A Relaxed Observer-Based Control for LPV Stochastic Systems Subject to H∞ Performance
- 3 Downloads
Abstract
A relaxed observer-based control problem of the disturbed Linear Parameter Varying (LPV) stochastic systems is addressed in this paper. For the control problem, some sufficient conditions are derived via a Lyapunov function whose positive definite matrix is not required as the diagonal case. Besides, a general H∞ performance index is proposed to constrain the effect of external disturbance on the state and estimation error. Furthermore, a lemma is proposed to eliminate the oscillation caused by determining performance level of state and estimation error. Another lemma is developed via extending projection lemma to convert the derived conditions into strict Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) form. By using convex optimization algorithm, all feasible solutions can be obtained by a single-step calculation to establish an observer-based Gain-Scheduled (GS) controller. Based on the designed controller, the asymptotical stability and H∞ performance of the LPV stochastic systems can be guaranteed in the sense of mean square. Finally, two examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness and applicability of the proposed method.
Keywords
Gain scheduled control H∞ performance LPV system multiplicative noise observer-based controlPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
References
- [1]D. Rotondo, F. Nejjari, and V. Puig, “Robust state-feedback control of uncertain LPV systems: an LMI-based approach,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 351, no. 5, pp. 2781–2803, 2014.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]C. C. Ku and C. I. Wu, “Controller synthesis of linear parameter varying stochastic systems based on gainscheduled technique,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 274–281, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [3]M. G. Yoon, V. A. Ugrinovskii, and M. Pszczel, “Gainscheduling of minimax optimal state-feedback controllers for uncertain LPV systems,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 311–317, 2007.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [4]N. Wada, K. Saito, and M. Saeki, “Model predictive control for linear parameter varying systems using parameter dependent Lyapunov function,” IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1446–1450, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [5]M. Sato, “Gain-scheduled open-loop system design for LPV systems using polynomially parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions,” Systems and Control Letters, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 265–276, 2010.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [6]W. Xie, “Gain scheduled state feedback for LPV system with new LMI formulation,” IEEE Proc., Part D, Control Theory and Application, vol. 152, no. 6, pp. 693–697, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [7]I. E. Kose, F. Jabbari, and W. E. Schmitendorf, “A direct characterization of L 2-gain controllers for LPV systems,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1302–1307, 1998.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [8]C. C. Ku and C. I. Wu, “Gain-scheduled H ∞ control for linear parameter varying stochastic systems,” ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, vol. 137, no. 11, 111012 (12pages), 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [9]S. Zhang, J. J. Yang and G. G. Zhu, “LPV modeling and mixed constrained H 2/H ∞ control of an electronic throttle,” IEEE/ASME Trans. on Mechatronics, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 2120–2132, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [10]J. Wang and Y. Wei, “Observer-based gain-scheduled H ∞ control for LPV systems with time-varying delays,” Proc. of the IEEE 2nd Int. Symposium on Systems and Control in Aerospace and Astronautics, pp. 1–7, 2008.Google Scholar
- [11]W. P. Maurice, H. Heemels, J. Daafouz, and G. Millerioux, “Observer-based control of discrete-time LPV systems with uncertain parameters,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2130–2135, 2010.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]C. C. Ku and G. W. Chen, “Relaxed observer-based controller design method of discrete-time multiplicative noised LPV systems via an extended projective lemma,” Int. Journal of Control, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2018.1476983
- [13]D. Efimov, T. Raïssi, and A. Zolghadri, “Control of nonlinear and LPV systems: interval observer-based framework,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 773–778, 2013.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [14]Y. Liu, X. Ban, F. Wu, and H. K. Lam, “A gain-scheduling control approach for Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems based on linear parameter-varying control theory,” ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 138, no. 1, 011008 (9 pages), 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [15]J. Song, Y. Niu, J. Lam, and Z. Shu, “A hybrid design approach for output feedback exponential stabilization of Markovian jump systems,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 63, no. 5, 1404–1417, 2018.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]L. Zhou, J. She, and S. Zhou, “Robust H ∞ control of an observer-based repetitive-control system,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 355, no. 12, pp. 4952–4969, 2018.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [17]J. C. Silva-Rivas and W. J. Kim, “Multivariable control and optimization of a compact 6-DOF precision positioner with hybrid H 2/H ∞ and digital filtering,” IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1641–1651, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [18]E. Allen, Modelling with Itô Stochastic Differential Equations, Springer, Texas, 2007.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- [19]W. J. Chang, H. Y. Qiao, and C. C. Ku, “Sliding mode fuzzy control for nonlinear stochastic systems subject to pole assignment and variance constraint,” Information Sciences, vol. 432, pp. 133–145, 2018.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [20]W. J. Chang, P. H. Chen, and C. C. Ku, “Variance and passivity constrained sliding mode fuzzy control for continuous stochastic nonlinear systems,” Neurocomputing, vol. 201, pp. 29–39, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [21]J. Song and Y. Niu, “Resilient finitetime stabilization of fuzzy stochastic systems with randomly occurring uncertainties and randomly occurring gain fluctuations,” Neurocomputing, vol.171, pp. 444–451, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [22]J. Li, Q. Zhang, X. G. Yan, and S. K. Spurgeon, “Robust stabilization of T-S fuzzy stochastic descriptor systems via integral sliding modes,” IEEE Trans. on Cybernetics, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 2736–2749, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [23]X. L. Lin, C. F. Wu, and B. S. Chen, “Robust H ∞ adaptive fuzzy tracking control for MIMO nonlinear stochastic Poisson jump diffusion systems,” IEEE Trans. on Cybernetics, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 3116–3130, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [24]C. Yuan and X. Mao, “Robust stability and controllability of stochastic differential delay equations with Markovian switching,” Automatica, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 343–354, 2004.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [25]V. A. Ugrinovskii, “Robust H ∞ control in the presence of stochastic uncertainty,” Int. Journal of Control, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 219–237, 1998.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [26]S. Kong, M. Saif, and H. Zhang, “Optimal filtering for Itô stochastic continuous-time systems with multiple delayed measurements,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 58, no. 7, pp. 1872–1877, 2013.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [27]J. Song, Y. Niu, and Y. Zou, “A parameter-dependent sliding mode approach for finite-time bounded control of uncertain stochastic systems with randomly varying actuator faults and its application to a parallel active suspension system,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 8124–8132, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [28]H. Gassara, A. El Hajjaji, and M. Chaabane, “Observer-based robust H ∞ reliable control for uncertain T-S fuzzy systems with state time delay,” IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1027–1040, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [29]M. Wu, L. Zhou, and J. She, “Design of observer-based H ∞ robust repetitive-control system,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 1452–1457, 2011.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [30]H. Qu and F. Yang, “Distributed H ∞-consensus filtering for target tracking over a wireless filter network with switching topology, channel fading and packet dropouts,” Neurocomputing, in press, 2019.Google Scholar
- [31]S. Ahmad and M. Rehan, “On observer-based control of one-sided Lipschitz systems,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 353, no. 4, pp. 903–916, 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [32]Y. Boukal, M. Darouach, M. Zasadzinski, and N. E. Radhy, “Robust H ∞observer-based control of fractional-order systems with gain parametrization,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 11, pp. 5710–5723, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [33]H. N. Wu, “Disturbance observer based robust mixed H 2/H ∞ fuzzy tracking control for hypersonic vehicles,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 306, pp. 118–136, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [34]H. Zhang, Q. Hong, H. Yan, and Y. Luo, “Observer-based decentralized event-triggered H ∞ control for networked systems,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 354, no. 9, pp. 3744–3759, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [35]H. Huang, T. Huang and X. Chen, “Further result on guaranteed performance state estimation of delayed static neural networks,” IEEE Trans. on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1335–1341, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [36]C. S. Tseng, “A novel approach to H ∞ decentralized fuzzy-observer-based fuzzy control design for nonlinear interconnected systems,” IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1337–1350, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [37]H. Zhang, Q. Wei, and Y. Luo, “A novel infinite-time optimal tracking control scheme for a class of discrete-time nonlinear systems via the greedy HDP iteration algorithm,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics), vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 937–942, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [38]J. Li, Q. Zhang, X. G. Yan, and S. K. Spurgeon, “Observer-based fuzzy integral sliding mode control for nonlinear descriptor systems,” IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 2818–2832, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [39]P. Apkarian, H. D. Tuan, and J. Bernussou, “Continuous-time analysis, eigenstructure assignment, and H 2 synthesis with enhanced linear matrix inequalities (LMI) characterizations,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 1941–1946, 2001.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [40]S. Boyd, L. E. Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [41]Y. Liu, C. Guo, and S. Yuan, “Integrated LPV control for underactuated ship linear track keeping and main diesel engine,” Proc. of the IEEE 7th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation, pp. 1840–1845, 2008.Google Scholar
- [42]J. Qiu, Y. Wei, H. R. Karimi, and H. Gao, “Reliable control of discrete-time piecewise-affine time-delay systems via output feedback,” IEEE Trans. on Reliability, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 79–91, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [43]J. Qiu, K. Sun, T. Wang, and H. Gao, “Observer-based fuzzy adaptive event-triggered control for pure-feedback nonlinear systems with prescribed performance,” IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2895560 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [44]J. Li and Q. Zhang, “Fuzzy reduced-order compensator-based stabilization for interconnected descriptor systems via integral sliding modes,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 752–765, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar