Advertisement

Control of Supercritical Organic Rankine Cycle based Waste Heat Recovery System Using Conventional and Fuzzy Self-tuned PID Controllers

  • Jahedul Islam Chowdhury
  • David Thornhill
  • Payam Soulatiantork
  • Yukun Hu
  • Nazmiye Balta-Ozkan
  • Liz Varga
  • Bao Kha NguyenEmail author
Article
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

This research develops a supercritical organic Rankine cycle (ORC) based waste heat recovery (WHR) system for control system simulation. In supercritical ORC-WHR systems, the evaporator is a main contributor to the thermal inertia of the system, which is greatly affected by transient heat sources during operation. In order to capture the thermal inertia of the system and reduce the computation time in the simulation process, a fuzzy-based dynamic evaporator model was developed and integrated with other component models to provide a complete dynamic ORC-WHR model. This paper presents two control strategies for the ORC-WHR system: evaporator temperature control and expander output control, and two control algorithms: a conventional PID controller and a fuzzy-based self-tuning PID controller. The performances of the proposed controllers are tested for set point tracking and disturbance rejection ability in the presence of steady and transient thermal input conditions. The robustness of the proposed controllers is investigated with respect to various operating conditions. The results show that the fuzzy self-tuning PID controller outperformed the conventional PID controller in terms of set point tracking and disturbance rejection ability at all conditions encountered in the paper.

Keywords

Control algorithms fuzzy logic organic Rankine cycle PID controller supercritical condition waste heat recovery 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

