Advertisement

Differential Game-based Formation Flight for Quadrotors

  • Manuel Jimenez-Lizarraga
  • Octavio Garcia
  • Ricardo Chapa-Garcia
  • Erik G. Rojo-Rodriguez
Regular Papers Robot and Applications
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

This paper focuses on a novel algorithm for the control of formation flight of a set of n-quadrotors based on the differential game approach. The mathematical model of n-quadrotors is presented using the Newton-Euler formulation considering the disturbances, and the formation flight scheme based on the game approach consists of one vehicle acting as a leader following a pre-designed trajectory meanwhile the others vehicles just follow the leader even in the presence of disturbances. A reduced dimension Riccati equation is solved in order to obtain the desired coordination. A numerical example is given in order to illustrate the effectiveness of the approach for the formation flight.

Keywords

Formation flight linear quadratic games Newton-Euler model quadrotors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    R. Isaacs, Differential Games, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., USA, 1965.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    B. J. Goode and M. J. Roan, “A differential game theoretic approach for two-agent collision avoidance with travel limitations,” The Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 201–218, September 2012.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J. B. Cruz and T. Xiaohuan, Dynamic Noncooperative Game Models for Deregulated Electricity, Nova Science Publishers, USA, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    E. Dockner, S. Jorgensen, N. Van Long, and G. Sorger, Differential Games in Economics and Management Science, Cambridge University Press, UK, 2009.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D. Gu, “A differential game approach to formation control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 85–93, January 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    K. Maler and A. De Zeeuw, “The acid rain differential game,” Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 167–184, September 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. C. Engwerda, B. Van Aarle, and J. Plasmans, “The infinite horizon open-loop nash LQ game: an application to EMU,” Annals of Operational Research, vol. 88, pp. 251–273, January 1999.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    T. Basar and G. Olsder, Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory, SIAM, Philadelphia, USA, 1999.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Starr and Y. Ho, “Nonzero-sum differential games,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 184–206, March 1969.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Starr and Y. Ho, “Further propeties of nonzero-sum differential games,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 207–219, April 1969.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    W. Dubnar and R. Murray, “Model predictive control of coordinated muti-vehicle formation,” Automatica, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 549–558, 2006.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    E. Camponogara, D. Jia, B. Krogh, and S. Talukdar, “Distributed model predictive control,” IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 44–52, August 2002.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. P. Desai, J. P. Ostrowski, and V. Kumar, “Modelling and control of formations of nonholonomic mobile robots,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 905–908, December 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    G. Vachtsevanos, L. Tang, and J. Reimann, “An intelligent approach to coordinated control of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles,” presented at the Amer. Helicopter Soc. 60th Annu. Forum, Baltimore, MD, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    T. Paul, T. R. Krogstad, and J. T. Gravdahl., “UAV formation flight using 3D potential field,” Proc. of 16th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, pp. 1240–1245, August 2008.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Z. Lin and R. M. Murray, “Double-graph control strategy of multivehicle formations,” Proc. of 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, The Atlantis, Paradise Islands, The Bahamas, December 2004.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    B. S. Park and S. J. Yoo, “Adaptive leader-follower formation control of mobile robots with unknown skidding and slipping effects,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 3587–594, February 2015.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    F. A. P. Lie and T. H. Go, “A collision-free formation reconfiguration control approach for unmanned aerial vehicles,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1100–1107, October 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    H. Yang, B. Jiang, and Y. Zhang, “Fault-tolerant shortest connection topology design for formation control,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 29–36, February 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    F. Munoz, E. S. Espinoza Quesada, Hung M. La, S. Salazar, S. Commuri, and L. R. Garcia Carrillo, “Adaptive consensus algorithms for real-time operation of multi-agent systems affected by switching network events,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1566–1588, 2016.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Z. Li, W. Ren, X. Liu, and L. Xie, “Distributed consensus of linear multi-agent systems with adaptive dynamic protocols,” Automatica, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 1956–1995, July 2013.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Z. Li, X. Liu, W. Ren, and L. Xie, “Distributed tracking control for linear multiagent systems with a leader of bounded unknown input,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 518–523, 2013.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    L. Cheng, Y. Wang, W. Ren, Z. G. Hou, and M. Tan, “On convergence rate of leader-following consensus of linear multi-agent systems with communication noises,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 3586–3592, January 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Z. Li and Z. Duan, “Distributed consensus protocol design for general linear multi-agent systems: a consensus region approach,” IET Control Theory and Applications, vol. 8, no. 18, pp. 2145–2161, December 2014.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    M. Zhu and S. Martinez, Distributed Optimization-Based Control of Multi-Agent Networks in Complex Environments, Springer International Publishing, ISBN: 978-3-319-19071-6, 2015.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Y. Chen and J. Sun, “Distributed optimal control for multiagent systems with obstacle avoidance,” Neurocomputing, vol. 173, no. 3, pp. 2014–2021, January 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    X. Dong, Y. Zhou, Z. Ren, and Y. Zhong, “Timevarying formation tracking for second-order multi-agent systems subjected to switching topologies with application to quadrotor formation flying,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 5014–5024, June 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    X. Dong, B. Yu, Z. Shi, and Y. Zhong, “Time-varying formation control for unmanned aerial vehicles: Theories and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 340–348, April 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    X. Dong, Y. Zhou, Z. Ren, and Y. Zhong, “Timevarying formation control for unmanned aerial vehicles with switching interaction topologies,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 46, pp. 26–361, January 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Y. Wu, R. Lu, P. Shi, H. Su, and Z. G. Wu, “Adaptive output synchronization of heterogeneous network with an uncertain leader,” Automatica, vol. 76, pp. 183–192, February 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Y. Wu, X. Meng, L. Xie, R. Lu, H. Su, and Z. G. Wu, “An input-based triggering approach to leader-following problems,” Automatica, vol. 75, pp. 221–228, January 2017.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    D. Gu, “A differential game approach to formation control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, vol. 16, pp. 85–93, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    S. M. LaValle, “Robot motion planning: a game-theoretic foundation,” Algorithmica, vol. 26, pp. 430–465, April 2000.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    B. L. Stevens and F. L. Lewis, Aircraft Control and Simulation, John Wiley and Sons, USA, 1992.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    F. L. Lewis, H. Zhang, K. Hengster-Movric, and A. Das, Cooperative Control of Multi-Agent Systems: Optimal and Adaptive Design Approaches, Springer, 2014.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    A. Sanchez, V. Parra-Vega, C. Izaguirre, and O. Garcia, “Position-yaw tracking of quadrotors,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, ASME, vol. 137, no. 6, pp. 061011, Paper No: DS-13-1322, June 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    R. Lozano, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Embedded Control, John Wiley-ISTE Ltd, USA, 2010.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    R. F. Stengel, Flight Dynamics, Princeton University Press, USA, 2004.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    J G. Leishman, Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, Cambridge University Press, USA, 2006.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    S. Levinson, H. Weiss, and J. Ben-Asher, “Trajectory shaping and terminal guidance using linear quadratic differential game,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit, 2002.Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    L. Dongxu and J. B. Cruz, “Defending an asset: a linear quadratic game approach,” IEEE Transaction on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 1026–1042, April 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    J. C. Engwerda, LQ Dynamic Optimization and Differential Games, Wiley, 2005.Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    J. C. Engwerda, Uncertainty in a Fishery Management Game, Inbook: Linear Quadratic Dynamic Optimization and Differential Game Theory, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, USA, 2005.Google Scholar
  44. [44]
    J.C. Engwerda, “On the Open-loop Nash Equilibrium in LQ-games,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 22, pp. 729–762, May 1998.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    N. Michael, J. Fink, and V. Kumar, “Cooperative manipulation and transportation with aerial robots,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 73–86, 2011.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    V. Parra-Vega, A. Sanchez, C. Izaguirre, O. Garcia, and F. Ruiz-Sanchez, “Toward aerial grasping and manipulation with multiple UAVs,” Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, Springer, vol. 70, no.1, pp. 575–593, September 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Jimenez-Lizarraga
    • 1
  • Octavio Garcia
    • 2
  • Ricardo Chapa-Garcia
    • 1
  • Erik G. Rojo-Rodriguez
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Physics-Mathematics SciencesAutonomous University of Nuevo LeonSan Nicolas de los GarzaMexico
  2. 2.Aeronautic Engineering Research and Innovation Center, Faculty of Mechanical and Electrical EngineeringAutonomous University of Nuevo LeonApodacaMexico

Personalised recommendations