.Google Scholar
  4. Ashley, J. M. (2016). Food security in the developing world. London, UK: Academic Press, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Assefa, A., Waters-Bayer, A., Finchman, R. & Mudahara, M. (2009). Comparison of frameworks for studying Grassroot innovation: Agricultural innovation systems (AIS) and agricultural knowledge and innovation systems (AKIS). In Sanginga et al. (Eds.) (2009). Innovation Africa Enriching Farmers Livelihoods. Earthscan. London, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Barham, J., & Chitemi, C. (2009). Collective action initiatives to improve marketing performance: Lessons from farmer groups in Tanzania. Food Policy, 34, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bensch, G., & Perters, J. (2015). The intensive margin of technology adoption- experimental evidence on improved cooking stoves in rural Senegal. Journal of Health Economics, 42, 44–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bokelmann, W., Doernberg, A., Schwerdtner, W., Kuntosch, A., Busse, M., König, B., Siebert, R., Koschatzky, K., & Stahlecker, T. (2012). Sektorstudie zur Untersuchung des Innovationssystems der deutschen Landwirtschaft, doi, 10.18452/13522.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, V. A., Harris, J. A., & Russell, J. Y. (Eds.). (2010). Tackling wicked problems through the transdisciplinary imagination. Earthscan. Washington DC: USA.Google Scholar
  10. Coulson, A. (2010). Kilimo kwanza: A new start for agriculture in Tanzania? Institute of local government studies. UK: Brighton.Google Scholar
  11. De Janvry, A., & Sadoulet, E. (2010). Agriculture for development in sub-Saharan Africa: An update. AfJARE, 5(1), 194–204.Google Scholar
  12. Deveaux, A., Velasco, C., & Jager, M. (2016). Integrating agricultural innovation and inclusive value chains development. In A. Devaux, M. Torero, J. Donovan, & D. Horton (Eds.), Innovation for inclusive value-chain development: Successes and challenges. IFPRI. Washington DC: USA.Google Scholar
  13. Diyamett, B.D., Ngowi, P. & Mutambala, M. (2012). Impact of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) on local technological capabilities in the Agricultural Sector in Tanzania. STIPRO Policy Brief, Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Organization No.3, 2012. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.Google Scholar
  14. Duhaime, G., & Godmaire, A. (2002). The conditions of sustainable food security. An integrated conceptual framework. Pimatziwin: A Journal of Aboriginal and Indigenous Community Health, 1(2), 87–127.Google Scholar
  15. Eidt, C. M., Hickey, G. M., & Vurtis, M. A. (2012). Knowledge integration and the adaption of new agricultural technologies. Kenyan perspectives. Food Security, 4(3), 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., & Green, K. (2004). System innovation and the transition to sustainability. Theory, Evidence and Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltham. USA: Northampton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Esterhuizen, D., Schutte, C. S. L., & DuToit, A. S. A. (2012). Knowledge creation processes as critical enablers for innovation. International Journal of Information Management, 32, 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fagerberg, J. (2003). Innovation: A guide to the literature. Paper presented at the Workshop: “The many guises of Innovation: What we have learnt and where we are heading”. Ottawa, Canada, October 2003.Google Scholar
  19. FAO (2008). An introduction to the basic concepts of food security. The EC-FAO food security Programme is funded by the European Union and implemented by FAO. Available from: www.foodsec.org/docs/concepts_guide.pdf Google Scholar
  20. Foran, T., Butler, J. R. A., Wanjura, W. J., Hall, A., Carter, L., & Carberry, P. S. (2014). Taking complexity in food systems seriously: An interdisciplinary analysis. World Development, 61, 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Graef, F., Sieber, S., Mutabazi, K., Asch, F., Biesalski, H. K., Bitegeko, J., Bokelmann, W., Bruentrup, M., Dietric, O., et al. (2014). Framework for participatory food security research in rural food value chains. Global Food Security, 3(1), 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grochowska, R. (2014). Specificity of food security concept as a wicked problem. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, B4, 823–831.Google Scholar
  23. Hall, A. (2007). Challenges to strengthening agricultural innovation systems: Where do we go from here? UNU-merit working papers. The Netherlands: Maastricht.Google Scholar
  24. Hall, A., Sulaiman, V. R., Clark, N., & Yogananda, B. (2003). From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: An innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research. Agricultural Systems, 78, 213–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Haug, R., & Hella, J. (2013). The art of balancing food security: Securing availability and affordability of food in Tanzania. Global Food Security, 5, 415–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heemskerk, W., Lema, N., Guindo, D., Schouten, C., Semgalawe, S., Verkuijl, H., Piters, B.d. S., & Penninkhoff, P. (2004). A guide to demand driven agricultural research. The client oriented research approach: Rural services delivery for agricultural development. In KIT publishers. The Netherlands: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  27. Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hermans, F., Stuiver, M., Beersm, P. J., & Kok, K. (2013). The distribution of roles and functions for upscaling and outscaling innovations in agricultural innovation systems. Agricultural Systems, 115, 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hounkonnou, D., Kossou, D., Kuyper, T. W., Leeuwis, C., Nederlof, E. Z., Röling, N., Sakyi-Dawson, W., Traoré, M., & van Huis, A. (2012). An innovation systems approach to institutional change: Smallholder development in West Africa. Agricultural Systems, 108, 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jama, B., Kiwia, A., & Mutegi, J. (2011). Innovative systems to reverse soil degradation and improve water Management for Enhanced Food Security: Experiences from African countries. Background paper. In World economic and social survey http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/policy/wess/wess_bg_papers/bp_wess2011_jama.pdf.Google Scholar
  31. Kaburire, L., & Ruvuga, S. (2006). Networking for agricultural innovation: the MVIWATA national network of farmers’ groups in Tanzania. In: Wennink, B. & Heemskerk, W. (eds.) Farmers’ organizations and agricultural innovation: case studies from Benin, Rwanda and Tanzania. Amsterdam: Royal Tropical Institute (KIT). pp. 79–86. http://www.kit.nl/net/KIT_Publicaties_output/showfile.aspx?e=913. Accessed 22 July 2011.
  32. Khandelwal, M., Hill Jr., M. E., Greenough, P., Anthony, J., Quill, M., Linderman, M., & Udaykumar, H. S. (2017). Why have improved cook-stove initiatives in India failed? World Development, 92, 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klerkx et al. (2012). Evolution of system approaches to agricultural innovation: Concepts, analysis and inter-ventions. In Darnhofer, I.,Gibbon, D., Dedieu, B. (eds.) (2012). Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic. Springer, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  34. Laborde, D., Tokgoz, S. & Torero, M. (2016). Long term drivers of food security and nutrition. FOODSECURE Working. IFPRI Discussion Papers 01531. Washington, D.C., USA: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). http://ebrary.ifpri.org/cdm/ref/collection/p15738coll2/id/130336
  35. Lamnek, S. (1998). Gruppendiskussion. Weinheim, Germany: Theorie und Praxis. Beltz. Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  36. Latjesteijn, H. C. v., & Rabbinge, R. (2012). Wicked problems in sustainable agriculture and food security. The TransForum experience. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 15(Special Issue B), 89–−94.Google Scholar
  37. Lundvall, B.-Å. (2005). National Innovation Systems Analytical Concept and development tool. For DRUID-Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark., (June 2005).Google Scholar
  38. Lundvall, B.-Å., Joseph, K. J., Chaminade, C., & Vang, J. (2009). Handbook of innovation systems and developing countries. Building domestic capabilities in a global setting. In Edward Elgar. UK: Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  39. Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malerba, F. (2004). Sectoral Systems of Innovation. Concepts, issues and analysis of six major sectors in Europe. Cambridge, UK: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malerba, F. (2005). Sectoral systems of innovation: A framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technologies, 14(1–2), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Matunga, B.N. (2008). Causes of food insecurity and coping strategies in Tanzania: A case of smallholder farmers in Chamwino district. Dissertation. Morogoro: Sokoine University of Agriculture. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/425. Accessed 08 May 2015.
  43. Mwalukasa, N. (2012). Agricultural information sources used for climate change adaptation in Tanzania. Emerald Library Review, 62(4/5), 2013.Google Scholar
  44. Mwinuka, L., Mutabazi, K. D., Graef, F., Sieber, S., Makindara, J., Kimaro, A., & Uckert, G. (2017). Simulated willingness of farmers to adopt fertilizers micro-dosing and rainwater harvesting technologies in semi-arid and sub-humid farming systems in Tanzania. Food Security, 9(6), 1237–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nederlof, S., Gildemacher, P., Heemskerk, W. & van der Lee, F. (2011). Facilitation of innovation: Experiences of RIU innovation platforms in Tanzania, Rwanda and Zambia. Development, Policy and Practice. Royal Tropical Institute. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  46. Palotti, A. (2008). Decentralizing power or spreading poverty? Review of African Political Economy, 116, 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Piprek, G. (2007). Linking with saving and credit cooperatives (SACCOS) to expand financial access in rural Tanzania: A case study of CRDB Bank in Tanzania. FAO, 2007.Google Scholar
  48. PROLINNOVA. (2012). Farmers` direct access to R&D resources accelerates local innovation. PROLINNOVA Policy Brief. 2012. The Netherlands: Leusden.Google Scholar
  49. Przyborski, A., & Wohlrab-Sahr, M. (2014). Qualitative Sozialforschung. In Ein Arbeitsbuch. Germany: Oldenbourg Verlag.Google Scholar
  50. Pyborn, R., & Woodhill, J. (Eds.). (2014). Dynamics of rural innovation. The Netherlands: A primer for emerging professionals. Royal Tropical Institute. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  51. Rajalahti, R. (2012). Sourcebook overview and user guide. In World Bank. Agricultural Innovation systems. An Investment Sourcebook. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA. pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  52. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovation (Fifth ed.). New York, USA: Free Press.Google Scholar
  53. Röling, N. (2009). Conceptual and Methodological Developments in Innovation. In: Sanginga et al. (Eds.) (2009): Innovation Africa Enriching Farmers’ Livelihoods. London: Earthscan Publishers.Google Scholar
  54. Röling, N., Hounkonnou, D., Kossou, D., Kuyper, T. W., Nederlof, S., Sakyi-Dawson, O., Traoré, M., & Huis, A.v. (2012). Diagnosing the scope for innovation: Linking smallholder practices and institutional context. Introducing the special Issue. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 60-63, 1–6.Google Scholar
  55. Sanginga, P.C., Waters-Bayer, A., Kaaria, S. Njuki, J. & Wettasinha, C. (2009). Innovation Africa: Beyond rhetoric to praxis. In Sanginga et al. (Eds.) (2009). Innovation Africa Enriching Farmers` Livelihoods. Earthscan Publishers, London, UK.Google Scholar
  56. Sieber, S., Graef, F. Amjath-Babu, T.S., Mutabazi, K.D., Tumbo, S.D. et al. (2017). Trans-SEC’s food security research in Tanzania: Principles, research models and assumptions. Food Security, 9(6), 1147−1155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0745-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Spielmann, D. J., Ekboir, J., & Davis, K. (2009). The art and science of innovation systems inquiry. Implications to sub-Saharan African agriculture. Technology in Society, 31, 399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stephenson, G. (2003). The somewhat flawed theoretical foundation of the extension service. Journal of Extension, 41(4), 1–7.Google Scholar
  59. Swaans, K., Cullen, B. Rooyen, A.V., Adekunle, A., Ngwenya, H. Lema, Z. & Nederloof, S. (2016). Dealing with critical challenges in African Innovation Platforms: lessons for facilitation. In: Deveaus, A., Torero, M. Donovan, J. and Horton, D. (2016): Innovation for Inclusive Value Chain Development Success and Challenges. IFPRI, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
  60. Temu, A.E., Nyange, D., Mattee, A.Z. & Kashasha, L.K. (2005). Assessing rural services, infrastructure and their impact on agricultural production, Marketing and Food security in Tanzania. Final donor report of a research project funded under IFPRI Eastern Africa. http://tanzaniagateway.org/docs/AssessingRuralServicesIandInfrastructureonAgriculturalProduction_Tanzania.pdf Google Scholar
  61. Uckert, G., Hafner, J., Hoffmann, H., Kimaro, A., Sereya, O., & Sieber, S. (2017). Farmer innovation driven by needs and understanding: Building the capacities of farmer groups for improved cooking stove construction and continued adoption. Environmental Research Letters, 12, 125001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for a sustainable development. Accessed, 11(05), 2017 http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.Google Scholar
  63. Uphoff, N. (2014). Systems thinking on intensification and sustainability: System boundaries, processes and dimensions. Environmental Sustainability, 8, 89–100.Google Scholar
  64. URT (2011). United republic of Tanzania, Tanzania Agriculture and Food Security Investment Plan TAFSIP. Main Document, October 2011, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.Google Scholar
  65. USAID. (2013). Livelihood and food security conceptual framework. Livelihood and Food Security Technical Assistance (LIFT). Washington DC: USA.Google Scholar
  66. WFP (2012). Comprehensive food security and vulnerability analysis. Tanzania 2012. https://www.wfp.org/content/tanzania-comprehensive-food-security-vulnerability-analysis-september-2013

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. and International Society for Plant Pathology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Life Sciences, Department for Horticultural Production and IRI THESysHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations