Advertisement

Parental responses to education reform in Singapore, Shanghai and Hong Kong

  • Charlene TanEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article analyses and compares the responses of parents to education policy initiatives in Singapore, Shanghai and Hong Kong. The education reform in three localities converges on changing an exam-centric culture and equipping students to thrive in a globalised world. Through a discussion of three representative policy initiatives—Direct School Admission in Singapore, extended and inquiry/research curricula in Shanghai and Liberal Studies in Hong Kong—this article contends that the parents variously make sense of, negotiate, support and circumvent the policy initiatives. Their strategies, it is argued, are grounded in and shaped by their shared habitus, manifesting the four processes identified by Zhao, Selman and Luke (Bourdieu and Chinese education: Inequality, competition, and change, Routledge, Oxon, 2018) for understanding the formation of habitus. A major implication arising from the study is the usefulness of the concept of habitus in illuminating the educational expectations and proposed actions of parents when confronted with educational changes.

Keywords

Education reform Habitus Hong Kong Shanghai Singapore 

References

  1. Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries (Education working paper No. 41). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=EDU/WKP%282009%2920&doclanguage=en. Accessed 12 Jan 2015.
  2. Author, X. X. X. X..Google Scholar
  3. Bodovski, K. (2010). Parental practices and educational achievement: Social class, race, and habitus. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 31(2), 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boterman, W. R., & Bridge, G. (2015). Gender, class and space in the field of parenthood: Comparing middle-class fractions in Amsterdam and London. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(2), 249–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Westport.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (2004). Forms of capital. In S. Ball (Ed.), The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in the Sociology of Education (pp. 15–29). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bray, M. (2013). Benefits and tensions of shadow education: Comparative perspectives on the roles and impact of private supplementary tutoring in the lives of Hong Kong students. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 29(1), 18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bray, M., et al. (2014). Differentiated demand for private supplementary tutoring: Patterns and implications in Hong Kong secondary education. Economics of Education Review, 38, 24–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Byun, S., & Pang, S.-I. (2016). Children’s highbrow cultural activities and academic achievement in Hong Kong. In G. Kao & H. Park (Eds.), Family environments, school resources, and educational outcomes (pp. 123–148). Bingley: Emerald Group Pub Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CDC. (2001). Learning to learn: Life-long learning and whole-person development. Hong Kong: Author.Google Scholar
  12. CDC (2013). Assessment framework for 2019 HKDSE: Liberal Studies. Retrieved from http://www.hkeaa.edu.hk/DocLibrary/HKDSE/Subject_Information/lib_st/2019hkdse-e-ls.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  13. CDC. (2017). Secondary education curriculum Guide. Booklet 1: Ongoing renewal of the school curriculum. Hong Kong: Author.Google Scholar
  14. Chan, C. (2012). The nature of teaching and learning in Hong Kong’s Liberal Studies curriculum: Students’ perceptions of learning experiences in tutorial and daytime schools. MEd dissertation, The University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  15. Chan, C., & Bray, M. (2014). Marketised private tutoring as a supplement to regular schooling: Liberal Studies and the shadow sector in Hong Kong secondary education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(3), 361–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheng, O. Y. (2014). Widespread culture of tutoring in Hong Kong. Retrieved from https://educationpolicytalk.com/2014/04/19/widespread-culture-of-private-tutoring-in-hong-kong/. Accessed 1 Dec 2017.
  17. China, D. (2016). Shanghai parents pay 2,500 yuan a month to make students competitive. Retrieved from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2016-06/02/content_25588449.htm. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  18. Chou, C. P., & Spangler, J. (Eds.). (2016). Chinese education models in a global age: Transforming practice into theory. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Davie, S. (2015). 7 in 10 parents send their children for tuition: ST poll. The Straits Times, Jul 4. Retrieved from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/7-in-10-parents-send-their-children-for-tuition-st-poll (accessed 3 Jan 2016).
  20. Dumais, S. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Education Commission. (2000). Learning for life, Learning through life: Reform proposals for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Education Commission.Google Scholar
  22. Farkas, G. (1996). Human capital or cultural capital? Ethnicity and poverty groups in an urban school district. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  23. Gillies, V. (2005). Raising the ‘meritocracy’: Parenting and the individualisation of social class. Sociology, 39(5), 835–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goh, C. T. (1997). Shaping our future: Thinking schools, learning nation. Speech by Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong at the opening of the 7th International Conference on Thinking, June 1–6, in Singapore.Google Scholar
  25. Gopinathan, S. (2007). Globalisation, the Singapore developmental state and education policy: A thesis revisited. Globalisation, Societies and Education 5(1), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grenfell, M. (2003). Bourdieu in the classroom. In M. Olssen (Ed.), Culture and learning: Access and opportunity in the curriculum. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  27. Guo, S., & Guo, Y. (Eds.). (2015). Spotlight on China: Changes in education under China’s market economy. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. Heng, S. K. (2011). Opening address by Mr Heng Swee Keat, Minister for Education, at the Ministry of Education (MOE) Work Plan Seminar on Tuesday, 22 September 2011, 10 a.m. at Ngee Ann Polytechnic Convention Centre. Retrieved from http://www.nas.gov.sg/archivesonline/data/pdfdoc/20110929001/wps_opening_address_%28media%29%28checked%29.pdf. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  29. Hill, M., & Lian, K. F. (1995). The politics of nation building and citizenship in Singapore. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Horvat, E., Weininger, E., & Lareau, A. (2003). From social ties to social capital: Class differences in the relations between schools and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 319–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ke, S. (2005). Jichu jiaoyu xinkegai shishi de zhangai: zhongmei bijiao fenxi [Hindrances to the implementation of the new curriculum reform for basic education: a comparative study of China and the United States]. Xiandai jiaoyu luncong, 6, 28–32.Google Scholar
  32. Koh, A. (2010). Tactical globalisation: Learning from the Singapore experiment. Bern: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lam, J. T.-S. (2014). Liberal Studies in Hong Kong: Teachers’ space, place and fusion of horizons. In C. Marsh & J. C.-K. Lee (Eds.), Asia’s high performing education systems: The case of Hong Kong (pp. 84–101). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Lareau, A. (2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lee, P. (2016). 3 unhealthy trends plaguing education: Denise Phua. The Straits Times, Jan 28, Retrieved from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/3-unhealthy-trends-plaguing-education-denise-phua. Accessed 2 Jan 2017.
  36. Lee, S. K., Lee, W. O., & Low, E. L. (Eds.). (2014). Educational policy innovations: Leveling up and sustaining educational achievement. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Li, W., & Li, Y. (2010). An analysis on social and cultural background of the resistance for China’s education reform and academic pressure. International Education Studies, 3(3), 211–215.Google Scholar
  38. Marsh, C., & Lee, J. C.-K. (Eds.). (2014). Asia’s high performing education systems: The case of Hong Kong. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Ministry of Education (2016). Direct admission. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/admissions/direct-admissions. Accessed 2 Jan 2017.
  40. Mokhtar, F. (2017). Direct School Admission exercise cap raised to 20% for all schools: MOE. Today, March 7. Retrieved from http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/direct-school-admission-exercise-cap-raised-20-all-schools-moe. Accessed 1 July 2017.
  41. Mu, D. (2012). Shanghai xinyouzhi xuexiao banhao meiyisuo jiamenkou de xuexiao [New high quality schools in Shanghai to excel in managing every school in the neighbourhood]. Jichu Jiaoyu Kecheng, 108, Dec, 22.Google Scholar
  42. Ng, F. H. C. (2006) Teacher knowledge construction in applying the Issue-enquiry Approach in Liberal Studies: A study of tensions and possibilities. Paper presented at the Conference on ‘School Improvement and University-school Partnership’, The Chinese University of Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://www.fed.cuhk.edu.hk/~cthk/paper/a5.pdf. Accessed Jan 10, 2013.
  43. OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/document/61/0,3343,en_32252351_46584327_46567613_1_1_1_1,00.html#News_release_and_press_material. Accessed 12 Apr 2011.
  44. OECD (2014a). PISA 2012 results in focus What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2016.
  45. OECD. (2015). Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/. Accessed 12 May 2013.
  46. Qi, D. (2015). Xin kecheng gaige de zhongshuo fenyun yu lixing sikaoJiyu Shanghai xuesheng PISA ceshi jieguo de shijiao [Different opinions and rational thinking on the new curriculum reform—A perspective on Shanghai students’ PISA test results]. Zhongguo Jiaoyu Xuekan, 7. Retrieved from http://se.risechina.org/yjzy/hwjysc/201508/4226.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  47. Reay, D. (2004). ‘It’s all becoming a habitus’: Beyond the habitual use of habitus in educational research. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(4), 431–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission. (2004). Curricular plan for mainstream primary and secondary schools in Shanghai city. [Shanghaishi putong zhongxiaoxue kecheng fangan]. Retrieved from http://www.shjhgz.com/yjxx/fangan.doc. Accessed 12 Apr 2011.
  49. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission. (n.d.) Explanation of the draft curricular plan for mainstream primary and secondary schools in Shanghai city. [Shanghaishi putong zhongxiaoxue kecheng fangan shixinggao shuoming]. Retrieved from http://www.shmec.gov.cn/attach/article/72.doc. Accessed 12 Apr 2011).
  50. Shen, Y. S. (2006). Classroom appraisal [Kecheng pingjia]. Beijing: Beijing shifan daxue zhubanshe.Google Scholar
  51. Shi, W. (2015). Shitan Zhongguo jichu jiaoyu fazhan zhuangkuang ji cunzai wenti—Jiyu quanqiu PISA ceshi sikao [On the development of basic education in China and problems—based on global PISA test reflections]. Advances in Education, 5(5), 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stankov, L. (2010). Unforgiving Confucian culture: A breeding ground for high achievement, anxiety and self-doubt? Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 555–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling transition to university in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1639–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tan, C. (2013). Learning from Shanghai: Lessons on achieving educational success. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tan, C. (2017). Private supplementary tutoring and parentocracy in Singapore. Interchange, 48(4), 315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tan, C. (2019). Comparing high-performing education systems: Singapore, Shanghai, and Hong Kong. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Teng, A. (2016). Fairly diverse group gains direct school admission, about 60% live in HDB flats: MOE. The Straits Times, Feb 23. Retrieved from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/moe-fairly-diverse-group-gains-direct-school-admission. Accessed 2 Jan 2017.
  58. Vincent, C. (2017). ‘The children have only got one education and you have to make sure it’s a good one’: Parenting and parent–school relations in a neoliberal age. Gender and Education, 29(5), 541–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vincent, C., & Maxwell, C. (2016). Parenting priorities and pressures: Furthering understanding of ‘concerted cultivation’. Discourse: Cultural Politics in Education, 37(2), 269–281.Google Scholar
  60. Weis, L., Cipollone, K., & Jenkins, H. (2014). Class warfare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wenjuan, & Wang (2015). Shanghai zhongxiaoxue kewai fudao feiyong zhende “dongzhe shangwanyuan” ma? [Do tuition classes for primary and middle school tuition really cost more than 10,000 yuan in Shanghai?] Retrieved from http://www.wenjuan.com/blog/2421.html. Accessed 11 Nov 2017.
  62. Xu, F. (2015). 700 ren tongxiao baoming gangtai buxiban chaoduo buxilu yazhou disijia jiaonian shouru qianwan [700 hundred people queue up overnight to sign up for private tutoring class in Hong Kong and Taiwan, percentage of private tutoring is ranked fourth in Asia, private tutors earn millions in annual income]. Retrieved from http://www.takefoto.cn/viewnews-411178.html. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  63. Yamamoto, Y., & Brinton, M. C. (2010). Cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: The case of Japan. Sociology of Education, 83(1), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zhang, W., & Bray, M. (2017): Equalising schooling, unequalising private supplementary tutoring: Access and tracking through shadow education in China. Oxford Review of Education,  https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1389710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhao, X. (2016). Educating competitive students for a competitive nation: How and why the Chinese discourse of competition in education has rapidly changed within three decades? Berkeley Review of Education, 6(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
  66. Zhao, X., Selman, R. L., & Luke, A. (2018). Academic competition and parental practice: A study of habitus and change. In G. M. Mu, K. Dooley & A. Luke (Eds.), Bourdieu and Chinese education: Inequality, competition, and change (pp. 1–24). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Zhao, Y., & Chen, Z. (2015). Buxi yu caolian, gangtai xuesheng huozai yingzi jiaoyu zhong [Private tutoring and drilling, students in Hong Kong and Taiwan are living in shadow education]. Retrieved from Duanchuamei https://theinitium.com/article/20151202-hongkong-tutor01/. Accessed 12 Dec 2017.
  68. Zhong, Q. Q., & Wu, G. P. (2007). Reflections on Chinese education [Fansi zhongguo jiaoyu]. Shanghai: Huadong shifan daxue zhubanshe.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Education Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Policy and Leadership StudiesNational Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations