Advertisement

Motion Planning of Robot Manipulator Based on Improved NSGA-II

  • Ying Huang
  • Minrui Fei
Regular Papers Robot and Applications

Abstract

In this paper, the trajectory of a robot manipulator is planned using the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II). Moreover, consumed time, Cartesian trajectory length, and smooth movement are used as the multi-objective to be optimized [1, 2]. The Pareto optimal solution set is obtained through NSGA-II, and simulation is used to obtain and verify the results. In an actual engineering case, the optimal solution of the Pareto solution set can be selected as the optimal path of a robot manipulator. Results show that the relationship between consumed time and joint jerk is a priority solution to practical engineering selection. Moreover, the spatial distribution of the optimal solution set is improved by enhancing the proposed crowding distance mechanism in the conventional NSGA-II algorithm.

Keywords

Crowding distance joint jerk manipulator non-dominated sorting NSGA-II Pareto 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    B. I. Kazem, A. I. Mahdi, and A. T. Oudah, “Motion planning for a robot arm by using genetic algorithm,” Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 131–136, September 2008.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Piazzi and A. Visioli, “Global minimum-jerk trajectory planning of robot manipulators,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 140–149, February 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. K. Sahu, “Optimal trajectory planning of industrial robots using geodesic,” International Journal of Robotics and Automation, vol. 5, no. 3, September 2016.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    B. Ombuki, B. J. Ross, and F. Hanshar, “Multi-objective genetic algorithms for vehicle routing problem with time windows,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. A. Abido, “Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for electric power dispatch problem,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 315–329, June 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    K. Sindhya, K. Miettinen, and K. Deb, “A hybrid framework for evolutionary multi-objective optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 495–511, August 2013.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    C. A. C. Coello, “Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: a historical view of the field,” IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–36, February 2006.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, C. M. Fonseca, and V. G. Fonseca, “Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and revies,” IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117–132, April 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    E. Zitzler and L. Thiele, “Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach,” IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 257–271, November 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    N. K. Madavan, “Multiobjective optimization using a Pareto differential evolution approach,” Proceedings of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Honolulu, IEEE, vol. 2, pp. 1145–1159, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. D. Knowles and D. W. Corne, “Approximating the nondominated front using the Pareto archived evolution strategy,” Evolutionary Computation, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 149–172, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    D. W. Corne, J. D. Knowles, and M. J. Oates, “The pareto envelope-based selection algorithm for multiobjecitve optimization,” In: Schoenauer M, Deb K, Rudolph G, eds. Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference. Paris, France, 2000. 839–848.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Z.-Y. Xing, Y. Zhang, Y.-L. Hou, and L.-M. Jia, “On generating fuzzy systems based on Pareto multi-objective cooperative coevolutionary algorithm,” International Journal of Control, Automation, and Systems, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 444–455, August 2007.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    K. Deb, Multi-objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, John Wiley & Sons, Chicester, pp. 13–46, 2001.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    X. F. Zou, Y. Chen, M. Z. Liu, and L. H. Kang, “A new evolutionary algorithm for solving many-objective optimization problems,” IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1402–1412. 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    C. A. C. Coello, A. D. Veldhuizen, and G. B. V. Lamont, Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems, Kluwer Academic, pp. 256–278, 2002.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    E. Zitzler, M. Laumanns, and L. Thiele, “SPEA2: improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization,” EUROGEN 2001-Evolutionary Methods for Design, Optimisation and Control with Applications to Industrial Problems, September 2001.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, April 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    J. Knowles and D. Corne, “The Pareto archived evolution strategy: a new baseline algorithm for Pareto multiobjective optimisation,” Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 99, vol. 1, July 1999.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Q. Zhang and H. Li. “MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 11, issue. 6, pp. 712–731, December 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    G. Na, X. Sun, D. Gong, Y. Zhang, “Solving robot path planning in an environment with terrains based on interval multi-objective PSO,” International Journal of Robotics and Automation, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 100–110, January 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    F.-A. Fortin and M. Parizeau, “Revisiting the NSGA-II crowding-distance computation,” GECCO’ 13, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, July 6-10, 2013.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    C.-S. Tsou, S.-C. Chang, and P.-W. Lai, “Using crowding distance to improve multiobjective PSO with local search,” Swarm Intelligence, Focus on Ant and Particle Swarm Optimization, InTech, ISBN: 978-3-902613-09-7, pp. 532, December 2007.Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    M. A. Jabbar, B. L. Deekshatulu, and P. Chandra, “Classification of heart disease using k-nearest neighbor and genetic algorithm,” International Conference on Computational Intelligence: Modeling Techniques and Applications (CIMTA), 2013.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    J. Yan, M. Li, Z. Xu, and J. Xu, “A simple Pareto adaptive e-domination differential evolution algorithm for multiobjective optimization,” The Open Automation and Control Systems Journal, vol. 7, 338–345, 2015.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    H. Li and Q. Zhang, “Multiobjective optimization problems with complicated Pareto sets, MOEA/D and NSGAII,” IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 284–302, April 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    R. G. L. D’Souza, K. C. Sekaran, and A. K. Andasamy, “Improved NSGA-II based on a novel ranking scheme,” Journal of Computing, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 91–95, February 2010.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Y.-L. Li, W. Shao, J.-T. Wang, and H. Chen, “An improved NSGA-II and its application for reconfigurable pixel antenna design,” Radioengineering, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 733–738, June 2014.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    D.-Q. Guo, J-P. Wang, J. Huang, et al. “Chaotic-NSGA-II: an effective algorithm to solve multi-objective optimization problems,” International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Integrated Systems (ICISS), Guilin, China, pp. 20–23, 2010.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    H. Wang, W. Sun, and P. X. Liu, “Adaptive intelligent control of nonaffine nonlinear time-delay systems with dynamic uncertainties,” IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 1474–1485, July 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    X. Zhao, P. Shi, X. Zheng, and J. Zhang, “Intelligent tracking control for a class of uncertain high-order nonlinear systems,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1976–1982, September 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    H. Wang, X. Liu, and P. Shi, “Observer-based fuzzy adaptive output-feedback control of stochastic nonlinear multiple time-delay systems,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 2568–2578, September 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    X. Zhao, P. Shi, and X. Zheng, “Fuzzy adaptive control design and discretization for a class of nonlinear uncertain systems,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 46, no. 6, pp.1476-1483, June 2016.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    X. Zhao, H. Yang, H. R. Karimi, and Y. Zhu, “Adaptive neural control of MIMO nonstrict-feedback nonlinear systems with time delay,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 46, no. 6, pp.1337–1349, June 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    H.Wang, X. Liu, and K. Liu, “Adaptive fuzzy tracking control for a class of pure-feedback stochastic nonlinear systems with non-lower triangular structure,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 302, pp. 101–120, November 2016.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    L. Liu, C. Chen, X. Zhao, and Y. Li, “Smooth trajectory planning for a parallel manipulator with joint friction and jerk constraints,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1022–1036, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    H.-I Lin, Y.-C. Liu, “Minimum-jerk robot joint trajectory using particle swarm optimization,” Proc. of 2011 First International Conference on Robot, Vision and Signal Processing, pp. 118–121, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    P. Huang, K. Chen, J. Yuan, and Y. Xu, “Motion trajectory planning of space manipulator for joint jerk minimization,” Proc. of IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 3543–3548, 2007.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    P. B. Mulik, “Optimal trajectory planning of industrial robot with evolutionary algorithm,” Proc. of 2015 International Conference on Computation of Power, Energy, Information and Communication, pp. 0256–0263, 2015.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Control, Robotics and Systems and The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechatronic Engineering and AutomationShangHai UniversityShangHaiChina
  2. 2.Electrical SchoolDianJi UniversityShang-HaiChina
  3. 3.School of Mechatronic Engineering and AutomationShangHai UniversityShangHaiChina

Personalised recommendations