Advertisement

Fisheries Science

, Volume 85, Issue 1, pp 53–60 | Cite as

Seabird densities and species and hydrographic features across Amchitka Pass, Aleutian Islands

  • Bungo NishizawaEmail author
  • Hiroji Onishi
  • Yutaka Watanuki
Original Article Biology

Abstract

To examine mesoscale physical and biological factors affecting seabird communities, boat-based seabird censuses were conducted during a single cruise from the North Pacific to the Bering Sea across Amchitka Pass, central Aleutian Islands, during summer. Acoustic surveys of potential prey biomass and currents, and conductivity-temperature-depth profiler measurements for vertical profiles of the temperature, salinity, and fluorescence, were conducted simultaneously. The seabird density and number of species were highest in Amchitka Pass (283 birds km−2, 17 species), where the acoustically determined biomass was the highest, followed by the Bering Sea basin (100 birds km−2, 13 species) and North Pacific basin (4 birds km−2, seven species). Crested auklets Aethia cristatella were dominant (95% in number) in Amchitka Pass, while short-tailed shearwaters Ardenna tenuirostris were dominant (92% in number) in the Bering Sea basin. Surface fluorescence was higher in the Bering Sea basin (median: 1.3 volts) than in Amchitka Pass (0.9) and the North Pacific basin (0.6). Within the pass, the number of crested auklets was highest over the northern part of the sill, where the water column was well mixed, and the northward-flowing tidal currents increased the concentration of acoustically determined biomass in the subsurface layer. Thus, we hypothesize that small alcids were attracted to an aggregation of prey that resulted from tidal currents impinging on the sill.

Keywords

North Pacific Bering Sea Tidal current Acoustic survey Alcids Mixing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the captain and the crew of the training ship Oshoro-Maru for their support and help with the field operations. We also thank Dr. Tohru Mukai and Dr. Yuka Iwahara for help with analyzing the acoustic data. We appreciate the useful and critical comments of Dr. George Hunt and one anonymous reviewer on the manuscript. Part of this research was supported by MEXT (Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology) through the Arctic Challenge for Sustainability Project.

Supplementary material

12562_2018_1259_MOESM1_ESM.docx (21 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)

References

  1. Burger AE (1991) Maximum diving depths and underwater foraging in alcids and penguins. In: Montevecchi WA, Gaston AJ (eds) Studies of high-latitude seabirds. 1. Behavioural, energetic, and oceanographic aspects of seabird foraging ecology. Can Wildl Serv Occas, Ottawa, pp 9–15Google Scholar
  2. Byrd GV, Renner HM, Renner M (2005) Distribution patterns and population trends of breeding seabirds in the Aleutian Islands. Fish Oceanogr 14(Suppl. 1):139–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dewey RK, Moum JN (1990) Enhancement of fronts by vertical mixing. J Geophys Res 95:9433–9446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Durazo R, Harrison NM, Hill AE (1998) Seabird observations at a tidal mixing front in the Irish Sea. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 47:153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Favorite F (1967) The Alaskan stream. Bull Int North Pacific Fish Comm 21:1–20Google Scholar
  6. Fischer KN, Suryan RM, Roby DD, Balogh GR (2009) Post-breeding season distribution of black-footed and Laysan albatrosses satellite-tagged in Alaska: inter-specific differences in spatial overlap with North Pacific fisheries. Biol Conserv 142:751–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franks PJS (1992) Sink or swim: accumulation of biomass at fronts. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 82:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hedd A, Montevecchi WA, Davoren GK, Fifield DA (2009) Diets and distributions of Leach’s storm petrel (Oceanodroma leucorhoa) before and after an ecosystem shift in the Northwest Atlantic. Can J Zool 87:787–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hunt GL Jr, Harrison NM, Piatt JF (1993) Foraging ecology as related to the distribution of planktivorous auklets in the Bering Sea. In: Vermeer K, Briggs KT, Morgan KH, Siegel-Causey D (eds) The status, ecology, and conservation of marine birds of the North Pacific. Can Wild1 Ser Spec Publ, Ottawa, pp 18–26Google Scholar
  10. Hunt GL Jr, Coyle KP, Hoffman S, Decker MB, Flint EN (1996) Foraging ecology of short-tailed shearwaters near the Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 141:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hunt GL Jr, Russell RW, Coyle KO, Weingartner T (1998) Comparative foraging ecology of planktivorous auklets in relation to ocean physics and prey availability. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 167:241–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jahncke J, Coyle KO, Hunt GL Jr (2005) Seabird distribution, abundance and diets in the central and eastern Aleutian Islands. Fish Oceanogr 14(Suppl. 1):160–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Korneliussen RJ, Ona E (2002) An operational system for processing and visualizing multi-frequency acoustic data. ICES J Mar Sci 59:293–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kuroda N (1955) Observations on pelagic birds of the northwest Pacific. Condor 57:290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuroda N (1960) Analysis of sea bird distribution in the northwest Pacific Ocean. Pac Sci 14:55–67Google Scholar
  16. Ladd C, Hunt GL Jr, Mordy CW, Salo SA, Stabeno PJ (2005a) Marine environment of the eastern and central Aleutian Islands. Fish Oceanogr 14(Suppl. 1):22–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ladd C, Jahncke J, Hunt GL Jr, Coyle KO, Stabeno PJ (2005b) Hydrographic features and seabird foraging in Aleutian Passes. Fish Oceanogr 14(Suppl. 1):178–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loder JW, Platt T (1985) Physical controls on phytoplankton production at tidal fronts. In: Gibbs PE (ed) Proceedings of the 19th European Marine Biology Symposium. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–21Google Scholar
  19. Mecklenburg CW, Mecklenburg TA, Thorsteinson LK (2002) Fishes of Alaska. American Fisheries Society, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  20. Okkonen SR (1996) The influence of an Alaskan Stream eddy on flow through Amchitka Pass. J Geophys Res 101:8839–8851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Quillfeldt P, McGill RAR, Furness RW (2005) Diet and foraging areas of Southern Ocean seabirds and their prey inferred from stable isotopes: review and case study of Wilson’s storm petrel. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 295:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reed RK (1990) A year-long observation of water exchange between the North Pacific and the Bering Sea. Limnol Oceanogr 35:1604–1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reed RK, Stabeno PJ (1994) Flow along and across the Aleutian Ridge. J Mar Res 52:639–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reed RK, Khen GV, Stabeno PJ, Verkhunov AV (1993) Water properties and flow over the deep Bering Sea basin, summer 1991. Deep Sea Res I 40:2325–2334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Russell RW, Harrison NM, Hunt GL Jr (1999) Foraging at a front: hydrography, zooplankton, and avian planktivory in the northern Bering Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 182:77–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stabeno PJ, Reed RK (1994) Circulation in the Bering Sea basin observed by satellite-tracked drifters:1986–1993. J Phys Oceanogr 24:848–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stabeno PJ, Kachel DG, Kachel NB, Sullivan ME (2005) Observations from moorings in the Aleutian Passes: temperature, salinity and transport. Fish Oceanogr 14(Suppl. 1):39–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tasker M, Jones PH, Dixon T, Blake B (1984) Counting seabirds at sea from ships: a review of methods employed and suggestions for a standardized approach. Auk 101:567–577Google Scholar
  29. Vlietstra LS, Coyle KO, Kachel NB, Hunt GL Jr (2005) Tidal front affects prey-size use by a top marine predator, the short-tailed shearwater (Puffinus tenuirostris). Fish Oceanogr 14(Suppl. 1):196–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wahl TR (1978) Seabirds in the northwestern Pacific Ocean and south central Bering Sea in June 1975. West Birds 9:45–66Google Scholar
  31. Wahl TR, Ainley DG, Benedict AH, DeGange AR (1989) Associations between seabirds and water-masses in the northern Pacific Ocean in summer. Mar Biol 103:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Society of Fisheries Science 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Fisheries SciencesHokkaido UniversityHakodateJapan

Personalised recommendations