Advertisement

An Interpolation Technique for Input Constrained Robust Stabilization

  • Jung-Su Kim
  • Young Il Lee
Regular Papers Control Theory and Applications
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

This paper presents an interpolation technique of two given robust stabilizing gains for input constrained uncertain systems. The proposed interpolated feedback gain is computed at every sampling instance by solving an optimization problem with a single decision variable. Use of the interpolated feedback gain can bring about not only large invariant set but also good control performance. Moreover, it is shown that the feasible and invariant set yielded by the proposed control is the convex hull of the two invariant sets by the known controls. The simulation results show that the proposed interpolation based feedback gain indeed results in both large invariant set and good control performance.

Keywords

Feasible and invariant set input constraints interpolation model uncertainties 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    G. Grimm, J. Hatfield, I. Postlethwaite, A. R. Teel, M. C. Turner, and L. Zaccarian, “Antiwindup for stable linear systems with input saturation: An lmi-based synthesis,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 48, no. 9, pp. 1509–1525, 2003.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S. Sajjadi-Kia and F. Jabbari, “Controllers for linear systems with bounded actuators: slab scheduling andantiwindup,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 762–769, 2013.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Z. Lin and A. Saberi, “A semi-global low-and-high gain design technique for linear systems with input saturation - stabilization and disturbance rejection,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 5, pp. 381–398, 1995.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    T. Hu and Z. Lin, Control Systems with Actuator Saturation, Birkhauser, 2002.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. Q. Mayne, J. B. Rawlings, C. V. Rao, and P. O. N. Scokaert, “Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality,” Automatica, vol. 36, pp. 789–814, 2000.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. Bemporad, M. Morari, V. Dua, and E. N. Pistikopoulos, “The explicit linear quadratic regulator for constrained systems,” Automatica, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 2002.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Z. Wan and M. V. Kothare, “An efficient off-line formulation of robust model predictive control using linear matrix inequalities,” Automatica, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 837–846, 2003.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    H.-N. Nguyen, S. Olaru, P.-O. Gutman, and M. Hovd, “Constrained control of uncertain, time-varying linear discrete-time systems subject to bounded disturbances,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 831–836, 2015.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. Lim, J.-S. Kim, and Y. Lee, “Robust tracking model predictive control for input-constrained uncertain linear time invariant systems,” International Journal of Control, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 120–130, 2013.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    D. Sui, L. Feng, C. J. Ong, and M. Hovd, “Robust explicit model predictive control for linear systems via interpolation techniques,” International Journal Robust Nonlinear Control, vol. 20, pp. 1166–1175, 2010.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. A. Rossiter, B. Kouvaritakis, and M. Bacic, “Interpolation based computationally efficient predictive control,” International Journal Control, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 290–301, 2004.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    H.-N. Nguyen, P.-O. Gutman, and R. Bourdais, “More efficient interpolating control,” Proeedings of IEEE European Control Conference, 2014.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    H.-N. Nguyen, P.-O. Gutman, S. Olaru, and M. Hovd, “Explicit constraint control based on interpolation techniques for time-varying and uncertain linear discrete-time systems,” Proceedings of IFAC, 2011.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    J. A. Rossiter and P. Grieder, “Using interpolation to simplify explicit model predictive control,” Proceedings of American Control Conference, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. Grieder, Z. Want, M. Kotharet, and M. Morari, “Two level model predictive control for the maximum control invariant set,” Proceedings of American Control Conference, 2004.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    T. Y. Jung, H. Jang, and J. H. Lee, “Move blocking strategy applied to re-entrant manufacturing line scheduling,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 410–418, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Y. I. Lee and B. Kouvaritakis, “Constrained robust model predictive control based on periodic invariance,” Automatica, vol. 42, pp. 2175–2181, 2006.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Y. I. Lee, “Input constrained receding horizon control with nonzero set points and model uncertainties,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 159–163, 2001.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Y. Wang and S. Boyd, “Fast model predictive control using online optimization,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 267–278, 2010.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    S. Boyd, L. E. Ghaoui, E. Feron, and V. Balakrishnan, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), 1994.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Jr. J. M. Gomes da Silva and S. Tarbouriech, “Local stabilization of discrete-time linear systems with saturating controls: an LMI-based approach,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 119–125, 2001.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    A. White, G. Zhu, and J. Choi, “Optimal LPV control with hard constraints,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 148–162, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    H. Yang, P. Li, Y. Xia, and Q. Geng, “Overall convergence rate of delta operator systems subject to actuator saturation,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 27, pp. 3564–3581, 2017.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    M. Rehan, M. Tufail, C. Ahn, and M. Chadli, “Stabilisation of locally lipschitz non-linear systems under input saturation and quantisation,” IET Control Theory and Applications, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 1459–1466, 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    G. Bitsoris and E. Gravalou, “Design techniques for the control of discrete-time systems subject to state and control constraints,” IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1057–1061, 1999.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    F. Blanchini, “Set invariance in control,” Automatica, vol. 35, pp. 1747–1767, 1999.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    B. Pluymers, J. A. Rossiter, J. A. K. Suykens, and B. De Moor, “Interpolation based MPC for LPV systems using polyhedral invariant sets,” American Control Conference, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Information EngineeringSeoul National University of Science and TechnologySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations