Advertisement

Nonlinear Adaptive Backstepping with ESO for the Quadrotor Trajectory Tracking Control in the Multiple Disturbances

  • Jie Liu
  • Wendong GaiEmail author
  • Jing Zhang
  • Yuxia Li
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we present a nonlinear adaptive backstepping with extended state observer (ESO) trajectory tracking controller for a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) subject to the multiple disturbances, which include the parametric uncertainties, actuator faults and external disturbance. First, a six-degrees of freedom quadrotor UAV model with the multiple disturbances function is built. Second, the adaptive backstepping controller is designed to track the desired trajectory command aim at internal disturbance. And the adaptive backstepping controller with ESO is designed to track the desired trajectory command aim at external disturbance. Third, the stability of the system is proved by the circle criterion. Finally, under different flight scenarios, simulation results are given to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Keywords

Adaptive backstepping extended state observer (ESO) multiple disturbances quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) trajectory tracking controller 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. [1]
    T. Lee, “Geometric control of quadrotor UAVs transporting a cable-suspended rigid body,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 225–264, February 2017.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    L. Derafa, A. Benallegue, and L. Fridman, “Super twisting control algorithm for the attitude tracking of a four rotors UAV,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 349, no. 2, pp. 685–699, March 2012.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. J. Zhao and D. G. Yang, “Model-free control of quad-rotor vehicle via finite-time convergent extended state observer,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 242–254, February 2016.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    P. Serra, R. Pedro, and T. Hamel, “Landing of a quadrotor on a moving target using dynamic image-based visual servo control,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1524–1535, December 2016.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Y. Zou and B. Zhu, “Adaptive trajectory tracking controller for quadrotor systems subject to parametric uncertainties,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 354, no. 15, pp. 6724–6746, October 2017.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    L. Wang and H. Jia, “The trajectory tracking problem of quadrotor UAV: global stability analysis and control design based on the cascade theory,” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 574–588, March 2014.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    T. Lee, M. Leok, and N. H. Mcclamroch, “Nonlinear robust tracking control of a quadrotor UAV on SE(3),” Asian Journal of Control, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 391–408, June 2012.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. P. Sandiwan, A. Cahyadi, and S. Herdjunanto, “Robust proportional-derivative control on SO(3) with disturbance compensation for quadrotor UAV,” International Journal of Control Automation & Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1–14, September 2017.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. H. Amoozgar, A. Chamseddine, and Y. Zhang, “Fault-tolerant fuzzy gain-scheduled PID for a quadrotor helicopter testbed in the presence of actuator faults,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 282–287, May 2012.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    F. Rinaldi, S. Chiesa, and F. Quagliotti, “Linear quadratic control for quadrotors UAVs dynamics and formation flight,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 203–220, July 2012.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    B. Hasan and E. Prempain, “Low order H controllers for a quadrotor UAV,” Ukacc International Conference on Control, IEEE, pp. 127–132, July 2014.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    W. Gai, J. Liu, and J. Zhang, “A new closed-loop control allocation method with application to direct force control,” International Journal of Control Automation & Systems, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 1355–1366, May 2018.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    V. T. Duong, H. K. Kim, and T. T. Nguyen, “Position control of a small scale quadrotor using block feedback linearization control,” Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 282, no. 2, pp. 525–534, March 2014.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    F. Chen and W. Lei, “A novel nonlinear resilient control for a quadrotor UAV via backstepping control and nonlinear disturbance observer,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 1281–1295, April 2016.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. Yang and R. Guo, “Study on the sliding mode fault tolerant predictive control based on multi agent particle swarm optimization,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 2034–2042, September 2017.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Z. Su and H. Wang, “Exact docking flight controller for autonomous aerial refueling with back-stepping based high order sliding mode,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 338–360, February 2018.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    R. Wang and J. Liu, “Trajectory tracking control of a 6-DOF quadrotor UAV with input saturation via backstepping,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 355, no. 7, pp. 3288–3309, May 2018.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    F. Chen, R. Jiang, and K. Zhang, “Robust backstepping sliding mode control and observer-based fault estimation for a quadrotor UAV,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 1–12, April 2016.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Chen, G. Tao, and B. Jiang, “Dynamic surface control using neural networks for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems with input saturation,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2086–2097, December 2017.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    R. C. Avram, X. Zhang, and J. Muse, “Nonlinear adaptive fault-tolerant quadrotor altitude and attitude tracking with multiple actuator faults,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1–7, March 2018.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    X. Shao, J. Liu, and H. Cao, “Robust dynamic surface trajectory tracking control for a quadrotor UAV via extended state observer,” International Journal of Robust & Nonlinear Control, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 2700–2719, January 2018.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Q. Hu, X. Shao, and L. Guo, “Adaptive fault-tolerant attitude tracking control of spacecraft with prescribed performance,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 331–341, February 2018.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    C. Wang, Z. Chen, and Q. Sun, “Design of PID and ADRC based quadrotor helicopter control system,” Control and Decision Conference, pp. 5860–5865, May 2016.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    N. Zhang and W. Gai, “An active disturbance rejection control guidance law based collision avoidance for unmanned aerial vehicles,” Aerospace Science & Technology, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 658–669, June 2018.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    J. Li and Y Xia, “Absolute stability analysis of non-linear active disturbance rejection control for single-inputsingle-output systems via the circle criterion method,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 9, no. 15, pp. 2320–2329, October 2015.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Z. Gan and J. Han, “Lyapunov function of general Lurie systems with multiple nonlinearities,” Applied Mathematics Letters, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 119–126. January 2003.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    P. Curran, “Proof of the circle criterion for state space systems via quadratic Lyapunov functions-Part 2,” International Journal of Control, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 957–969, Jun 2010.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    B. Z. Guo and Z. L. Zhao, “On the convergence of extended state observer for nonlinear systems with uncertainty,” Systems & Control Letters, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 420–430, June 2011.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    L. Yang, W Zhang, and D. Huang, “Robust trajectory tracking for quadrotor aircraft based on ADRC attitude decoupling control,” Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1026–1033, June 2015.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    H. Wang, X. Ye, and T. Yang, “Model-free-based terminal SMC of quadrotor attitude and position,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace & Electronic Systems, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 2519–2528, October 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICROS, KIEE and Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The College of Electrical Engineering and AutomationShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations