Advertisement

Layered Formation-containment Control of Multi-agent Systems in Constrained Space

  • Dongyu Li
  • Shuzhi Sam Ge
  • Guangfu MaEmail author
  • Wei He
Article
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

This paper addresses the layered formation-containment (LFC) problem for multiagents in the constrained space with a directed communication topology. The formation-containment problem is first defined using a layered framework, and a layered distributed finite-time estimator is proposed to acquire the target states for agents in each layer. Based on the proposed framework, the formation configuration and the mechanism of the information flow can be explored and designed naturally. To avoid collisions with borders, obstacles, as well as the other agents in the constrained space, an artificial potential function is designed based on the Dirac delta function. Further, a disturbance observer and adaptive neural networks (NNs) are applied to respectively tackle the external disturbance and the model uncertainties. The desired formation of each layer can be achieved while no collision occurs in the constrained space. The semi-global uniform ultimate boundedness of closed-loop errors is guaranteed by Lyapunov stability theory. Simulation results are given to show the effectiveness of the proposed approaches.

Keywords

Constrained space formation-containment control multi-agent systems neural networks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. [1]
    A. Jadbabaie, J. Lin, and A. S. Morse, “Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 988–1001, 2003.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    R. Olfati-Saber and R. M. Murray, “Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1520–1533, 2004.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    W. Ren and R. W. Beard, “Consensus seeking in multiagent systems under dynamically changing interaction topologies,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 655–661, 2005.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Xie, S. Xu, B. Zhang, Y. Li, and Y. Chu, “Consensus for multi-agent systems with distributed adaptive control and an event-triggered communication strategy,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 1547–1555, 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. Muscio, F. Pierri, M. A. Trujillo, E. Cataldi, G. Antonelli, F. Caccavale, A. Viguria, S. Chiaverini, and A. Ollero, “Coordinated control of aerial robotic manipulators: theory and experiments,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 1406–1413, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    K. Peng and Y. Yang, “Leader-following consensus problem with a varying-velocity leader and time-varying delays,” Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications, vol. 388, no. 388, pp. 193–208, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    R. W. Beard, J. Lawton, and F. Y. Hadaegh, “A coordination architecture for spacecraft formation control,” IEEE Transactions on control systems technology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 777–790, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. D. Do, “Bounded controllers for formation stabilization of mobile agents with limited sensing ranges,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 569–576, 2007.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    C. C. Cheah, S. P. Hou, and J. J. E. Slotine, “Region-based shape control for a swarm of robots,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 2406–2411, 2009.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. Sakai, H. Fukushima, and F. Matsuno, “Leader-follower navigation in obstacle environments while preserving connectivity without data transmission,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1233–1248, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    D. Li, G. Ma, W. He, S. S. Ge, and T. H. Lee, “Cooperative circumnavigation control of networked microsatel-lites,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2019. DOI: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2923119Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    G. Notarstefano, M. Egerstedt, and M. Haque, “Containment in leader-follower networks with switching communication topologies,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1035–1040, 2011.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    M. Ji, G. Ferrari-Trecate, M. Egerstedt, and A. Buffa, “Containment Control in Mobile Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1972–1975, 2008.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    L. Rong, J. Lu, S. Xu, and Y. Chu, “Reference model-based containment control of multi-agent systems with higher-order dynamics,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 796–802, 2014.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    G. Cui, S. Xu, Q. Ma, Z. Li, and Y. Chu, “Command-filter-based distributed containment control of nonlinear multi-agent systems with actuator failures,” International Journal of Control, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 1708–1719, 2018.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    L. Han, X. Dong, Q. Li, and Z. Ren, “Formation-containment control for second-order multi-agent systems with time-varying delays,” Neurocomputing, vol. 218, pp. 439–447, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    X. Dong, Z. Shi, G. Lu, and Y. Zhong, “Formation-containment analysis and design for high-order linear time-invariant swarm systems,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 3439–3456, 2015.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Y. Wang, X. Liu, and J. Xiao, “Output formation-containment of coupled heterogeneous linear systems under intermittent communication,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 354, no. 1, pp. 392–414, 2017.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    T. Han, M. Chi, Z.-H. Guan, B. Hu, J.-W. Xiao, and Y. Huang, “Distributed Three-Dimensional Formation Containment Control of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems,” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1103–1113, 2017.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    D. Li, W. Zhang, W. He, C. Li, and S. S. Ge, “Two-layer distributed formation-containment control of multiple Euler-Lagrange systems by output feedback,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 675–687, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    D. Li, S. Ge, W. He, G. Ma, and L. Xie, “Multilayer formation control of multiagent systems,” Automatica, vol. 109, Article 108558, Nov. 2019.10.1016/j.automatica.2019.108558MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    O. Khatib, “Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 90–98, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    L.-F. Lee and V. Krovi, “A standardized testing-ground for artificial potential-field based motion planning for robot collectives,” Proceedings of the Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems Workshop, Gaithersburg, 2006.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    H. Rezaee and F. Abdollahi, “A decentralized cooperative control scheme with obstacle avoidance for a team of mobile robots,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 347–354, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    D. Panagou and V. Kumar, “Cooperative visibility maintenance for leader-follower formations in obstacle environments,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 831–844, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    K. D. Kallu, W. Jie, and M. C. Lee, “Sensorless reaction force estimation of the end effector of a dual-arm robot manipulator using sliding mode control with a sliding perturbation observer,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1367–1378, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    L. Ballard, Y. Cao, and W. Ren, “Distributed discrete-time coupled harmonic oscillators with application to synchronised motion coordination,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 806–816, 2010.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    P. Li, S. Xu, Y. Chu, W. Chen, and Z. Zhang, “Finite-time leader-following rendezvous for Euler-Lagrange multi-agent systems with an uncertain leader,” Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1766–1775, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    S. S. Ge and C. Wang, “Adaptive neural control of uncertain MIMO nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 674–692, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    W. He and Y. Dong, “Adaptive fuzzy neural network control for a constrained robot using impedance learning,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1174–1186, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    D. Li, G. Ma, W. He, W. Zhang, C. Li, and S. S. Ge, “Distributed coordinated tracking control of multiple Euler-Lagrange systems by state and output feedback,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 11, no. 14, pp. 2213–2221, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    M. Chen and S. S. Ge, “Adaptive neural output feedback control of uncertain nonlinear systems with unknown hysteresis using disturbance observer,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 7706–7716, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Q. Guo, Y. Zhang, B. G. Celler, and S. W. Su, “Back-stepping control of electro-hydraulic system based on extended-state-observer with plant dynamics largely unknown,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 6909–6920, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Z. Zhang and S. Xu, “Observer design for uncertain nonlinear systems with unmodeled dynamics,” Automatica, vol. 51, pp. 80–84, 2015.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    S. Jung, “Improvement of tracking control of a sliding mode controller for robot manipulators by a neural network,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 937–943, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Z. Li, C. Y. Su, L. Wang, Z. Chen, and T. Chai, “Nonlinear disturbance observer-based control design for a robotic exoskeleton incorporating fuzzy approximation,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 5763–5775, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    D. Li, G. Ma, C. Li, W. He, J. Mei, and S. S. Ge, “Distributed attitude coordinated control of multiple spacecraft with attitude constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 2233–2245, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    S. S. Ge, X. Liu, C.-H. Goh, and L. Xu, “Formation tracking control of multiagents in constrained space,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 992–1003, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    P. A. M. Dirac, The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, no. 27, Oxford university press, 1981.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    M. Kubat, “Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation by Simon Haykin, Macmillan, 1994, ISBN 0-02-352781-7.” Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 409–412, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Y. Cao, W. Ren, and Z. Meng, “Decentralized finite-time sliding mode estimators and their applications in decentralized finite-time formation tracking,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 59, no. 9, pp. 522–529, 2010.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICROS, KIEE and Springer 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dongyu Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shuzhi Sam Ge
    • 2
  • Guangfu Ma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wei He
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Control Science and EngineeringHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.School of Automation and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Science and Technology BeijingBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations