Advertisement

Biophysical Reviews

, Volume 11, Issue 6, pp 833–839 | Cite as

2019—A year in Biophysical Reviews

  • Damien HallEmail author
Editorial

This editorial first discusses the set of reviews appearing in the current issue (2019 volume 11, issue 6) and then highlights some notable journal activities for the year of 2019.

Each year, Biophysical Reviews publishes six Issues. Of these, roughly half are Special Issues (which gather articles focused on a specific theme) with the remainder being regular Issues, having an open format. The present Issue (Issue 6) is a regular Issue, composed of a topical Commentary and a diverse set of Reviews. The first goal of this Editorial (Hall 2019a) is to introduce the articles constituting Issue 6.

Issue 6—description of contents

Written by Professor Juan Carmelo Gomez-Fernandez, the Commentary following this Editorial deals with the European Union’s Plan S proposal that will require publication of all EU funded research to be in open access journals (Gómez-Fernández 2019). This Commentary was commissioned to inform readers about this major change affecting both the funding of science and its dissemination via publication. As the General Secretary of IUPAB (International Union of Pure and Applied Biophysics), Juan Carmelo is particularly able to provide an informed opinion on this subject. The observant reader will spot the underlying ramifications of Plan S for Biophysical Reviews, which currently operates on a hybrid open access model (Hall 2019b).

Following this Commentary on the Plan S proposal is a set of nine Reviews. The first two Reviews are contributed by an Australian-based medical doctor/scientist, Dr. Vangelis Kanellis, and together they form a related pairing on the subject of skin cancer (Kanellis 2019a, 2019b). The first of these contributions discusses the light absorbing properties of melanin present within human skin, alongside quantitative techniques for its measurement (Kanellis 2019a). The second Review describes various techniques and devices for measuring UV radiation at the skin level (Kanellis 2019b). Taken together, these Reviews provide a biophysical viewpoint on some of the predominant factors associated with skin cancer. The third Review by Yeo et al. (2019) is a detailed biological description of the kinetics of red blood cell generation within the human body. With over 2 billion new blood cells generated each day, the scope of red cell production is quite literally breathtaking (Yeo et al. 2019). Submitted by researchers collaborating between the USA and India, the next Review by Basak and colleagues deals with the subject of quantifying molecular diffusion in complex solutions, such as those found inside the cell (Basak et al. 2019). Providing an introductory background to diffusion and reaction rate theory, this Review goes on to treat theory useful for analyzing fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) measurements and so should prove helpful to scientists seeking to use FCS in their own studies. The fifth Review is a contribution from Iran that examines rational design strategies for pharmaceutical development of drugs to combat Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Jokar et al. 2019). As an age-related phenomenon AD is becoming more prevalent with increasing human longevity and so this topic is becomingly increasingly germane. Beginning with a summary of the major AD mechanistic hypotheses, this Review goes on to summarize recent drug development approaches discussed in the light of clinical trial results (Jokar et al. 2019). The sixth Review in this Issue by US-based Park and Horton (2019) discusses the tendency for a subset of enzymes to form filamentous regular repeating structures from the natively folded monomer state. With over twenty-five examples given this Review is perhaps the longest ever published by the journal and potentially presages a paradigm shift in the manner in which we consider quaternary and “quinary” levels of organization within the cell (Park and Horton 2019). The seventh Review originates from Argentina and discusses experimental procedures for measuring ion generated membrane potential differences in erythrocytes (Balach et al. 2019). Covering a range of methods that vary from the use of fluorescent dye proxies to nuclear magnetic resonance active markers, the authors provide an in depth description of analytical techniques—with nearly all couched within the Nernst equation formalism for quantifying the selective electrostatic potential difference across cell membranes (Balach et al. 2019). The eighth Review is a collaboration between research groups in Canada and South Africa (Seraphim et al. 2019). This Review highlights what is known about the interactions between the Hsp90s (Hsp, heat shock protein) and the four protein sub-complex RT2P occurring within the Plasmodium falciparum protozoan. Aside from providing a clear summation of an interesting area of biochemistry this Review also holds importance for outlining the behavior of a novel set of drug targets in the protozoan agent responsible for malaria—a disease estimated to have infected over 200 million people worldwide, killing approximately half a million each year (W.H.O World Malaria Report 2019). Rounding out the Issue is a Review contributed from Israel on the subject of continuous blood glucose measurement in patients at risk for diabetes, based on dielectric spectroscopy (Caduff et al. 2019). This Review first discusses why the technique can indeed be successful for measuring changes in the concentration of an uncharged molecule such as glucose (within the blood). By way of review, Caduff and coworkers outline the relevant theory and discuss potential experimental improvements for maximizing signal response (Caduff et al. 2019).

In closing this Issue description it is perhaps appropriate to re-emphasize the two main aims of the IUPAB Biophysical Reviews journal,
  1. (i).

    To publish high quality topical Reviews in biophysics-related subject areas that are written by leading experts in the field.

     
  2. (ii).

    To encourage the development and publication of biophysics-related research across all areas of the world.

     

As can be noted from this summary of contents, the contributions to Issue 6 meet both of these criteria relating to excellence and international origin. With due attention paid to highlighting the contents of the present Issue, I now take the opportunity, with this last Issue of the year, to reflect on some of the events and articles that have featured in Biophysical Reviews during 2019.

2019—a year in review

Issue 6 caps off an eventful year for the journal. In what follows I first highlight some of the articles featured in each of the five previous Issues. Following this I then describe events of note related to the journal’s progress in 2019.

Issue 1—Special Issue on ‘Big Data’:

Released in mid-February the first Issue of the year was a Special Issue concerned with the rise of data driven bioinformatics-based science. Edited by Assoc. Prof. Joshua Ho and Dr. Eleni Giannoulatou (Ho and Giannoulatou 2019) the Big Data Issue contained 16 contributions dealing with subjects as diverse as Bayesian statistical analysis (Yau and Campbell 2019), the dangers of using statistical tests rooted in the assumption of a normal distribution (Mar 2019), Hi-C analysis of interactions between genomic loci (Pal et al. 2019), bioinformatics-based discovery of cancer causing mutations (Nussinov et al. 2019), and machine learning in predicting cancer patient treatment outcomes (Mehreen and Aittokallio 2019).

Issue 2—Regular Issue:

Following the Editorials (dos Remedios 2019; Hall 2019c) Issue 2 began with a pair of topical Commentaries describing two careers, one written from the perspective of someone at the beginning of the academic mountain climb (Li 2019) with the other written from the point of view of someone enjoying the warmth of the sunlight at the research summit (dos Remedios 2019). Aside from saying goodbye and thank you to the outgoing Chief Editor, Issue 2 also contained a bevy of very interesting review articles. Among the articles included in Issue 2 I highlight the following concerned with, novel localization technologies in high resolution transmission and cryo-electron microscopy (Brown and Takagi 2019), structure-based drug development against proteases found in the deadly dengue, Zika and West Nile viruses (Nitsche 2019), the use of in situ photo-irradiation as a structural probe in solid state nuclear magnetic resonance studies (Naito et al. 2019), assessments of the roles played by non-specific aggregation in amyloid formation (Hirota et al. 2019) and the development of differential equation–based mathematical models of thyroid cancer (da Silva et al. 2019).

Issue 3—Focus on the ABA/ASB Meeting:

With content drawn from the joint meeting of the Asian Biophysics Association (ABA) and the Australian Society for Biophysics (ASB), Issue 3 was the second Special Issue of the year and the largest Issue overall in terms of contributions (38 articles). The six Special Issue Editors (Prof. Kuniaki Nagayama, Prof. Hiroyuki Noji, Prof. Kyeong Kyu Kim, Prof. Raymond Norton, Associate Professor Till Böcking and Dr. Andrew Battle, performed a remarkable job in inviting and assessing the contributions—a precis of which can be found in the two Issue Editorials (Battle et al. 2019; Hall 2019d). Some of the standout contributions to this Issue include the informative Commentaries describing the individual national and regional biophysical organizations making up the ABA (Hatters and Noji 2019) (with specific examples including Australia (Hill 2019); China (Xu 2019); Japan (Kandori et al. 2019); Hong Kong (Zhu 2019); Taiwan (Lyu 2019); Korea (Lim et al. 2019) and India (Jagannathan 2019)). To get a feel for the science presented in the Issue (from the very many interesting contributions), I recommend the following review articles on the topics of functional amyloids (Shanmugam et al. 2019); cellular sensing of compression (Chen et al. 2019); mechanical control of disulfide bond formation (Passam and Chiu 2019); and the performance of efficient molecular dynamic simulations using multi-baric and multi-thermal sampling procedures (Yamauchi et al. 2019).

Issue 4—Structural Biology in South Africa:

Issue 4 was based on presentations made at an IUPAB sponsored meeting on Structural Biology held in Cape Town, South Africa. The lone Special Issue Editor, Prof. Trevor Sewell, performed a remarkable job, both in organizing the Meeting and in assembling the nineteen contributions to the Issue (Sewell 2019; Hall 2019a). One of the standout features of this Issue was the well-argued Letter contributed by Connell and coworkers making the case for investment in an African Synchrotron (Connell et al. 2019). As described within that Letter, such a proposal could potentially produce positive developments in ways not just relating to scientific research, by helping to build infrastructure capable of supporting industrial and societal improvements for all within the continent. These opening remarks were complemented by series of excellent Commentaries describing areas of structural biology as diverse as protein production (Owens and Gileadi, 2019), x-ray crystallography (Garman 2019), cryo-electron microscopy (Bhella 2019) and soft x-ray tomography (Pereiro 2019). These Commentaries were followed by an array of equally high-quality review articles as evidenced from the few following examples describing; synchrotron x-ray radiation (Iwamoto 2019); structural studies of protein-protein interaction modulating factors (Mabonga and Kappo, 2019); angiotensin drug discovery (Lubbe and Sturrock 2019); structural analysis of virus capsids (Conley and Bhella 2019); heat shock protein structure and function (Chakafana et al. 2019); small wavelength cellular tomography (Groen et al. 2019); structural analysis based on combined usage of electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR)/nuclear magnetic resonance techniques (Kachooei et al. 2019) and mesoscopic structural analysis and inference based on fluorescence and optical microscopies (Mueller et al. 2019; Nishizaka et al. 2019).

Issue 5—Mechanobiology in Italy:

The penultimate Issue for the year was a Special Issue based on the Nanoengineering for Mechanobiology (N4M) conference held in Genoa, Italy. The four Special Issue Editors, Prof. Boris Martinac, Prof. Aldo Ferrari, Associate Prof. Marco Capitanio and Associate Prof. Massimo Vasalli were also responsible for organizing the Meeting. As described in the Editorials (Ferrari et al. 2019; Hall 2019e) the Issue discussed how mechanical environments can determine the function of cells and tissues, alongside presenting a range of suitable techniques for the measurement of such mechanical effects and responses. Features of the Issue included a number of interesting Commentaries written by senior (Guck 2019; Verheyen et al. 2019) and junior investigators (Steward Jr. 2019) as well as Presidents of relevant Societies (Pérez 2019). The 13 contributed Letters and Reviews address fundamental basic science questions such as the reasons for heterogeneity in cell populations (Vishwakarma and Di Russo 2019) and mechanotransduction principles in neurons and other cell types (Chighizola et al. 2019; Ridone et al. 2019). The review articles also present latest technological developments relating to high speed atomic force microscopy (Valotteau et al. 2019) and optical trapping and microscopy techniques (Boeri et al. 2019; Arbore et al. 2019) along with relevant nanofabrication approaches (De Masi et al. 2019).

Establishment of a social media promotion:

The year of 2019 saw Biophysical Reviews take the leap into the social media world of Twitter™ and YouTube™. With an eye towards keeping things relatively friendly and free of controversy the Biophysical Reviews media accounts are follower only (for Twitter™) and comment disabled (for YouTube™). These post-publication promotional tools have proved quite popular with authors, their institutions and third party agencies such as local news publications and television channels. Based around the Springer SharedIt™ online posting tool (Hall, 2017) the Biophysical Reviews social media arm has allowed complex scientific principles to be discussed around the world in 280 characters or less and the latest issue content abstracts enjoyed with a varying musical accompaniment. While some may question whether these are positive (or necessary) developments the wheels of progress continue to roll on. The Biophysical Reviews’ social media channels can be found at the following links and we encourage readers of the journal to follow/subscribe to these accounts to receive relevant Issue updates.

Twitter: @BiophysicalRev1.

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCzG_5MWmnrB2UBibtxs2DuA

New Chief Editor for Biophysical Reviews:

After having performed the role with distinction for five years, at the beginning of the 2019 the longtime Chief Editor of Biophysical Reviews Prof. Cristobal dos Remedios signaled his intention to stand down (dos Remedios 2019). I was asked by IUPAB President to take over in January of 2019 and Cris and I together effected a relatively smooth changeover under the pressures of closing Issue deadlines. With genuine pleasure, my first official duty as the new Chief Editor at the Biophysical Reviews annual February board meeting was to nominate Cristobal dos Remedios to the position of Chief Editor Emeritus. The vote was carried unanimously whereupon Cris joined with the Founding Chief Editor Jean Garnier in this role. This was later followed up with a note thanking Cris for his efforts in advancing the cause of Biophysical Reviews (Hall 2019c).

New Editorial Board Members:

This year has seen some changes to the Editorial Board due to retirements and new additions. The journal depends heavily on the good will of its Editorial Board Members and as such I would like to thank those who have served the journal in the past and who presently continue to act in service of the journal (Table 1) for their time and effort in both inviting appropriate authors to contribute review articles as well as their efforts in acting as expert reviewers of submitted manuscripts for the journal. In particular I would like to welcome three new Executive Editors, Prof. Kuniaki Nagayama (Japan), Prof. Rosangela Itri (Brazil) and Assoc. Prof. Joshua Ho (China) who have joined with Prof. Wilma Olson (USA) and Prof. Naranamangalam Jagannathan (India) to make up the senior advisory Executive. I would also welcome some very recent additions to the Editorial Board from Scotland (Prof. Massimo Vassalli) and South Africa (Prof. Addmore Shonhai).
Table 1

2019 Biophysical Reviews Editorial Board

Chief Editor

Damien Hall

NIDDK National Institutes of Health (USA)/IPR Osaka University (Japan)

Emeritus Chief Editors

  Cristobal dos Remedios

Department of Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.

  Jean Garnier

International Science Council, France

Executive Editors

  J.W.K. Ho

Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, China

  R. Itri

Institute of Physics, University of Sao Paolo, Sao Paolo, Brazil

  N. R. Jagannathan

Department of NMR & MRI, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, India

  K. Nagayama

National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Okazaki, Japan

  W. Olson

Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rutgers University, USA

SI Editors 2019

  E. Giannoulatou

  J.W.K. Ho

Issue 1—Big Data

  Kyeong Kyu Kim

  Kuniaki Nagayama

  Hiroyuki Noji

  Ray Norton

  Till Böcking

  Andrew Battle,

Issue 3—Asian Biophysical Association/Australian Society for Biophysics Meeting

  B.T. Sewell

Issue 4—Structural Biology at Synchrotrons - South African Workshop

  Boris Martinac

  Massimo Vassalli

  Marco Capitanio

  Aldo Ferrari

Issue 5—Nanoengineering for Mechanobiology

Editorial Board Members

  T.W. Allen

Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Victoria Australia

  J. Baenziger

University of Ottawa, Canada

  E. Baulieu

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

  A. Benedetto

University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

  P. Ciancaglini

Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirao Preto – SP, Brazil

  D. Crossman

University of Auckland, New Zealand

  P.J. Cozzone

Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France

  E.M. De La Cruz

Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

  D. Devaurs

INRIA, Grenoble, France

  E.J. Dufourc

University of Bordeaux, France

  E. Ehler

University of London King’s College, London, England

  L. Finzi

Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

  J. C. Gómez-Fernández

University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain

  S.J. Harding

University of Nottingham, England

  J. Higo

University of Hyogo, Japan

  P. Karthe

CAS in Crystallography and Biophysics, University of Madras, India

  A.R. Kinjo

Department of Mathematics, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Brunei

  J. Kozelka

University Paris Diderot, France & Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

  T. Kraft

Hannover Medical School, Germany

  A. Li

Latrobe University, Melbourne, Australia

  B. Maggio

Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina

  B. Martinac

Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Australia

  J.W. McNamara

University of Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

  M.M. Morales

Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

  H. Nakamura

Institute of Protein Research, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

  H. Noji

The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

  R.D. Peluffo

University of the Republic, Uruguay

  P. Pohl

University Linz, Linz, Austria

  M. Prietto

University of Lisbon, Portugal

  K. Radotic

University of Belgrade, Serbia

  C.M. Rao

Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, India

  Z. Rao

Tsinghua University, China

  C. Royer

Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA

  F. Separovic

University of Melbourne, Australia

  B. T. Sewell

University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

  K. Shearwin

Molecular and Biomedical Science, University of Adelaide, Australia

  A. Shonhai

University of Venga, South Africa

  C.M. Soares

Universidade Nove de Lisboa, Oeiras, Portugal

  D. Szczesna-Cordary

University of Miami, FL, USA

  J. Tame

Yokohama City University, Japan

  S. del Valle Alonso

Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Argentina

  J. van der Velden

VU University Medical Center, The Netherlands

  M. Vassalli

University of Glasgow, Scotland

  M. Williams

Massey University, New Zealand

  G.J.L. Wuite

VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands

  K. Yasuda

Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan

  G. Zucchelli

Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy

Michele Auger Award:

Finally I would like to note the permanent memorial organized for Prof. Michéle Auger—a well-liked and diligent Member of the Biophysical Reviews Editorial Board who sadly passed away in late 2018. As a mark of our respect for Michèle, the Biophysical Reviews’ Board announced a perpetual award in honor of her life and service. The, “Michèle Auger Award for Young Scientists’ Independent Research” will be granted each year to a single candidate performing biophysical research who, at the time of application, is under 40 years of age. The award consists of a plaque and a free personal subscription to the journal along with an invitation to submit a single author Review article to Biophysical Reviews. The winner’s published Review will carry a short foreword about the life of Professor Michèle Auger, along with her work associated with teaching and training the next generation of biophysical scientists. A call for nominations in the form of a candidate’s one page curriculum vitae, along with five original manuscripts, were requested to be submitted prior to 2019, October 31 (Hall 2019a). Judging is currently being carried out by a special committee assembled from the Biophysical Reviews Editorial Board and selected external experts. Results will be announced in late December, with the winner’s single author Review to be published in 2020.

Concluding remarks

A genuinely fun aspect of being Chief Editor of Biophysical Reviews is that this duty requires careful reading of a lot of good review articles that cover a diverse range of topics. In this, “Year in Biophysical Reviews,” summary I have described a relatively small fraction of the total articles published in the journal this year. The articles I have selected were both memorable and interesting however there were many more of similar quality and interest, that due to reasons of continuity and flow, I could not include in such a summary report. I hope that this ‘highlight reel’ might encourage the reader to re-visit some of the Issues published in Biophysical Reviews during 2019 for a second look. I also hope that this summary might encourage the Review-curious scientist to think about submitting their own Review for consideration. As always, prospective topics should be discussed with the Chief Editor or a Member of the Editorial Board prior to submission to determine relevance and establish realistic submission timetables. However with this point noted, the Biophysical Reviews Editorial Board, in alignment with the aims of IUPAB, is genuinely interested in helping to facilitate the publication of topical and excellent Reviews by scientists from all over the world. As 2019 draws to a close, it is in this spirit that, on behalf of the journal, I would like to wish all readers, authors, reviewers of manuscripts and journal editorial and production staff the very best for the holidays and peace and good health for the coming 2020.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr. Meran Lloyd-Owen for comments on an early draft of the current manuscript. I would like to acknowledge the Institute for Protein Research at Osaka University for continuing remarkable support. I gratefully acknowledge the US Government for funds provided in the form of an ORISE Established Scientist Position carried out at the NIDDK. This research was supported in part by an appointment to the National Library of Medicine (NLM) Research Participation Program. This program is administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education through an interagency agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Library of Medicine (NLM). ORISE is managed by ORAU under DOE contract number DE-SC0014664. All opinions expressed in this paper are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the policies and views of NLM, DOE, or ORAU/ORISE.

References

  1. Arbore C, Perego L, Sergides M, Capitanio M (2019) Probing force in living cells with optical tweezers: from single-molecule mechanics to cell mechanotransduction. Biophys Rev 11(5):765–782PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Balach MM, Casale CH, Campetelli AN (2019) Erythrocyte plasma membrane potential: past and current methods for its measurement. Biophys Rev 11(6):Current IssueGoogle Scholar
  3. Basak S, Sengupta S, Chattopadhyay K (2019) Understanding biochemical processes in the presence of sub-diffusive behavior of biomolecules in solution and living cells. Biophys Rev 11(6):Current IssueGoogle Scholar
  4. Battle AR, Norton RS, Böcking T, Noji H, Kim KK, Nagayama K (2019) Editorial: Special issue of Biophysical Reviews dedicated to the joint 10th Asian Biophysics Association Symposium and 42nd Australian Society for Biophysics Meeting, Melbourne, Australia, December 2–6, 2018. Biophys Rev 11(3):245–247PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhella D (2019) Cryo-electron microscopy: an introduction to the technique, and considerations when working to establish a national facility. Biophys Rev 11(4):515–519PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Boeri L, Albani D, Raimondi MT, Jacchetti E (2019) Mechanical regulation of nucleocytoplasmic translocation in mesenchymal stem cells: characterization and methods for investigation. Biophys Rev 11(5):817–831PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown ZP, Takagi J (2019) Advances in domain and subunit localization technology for electron microscopy. Biophys Rev 11(2):149–155PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Caduff A, Ishai PB, Feldman Y (2019) Continuous noninvasive glucose monitoring; water as a relevant marker of glucose uptake in vivo. Biophys Rev 11(6):Current IssueGoogle Scholar
  9. Chakafana G, Zininga T, Shonhai A (2019) Comparative structure-function features of Hsp70s of plasmodium falciparum and human origins. Biophys Rev 11(3):591–602PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen Y, Li Z, Ju LA (2019) Tensile and compressive force regulation on cell mechano-sensing. Biophys Rev 11(3):311–318PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chighizola M, Dini T, Lenardi C, Milani P, Podestà A, Schulte C (2019) Mechanotransduction in neuronal cell development and functioning. Biophys Rev 11(5):701–720PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Conley MJ, Bhella D (2019) Asymmetric analysis reveals novel virus capsid features. Biophys Rev 11(4):603–609PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Connell SH, Mtingwa SK, Dobbins T, Khumbah N, Masara B, Mitchell EP, Norris L, Ngabonziza P, Ntsoane T, Winick H (2019) Towards an African light source. Biophys Rev 11(4):499–507PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. da Silva JG, de Morais RM, da Silva ICR, de Arruda Mancera PF (2019) Mathematical models applied to thyroid cancer. Biophys Rev 11(2):183–189PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. De Masi A, Tonazzini I, Masciullo C, Mezzena R, Chiellini F, Puppi D, Cecchini M (2019) Chitosan films for regenerative medicine: fabrication methods and mechanical characterization of nanostructured chitosan films. Biophys Rev 11(5):807–815PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. dos Remedios CG (2019) Letter from the Editor. Biophys Rev 11(2):127–128PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferrari A, Capitanio M, Vassalli M, Martinac B (2019) Science by the sea: how nanoengineering met mechanobiology in Camogli. Biophys Rev 11(5):659–661PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Garman EF (2019) Summary of lecture at biophysics and structural biology at synchrotrons workshop crystallography 101: diffraction theory and space groups. Biophys Rev 11(4):525–528PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gómez-Fernández JC (2019) Plan S for publishing science in an Open Access way. Not everyone is likely to be happy. Biophysical Reviews 11(6):Current IssueGoogle Scholar
  20. Groen J, Conesa JJ, Valcárcel R, Pereiro E (2019) The cellular landscape by cryo soft X-ray tomography. Biophys Rev 11(4):611–619PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Guck J (2019) Some thoughts on the future of cell mechanics. Biophys Rev 11(5):667–670PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall D (2017) Innovations in publication: free sharing of all biophysical reviews’ content. Biophys Rev 9(2):67–68PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall D (2019a) 2019 – a year in biophysical reviews. Biophys Rev 11(6):Current IssueGoogle Scholar
  24. Hall D (2019b) Biophysical Reviews: promoting the African synchrotron facility, partnering with national biophysical societies, highlighting advances in structural biology. Biophys Rev 11(4):495–497PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Hall D (2019c) A note of appreciation for Prof. Cristobal dos Remedios on behalf of Biophysical Reviews. Biophys Rev 11(2):129–130PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Hall D (2019d) Biophysical Reviews enters the online world, provides a focus on biophysics in Asia. Biophys Rev 11(3):249–250PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall D (2019e) The benefits of writing a Review. Biophys Rev 11(5):663–666PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Hatters D, Noji H (2019) The Asian Biophysics Association—supporting biophysics in the greater Asia region. Biophys Rev 11(3):251–252PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Hill AP (2019) Introduction to the Australian Society for Biophysics. Biophys Rev 11(3):253–254PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Hirota N, Edskes H, Hall D (2019) Unified theoretical description of the kinetics of protein aggregation. Biophys Rev 11(2):191–208PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Ho JWK, Giannoulatou E (2019) Big data: the elements of good questions, open data, and powerful software. Biophys Rev 11(1):1–3PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Iwamoto H (2019) Synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction studies on muscle: past, present, and future. Biophys Rev 11(4):547–558PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Jagannathan NR (2019) Indian Biophysical Society. Biophys Rev 11(3):269–270PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Jokar S, Khazaei S, Behnammanesh H, Shamloo A, Beiki D, Bavi O (2019) Advances in the design and applications of amyloid β-peptide aggregation inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease therapy. Biophys Rev 11(6):Current IssueGoogle Scholar
  35. Kachooei E, Cordina NM, Brown LJ (2019) Constructing a structural model of troponin using site-directed spin labeling: EPR and PRE-NMR. Biophys Rev 11(4):621–639PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Kandori H, Harada Y, Noji H (2019) Introduction to the Biophysical Society of Japan (BSJ). Biophys Rev 11(3):265–266PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Kanellis VG (2019a) A review of melanin sensor devices. Biophys Rev 11(6):Current IssueGoogle Scholar
  38. Kanellis VG (2019b) Ultraviolet radiation sensors: a review. Biophys Rev 11(6):Current IssueGoogle Scholar
  39. Li A (2019) Trials and tribulations of an early career academic pathway after returning to Australia: reflections from an early career investigator. Biophys Rev 11(2):131–134PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Lim HH, Kim KK, Park CS (2019) Introduction to the Korean Biophysical Society (KBPS). Biophys Rev 11(3):267–268PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Lubbe L, Sturrock ED (2019) Interacting cogs in the machinery of the renin angiotensin system. Biophys Rev 11(3):583–589PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Lyu PC (2019) Introduction to the Taiwan Biophysical Society. Biophys Rev 11(3):259–261Google Scholar
  43. Mabonga L, Kappo AP (2019) Protein-protein interaction modulators: advances, successes and remaining challenges. Biophys Rev 11(4):559–581PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Mar JC (2019) The rise of the distributions: why non-normality is important for understanding the transcriptome and beyond. Biophys Rev 11(1):89–94PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Mehreen A, Aittokallio T (2019) Machine learning and feature selection for drug response prediction in precision oncology applications. Biophys Rev 11(1):31–39Google Scholar
  46. Mueller SH, Spenkelink LM, van Oijen AM (2019) When proteins play tag: the dynamic nature of the replisome. Biophys Rev 11(4):641–651PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Naito A, Makino Y, Shigeta A, Kawamura I (2019) Photoreaction pathways and photointermediates of retinal-binding photoreceptor proteins as revealed by in situ photoirradiation solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Biophys Rev 11(2):167–181PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Nishizaka T, Masaike T, Nakane D (2019) Insights into the mechanism of ATP-driven rotary motors from direct torque measurement. Biophys Rev 11(4):653–657PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Nitsche C (2019) Proteases from dengue, West Nile and Zika viruses as drug targets. Biophys Rev 11(2):157–165PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Nussinov R, Jang H, Tsai CJ, Cheng F (2019) Precision medicine review: rare driver mutations and their biophysical classification. Biophys Rev 11(1):5–19PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Owens RJ, Gileadi O (2019) Streamlining the production of proteins for structural biology. Biophys Rev 11(4):533–534PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Pal K, Forcato M, Ferrari F (2019) Hi-C analysis: from data generation to integration. Biophys Rev 11(1):67–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Park CK and Horton NC (2019) Structures, functions, and mechanisms of filament forming enzymes: a renaissance of enzyme filamentation. Biophys Rev 11(6):Current IssueGoogle Scholar
  54. Passam FJ, Chiu J (2019) Allosteric disulphide bonds as reversible mechano-sensitive switches that control protein functions in the vasculature. Biophys Rev 11(3):419–430PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Pérez MA (2019) Introduction to the European Society of Biomechanics. Biophys Rev 11(5):671–672PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Pereiro E (2019) Correlative cryo-soft X-ray tomography of cells. Biophys Rev 11(4):529–530PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Ridone P, Vassalli M, Martinac B (2019) Piezo1 mechanosensitive channels: what are they and why are they important. Biophys Rev 11(5):795–805PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Seraphim TV, Chakafana G, Shonhai A and Houry WA (2019) Plasmodium falciparum R2TP complex: driver of parasite Hsp90 function. Biophys Rev 11(6):Current IssueGoogle Scholar
  59. Sewell BT (2019) The workshop on “Biophysics and Structural Biology at Synchrotrons” presented at the University of Cape Town from 16–24 January 2019. Biophys Rev 11(4):491–493PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Shanmugam N, Baker MODG, Ball SR, Steain M, Pham CLL, Sunde M (2019) Microbial functional amyloids serve diverse purposes for structure, adhesion and defence. Biophys Rev 11(3):287–302PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Steward RL Jr (2019) Advice for starting a mechanobiology lab. Biophys Rev 11(5):673–674PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Valotteau C, Sumbul F, Rico F (2019) High-speed force spectroscopy: microsecond force measurements using ultrashort cantilevers. Biophys Rev 11(5):689–699PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Verheyen J, Kohl P, Peyronnet R (2019) The Institute for Experimental Cardiovascular Medicine in Freiburg. Biophys Rev 11(5):675–677PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Vishwakarma M, Di Russo J (2019) Why does epithelia display heterogeneity? Bridging physical and biological concepts. Biophys Rev 11(5):683–687PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Xu T (2019) The Biophysical Society of China strengthens international academic exchanges and collaborations. Biophys Rev 11(3):255–258PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Yamauchi M, Mori Y, Okumura H (2019) Molecular simulations by generalized-ensemble algorithms in isothermal–isobaric ensemble. Biophys Rev 11(3):457–469PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Yau C, Campbell K (2019) Bayesian statistical learning for big data biology. Biophys Rev 11(1):95–102PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Yeo JH, Lam YW, and Fraser ST (2019) Cellular dynamics of mammalian red blood cell production in the erythroblastic island niche. Biophysical reviews 11(6) current issueGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhu G (2019) Biophysical Reviews, The Biophysical Society of Hong Kong (BPHK): past, present, and future. Biophys Rev 11(3):259–261PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Biochemistry and Genetics, NIDDK, NIHBethesdaUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Protein ResearchOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations