Advertisement

Tip-position/velocity Tracking Control of Manipulator for Hull Derusting and Spray Painting based on Active Disturbance Rejection Control

  • Zhong Wang
  • Xiaohong Jiao
  • Meiyu Feng
Regular Papers Robot and Applications
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

During sandblasting and spray painting for hull, the tracking performance of the end-effector of manipulator to the outer surface of the hull in uniform velocity is seriously affected by uncertainty of the electrohydraulic actuator and deflection of the manipulator. To effectively improve the tracking performance of the tip-position/velocity, a novel tracking control strategy is proposed, which is based on active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) with extended state observer (ESO) and setting position feedforward control with deflection compensation. First, to reduce tracking error caused by the deflection, the reference positions of two cylinders driving telescopic and luffing motion are calculated with consideration of the deflection influence according to manipulator geometry. And then, ADRC technique is adopted to design the position servo controller of the luffing/telescopic cylinder with the help of the estimate for the uncertainty of the electro-hydraulic system by the ESO. The stability of the whole closed-loop system and the convergence of tracking error are guaranteed theoretically, simultaneously, simulation carried out in Matlab/Simulink environment with physical parameters of a real system demonstrates the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed control strategy compared with existing control schemes. Furthermore, the experimental result is given to show the feasibility and availability of the control method.

Keywords

ADRC defection electro-hydraulic system manipulator tip-position tracking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Y. Barcohen, X. Bao, and B. P. Dolgin, “Residue detection for real-time removal of paint from metallic surfaces,” Proc Spie, vol. 4335, pp. 115–120, July 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. Činkelj, R. Kamnik, P. Čepon, M. Mihelj, and M. Munih, “Closed-loop control of hydraulic telescopic handler,” Automation in Construction, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 954–963, August 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. V. Huynh and P. Dan, “Optimal cascade hydraulic control for a parallel robot platform by PSO,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 72, no. 5–8, pp. 1085–1098, May 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Mohanty and B. Yao, “Indirect adaptive robust control of hydraulic manipulators with accurate parameter estimates,” IEEE Transactions on Control System Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 567–575, May 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Q. Hu, L. Xu, and A. Zhang, “Adaptive backstepping trajectory tracking control of robot manipulator,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 349, no. 3, pp. 1087–1105, April 2012.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    C. Treesatayapun, “Discrete-time direct adaptive control for robotic systems based on model-free and if-then rules operation,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 575–590, February 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Yang, H. Su, Z. Li, and R. Song, “Adaptive control with a fuzzy tuner for cable-based rehabilitation robot,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 865–875, June 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    L. Chan, F. Naghdy, and D. Stirling, “An improved extended active observer for adaptive control of a n-DOF robot manipulator,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic System, vol. 85, no. 3–4, pp. 679–692, March 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    V. T. Yen, Y. N. Wang, P. V. Cuong, N. X. Quynh, and V. H. Thich, “Robust adaptive sliding mode control for industrial robot manipulator using fuzzy wavelet neural network,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2930–2941, December 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. J. Zhao and D. G. Yang, “Model-free control of quadrotor vehicle via finite-time convergent extended state observer,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 242–254, Frebuary 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    I. Zohar and A. Ailon, “Tracking controllers for aerial vehicles subject to restricted inputs and wind perturbations,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 433–441, June 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    K. Lee, J. Back, and I. Choy, “Nonlinear disturbance observer based robust attitude tracking controller for quadrotor UAVs,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1266–1275, December 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    H. Zhang, X. Liu, J. Wang, and H. R. Karimi, “Robust H sliding mode control with pole placement for a fluid power electrohydraulic actuator (EHA) system,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 1095–1104, May 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. T. Le, Y. H. Joo, P. X. Duong, and Q. T. Le, “Parameter estimator integrated-sliding mode control of dual arm robots,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 2754–2763, December 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. F. Carneiro, F. G. Almeida, “Accurate motion control of a servopneumatic system using integral sliding mode control,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 1533–1548, April 2014.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    C. S. Yoo, S. D. Ryu, B. J. Park, Y. S. Kang, and S. B. Jung, “Actuator controller based on fuzzy sliding mode control of tilt rotor unmanned aerial vehicle,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 1257–1265, November 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Sadeghzadeh, D. Calvert, and H. A. Abdullah, “Self-learning visual servoing of robot manipulator using explanation-based fuzzy neural network and Q-learning,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic System, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 83–104, April 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    B. Jia, S. Liu, and Y. Liu, “Homography-based trajectory tracking of industrial manipulator with iterative learning control,” International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision, pp. 1455–1460, December 2014.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    F. Bouakrif and M. Zasadzinski, “Trajectory tracking control for perturbed robot manipulators using iterative learning method,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 87, no. 5–8, pp. 1–10, March 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    R. M. T. R. Ismail, N. D. That, and Q. P. Ha, “Modelling and robust trajectory following for offshore container crane systems,” Automation in Construction, vol. 59, pp. 179–187, July 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    A. Trabka, “Influence of flexibilities of cranes structural components on load trajectory,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–14, January 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    N. Zimmert, A. Kharitonov, and O. Sawodny, “A new control strategy for trajectory tracking of fire-rescue turntable ladders,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 869–874, July 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Q. H. Yuan, J. Lew, and D. Piyabongkam, “Motion control of an aerial work platform,” American Control Conference IEEE, pp. 2873–2878, St. Louis, USA July 2009.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    X. Cao, P. Liu, R. Sun, X. Wang, and S. Gao “Research on straight trajectory control of telescopic boom aerial work platform,” Journal of Convergence Information Technology, vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 394–404, June 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    A. Andrew and L. Rui, “A simplified approach to force control for electro-hydraulic systems,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 1347–1356, December 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    M. R. Stankovic, S. M. Manojlovic, and S. M. Simic, “FPGA system-level based design of multi-axis ADRC controller, Mechatronics,” Mechatronics, vol. 40, pp. 146–155, October 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Institute of Electrical EngineeringYanshan UniversityQinhuangdaoChina

Personalised recommendations