Fisheries Science

, Volume 85, Issue 2, pp 285–294 | Cite as

Biological aspects of the butterfly kingfish Gasterochisma melampus: distribution, total catch, size composition and CPUE

  • Tomoyuki ItohEmail author
Original Article Fisheries


Biological aspects of butterfly kingfish Gasterochisma melampus were examined using Japanese longline fishery data and research data collected for over 20 years. Butterfly kingfish were distributed in a continuous band around the circumpolar region between 35°S and 45°S. The southern limit of distribution corresponded with the sub-Antarctic front. The estimated global total annual catch for butterfly kingfish ranged from 613 to 3699 t (mean 1859 t) with Japan taking the largest proportion of the total catch. Large, adult butterfly kingfish spawn in the south-eastern Pacific, whereas smaller, immature fish are distributed in feeding grounds in the area extending across the Atlantic and Indian Oceans to the south-western Pacific Ocean. Catch per unit effort (CPUE) data for fish in the feeding grounds from 1993 to 2016 were compared with the CPUE value from 1970. These data indicate that the stock is currently not likely to be depleted.


Catch-per-unit-effort GLM Scombridae Sea surface temperature 



The author thanks the scientific observers and the crew and researchers of the JAMARC research vessels. Thanks also to JAMARC for allowing the use of their data. This study was supported by a grant from the Japan Fisheries Agency. The contribution of two anonymous reviewers is greatly appreciated.


  1. Anonymous (2017a) Report of the twenty-second meeting of the scientific committee. The Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna.
  2. Anonymous (2017b) Report of the twenty-fourth annual meeting of the commission. The Commission for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin Tuna.
  3. Belkin IM, Gordon AL (1996) Southern ocean fronts from the Greenwich meridian to Tasmania. J Geophys Res 101:3675–3696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Block BA, Finnerty JR, Stewart AFR, Kidd J (1993) Evolution of endothermy in fish: mapping physiological traits on a molecular phylogeny. Science 260:210–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campana S (1999) Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths: pathways, mechanisms and applications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 188:263–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell RA (2004) CPUE standardisation and the construction of indices of stock abundance in a spatially varying fishery using general linear models. Fish Res 70:209–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carey FG (1982) A brain heater in the swordfish. Science 216:1327–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caton AE (ed) (1994) Review of aspects of southern bluefin tuna biology, population, and fisheries. In: Shomura J et al (eds) Interactions of Pacific tuna fisheries. Proceedings of the first FAO expert consultation on interactions of Pacific tuna fisheries. FAO, Rome, FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 336, vol 2, pp 296–343Google Scholar
  9. Collette BB, Nauen CE (1983) FAO species catalogue. Vol. 2 Scombrids of the world. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of tunas, mackerels, bonitos and related species know to date, vol 2. FAO Fisheries Synopsis, Rome, pp 1–137Google Scholar
  10. Collette BB, Reeb C, Block BA (2001) Systematics of the tunas and mackerels (Scombridae). In: Block BA, Stevens ED (eds) Fish physiology: tuna: physiology, ecology, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 1–33Google Scholar
  11. FAO (1995) Code of conduct for responsible fisheries. FAO, Rome, pp 1–41Google Scholar
  12. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department (2016) FishStatJ—software for fishery statistical time series [online]. Rome. Updated 21 July 2016Google Scholar
  13. Gauldie RW, Radtke RL (1990) Using the physical dimensions of the semicircular canal as a probe to evaluate inner ear function in fishes. Comp Biochem Physiol A 96:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Graham JB, Dickson KA (2001) Anatomical and physiological specializations for endothermy. In: Block BA, Stevens ED (eds) Fish physiology: tuna: physiology, ecology, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 121–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gunn J, Block BA (2001) Advances in acoustic, archival and pop-up satellite tagging of tunas. In: Block BA, Stevens ED (eds) Fish physiology: tuna: physiology, ecology, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 167–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hillary RM, Preece AL, Davies CR, Kurota H, Sakai O, Itoh T, Branch TA (2015) A scientific alternative to moratoria for rebuilding depleted international tuna stocks. Fish Fish 17:469–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ito RY, Hawn DR, Collette BB (1994) First record of the butterfly kingfish Gasterochisma melampus (Scombridae) from the north Pacific Ocean. Gyoruigaku Zasshi 40:482–486Google Scholar
  18. Itoh T, Sawadaishi S (2018) Spawning area and season of butterfly kingfish (Gasterochisma melampus), a large scombrid adapted to cooler temperate southern water. Mar Freshw Res 69:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kohno H (1984) Osteology and systematic position of the butterfly mackerel, Gasterochisma melampus. Gyoruigaku Zasshi 31:268–286Google Scholar
  20. Maunder MN, Punt AE (2004) Standardizing catch and effort data: a review of recent approaches. Fish Res 70:141–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Miya M, Friedman M, Satoh TP, Takeshima H, Sado T, Iwasaki W, Nishida M (2013) Evolutionary origin of the Scombridae (tunas and mackerels): members of a paleogene adaptive radiation with 14 other pelagic fish families. PLoS One 8:e73535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Qiu F, Kitchen A, Burleigh JG, Miyamoto MM (2014) Scombroid fishes provide novel insights into the trait/rate associations of molecular evolution. J Mol Evol 78:338–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rotundo MM, Júnior TV, Van Sebroeck Doria DMA (2015) Report of the butterfly kingfish, Gasterochisma melampus (Scombridae: Gasterochismatinae) in southeastern Brazil. PanAm J Aquat Sci 10:293–296Google Scholar
  24. Santos SR, Nunan GW (2015) A record of the Southern Ocean Gasterochisma melampus (Teleostei: Scombridae) in the tropical south-western Atlantic, with comments on previous records. Mar Biodivers Rec 8:e27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Semba Y, Yokawa K, Matsunaga H, Shono H (2013) Distribution and trend in abundance of the porbeagle (Lamna nasus) in the southern hemisphere. Mar Freshw Res 64:518–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shimose T, Yokawa K, Saito H, Tachihara K (2012) Sexual difference in the migration pattern of blue marlin, Makaira nigricans, related to spawning and feeding activities in the western and central North Pacific Ocean. Bull Mar Sci 88:231–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shingu C (1970) Studies relevant to distribution and migration of the southern bluefin tuna. Bull Far Seas Fish Res Lab 3:57–113Google Scholar
  28. Shono H (2004) A review of some statistical approaches used for CPUE standardization. Bull Jpn Soc Fish Oceanogr 68:106–120Google Scholar
  29. Warashina I, Hisada K (1972) Geographical distribution and body length composition of two tuna-like fishes, Gasterochisma melampus Richardson and Allothunnus fallai Serventy, taken by Japanese tuna longline fishery. Bull Far Seas Fish Res Lab 6:51–75Google Scholar
  30. Yatsu A (1995) Zoogeography of the epipelagic fishes in the South Pacific Ocean and the Pacific sector of the Subantarctic, with special reference to the ecological role of slender tuna, Allothunnus fallai. Bull Far Seas Fish Res Lab 32:1–145Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Research Institute of Far Seas Fisheries, Japan Fisheries Research and Education AgencyShizuoka-shiJapan

Personalised recommendations