Advertisement

An IoT architecture for preventive maintenance of medical devices in healthcare organizations

  • Jamal MaktoubianEmail author
  • Keyvan Ansari
Original Paper
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

In recent years, hospitals have spent a significant amount on technologically advanced medical equipment to ensure not only the accuracy and reliability of medical devices, but also the required level of performance. Although medical devices have been revolutionized thanks to technology advancements, outdated maintenance strategies are still used in healthcare systems and services. Also, maintenance plans must often be developed for a mixture of advanced and obsolete technologies being used in medical devices. Therefore, most healthcare organizations have been facing the challenge of detecting equipment-related risks that would have been alleviated if effective integrity monitoring mechanisms were in place. Additionally, continuously growing volumes of large data streams, collected from sensors and actuators embedded into network-enabled sensors and microprocessors of medical equipment, require a scalable platform architecture to support the necessary storage and real-time processing of the data for device monitoring and maintenance. This paper investigates the issue of maintaining medical devices through an Internet-of-Things (IoT)-enabled autonomous integrity monitoring mechanism for those devices generating large-scale real-time data in healthcare organizations. The proposed architecture that includes an integrity monitoring framework and a data analytics module ensures the complete visibility into medical devices and provides a facility to predict possible failures before happening.

Keywords

Real-time monitoring information system Big data Medical devices Internet-of-Things (IoT) Network-enabled preventive maintenance 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Author Jamal Maktoubian certify that he has NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest and declares that he has no conflict of interest. Author Keyvan Ansari declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Dor G, Zeeli D, Kadosh-Tamari I. System and method for tracking and monitoring surgical tools. 2016, Google Patents.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heneghan C, Thompson M, Billingsley M, et al. Medical-device recalls in the UK and the device-regulation process: retrospective review of safety notices and alerts. BMJ Open. 2011;1:e000155.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000155.
  3. 3.
    Singh S. What is the best way to supervise the quality of medical devices? Searching for a balance between ex–ante and ex–post regulation. European Journal of Risk Regulation. 2013;4:465–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ramezani A, Golpaygani AT, Movahedi MM. Metrological reliability and electrical safety: a case study on electrosurgical equipment. In: Kyriacou E, Christofides S, Pattichis C, editors. XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 57. Cham: Springer; 2016.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di Maio F, et al. Ensemble-approaches for clustering health status of oil sand pumps. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39(5):4847–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sethiya S. Condition based maintenance (CBM). Secy. to CME/WCR/JBP. 2006.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Raheja D, et al. Data fusion/data mining-based architecture for condition-based maintenance. Int J Prod Res. 2006;44(14):2869–87.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rice WP. Medical device risk based evaluation and maintenance using fault tree analysis. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2007;41(1):76–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Babula DA, et al. Medical imaging system with integrated service interface. 2002. US Google Patent 6,353,445.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang L. Big data analytics for emaintenance: modeling of high-dimensional data streams. Luleå: Luleå Tekniska Universitet; 2015.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rusitschka S, Curry E. Big data in the energy and transport sectors. In New horizons for a data-driven economy. Springer; 2016. p. 225–44.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garg N. Apache Kafka. Birmingham: Packt Publishing Ltd; 2013.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lasch, R, Fritzsche R. Condition-based maintenance planning within the aviation industry. Logistics Management: Contributions of the Section Logistics of the German Academic Association for Business Research, Braunschweig, Germany, 2015, p. 3.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jamshidi A, et al. Medical devices inspection and maintenance; a literature review. In IIE annual conference. Proceedings. 2014. Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roesch M. Snort – lightweight intrusion detection for networks. In: Proceedings of the 13th USENIX Conference on System Administration Seattle, Washington, 1999, pp. 229–238.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bro PV. A system for detecting network intruders in real-time. In Proc. 7th USENIX security symposium. 1998.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Finamore, A, Mellia M, Meo M, Munaf`o MM, Rossi D. Live traffic monitoring with Tstat: capabilities and experiences. In: WWIC. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. pp. 290–301.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kumar V, Hintze MS, Jacob AM. A random survey of anesthesia machines and ancillary monitors in 45 hospitals. Anesth Analg. 1988;67(7):644–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hauser RG, Kallinen L. Deaths associated with implantable cardioverter defibrillator failure and deactivation reported in the United States food and drug administration manufacturer and user facility device experience database. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1(4):399–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Siebermair J, et al. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Herz. 2015;40(2):110–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Taghipour S. Reliability and maintenance of medical devices [Ph.D. thesis]. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2011.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hu S, et al. Reform of how health care is paid for in China: challenges and opportunities. Lancet. 2008;372(9652):1846–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shin J-H, Jun H-B. On condition based maintenance policy. J Comput Des Eng. 2015;2:119–27.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chawla NV, Davis DA. Bringing big data to personalized healthcare: a patient-centered framework. J Gen Intern Med. 2013;28(3):660–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Organizations, J.C.o.A.o.H. Comprehensive accreditation manual for hospitals: the official handbook: 2006 CAMH. 2006: joint commission on accreditation of healthcare organizations.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Arunraj N, Maiti J. Risk-based maintenance—techniques and applications. J Hazard Mater. 2007;142(3):653–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Camci F. System maintenance scheduling with prognostics information using genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2009;58(3):539–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mahfoud H, El Barkany A, El Biyaali A. A hybrid decision-making model for maintenance prioritization in health care systems. Am J Appl Sci. 2016;13(4):439–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ridgway M. Optimizing our PM programs. Biomed Instrum Technol. 2009;43(3):244–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pintelon L, Parodi-Herz A. Maintenance: an evolutionary perspective. In: Kobbacy KAH, Murthy DNP, editors. Complex system maintenance handbook. Berlin: Springer; 2008.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Taghipour S, Banjevic D, Jardine AK. Prioritization of medical equipment for maintenance decisions. J Oper Res Soc. 2011;62(9):1666–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Swan M. The quantified self: fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data. 2013;1:85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hansen M, et al. Big data in science and healthcare: a review of recent literature and perspectives: contribution of the IMIA social media working group. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. 2014;9(1):21.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Raghupathi W, Raghupathi V. Big data analytics in healthcare: promise and potential. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2014;7(2):3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kail IV, Karl A. Reprogrammable remote sensor monitoring system. 2001. Google Patents.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Godager O. Method and apparatus for in-situ wellbore measurement and control with inductive connectivity. 2013. Google Patents.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bui N, Zorzi M. Health care applications: a solution based on the internet of things. In Proceedings of the 4th International symposium on applied sciences in biomedical and communication technologies. 2011. ACM.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Vasseur JP, Agarwal N, Hui J, Shelby Z, Bertand P, Chauvenet C. RPL: The IP routing protocol designed for low power and lossy networks. Internet Protocol for Smart Objects (IPSO) Alliance; 2011.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Shelby Z, Hartke K, Bormann C. The constrained application protocol (CoAP). RFC 7252, 2014.  https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC7252.
  40. 40.
    Castellani AP, et al. Web services for the internet of things through CoAP and EXI. In Communications Workshops (ICC), 2011 IEEE international conference on. 2011. IEEE.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Salman T, Jain R. Networking protocols and standards for internet of things. In: Internet of things and data analytics handbook. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.; 2015.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bhuvaneswari A. A survey on internet of things [IoT]. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci. 2017;8(1).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Winter T, ThubertP, Brandt A, Hui J, Kelsey R, Levis P, Pister K, Struik R, Vasseur JP, Alexander R. RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. In: IETF, RFC 6550, March 2012. http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6550.
  44. 44.
    Fodor G, et al. Design aspects of network assisted device-to-device communications. IEEE Commun Mag. 2012;50(3).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Turnbull J. The Logstash Book. James Turnbull; 2013.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Boyd S, Parikh N, Chu E, Peleato B, Eckstein J. Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning. 2010;3(1):1–122.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shah M. Big Data and the internet of things. Palo Alto: Research and Technology Center - North America, Robert Bosch LLC; 2015. p. 33.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bifet A. et al. StreamDM: advanced data mining in Spark streaming. In Data Mining Workshop (ICDMW), 2015 IEEE international conference on. 2015. IEEE.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gormley C, Tong Z. Elasticsearch: the definitive guide: a distributed real-time search and analytics engine. 2015. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Yang W, Haider SN, Zou J, Zhao Q. Industrial big data platform based on open source software. Presented at the International Conference on Computer Networks and Communication Technology (CNCT 2016). Atlantis Press; 2016.  https://doi.org/10.2991/cnct-16.2017.90.
  51. 51.
    Wang Z et al. Kafka and its using in high-throughput and reliable message distribution. In Intelligent Networks and Intelligent Systems (ICINIS), 2015 8th international conference on. 2015. IEEE.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IUPESM and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MysoreMysoreIndia
  2. 2.Farafekr Technology LTDBabolIran
  3. 3.University of the Sunshine CoastSippy DownsAustralia

Personalised recommendations