Advertisement

Hybrid fuzzy based spearman rank correlation for cranial nerve palsy detection in MIoT environment

  • S. BaskarEmail author
  • V. R. Sarma Dhulipala
  • P. Mohamed Shakeel
  • K. P. Sridhar
  • R. Kumar
Original Paper
  • 9 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Internet Of Medical Things In E-Health

Abstract

In the recent past, the micro vascular cranial nerve palsy has been detected from the EEG signal using the discrete wavelet transform and multi class support vector machine approach which examines each and every frequencies and features with effective manner. Though the epilepsy are identified using the various techniques, the accuracy and efficiency of the system with less error rate of the classifiers are still one of the major issues in Medical Internet of Things Environment (MIoT). Even though these methods retrieves the cranial nerve palsy which is termed as lack of function of nerves successfully, the efficiency of the system is must be improved. So effective epilepsy which causes cranial nerve palsy need to be analyzed and detect in an automatic manner for minimizing the number of deaths. These problems are reduced by using optimized signal decomposition, Exact feature extraction, selection and the recognition with less error rate has been computed with the help of the Fuzzy based twofold graphic discrete wavelet transform (FTF-TGTWT), hybrid Fuzzy based spearman rank correlation (HF-SRC) Then the performance of the system is analyzed using the experimental results and discussions.

Keywords

MIoT Fuzzy Cranial nerve palsy Spearman rank correlation Discrete wavelet transform 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Anand S, Nath V. Study and Design of Smart Embedded System for remote health monitoring using internet of things. In: Nanoelectronics, circuits and communication systems. Singapore: Springer; 2019. p. 409–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chu NN. Surprising prevalence of electroencephalogram brain-computer Interface to internet of things [future directions]. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine. 2017;6(2):31–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim YJ, Lee JY, Oh S, Park M, Jung HY, Sohn BK, et al. Associations between prospective symptom changes and slow-wave activity in patients with internet gaming disorder: a resting-state EEG study. Medicine. 2017;96(8).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hussain SA, Mohammed H, Hussain SJ. Detection of brain activity with an automated system hardware for accurate diagnostic of mental disorders. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Internet of things and Cloud Computing. ACM; 2017. p. 79.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matsuo K, Yamada M, Bylykbashi K, Cuka M, Liu Y, Barolli L. Implementation of an IoT-Based E-Learning Testbed: performance evaluation using mean-shift clustering approach considering four types of brain waves. In: 2018 32nd International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA). IEEE; 2018. p. 203–209.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maeda Y, Kudomi N, Yamamoto Y, Hatakeyama T, Nishiyama Y. Impact of reconstruction algorithm with PSF and TOF and reconstruction parameter in fractal analysis: evaluation by changed the Gaussian filter size. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(supplement 1):1858.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alickovic E, Kevric J, Subasi A. Performance evaluation of empirical mode decomposition, discrete wavelet transform, and wavelet packed decomposition for automated epileptic seizure detection and prediction. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control. 2018;39:94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mafarja MM, Mirjalili S. Hybrid binary ant lion optimizer with rough set and approximate entropy reducts for feature selection. Soft Computing in Springer. 2018:1–17.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liu Y, Jiang C, Zhao H. Using contextual features and multi-view ensemble learning in product defect identification from online discussion forums. Decis Support Syst. 2018;105:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang L, Zhang Q, Du B, Huang X, Tang YY, Tao D. Simultaneous spectral-spatial feature selection and extraction for hyperspectral images. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics. 2018;48(1):16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu H, Li Y, Chen M, Kim H, Serikawa S. Brain intelligence: go beyond artificial intelligence. Mobile Networks and Applications. 2018;23(2):368–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Manogaran G, Vijayakumar V, Varatharajan R, Kumar PM, Sundarasekar R, Hsu CH. Machine learning based big data processing framework for cancer diagnosis using hidden Markov model and GM clustering. Wirel Pers Commun. 2018;102(3):2099–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jagadeeswari V, Subramaniyaswamy V, Logesh R, Vijayakumar V. A study on medical internet of things and big data in personalized healthcare system. Health Information Science and Systems in Springer. 2018;6(1):14.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yamada M, Cuka M, Liu Y, Oda T, Matsuo K, Barolli L. Performance evaluation of an IoT-based E-learning testbed using mean-shift clustering approach considering Theta type of brain waves. In: International conference on intelligent networking and collaborative systems. Cham: Springer; 2017, August. p. 62–72.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waldstein SM, Montuoro A, Podkowinski D, Philip AM, Gerendas BS, Bogunovic H, et al. Evaluating the impact of vitreomacular adhesion on anti-VEGF therapy for retinal vein occlusion using machine learning. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steele VR, Rao V, Calhoun VD, Kiehl KA. Machine learning of structural magnetic resonance imaging predicts psychopathic traits in adolescent offenders. NeuroImage. 2017;145:265–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khosravan N, Celik H, Turkbey B, Jones E, Wood B, Bagci U. A Collaborative Computer Aided Diagnosis (C-CAD) system with eye-tracking, sparse attentional model, and deep learning. J Med Image Anal. 2018;51:101–115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2018.10.010.
  18. 18.
    Kohli MD, Summers RM, Geis JR. Medical image data and datasets in the era of machine learning—whitepaper from the 2016 C-MIMI meeting dataset session. J Digit Imaging. 2017;30(4):392–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Narang A, Batra B, Ahuja A, Yadav J, Pachauri N. Classification of EEG signals for epileptic seizures using Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm based multilayer perceptron neural network. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2018;34(3):1669–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Talboom JS, Huentelman MJ. Big data collision: the internet of things, wearable devices and genomics in the study of neurological traits and disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(R1):R35–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rahmani AM, Gia TN, Negash B, Anzanpour A, Azimi I, Jiang M, et al. Exploiting smart e-health gateways at the edge of healthcare internet-of-things: a fog computing approach. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2018;78:641–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tzimourta KD, Tzallas AT, Giannakeas N, Astrakas LG, Tsalikakis DG, Angelidis P, et al. A robust methodology for classification of epileptic seizures in EEG signals. Heal Technol. 2018:1–8.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vergara, P. M., de la Cal, E., Villar, J. R., González, V. M., & Sedano, J. (2017). An IoT platform for epilepsy monitoring and supervising. Journal of Sensors 2017:18.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6043069
  24. 24.
    Hamad A, Houssein EH, Hassanien AE, Fahmy AA. Hybrid grasshopper optimization algorithm and support vector Machines for automatic seizure detection in EEG signals. In: International conference on advanced machine learning technologies and applications. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 82–91.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IUPESM and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Baskar
    • 1
    Email author
  • V. R. Sarma Dhulipala
    • 2
  • P. Mohamed Shakeel
    • 3
  • K. P. Sridhar
    • 1
  • R. Kumar
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of ECEKarpagam Academy of Higher EducationCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsAnna UniversityTiruchirappalliIndia
  3. 3.Faculty of Information and Communication TechnologyUniversiti Teknikal Malaysia MelakaMelakaMalaysia
  4. 4.Department of Electronics and Instrumentation EngineeringNIT NagalandDimapurIndia

Personalised recommendations