Advertisement

A novel fall detection algorithm for elderly using SHIMMER wearable sensors

  • Amir MehmoodEmail author
  • Adnan Nadeem
  • Muhammad Ashraf
  • Turki Alghamdi
  • Muhammad Shoaib Siddiqui
Original Paper
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

Fall is one of the major cause of deaths in elderly along with other chronic diseases in all over the world. Therefore, it is important to find a cost effective, non-intrusive and lightweight solution for early fall detection and prevention in elderly. Several fall detection systems have been proposed, using the different types of sensors and techniques. In this paper, a novel fall detection technique, using the wearable SHIMMER™ sensors, is proposed, which identifies the fall event, using Mahalanobis distance on real-time data. It is more robust than other conventional distance measure techniques, followed in existing fall detection systems. We first developed a real dataset that consists of three daily life activities, such as walking, sitting (on) and getting up (from) a chair, and standing still. These activities are the main cause of fall in elderlies. The proposed algorithm was tested and validated, to identify the fall event. It produced the promising results, which are comparable to the state-of-the-art fall detection techniques.

Keywords

Fall detection system Wearable sensors WBAN SHIMMER sensors Mahalanobis distance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is partially supported by ICT R&D project in Pakistan and Deanship of Research Grant, Islamic University of Madinah, Saudi Arabia. The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of Mr. Kashif Rizwan, Faraz, Mutahhir, Faheem and Moiz Ahmed for data collection as part of their undergraduate project at Federal Urdu University and University of Pakistan. We also acknowledge the administration of Dar-ul-Sukoon (old age home, Pakistan) and Edhi foundation old age homes at two locations in Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding information

Part of this research is supported by the Federal Urdu University Pakistan and Islamic University Madinah through deanship of research project.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors have no conflict of interest with any individual or organization regarding the study in this paper.

Ethical standard

The study involves data collection of certain daily life activities through wearable shimmer sensor on normal humans. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.”

Informed consent

The consent form was signed with the organizations and individual before the experiments. The process also ensures the privacy of the identity of the subjects.

References

  1. 1.
    Pannurat N, Surapa T, Ekawit N. Automatic fall monitoring: a review. Sensors. 2014;14(7):12900–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tinetti ME. Prevention of falls and fall injuries in elderly persons: a research agenda. Prev Med. 1994;23(5):756–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Society, American Geriatrics, Geriatrics Society, On Falls Prevention, and Orthopaedic Surgeons Panel. Guideline for the prevention of falls in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49(5):664–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lozano R, Mohsen N, Kyle F, Stephen L, Kenji S, Victor A, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2095–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    World Health Organization. Ageing, and Life Course Unit. WHO global report on falls prevention in older age. World Health Organization, 2008.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu J, Kenneth D, Kochanek S, Murphy L, Betzaida TV. Deaths: final data for 2014. 2016.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yardley L, Jacqueline L. Falls in older people: risk factors and strategies for prevention. Ageing Soc. 2008;28(2):299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tinetti ME, Wen-Liang L, Elizabeth BC. Predictors and prognosis of inability to get up after falls among elderly persons. JAMA. 1993;269(1):65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doukas C, Maglogiannis, I, Tragas, P, Liapis, D, Yovanof, G. Patient fall detection using support vector machines. Artificial Intelligence and Innovations 2007: from Theory to Applications. Springer US. 2007; 147–156.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jantaraprim P, Phukpattaranont P, Limsakul C, Wongkittisuksa B. Fall detection for the elderly using a support vector machine. Int J Soft Comput Eng. 2012;2(1):484–90.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang T, Wang J, Xu L, Liu P. Using wearable sensor and NMF algorithm to realize ambulatory fall detection. International conference on natural computation 2006:488-491. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kau L, Chen C. A smart phone-based pocket fall accident detection, positioning and rescue system. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf. 2014.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2014.2328593.
  13. 13.
    Aziz O, Musngi M, Park EJ, Mori G, Robinovitch SN. A comparison of accuracy of fall detection algorithms (threshold-based vs. machine learning) using waist-mounted tri-axial accelerometer signals from a comprehensive set of falls and non-fall trials. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2017;55(1):45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gjoreski H, Lustrek M, Gams M. Accelerometer placement for posture recognition and fall detection. In Intelligent environments (IE), 2011 7th international conference on 2011:47–54.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ojetola O, Elena IG, James B. Fall detection with wearable sensors--safe (Smart Fall Detection). In Intelligent Environments (IE), 2011 7th International Conference on, 2011:318–321.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bilgin T, Erdogan S. A data mining approach for fall detection by using k-nearest neighbour algorithm on wireless sensor network data. IET Commun. 2012;6:3281–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dinh C, Struck M. A new real-time fall detection approach using fuzzy logic and a neural network. Wearable Micro and Nano Technologies for Personalized Health (pHealth), 2009 6th International Workshop on 2009:57–60.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Delahoz YS, Labrador MA. Survey on fall detection and fall prevention using wearable and external sensors. Sensors. 2014;14(10):19806–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dinh KQ, Pham CND, Nguyen MPT. Real-time fall detection using an accelerometer. J Sci Technol. 2013;51(1A):108–16.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pham C, Phuong TM. Real-time fall detection and activity recognition using low-cost wearable sensors. International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications. 2013:673-682. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Diep NN, Pham C, Phuong TM. A classifier based approach to real-time fall detection using low-cost wearable sensors. Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR), 2013 International Conference of. 2013:105–110.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gadde A, Amin MG, Zhang YD, Ahmad F. Fall detection and classifications based on time-scale radar signal characteristics. Radar Sensor Technology XVIII. 2014;9077:907712. International Society for Optics and Photonics.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Burns A, Barry RG, Michael JM, Terrance JO, Benjamin K, Steven MA, et al. SHIMMER™–a wireless sensor platform for noninvasive biomedical research. IEEE Sensors J. 2010;10(9):1527–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Erdogan S. Z, and Turgay TB. A data mining approach for fall detection by using k-nearest neighbour algorithm on wireless sensor network data. IET Commun. 2012;6(18):3281–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baek WS, Dong-Min K, Faisal B, Jae-Young P. Real life applicable fall detection system based on wireless body area network. Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC)IEEE, 2013:62–67.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sengto A, Thurdsak L. Human falling detection algorithm using back propagation neural network. In Biomedical Engineering International Conference (BMEiCON), 2012:1-5. IEEE.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen D, Wei F, Zhang Y, Li X, Tianmiao W. A wearable wireless fall detection system with accelerators. Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, 2011: 2259–2263.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yuwono M, Steven WS, Bruce M. Fall detection using a Gaussian distribution of clustered knowledge, augmented radial basis neural-network, and multilayer perceptron. In Broadband and Biomedical Communications (IB2Com), IEEE 6th International Conference on. 2011:145–150.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rakhman AZ, Lukito EN. u-FASt: Ubiquitous fall detection and alert system for elderly people in smart home environment. Electrical Engineering and Informatics (MICEEI), 2014 Makassar International Conference on. 2014:136–140.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sposaro F, Gary T. iFall: an Android application for fall monitoring and response. In Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. EMBC 2009. Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 2009:6119–6122.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tacconi C, Sabato M, Lorenzo C. Smartphone-based applications for investigating falls and mobility. In Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth), 2011 5th International Conference on, 2011:258–261.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dau, HA, Flora DS, Andy S, Lachlan H, Margaret H. Phone based fall detection by genetic programming. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, 2014: 256–257. ACM.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bourke AK, O’brien JV, Lyons GM. Evaluation of a threshold-based tri-axial accelerometer fall detection algorithm. Gait Posture. 2007;26(2):194–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mehmood A, Akhter R, Adnan N, Umair S. Study of multi-classification of advanced daily life activities on shimmer sensor dataset. Int J Commun Netw Inform Sec. 2016;8(2):86.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dai J, Xiaole B, Zhimin Y, Zhaohui S, and Dong X. PerFallD: A pervasive fall detection system using mobile phones. Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), 2010 8th IEEE International Conference on, 2010:292–297.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kangas M, Antti K, Per L, Ilkka W, Timo J. Comparison of low-complexity fall detection algorithms for body attached accelerometers. Gait Posture. 2007;28(2):285–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fang S, Yi-Chung L, and Kuan-Ming C. Developing a mobile phone-based fall detection system on android platform. Computing, Communications and Applications Conference (ComComAp), 2012:143–146.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Özdemir AT. An analysis on sensor locations of the human body for wearable fall detection devices: Principles and practice. Sensors. 2016;16(8):1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shaikh Zaid Islamic Center. http://www.szic.edu.pk.
  40. 40.
    A home for senior citizens, a project of Dar-ul-Sukun trust, detailed information available at: http://www.darulsukun.com.
  41. 41.
    The Edhi Foundation detail information available at: https://edhi.org/index.php/networks/edhi-home-karachi.

Copyright information

© IUPESM and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science & TechnologyKarachiPakistan
  2. 2.NED University of Engineering & TechnologyKarachiPakistan
  3. 3.Islamic University of MadinahMadinahKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations