Forecasting mortality rates: multivariate or univariate models?
It is well known that accurate forecasts of mortality rates are essential to various demographic research topics, such as population projections and the pricing of insurance products such as pensions and annuities. In this study, we argue that including the lagged rates of neighbouring ages cannot further improve mortality forecasting after allowing for autocorrelations. This is because the sample cross-correlation function cannot exhibit meaningful and statistically significant correlations. In other words, rates of neighbouring ages are usually not leading indicators in mortality forecasting. Therefore, multivariate stochastic mortality models like the classic Lee–Carter may not necessarily lead to more accurate forecasts, compared with sophisticated univariate models. Using Australian mortality data, simulation and empirical studies employing the Lee–Carter, Functional Data, Vector Autoregression, Autoregression-Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity and exponential smoothing (ETS) state space models are performed. Results suggest that ETS models consistently outperform the others in terms of forecasting accuracy. This conclusion holds for both female and male mortality data with different empirical features across various forecasting error measurements. Hence, ETS can be a widely useful tool to model and forecast mortality rates in actuarial practice.
KeywordsMortality rates Multivariate model Univariate model Exponential smoothing Lee–Carter model
We are grateful to the Macquarie University and Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics for their support. The authors would also like to thank Rob Hyndman, James Raymer and Hanlin Shang for their helpful comments and suggestions. We are also grateful for the valuable advice provided by the Editor (Santosh Jatrana) and two anonymous referees. The usual disclaimer applies.
- Bell, W. R. (1997). Comparing and assessing time series methods for forecasting age specific fertility and mortality rates. Journal of Official Statistics, 13, 279.Google Scholar
- Chatfield, C. (1997). Forecasting in the 1990s. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician), 46(4), 461–473.Google Scholar
- Giacometti, R., Bertocchi, M., Rachev, S. T., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2012). A comparison of the Lee–Carter model and AR-ARCH model for forecasting mortality rates. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 50(1), 85–93.Google Scholar
- Girosi, F., & King, G. (2007). Understanding the Lee-Carter mortality forecasting method 1. Technical report, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
- Human Mortality Database. (2016). University of California, Berkeley (USA), and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (Germany), http://www.mortality.org. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
- Lee, R. D., & Carter, L. R. (1992). Modeling and forecasting US mortality. Journal of the American statistical association, 87(419), 659–671.Google Scholar
- Renshaw, A. E., & Haberman, S. (2003). Lee–carter mortality forecasting with age-specific enhancement. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 33(2), 255–272.Google Scholar
- Renshaw, A. E., & Haberman, S. (2006). A cohort-based extension to the Lee–Carter model for mortality reduction factors. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 38(3), 556–570.Google Scholar
- Trefethen, L. N., & Bau, D. (1997). Numerical linear algebra (Vol. 50). Siam.Google Scholar