Advertisement

Biophysical Reviews

, Volume 9, Issue 6, pp 931–940 | Cite as

Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for intracellular delivery

  • Lemmuel L. TayoEmail author
Review

Abstract

The emergence of different nanoparticles (NPs) has made a significant revolution in the field of medicine. Different NPs in the form of metallic NPs, dendrimers, polymeric NPs, carbon quantum dots and liposomes have been functionalized and used as platforms for intracellular delivery of biomolecules, drugs, imaging agents and nucleic acids. These NPs are designed to improve the pharmacokinetic properties of the drug, improve their bioavailability and successfully surpass physiological or pathological obstacles in the biological system so that therapeutic efficacy is achieved. In this review I present some of the current approaches used in intracellular delivery systems, with a focus on various stimuli-responsive nanocarriers, including cell-penetrating peptides, to highlight their various biomedical applications.

Keywords

Nanocarrier Drug delivery Stimuli-responsive Intelligent materials Nanomedicine 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to congratulate Prof. Fumio Arisaka for his long scientific career and significant contribution to the field of life sciences. I wish him a blissful 70th birthday and more fruitful years to come. I also acknowledge the organizers of this special edition of Biophysical Reviews.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Lemmuel L. Tayo declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the author.

References

  1. Allen TM (2002) Ligand-targeted therapeutics in anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 2:750–763PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Babin J, Pelletier M, Lepage M, Allard J-F, Morris D, Zhao Y (2009) A new two-photon sensitive block copolymer nanocarrier. Angew Chem Int Ed 48:3329–3332Google Scholar
  3. Baghbani F, Moztarzadeh F (2017) Bypassing multidrug resistant ovarian cancer using ultrasoundresponsive doxorubicin/curcumin co-deliver alginate nanodroplets. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 153:132–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baghbani F, Chegeni M, Moztarzadeh F, Hadian-Ghazvini S, Raz M (2017a) Novel ultrasound-responsive chitosan/perfluorohexane nanodroplets for image-guided smart delivery of an anticancer agent: curcumin. Mater Sci Eng C 74:186–193Google Scholar
  5. Baghbani F, Chegeni M, Moztarzadeh F, Mohandesi JA, Mokhtari-Dizaji M (2017b) Ultrasonic nanotherapy of breast cancer using novel ultrasound-responsive alginate-shelled perfluorohexane nanodroplets: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Mater Sci Eng C 77:698–707Google Scholar
  6. Bazban-Shotorbani S, Hasani-Sadrabadi MM, Karkhaneh A, Serpooshan V, Jacob KI, Moshaverinia A, Mahmoudi M (2017) Revisiting structure-property relationship of pH-responsive polymers for drug delivery applications. J Control Release 253:46–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouchaala R, Anton N, Anton H, Vandamme T, Vermot J, Smail D, Mély Y, Klymchenko AS (2017) Light-triggered release from dye-loaded fluorescent lipid nanocarriersin vitro and in vivo. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 156:414–421PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Canton I, Battaglia G (2012) Endocytosis at the nanoscale. Chem Soc Rev 41:2718–2739PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chan DCF, Kirpotin DB, Bunn PA (1993) Synthesis and evaluation of colloidal magnetic iron-oxides for the site-specific radiofrequency induced hyperthermia of cancer. J Magn Magn Mater 122:374–378Google Scholar
  10. Chang Y, Shih YJ, Ko CY, Jhong JF, Liu YL, Wei TC (2011) Hemocompatibility of poly(vinylidene fluoride) membrane grafted with network-like and brush-like antifouling layer controlled via plasma-induced surface PEGylation. Langmuir 27:5445–5455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheng C, Wei H, Shi B-X, Cheng H, Li C, Gu Z-W, Cheng S-X, Zhang X-Z, Zhuo R-X (2008) Biotinylated thermoresponsive micelle self-assembled from double-hydrophilic block copolymer for drug delivery and tumor target. Biomaterials 29:497–505PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheng R, Feng F, Meng F, Deng C, Feijen J, Zhong Z (2011) Glutathione-responsive nanovehicles as a promising platform for targeted intracellular drug and gene delivery. J Control Release 152:2–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Chilkoti A, Dreher MR, Meyer DE, Raucher D (2002) Targeted drug delivery by thermally responsive polymers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 54:613–630PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Derfus AM, Chen AA, Min D-H, Ruoslahti E, Bhatia SN (2007) Targeted quantum dot conjugates for siRNA delivery. Bioconjug Chem 18:1391–1396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Ding C, Li Z (2017) A review of drug release mechanisms from nanocarrier systems. Mater Sci Eng C 76:1440–1453Google Scholar
  16. Doherty GJ, McMahon HT (2009) Mechanisms of endocytosis. Annu Rev Biochem 78:857–859PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dowaidara M, Abdelhamid HN, Hällbrink M, Zou X, Langel U (2017) Graphene oxide nanosheets in complex with cell penetrating peptides for oligonucleotides delivery. BBA Gen Subjects 1861:2334–2341Google Scholar
  18. Duchardt F, Fotin-Mleczek M, Schwarz H, Fischer R, Brock R (2007) A comprehensive model for the cellular uptake of cationic cell-penetrating peptides. Traffic 8:848–866PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Dumville JC, O'Meara S, Deshpande S, Speak K (2011) Hydrogel dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD009101Google Scholar
  20. Elegbede AI, Banerjee J, Hanson AJ, Tobwala S, Ganguli B, Wang R et al (2008) Mechanistic studies of the triggered release of liposomal contents by matrix metalloproteinase-9. J Am Chem Soc 130:10633–10642PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Fomina N, Sankaranarayanan J, Almutairi A (2012) Photochemical mechanisms of lighttriggered release from nanocarriers. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:1005–1020PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Frenkel V (2008) Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 60:1193–1208PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Frimpong RA, Hilt JZ (2010) Magnetic nanoparticles in biomedicine: synthesis, functionalization and applications. Nanomedicine (London) 5:1401–1414Google Scholar
  24. Gao W, Chan JM, Farokhzad OC (2010) pH-responsive nanoparticles for drug delivery. Mol Pharm 7:1913–1920PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Gao J, Liu W, Xia Y, Li W, Sun J, Chen H et al (2011) The promotion of siRNA delivery to breast cancer overexpressing epidermal growth factor receptor through anti-EGFR antibody conjugation by immunoliposomes. Biomaterials 32:3459–3470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ginn SL, Alexander IE, Edelstein ML, Abedi MR, Wixon J (2013) Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide to 2012—an update. J Gene Med 15:65–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Han G, Ghosh P, De M, Rotello VM (2007) Drug and gene delivery using gold nanoparticles. NanoBiotechnology 3:40–45Google Scholar
  28. Han L, Zhang XY, Wang YL, Li X, Yang XH, Huang M, Hu K, Li LH, Wei Y (2017) Redox-responsive theranostic nanoplatforms based on inorganic nanomaterials. J Control Release 259:40–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Immordino ML, Dosio F, Cattel L (2006) Stealth liposomes: review of the basic science, rationale, and clinical applications, existing and potential. Int J Nanomedicine 1:297–315PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Jeong JH, Kim SW, Park TG (2007) Molecular design of functional polymers for gene therapy. Prog Polym Sci 32:1239–1274Google Scholar
  31. Jewell CM, Lynn DM (2008) Surface-mediated delivery of DNA: cationic polymers take charge. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 13:395–402PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Jia L, Xu J-P, Wang H, Ji J (2011) Polyamidoamine dendrimers surface engineered with biomimetic phosphorylcholine as potential drug delivery carriers. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 84:49–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jia YP, Ma BY, Wei XW, Qian ZY (2017) The in vitro and in vivo toxicity of gold nanoparticles. Chin Chem Lett 28:691–702Google Scholar
  34. Jiang SY, Cao ZQ (2010) Ultralow-fouling, functionalizable, and hydrolyzable zwitterionic materials and their derivatives for biological applications. Adv Mater 22:920–932PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Joshi S, Cooke JRN, Chan DKW, Ellis JA, Hossain SS, Singh-Moon RP, Wang M, Bigio IJ, Bruce JN, Straubinger RM (2017) Liposome size and charge optimization for intraarterial delivery to gliomas. Drug Deliv Transl Res 3:225–233Google Scholar
  36. Kamaly N, Xiao Z, Valencia PM, Radovic-Moreno AF, Farokhzad OC (2012) Targeted polymeric therapeutic nanoparticles: design, development and clinical translation. Chem Soc Rev 41:2971–3010PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Koo H, Huh MS, Sun I-C, Yuk SH, Choi K, Kim K, Kwon IC (2011) In vivo targeted delivery of nanoparticles for theranosis. Acc Chem Res 44:1018–1028PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kooiman K, Vos HJ, Versluis M, de Jong N (2014) Acoustic behavior of microbubbles and implications for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 72C:28–48Google Scholar
  39. Kumar B, Jalodia K, Kumar P, Gautam HK (2017) Recent advances in nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol 41:260–268Google Scholar
  40. Kunath K, von Harpe A, Fischer D, Peterson H, Bickel U, Voigt K, Kissel T (2003) Low molecular-weight polyethylenimine as a non-viral vector for DNA delivery: comparison of physicochemical properties, transfection efficiency and in vivo distribution with high molecular weight polyethylenimine. J Control Release 89:113–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuppusamy P, Li H, Ilangovan G, Cardounel AJ, Zweier JL, Yamada K, Krishna MC, Mitchell JB (2002) Noninvasive imaging of tumor redox status and its modification by tissue glutathione levels. Cancer Res 62:307–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee ES, Gao Z, Kim D, Park K, Kwon IC, Bae YH (2008) Super pH-sensitive multifunctional polymeric micelle for tumor pH(e) specific TAT exposure and multidrug resistance. J Control Release 129:228–236PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Lehner R, Wang X, Marsch S, Hunziker P (2013) Intelligent nanomaterials for medicine: carrier platforms and targeting strategies in the context of clinical application. Nanomed Nanotech Biol Med 9:742–757Google Scholar
  44. Li S-D, Huang L (2008) Pharmacokinetics and biodistribution of nanoparticles. Mol Pharm 5:496–504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lin JT, Liuc ZK, Zhuc QL, Rongd XH, Liang CL, Wang J, Mae D, Sund J, Wang GH (2017) Redox-responsive nanocarriers for drug and gene co-delivery basedon chitosan derivatives modified mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 155:41–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu YC, Le Ny ALM, Schmidt J, Talmon Y, Chmelka BF, Lee CT Jr (2009) Photo-assisted gene delivery using light-responsive catanionic vesicles. Langmuir 25:5713–5724PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu M, Du H, Zhang W, Zhai G (2017) Internal stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery: design strategies and applications. Mater Sci Eng C 71:1267–1280Google Scholar
  48. Luo G, Long J, Zhang B, Liu C, Ji S, Xu J et al (2012) Quantum dots in cancer therapy. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 9:47–58PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T, Matsumura Y, Hori K (2000) Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. J Control Release 65:271–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Maeda H (2010) Tumor-Selective Delivery of Macromolecular Drugs via the EPR Effect: Background and Future Prospects Bioconjugate Chemistry Vol. 21, Issue 5, 19:797–802PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Manchun S, Dass CR, Sriamornsak P (2012) Targeted therapy for cancer using pH-responsive nanocarrier systems. Life Sci 90:381–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Marturano V, Cerruti P, Carfagna C, Giamberini M, Tylkowski B, Ambrogi V (2015) Photo-responsive polymer nanocapsules. Polymer 70:222–230Google Scholar
  53. Meng F, Hennink WE, Zhong Z (2009) Reduction-sensitive polymers and bioconjugates for biomedical applications. Biomaterials 30:2180–2198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Mesken J, Iltzsche A, Mulac D, Langer K (2017) Modifying plasmid-loaded HSA-nanoparticles with cell penetrating peptides—cellular uptake and enhanced gene delivery. Int J Pharm 522:198–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Naeye B, Raemdonck K, Remaut K, Sproat B, Demeester J, De Smedt SC (2010) PEGylation of biodegradable dextran nanogels for siRNA delivery. Eur J Pharm Sci 40:342–351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Namdari P, Negahdari B, Eatemadi A (2017) Synthesis, properties and biomedical applications of carbon-based quantum dots: an updated review. Biomed Pharmacother 87:209–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Navarro G, Tros de Ilarduya C (2009) Activated and non-activated PAMAM dendrimers for gene delivery in vitro and in vivo. Nanomedicine 5:287–297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Paleos CM, Tsiourvas D, Sideratou Z, Tziveleka L-A (2010) Drug delivery using multifunctional dendrimers and hyperbranched polymers. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 7:1387–1398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Pang X, Jiang Y, Xiao Q, Leung AW, Hua H, Xu C (2016) pH-responsive polymer–drug conjugates: design and progress. J Control Release 222:116–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Pärnaste L, Arukuusk P, Langel K, Tenson T, Langel U (2017) The formation of nanoparticles between small interfering RNA and amphipathic cell-penetrating peptides. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids 7:1–10PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Patra HK, Banerjee S, Chaudhuri U, Lahiri P, Dasgupta AK (2007) Cell selective response to gold nanoparticles. Nanomedicine 3:111–119PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Pavan GM, Posocco P, Tagliabue A, Maly M, Malek A, Danani A et al (2010) PAMAM dendrimers for siRNA delivery: computational and experimental insights. Chemistry 16:7781–7795PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rao NV, Mane S, Kishore A, Das Sarma J, Shunmugam R (2011) Norbornene derived doxorubicin copolymers as drug carriers with pH responsive hydrazone linker. Biomacromolecules 13:221–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Saravanakumar G, Kim WJ (2014) Stimuli-responsive polymeric nanocarriers as promising drug and gene delivery systems. In: Prokop A, Iwasaki Y, Harada A (eds) Intracellular delivery II. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, pp 55–91Google Scholar
  65. Schmaljohann D (2006) Thermo- and pH-responsive polymers in drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58:1655–1670PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Shih Y, Venault A, Tayo LL, Chen SH, Higuchi A, Deratani A, Chinnathambi A, Alharbi SA, Quemener D, Chang Y (2017) A Zwitterionic-shielded carrier with pH-modulated reversible self-assembly for gene transfection. Langmuir 33:1914–1926PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Shim MS, Kwon YJ (2012) Stimuli-responsive polymers and nanomaterials for gene delivery and imaging applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 64:1046–1059PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Skulason S, Holbrook WP, Thormar H, Gunnarsson GB, Kristmundsdottir T (2012) A study of the clinical activity of a gel combining monocaprin and doxycycline: a novel treatment for herpes labialis. J Oral Pathol Med 41:61–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Son S, Singha K, Kim WJ (2010) Bioreducible BPEI-SS-PEG-cNGR polymer as a tumor targeted nonviral gene carrier. Biomaterials 31:6344–6354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Son S, Namgung R, Kim J, Singha K, Kim WJ (2011) Bioreducible polymers for gene silencing and delivery. Acc Chem Res 45:1100–1112PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Sumetpipat K, Baowan D (2014) Three model shapes of doxorubicin for liposome encapsulation. J Mol Model 20:2504PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Suzuki R, Oda Y, Utoguchi N, Maruyama K (2010) Development of ultrasonic cancer therapy using ultrasound sensitive liposome. Yakugaku Zasshi 130:1665–1670PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Tamura A, Oishi M, Nagasaki Y (2010) Efficient siRNA delivery based on PEGylated and partially quaternized polyamine nanogels: enhanced gene silencing activity by the cooperative effect of tertiary and quaternary amino groups in the core. J Control Release 146:378–387PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Tashima T (2017) Intelligent substance delivery into cells using cell-penetrating peptides. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 27:121–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Tayo LL, Venault A, Constantino VGR, Caparanga AR, Chinnathambi A, Alharbi SA, Zheng J, Chang Y (2015) Design of hemocompatible poly(DMAEMA-co-PEGMA) hydrogels for controlled release of insulin. J Appl Polym Sci 132(32):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1002/APP.42365 Google Scholar
  76. Tian H, Li F, Chen J, Huang Y, Chen X (2012) N-isopropylacrylamide-modified polyethylenimines as effective gene carriers. Macromol Biosci 12:1680–1688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Tomalia DA, Baker H, Dewald J, Hall M, Kallos G, Martin S et al (1985) A new class of polymers: starburst-dendritic macromolecules. Polym J 17:117–132Google Scholar
  78. Tomatsu I, Peng K, Kros A (2011) Photoresponsive hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 63:1257–1266PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Waehler R, Russell SJ, Curiel DT (2007) Engineering targeted viral vectors for gene therapy. Nat Rev Genet 8:573–587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Wang P, Yin T, Li J, Zheng B, Wang X, Wang Y, Zheng J, Zheng R (2016) Ultrasound-responsive microbubbles for sonography-guided siRNA delivery. Nanomed Nanotech Biol Med 12:1139–1149Google Scholar
  81. Wang X-Q, Zhang Q (2012) pH-sensitive polymeric nanoparticles to improve oral bioavailability of peptide/protein drugs and poorly water-soluble drugs. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 82:219–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. Wei H, Zhuo R-X, Zhang X-Z (2013) Design and development of polymeric micelles with cleavable links for intracellular drug delivery. Prog Polym Sci 38:503–535Google Scholar
  83. Xu X, Ray R, Gu Y, Ploehn HJ, Gearheart L, Raker K, Scrivens WA. (2004). "Electrophoretic Analysis and Purification of Fluorescent Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Fragments". Journal of the American Chemical Society. 126 (40): 12736–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Yan F, Li L, Deng Z, Jin Q, Chen J, Yang W et al (2013) Paclitaxel–liposome–microbubble complexes as ultrasound-triggered therapeutic drug delivery carriers. J Control Release 166:246–255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Yokoyama M (2002) Gene delivery using temperature-responsive polymeric carriers. Drug Discov Today 7:426–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Yokoyama M (2014) Polymeric micelles as drug carriers: Their lights and shadow. Journal of Drug Targeting 22:576–583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhang W, Shi L, Wu K, An Y (2005) Thermoresponsive micellization of poly(ethylene glycol)-bpoly(N-isopropylacrylamide) in water. Macromolecules 38:5743–5747Google Scholar
  88. Zhang Z, Chao T, Chen S, Jiang S (2006) Superlow fouling sulfobetaine and carboxybetaine polymers on glass slides. Langmuir 22:10072–10077PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhao F, Zhao Y, Liu Y et al (2011) Cellular uptake, intracellular trafficking, and cytotoxicity of nanomaterials. Small 7:1322–1337PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhao Y (2007) Rational design of light-controllable polymer micelles. Chem Rec 7:286–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Zhao Y (2012) Light-responsive block copolymer micelles. Macromolecules 45:3647–3657Google Scholar
  92. Zintchenko A, Susha AS, Concia M, Feldmann J, Wagner E, Rogach AL et al (2009) Drug nanocarriers labeled with near-infrared-emitting quantum dots (quantoplexes): imaging fast dynamics of distribution in living animals. Mol Ther 17:1849–1856PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Union for Pure and Applied Biophysics (IUPAB) and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical, Biological, and Materials Engineering and SciencesMapúa UniversityIntramuros ManilaPhilippines

Personalised recommendations