Advertisement

PalZ

pp 1–14 | Cite as

A new species of Burguklia (Pisces, Actinopterygii) from the Middle Permian of the Volga Region (European Russia)

  • Aleksandr BakaevEmail author
  • Ilja Kogan
Research Paper

Abstract

A new species of early actinopterygians, Burguklia minichorum sp. nov., is described based on the occurrence of numerous isolated scales from freshwater deposits of the Urzhumian and Severodvinian regional stages (Wordian–Capitanian) of the East European Platform. The type and only hitherto known species of the genus, Burguklia gdali Kazantseva-Selezneva, 1980, comes from the Early Permian of Siberia. The new discovery indicates the existence of non-marine palaeogeographic pathways between Siberia and European Russia during the Permian.

Keywords

Permian Actinopterygian scales Histology Angaraland East European Platform Russia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work forms part of the first author’s master's thesis written for the Kazan–Freiberg double master programme under the supervision of Jörg W. Schneider (TU Bergakademie Freiberg) and Vladimir V. Silantiev (Kazan Federal University). It was performed according to the Russian Government Program of Competitive Growth of Kazan Federal University. We thank V.V. Bulanov and V.K. Golubev (both PIN RAS, Moscow) and V.V. Silantiev for providing washed rock samples, from which the scales described have been extracted. J.W. Schneider is acknowledged for facilitating the provision of thin sections and SEM micrographs of the material, and Susanne Eberspächer (TU Bergakademie Freiberg) is thanked for the light microscope pictures. We are grateful to A.V. and the late M.G. Minikh (Saratov State University) for permission to study their collection of fossil actinopterygians. Constructive comments from the reviewers Kate Trinajstic and Stanislav Štamberg and from the editors Adriana López-Arbarello and Mike Reich greatly improved the manuscript; many thanks for that. IK acknowledges funding by the ESF and the State of Saxony.

References

  1. Agassiz, L. 1833-1843. Recherches sur les Poissons fossiles. Neuchâtel: Petitpierre.Google Scholar
  2. Arefiev, M.P., V.K. Golubev, Yu.P. Balabanov, E.V. Karasev, A.V. Minikh, M.G. Minikh, I.I. Molostovskaya, O.P. Yaroshenko, and M.A. Zhokina-Naumcheva. 2015. Type and reference sections of the Permian-Triassic continental sequences of the East European Platform: main isotope, magnetic, and biotic events. Moscow: PIN RAS.Google Scholar
  3. Bakaev, A.S. 2017. Changes in Middle and Late Permian ray-finned fish faunas of European Russia—causes, significance, global correlation. In Kazan Golovkinsky Stratigraphic Meeting-2017 and Fourth All-Russian Conference “Upper Palaeozoic of Russia”. Upper Palaeozoic Earth systems: high-precision biostratigraphy, geochronology and petroleum resources. Abstract volume. Kazan, September, 19–23, 2017, eds. D.K. Nurgaliev and V.V. Silantiev, 17–18. Kazan: Kazan University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blainville, H. de. 1818. Sur les ichthyolites ou les poissons fossiles. Nouveau Dictionnaire d’Histoire Naturelle, appliquée aux Arts, à l’Agriculture, à l’Économie rurale et domestique, à la Medicine, etc. Nouvelle Edition 27: 310–395.Google Scholar
  5. Bulanov, V.V. 2014. The character of changes in aquatic tetrapod communities of the East Europe in the Late Urzhumian–Early Severodvinian time. In Proceeding of Kazan Golovkinsky Stratigraphic Meeting « Carboniferous and Permian Earth systems, stratigraphic events, biotic evolution, sedimentary basins and resources » (October, 20–23 2014), ed. D.K. Nurgaliev, 25–26. Kazan: Kazan University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bulanov, V.V., A.O. Ivanov, J.V. Kuznetzova, and V.V. Silantiev. 2014. The new locality of the Late Urzhumian vertebrate fauna in Kazan Region (East European Platform, Russia). In Proceeding of Kazan Golovkinsky Stratigraphic Meeting « Carboniferous and Permian Earth systems, stratigraphic events, biotic evolution, sedimentary basins and resources » (October, 20–23 2014), ed. D.K. Nurgaliev, 27–28. Kazan: Kazan University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Burrow, C. 1994. Form and function in scales of Ligulalepis toombsi Schultze, a palaeoniscoid from the Early Devonian of Australia. Records of the South Australian Museum 27(2): 175–185.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, D.-L., P. Janvier, P.E. Ahlberg, and H. Blom. 2012. Scale morphology and squamation of the Late Silurian osteichthyan Andreolepis from Gotland, Sweden. Historical Biology 24: 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cope, E.D. 1887. Geology and palaeontology. Zittel’s Manual of Palaeontology. American Naturalist 22: 1014–1019.Google Scholar
  10. Esin, D.N. 1990. The scale cover of Amblypterina costata (Eichwald) and the paleoniscid taxonomy based on isolated scales. Paleontological Journal 1990(2): 90–98.Google Scholar
  11. Esin, D.N. 1995a. Early Kazanian Paleoniscids from the North European part and Kama river basin of Russia. Paleontological Journal 1995(2): 119–132.Google Scholar
  12. Esin, D.N. 1995b. Ontogenetic development of the squamation in some Palaeoniscoid fishes. Bulletin du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Section C 17: 227–234.Google Scholar
  13. Esin, D.N. 1995c. Late Permian Palaeoniscids of the European Part of Russia [Posdnepermskiye paleoniscidy evropejskoj chasti Rossii]. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lomonossov State University, Moscow, 250 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  14. Esin, D.N., and V.L. Mashin. 1996. Ichthyoliths [Ikhtiolity]. In Stratotypes and reference sections of the Upper Permian of Povolzhye and Prikamye [Stratotipy i oporny’e razrezy verkhnej permi Povolzh’ya i Prikam’ya], eds. N.K. Esaulova and V.R. Lozovsky, 270–293. Kazan: Ecocenter. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  15. Giebel, C.G. 1848. Fauna der Vorwelt, mit steter Berücksichtigung der lebenden Thiere. Erster Band: Wirbelthiere. Dritte Abtheilung: Fische. Leipzig: F.A. Brockhaus.Google Scholar
  16. Golubev, V.K., N.K. Esaulova, A.M. Meskhi, N.G. Nurgalieva, A.A. Galiev, A.B. Bogachkin, V.V. Silantiev, I.I. Molostovskaya, A.V. Minikh, and M.G. Minikh. 2001. Stratotype section of the Tatarian stage on the Vyatka river [Stratotipichesky razrez tatarskogo yarusa na reke Vyatke]. Moscow: Geos. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  17. Huxley, T.H. 1880. On the application of the laws of evolution to the arrangement of the Vertebrata, and more particularly of the Mammalia. Proceedings of the Scientific Meetings of the Zoological Society of London 1880: 649–662.Google Scholar
  18. Kazantseva-Selezneva, A.A. 1980. Permian Palaeonisci of central Siberia. Paleontological Journal 14: 80–87.Google Scholar
  19. Kazantseva-Selezneva, A.A. 1981. Late Palaeozoic Palaeonisci of East Kazakhstan [Pozdnepaleozoiskie paleoniski Vostochnogo Kazakhstana]. Trudy Paleontologicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR 180: 1–140. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  20. Komagata, K., A. Suzuki, and R. Kuwabara. 1993. Sexual dimorphism in the Polypterid fishes, Polypterus senegalus and Calamoichthys calabaricus. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 39: 387–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lu, L., and X. Chen. 2010. A review on the study of Carboniferous-Permian vertebrates in China. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Chinese Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, ed. Dong Wei, 1–12. Beijing: Jacean Press.Google Scholar
  22. Minikh, A.V. 1995. New actinopterygian fishes from the Tatarian stage of the Sukhona river basin and Southern Cis-Urals [Novy’e luchepiory’e ryby iz tatarskogo yarusa basseyna r. Sukhony i Yuzhnogo Priural’ya]. Saratov: Saratov University Press. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  23. Minikh, A.V. 1998. New representatives of actinopterygian fishes (Order Discordichthyida, ord. nov.) from the Upper Permian of the East European Platform [Novy’e predstaviteli luchepiorykh ryb (otryad Discordichthyida ord. nov.) iz verkhney permi Vostochno-Evropeyskoy platformy. Voprosy paleontologii I stratigrafii, New Series 1: 47–58. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  24. Minikh, A.V., and M.G. Minikh. 2009. Ichthyofauna of the Permian of European Russia [Ikhtiofauna Permi Evropeyskoy Rossii]. Saratov: Nauka Publishing Centre. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  25. Minikh, M.G., and A.V. Minikh. 1990. Revision of some palaeoniscids and new fishes from the Upper Permian of the East European Platform, and possibilities of using them stratigraphically [Revisija nekotorykh paleoniskov I novy’e ryby iz verkhnej permi Vostochno-Evropeyskoy platformy I vozmozhnosti ikh ispolzovaniya v stratigrafii]. In Problems of the geology of South Urals and Lower Volga Region [Voprosy geologii Yuzhnogo Urala I Nizhnego Povolzh’ya], ed. O.I. Aleshechkin, 84–104. Saratov: SarGU Press. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  26. Porokhovnichenko, L. 2017. Subdivision of the Bourguklin horizon of the Tunguska basin into three parts according to plant assemblages. In Kazan Golovkinsky Stratigraphic Meeting-2017 and Fourth All-Russian Conference “Upper Palaeozoic of Russia”. Upper Palaeozoic Earth systems: high-precision biostratigraphy, geochronology and petroleum resources. Abstract volume. Kazan, September, 19–23, 2017, eds. D.K. Nurgaliev and V.V. Silantiev, 163–164. Kazan: Kazan University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Qu, Q., M. Zhu, and W. Wang. 2013. Scales and dermal skeletal histology of an early bony fish Psarolepis romeri and their bearing on the evolution of rhombic scales and hard tissues. PLoS One 8(4): e61485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richter, M., and M. Smith. 1995. A microstructural study of the ganoine tissue of selected lower vertebrates. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 114: 173–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schultze, H.-P. 1966. Morphologische und histologische Untersuchungen an Schuppen mesozoischer Actinopterygier (Übergang von Ganoid- zu Rundschuppen). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 126(3): 232–314.Google Scholar
  30. Schultze, H.-P. 1968. Palaeoniscoidea-Schuppen aus dem Unterdevon Australiens und Kanadas und aus dem Mitteldevon Spitzbergens. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology 16: 342–368.Google Scholar
  31. Schultze, H.-P. 2016. Scales, enamel, cosmine, ganoine, and early osteichthyans. Comptes Rendus Palevol 15: 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Semikhatov, M.A., and N.M. Chumakov (eds.). 2004. Climate during large biospheric remodeling phases [Klimat v epokhi krupnykh biosfernykh perestroyek]. Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  33. Silantiev, V.V., M.P. Arefiev, N.G. Nurgalieva, F.A. Mouraviev, V.V. Bulanov, A.O. Ivanov, M.N. Urazaeva, R.R. Khaziev, E.I. Fakhrutdinov, and D.M. Kuzina. 2015. Cheremushka section. Parastratotype of Urzhumian stage. In Type and reference sections of the Middle and Upper Permian of the Volga and Kama River Regions. A Field Guidebook of XVIII International Congress on Carboniferous and Permian. Kazan, August, 16–20, 2015, eds. D.K. Nurgaliev, V.V. Silantiev, and S.V. Nikolaeva, 70–119. Kazan: Kazan University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Silantiev, V.V. 2015. Developmental steps of the Permian non-marine bivalve fauna of the East European Platform [Etapy razvitiya permskoy fauny nemorskikh dvustvorchatykh mollyuskov Vostochno-Yevropeyskoy platformy]. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists. Geological Series 90(6): 48–57. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  35. Silantiev, V.V. 2016. Permian non-marine bivalve molluscs of the East European Platform: stratigraphic distribution and correlation [Permskiye nemorskiye dvustvorchatyye mollyuski Vostochno-Yevropeyskoy platformy: stratigraficheskoye rasprostraneniye i korrelyatsiya]. Bulletin of Moscow Society of Naturalists. Geological Series 91(1): 48–57.Google Scholar
  36. Sire, J.-Y., P.C.J. Donoghue, and M.K. Vickaryous. 2009. Origin and evolution of the integumentary skeleton in non-tetrapod vertebrates. Journal of Anatomy 214: 409–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sire, J.-Y., J. Géraudie, F.J. Meunier, and L. Zylberberg. 1987. On the origin of ganoine: histological and ultrastructural data on the experimental regeneration of the scales of Calamoichthys calabricus (Osteichthyes, Brachiopterygii, Polypteridae). American Journal of Anatomy 180: 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Trinajstic, K. 1999. Scale morphology of the Late Devonian palaeoniscoid Moythomasia durgaringa Gardiner and Bartram, 1977. Alcheringa 23(1): 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yankevitch, D.I., and M.G. Minikh. 1998. Ichthyofauna [Ikhtiofauna]. In Biota of the East of European Russia at the transition of Early and Late Permian [Biota Vostoka Exvropeyskoy Rossii na rubezhe ranney i pozdney permi], eds. T.A. Grunt, N.K. Esaulova, and G.P. Kanev, 256–266. Moscow: Geos.Google Scholar
  40. Young, J. 1866. On the affinities of Platysomus and allied genera. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 22: 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zylberberg, L., J.-Y. Sire, and A. Nanci. 1997. Immunodetection of amelogenin-like proteins in the ganoine of experimentally regenerating scales of Calamoichthys calabricus, a primitive actinopterygian fish. Anatomical Record 249: 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Paläontologische Gesellschaft 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Paleoichthyology, Paleontological InstituteRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of Palaeontology and Stratigraphy, Geological InstituteTU Bergakademie FreibergFreibergGermany
  3. 3.Institute of Geology and Petroleum TechnologiesKazan Federal UniversityKazanRussia

Personalised recommendations