References

  1. [1]
    United States Environmental Protection Agency, “global Greenhouse Gas Emissions Data,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/global-greenhouse-gas-emissions-data. [Accessed: 01-Jun-2016].
  2. [2]
    J. I. Chowdhury, Y. Hu, I. Haltas, N. Balta-Ozkan, G. J. Matthew, and L. Varga, “Reducing industrial energy demand in the UK: a review of energy efficiency technologies and energy saving potential in selected sectors,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 94, pp. 1153–1178, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. I. Chowdhury, B. K. Nguyen, and D. Thornhill, “Investigation of waste heat recovery system at supercritical conditions with vehicle drive cycles,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 923–936, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Schuster, S. Karellas, and R. Aumann, “Efficiency optimization potential in supercritical organic Rankine cycles,” Energy, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1033–1039, Feb. 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    X. Dai, L. Shi, Q. An, and W. Qian, “Screening of hydrocarbons as supercritical ORCs working fluids by thermal stability,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 126, pp. 632–637, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    E. Wang, Z. Yu, H. Zhang, and F. Yang, “A regenerative supercritical-subcritical dual-loop organic Rankine cycle system for energy recovery from the waste heat of internal combustion engines,” Applied Energy, vol. 190, pp. 574–590, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. I. Chowdhury, B. K. Nguyen, and D. Thornhill, “Modelling of evaporator in waste heat recovery system using finite volume method and fuzzy technique,” Energies, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 14078–14097, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    H. Singh and R. S. Mishra, “Performance evaluation of the supercritical organic Rankine cycle (SORC) integrated with large scale solar parabolic trough collector (SPTC) system: an exergy energy analysis,” Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 891–899, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. I. Chowdhury, P. Soulatiantork, and B. K. Nguyen, “Simulation of waste heat recovery system with fuzzy based evaporator model,” Proc. of the 11th Asian Control Conference (ASCC), pp. 2143–2147, 2017.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    B. Dong, G. Xu, X. Luo, L. Zhuang, and Y. Quan, “Analysis of the supercritical organic Rankine cycle and the radial turbine design for high temperature applications,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 123, pp. 1523–1530, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. I. Chowdhury, B. K. Nguyen, D. Thornhill, R. Douglas, and S. Glover, “Modelling of organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery process in supercritical condition,” International Journal of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 477–482, 2015.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    J. Patiño, R. Llopis, D. Sánchez, C. Sanz-Kock, R. Cabello, and E. Torrella, “A comparative analysis of a CO2 evaporator model using experimental heat transfer correlations and a flow pattern map,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 71, pp. 361–375, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. Sun and W. Li, “Operation optimization of an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) heat recovery power plant,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 31, no. 11–12, pp. 2032–2041, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. I. Chowdhury, B. K. Nguyen, and D. Thornhill, “Fuzzy based evaporator model in waste heat recovery system,” Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer (FFHMT16), 2016.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. Zhang, K. Li, and J. Xu, “Recent developments of control strategies for organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems,” Trans. of the Institute of Measurement and Control, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1528–1539, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    J. Zhang, Y. Zhou, Y. Li, G. Hou, and F. Fang, “Generalized predictive control applied in waste heat recovery power plants,” Applied Energy, vol. 102, pp. 320–326, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. Yebi, B. Xu, X. Liu, J. Shutty, P. Anschel, S. Onori, Z. Filipi, and M. Hoffman, “Nonlinear model predictive control strategies for a parallel evaporator diesel engine waste heat recovery system,” Proceedings of the ASME 2016 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, pp. 1–9, 2016.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    S. Quoilin, R. Aumann, A. Grill, A. Schuster, V. Lemort, and H. Spliethoff, “Dynamic modeling and optimal control strategy of waste heat recovery organic Rankine cycles,” Applied Energy, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 2183–2190, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    X. Zhao, P. Shi, and X. Zheng, “Fuzzy adaptive control design and discretization for a class of nonlinear uncertain systems,” IEEE Trans. on Cybernetics, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1476–1483, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    H. Wang, P. X. Liu, and B. Niu, “Robust fuzzy adaptive tracking control for nonaffine stochastic nonlinear switching systems,” IEEE Trans. on Cybernetics, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 2462–2471, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. I. Chowdhury, B. K. Nguyen, and D. Thornhill, “Dynamic model of supercritical organic Rankine cycle waste heat recovery system for internal combustion engine,” International Journal of Automotive Technology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 589–601, Aug. 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    J. I. Chowdhury, B. K. Nguyen, D. Thornhill, Y. Hu, P. Soulatiantork, N. Balta-Ozkan, and L. Varga, “Fuzzy nonlinear dynamic evaporator model in supercritical organic Rankine Cycle Waste Heat Recovery Systems,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 901, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Y. Wei, J. Qiu, and H. R. Karimi, “Fuzzy-affine-modelbased memory filter design of nonlinear systems with timevarying delay,” IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 504–517, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Y. Wei, J. Qiu, and H. K. Lam, “A novel approach to reliable output feedback control of fuzzy-affine systems with time delays and sensor faults,” IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1808–1823, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Hydra-Cell, “Installation and service manual: Hydra-Cell Industrial pumps,” [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/www.hydracell.com/product/D03-hydracell-pump.html. [Accessed: 01-May-2015].
  26. [26]
    S. E. Haaland, “Simple and explicit formulas for the friction factor in turbulent pipe flow,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 89–90, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    J. I. Chowdhury, Modelling and Control of Waste Heat Recovery System, Queens University Belfast, 2017.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    S. Quoilin, Sustainable Energy Conversion through the Use of Organic Rankine Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery and Solar Applications, University of Liége, 2011.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    A. Fadaei and K. Salahshoor, “A novel real-time fuzzy adaptive auto-tuning scheme for cascade PID controllers,” International Journal of Control Automation and Systems, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 823–833, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    S. Barghandan, M. A. Badamchizadeh, and M. R. Jahedmotlagh, “Improved adaptive fuzzy sliding mode controller for robust fault tolerant of a quadrotor,” International Journal of Control Automation and Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 427–441, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    M. C. Esposito, N. Pompini, A. Gambarotta, V. Chandrasekaran, J. Zhou, and M. Canova, “Nonlinear model predictive control of an organic Rankine cycle for exhaust waste heat recovery in automotive engines,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 48, no. 15, pp. 411–418, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICROS, KIEE and Springer 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Water, Energy and EnvironmentCranfield UniversityBedfordUK
  2. 2.Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringQueens University BelfastBelfastUK
  4. 4.Department of Automatic Control and Systems EngineeringUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  5. 5.School of Engineering and InformaticsUniversity of SussexBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations