Advertisement

Fisheries Science

, Volume 85, Issue 6, pp 1027–1036 | Cite as

Bacterial diversity in gut of large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea and black sea bream Sparus macrocephalus reared in an inshore net pen

  • Chen Zhang
  • Xiafei Zheng
  • Xing Ren
  • Yunmeng Li
  • Yan WangEmail author
Original Article Aquaculture

Abstract

Bacterial diversity in the foregut, midgut and hindgut of large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea and black sea bream Sparus macrocephalus reared in an inshore net pen, formulated feed and seawater were analyzed with Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing platforms. A total of 270 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified from fish guts, formulated feed and seawater, which belonged to 17 phyla and 20 genera. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria dominated at the phylum level, while Bacillus, Lactococcus and Oceanobacillus dominated at the genus level, in fish gut. The similarity in bacterial community between the guts of two fish species was higher than that either between fish gut and formulated feed or between fish gut and seawater. This result indicates that bacterial communities in guts of large yellow croaker and black sea bream were independent on those in the formulated feed and seawater. The common OTUs between fish gut and formulated feed were more than that between fish gut and seawater, suggesting that the impact of the formulated feed on intestinal bacteria of large yellow croaker and black sea bream was greater relative to that of seawater in the net pen. Spatial heterogeneity in bacterial composition along the gut of large yellow croaker and black sea bream was also evaluated.

Keywords

Large yellow croaker Black sea bream Intestinal bacteria Spatial heterogeneity Net pen 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31772868).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12562_2019_1349_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (60 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 60 kb)

References

  1. Bano N, Smith AD, Bennett WA, Vasquez L, Hollibaugh JT (2007) Dominance of Mycoplasma in the guts of the long-jawed mudsucker, Gillichthys mirabilis, from five California salt marshes. Environ Microbiol 9:2636–2641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Büyükdeveci ME, Balcázar JL, Demirkale İ, Dikel S (2018) Effects of garlic-supplemented diet on growth performance and intestinal microbiota of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 486:170–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dawood MAO, Koshio S, Ishikawa M, Yokoyama S, El Basuini MF, Hossain MS, Nhu TH, Dossou S, Moss AS (2016) Effects of dietary supplementation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus or/and Lactococcus lactis on the growth, gut microbiota and immune responses of red sea bream, Pagrus major. Fish Shellfish Immunol 49:275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dehler CE, Secombes CJ, Martin SA (2017) Environmental and physiological factors shape the gut microbiota of Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture 467:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Desai AR, Links MG, Collins SA, Mansfield GS, Drew MD, Van Kessel AG, Hill JE (2012) Effects of plant-based diets on the distal gut microbiome of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 350:134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Egerton S, Culloty SC, Whooley J, Stanton C, Ross RP (2018) The gut microbiota of marine fish. Front Microbiol 9:873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Estruch G, Collado MC, Penaranda DS, Vidal AT, Cerda MJ, Martinez GP, Martinezllorens S (2015) Impact of fishmeal replacement in diets for gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) on the gastrointestinal microbiota determined by pyrosequencing the 16S rRNA gene. PLoS One 10:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng L, Jiang T, Wang Y, Li J (2012) Effects of tea polyphenol coating combined with ozone water washing on the storage quality of black sea bream (Sparus macrocephalus). Food Chem 135:2915–2921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghanbari M, Kneifel W, Domig KJ (2015) A new view of the fish gut microbiome: advances from next-generation sequencing. Aquaculture 448:464–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gonzalez-Felix ML, Gatlin DM, Urquidezbejarano P, La Reerodriguez CD, Duarterodriguez L, Sanchez F, Casasreyes A, Yamamoto FY, Ochoaleyva A, Perezvelazquez M (2018) Effects of commercial dietary prebiotic and probiotic supplements on growth, innate immune responses, and intestinal microbiota and histology of Totoaba macdonaldi. Aquaculture 491:239–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guerreiro I, Serra CR, Enes P, Couto AR, Salvador AF, Costas B, Olivateles A (2016) Effect of short chain fructooligosaccharides (scFOS) on immunological status and gut microbiota of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) reared at two temperatures. Fish Shellfish Immunol 49:122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Holben WE, Williams P, Saarinen M, Särkilahti LK, Apajalahti JHA (2002) Phylogenetic analysis of intestinal microflora indicates a novel Mycoplasma phylotype in farmed and wild salmon. Microb Ecol 44:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ingerslev H, Jorgensen LV, Strube ML, Larsen N, Dalsgaard I, Boye M, Madsen L (2014) The development of the gut microbiota in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) is affected by first feeding and diet type. Aquaculture 424:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kormas KA, Meziti A, Mente E, Frentzos A (2014) Dietary differences are reflected on the gut prokaryotic community structure of wild and commercially reared sea bream (Sparus aurata). Microbiologyopen 3:718–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larsen AM, Mohammed HH, Arias CR (2014) Characterization of the gut microbiota of three commercially valuable warmwater fish species. J Appl Microbiol 116:1396–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leisner JJ, Laursen BG, Prévost H, Drider D, Dalgaard P (2007) Carnobacterium: positive and negative effects in the environment and in foods. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:592–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li J, Ni J, Wang C, Li X, Wu S, Zhang T, Yu Y, Yan Q (2014a) Comparative study on gastrointestinal microbiota of eight fish species with different feeding habits. J Appl Microbiol 117:1750–1760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li X, Zhu Y, Yan Q, Ringo E, Yang D (2014b) Do the intestinal microbiotas differ between paddlefish (Polyodon spathala) and bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) reared in the same pond? J Appl Microbiol 117:1245–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li H, Zhong Q, Wirth S, Wang W, Hao Y, Wu S, Zou H, Li W, Wang G (2015) Diversity of autochthonous bacterial communities in the intestinal mucosa of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus)(Valenciennes) determined by culture-dependent and culture-independent techniques. Aquac Res 46:2344–2359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li T, Long M, Li H, Gatesoupe FJ, Zhang X, Zhang Q, Feng D, Li A (2017) Multi-Omics analysis reveals a correlation between the host phylogeny, gut microbiota and metabolite profiles in cyprinid fishes. Front Microbiol 8:454PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Lyons PP, Turnbull JF, Dawson KA, Crumlish M (2017) Phylogenetic and functional characterization of the distal intestinal microbiome of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss from both farm and aquarium settings. J Appl Microbiol 122:347–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Neuman C, Hatje E, Zarkasi KZ, Smullen R, Bowman JP, Katouli M (2016) The effect of diet and environmental temperature on the faecal microbiota of farmed Tasmanian Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquac Res 47:660–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ni J, Yan Q, Yu Y, Zhang T (2014) Factors influencing the grass carp gut microbiome and its effect on metabolism. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 87:704–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nicholson JK, Holmes E, Kinross J, Burcelin R, Gibson GR, Jia W, Pettersson S (2012) Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Science 336:1262–1267Google Scholar
  25. Parma L, Candela M, Soverini M, Turroni S, Consolandi C, Brigidi P, Mandrioli L, Sirri R, Fontanillas R, Gatta PP, Bonaldo A (2016) Next-generation sequencing characterization of the gut bacterial community of gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata, L.) fed low fishmeal based diets with increasing soybean meal levels. Anim Feed Sci Technol 222:204–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ringø E, Sperstad S, Myklebust R, Refstie S, Krogdahl A (2006) Characterisation of the microbiota associated with intestine of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.): the effect of fish meal, standard soybean meal and a bioprocessed soybean meal. Aquaculture 261:829–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ringø E, Sperstad S, Kraugerud OF, Krogdahl A (2008) Use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing analysis to characterize culturable intestinal bacteria in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed diets with cellulose or non-starch polysaccharides from soy. Aquac Res 39:1087–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ringø E, Zhou Z, Vecino JG, Wadsworth S, Romero J, Krogdahl A, Olsen RE, Dimitroglou A, Foey AD, Davies SJ, Owen M, Lauzon HL, Martinsen LL, Schryver PD, Bossier P, Sperstad S, Merrifield DL (2016) Effect of dietary components on the gut microbiota of aquatic animals. A never-ending story? Aquac Nutr 22:219–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Song W, Li L, Huang H, Jiang K, Zhang F, Chen X, Zhao M, Ma L (2016) The gut microbial community of Antarctic fish detected by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Biomed Res Int 15:1–7Google Scholar
  30. Sun YZ, Yang HL, Ma RL, Song K, Lin WY (2011) Molecular analysis of autochthonous microbiota along the digestive tract of juvenile grouper (Epinephelus coioides) following probiotic Bacillus pumilus administration. J Appl Microbiol 110:1093–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sun YZ, Yang HL, Ling ZC, Ye JD (2015) Microbial communities associated with early stages of intensively reared orange-spotted grouper (Epinephelus coioides). Aquac Res 46:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tehrani AB, Nezami BG, Gewirtz A, Srinivasan S (2012) Obesity and its associated disease: a role for microbiota? Neurogastroenterol Motil 24:305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang AR, Ran C, Ringo E, Zhou ZG (2018) Progress in fish gastrointestinal microbiota research. Rev Aquac 10:626–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wei N, Wang C, Xiao S, Huang W, Lin M, Yan Q, Ma Y (2018) Intestinal microbiota in large yellow croaker, Larimichthys crocea, at different ages. J World Aquac Soc 49:256–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu S, Wang G, Angert ER, Wang W, Li W, Zou H (2012) Composition, diversity, and origin of the bacterial community in grass carp intestine. PLoS One 7:e30440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wu S, Tian J, Gatesoupe F, Li W, Zou H, Yang B, Wang G (2013) Intestinal microbiota of gibel carp (Carassius auratus gibelio) and its origin as revealed by 454 pyrosequencing. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:1585–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Xia JH, Lin G, Fu GH, Wan ZY, Lee M, Wang L, Liu XJ, Yue GH (2014) The intestinal microbiome of fish under starvation. BMC Genomics 15:266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Xu N, Tan G, Wang H, Gai X (2016) Effect of biochar additions to soil on nitrogen leaching, microbial biomass and bacterial community structure. Eur J Soil Biol 74:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yamamoto FY, Yin F, Rossi W, Hume M, Gatlin DM (2018) β-1, 3 glucan derived from Euglena gracilis and Algamune™ enhances innate immune responses of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol 77:273–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ye L, Amberg J, Chapman D, Gaikowski M, Liu WT (2014) Fish gut microbiota analysis differentiates physiology and behavior of invasive Asian carp and indigenous American fish. ISME J 8:541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zheng X, Tang J, Ren G, Wang Y (2017) The effect of four microbial products on production performance and water quality in integrated culture of freshwater pearl mussel and fishes. Aquac Res 48:4897–4909CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chen Zhang
    • 1
  • Xiafei Zheng
    • 2
  • Xing Ren
    • 1
  • Yunmeng Li
    • 1
  • Yan Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Ocean CollegeZhejiang UniversityZhoushanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Animal SciencesZhejiang UniversityHangzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations