Advertisement

Biophysical Reviews

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 235–239 | Cite as

Chara braunii genome: a new resource for plant electrophysiology

  • M. J. BeilbyEmail author
Review

Abstract

The large-celled green alga Chara provided early electrophysiological data, but this model organism lost popularity once the smaller cells of higher plants became accessible to electrophysiology and genetic manipulation. However, with the sequencing of the Chara braunii genome (Nishiyama et al. Cell 174: 448–464, 2018), the molecular identity of the underlaying ion transporters in Characeae can be found and placed in evolutionary context. As Characeae are close to ancestors of land plants, the wealth of electrophysiological data will provide insights into important aspects of plant physiology, such as salt tolerance and sensitivity, carbon concentrating mechanisms, pH banding and the action potential generation.

Keywords

Chara genome Electrophysiology Salt tolerance OH channel pH banding Action potential mechanism Hypotonic regulation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

M. J. Beilby declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

References

  1. Absolonova M, Beilby MJ, Sommer A, Hoepflinger MC, Foissner I (2018) Surface pH changes suggest a role for H+/OH channels in salinity response of Chara australis. Protoplasma 255:851–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Khazaaly S, Walker NA, Beilby MJ, Shepherd VA (2009) Membrane potential fluctuations in Chara australis: a characteristic signature of high external sodium. Eur Biophys J 39:167–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aquino RS, Grativol C, Mourão PAS (2011) Rising from the sea: correlations between sulfated polysaccharides and salinity in plants. PLoS One 6:e18862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beilby MJ (2007) Action potential in charophytes. in International review of cytology, Vol. 257, ed. K.W. Jeon (San Diego, CA: Elsevier Inc.), pp 43–82Google Scholar
  5. Beilby MJ (2015) Salt tolerance at single cell level in giant-celled Characeae. Front Plant Sci. Salinity tolerance in plants: mechanisms and regulation of ion transport, 6: 226  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00226
  6. Beilby MJ, Al Khazaaly S (2009) The role of H+/OH channels in salt stress response of Chara australis. J Membr Biol 230:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beilby MJ, Al Khazaaly S (2016) Re-modeling Chara action potential: I. From Thiel model of Ca2+ transient to action potential form. Special issue: biophysics of ion transport in plants. AIMS Biophysics 3(3):431–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beilby MJ, Al Khazaaly S (2017) Re-modeling Chara action potential: II. The action potential form under salinity stress. Special issue: biophysics of ion transport in plants. AIMS Biophys 4(2):298–315Google Scholar
  9. Beilby MJ, Bisson MA (2012) pH banding in charophyte algae. Plant electrophysiology methods and cell electrophysiology. ed. A. G. Volkov. Berlin Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag: 247–271Google Scholar
  10. Beilby MJ, Casanova MT (2014) The physiology of characean cells. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  11. Beilby MJ, Shepherd VA (1996) Turgor regulation in Lamprothamnium papulosum.1. I/V analysis and pharmacological dissection of the hypotonic effect. Plant Cell Environ 19:837–847Google Scholar
  12. Beilby MJ, Cherry CA, Shepherd VA (1999) Dual regulation response to hypertonic stress in Lamprothaminum papulosum. Plant Cell Environ 22:347–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beilby MJ, Shepherd VA, Absolonova M (2018) The role of H+/OH channels in saline pathology of Chara australis: brief history. Bot Lett 165:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bisson MA, Bartholomew D (1984) Osmoregulation or turgor regulation in Chara? Plant Physiol 74:252–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bisson MA, Kirst GO (1980) Lamprothamnium, a euryhaline charophyte. I Osmotic relations and membrane potential at steady state. J Exp Bot 31:1223–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blinks LR, Harris ES, Osterhout WJ (1929) Studies on stimulation in Nitella. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 26:836–838Google Scholar
  17. Brunet T, Arendt D (2016) From damage response to action potentials: early evolution of neural and contractile modules in stem eukaryotes. Phil Trans Roy Soc B 371:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burne RV, Bauld J, de Dekker P (1980) Saline lake charophytes and their geological significance. J Sediment Petrol 50:281–294Google Scholar
  19. Casanova MT (2013) Lamprothamnium in Australia (Characeae, Charophyceaea). Austr Syst Bot 26:268–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Corti B (1774) Osservazioni microschopische sulla tremella e sulla circolazione del fluido in una pianta aquajuola. Lucca, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  21. Feijo J, Sainhas J, Hackett GR, Kunkel JG, Hepler PK (1999) Growing pollen tubes possess a constitutive alkaline band in the clear zone and a growth-dependent acidic tip. J Cell Biol 144:483–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Findlay GP, Hope AB (1964) Ionic relations of cells of Chara australis: VII. The separate electrical characteristics of the plasmalemma and tonoplast. Austr J Biol Sci 17:62–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gutknecht J, Hastings DF, Bisson MA (1978) Ion transport and turgor pressure regulation in giant algal cells. In Membrane transport in biology, Vol. III, Transport Across Multimembrane Systems, eds G.Giebisch, D.Tosteson and G. Ussing (Berlin: Springer), 125–174Google Scholar
  24. Hirono C, Mitsui T (1981) The course of activation in plasmalemma of Nitella axiliformis. In: Matsumoto AG, Kotani M (eds) Nerve membrane. University of Tokyo, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoffmann R, Bisson MA (1986) Chara buckellii, a euryhaline charophyte from an unusual saline environment. I. Osmotic relations at steady state. Can J Bot 64:1599–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hope AB, Walker NA (1975) The physiology of giant algal cells. Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Initiative TAG (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jost L (1927) Elektrische potential differenzen an der einzelzelle. Sitzungsher, Heidelberger Akad. D. Wiss. (Math.-naturwiss). Kl. Jahrg.,13 AbhGoogle Scholar
  29. Lara MV, Casati P, Andreo CS (2002) CO2-concentrating mechanisms in Egeria densa, a submersed aquatic plant. Physiol Plant 115:487–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCourt RM, Delwiche CF, Karol KG (2004) Charophyte algae and land plant origins. Trends Ecol Evol 19:661–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Michard E, Dias P, Feijo JA (2008) Tobacco pollen tubes as cellular models for ion dynamics: improved spatial and temporal resolution of extracellular flux and free cytosolic concentration of calcium and protons using pHluorin and YC3.1 CaMeleon. Sex Plant Reprod 21:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Myers EJ, Marshall A, Jennings ML, Parker MD (2016) Mouse Slc4a11 expressed in Xenopus oocytes is an ideally selective H+/OH conductance pathway that is stimulated by rises in intracellular and extracellular pH. Am J Phys Cell Phys 311:C945–C959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nishiyama T et al (2018) The Chara genome: secondary complexity and implications for plant terrestrialization. Cell 174:448–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Okazaki Y, Shimmen T, Tazawa M (1984) Turgor regulation in a brackish Charophyte, Lamprothamnium succinctum. II. Changes in K+, Na+ and Cl- concentrations, membrane potential and membrane resistance during turgor regulation. Plant Cell Physiol 25:573–581Google Scholar
  35. Osterhout WJ, Harris ES (1928) Protoplasmic asymmetry in Nitella as shown by bioelectric measurements. J Gen Physiol 11:791–406Google Scholar
  36. Osterhout WJ, Damon VE, Jacques AG (1927) Dissimilarity of inner and outer protoplasmic surfaces in Valonia. J Gen Physiol 11:193–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Othmer HG (1997) Signal transduction and second messenger systems. In: Case studies in mathematical modeling—ecology, physiology and cell biology. Englewood cliffs: Prentice Hall, 123–186Google Scholar
  38. Pertl-Obermeyer H, Lackner P, Schulze WX, Hoepflinger MC, Hoeftberger M, Foissner I, Obermeyer G (2018) Dissecting the subcellular membrane proteome reveals enrichment of H+ (co-) transporters and vesicle trafficking proteins in acidic zones of Chara internodal cells. PLoS One 13(8):e0201480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Prins HBA, Snel JFH, Helder RJ, Zanstra PE (1980) Photosynthetic HCO3 utilization and OH excretion in aquatic angiosperms. Plant Physiol 66:818–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raven JA (1991) Terrestrial rhizophytes and H+ currents circulating over at least a millimetre: an obligate relationship. New Phytol 117:177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raven JA (2000) Land plant biochemistry. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 355:833–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sakmann B, Neher E (1984) Patch clamp techniques for studying ionic channels in excitable membranes. Annu Rev Physiol 46:455–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sanders D (1981) Physiological control of chloride transport in Chara corallina.I. Effects of low temperature, cell turgor pressure, and anions. Plant Physiol 67:1113–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shepherd VA, Beilby MJ (1999) The effect of an extracellular mucilage on the response to osmotic shock in the charophyte alga Lamprothamnium papulosum. J Membr Biol 170:229–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shepherd VA, Beilby MJ, Al Khazaaly S, Shimmen T (2008) Mechanoperception in Chara cells: the influence of salinity and calcium on touch activated receptor potentials, action potentials and ion transport. Plant Cell Environ 31:1575–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shimmen T, Tazawa M (1982) Effects of intracellular vanadate on electrogenesis, excitability and cytoplasmic streaming in Nitellopsis obtusa. Plant Cell Physiol 23:669–677Google Scholar
  47. Spear DG, Barr JK, Barr CE (1969) Localization of hydrogen ion and chloride ion fluxes in Nitella. J Genl Physiol 54:397–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sukhov V, Vodeneev V (2009) A mathematical model of action potential in cells of vascular plants. J Membr Biol 232:59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sukhov V, Nerush V, Orlova L, Vodeneev V (2011) Simulation of action potential propagation in plants. J Theor Biol 291:47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tazawa M (1964) Studies on Nitella having artificial cell sap. I. Replacement of the cell sap with artificial solutions. Plant Cell Physiol 5:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tazawa M, Kikuyama M, Okazaki Y (1976) Electric characteristics and cytoplasmic streaming of Characeae cells lacking tonoplast. Cell Struct Funct 1:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tyerman SD, Beilby MJ, Whittington J, Juswono U, Newman I, Shabala S (2001) Oscillations in proton transport revealed from simultaneous measurements of net current and net proton fluxes from isolated root protoplasts: MIFE meets patch-clamp. Austr J Plant Physiol 28:591–604Google Scholar
  53. Wacke M, Thiel G, Hutt MT (2003) Ca2+ dynamics during membrane excitation of green alga Chara: model simulations and experimental data. J Membr Biol 191:179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Walker NA (1955) Microelectrode experiments on Nitella. Austr J Biol Sci 8:476–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Williams WD (1998) Salinity as a determinant of the structure of biological communities in salt lakes. Hydrobiology 381:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Williamson RE (1975) Cytoplasmic streaming in Chara: a cell model activated by ATP and inhibited by cytochalasin B. J Cell Sci 17:655–668Google Scholar
  57. Winter U, Soulie-Marsche I, Kirst GO (1996) Effects of salinity on turgor pressure and fertility in Tolypella (Characeae). Plant Cell Environ 19:869–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for Pure and Applied Biophysics (IUPAB) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PhysicsUniversity of NSWKensingtonAustralia

Personalised recommendations