Advertisement

Development of a Lightweight and High-efficiency Compact Cycloidal Reducer for Legged Robots

  • KangKyu Lee
  • Seungwoo Hong
  • Jun-Ho OhEmail author
Regular Paper
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

Actuating systems for the proprioceptive control of legged robots must have a high mechanical efficiency and mechanical bandwidth for high torque transmission to avoid power transmission losses. We developed a high-efficiency compact cycloidal reducer for legged robots that uses needle roller bearings in all parts where contact occurs during the power transfer process inside the reducer, which greatly improves the efficiency compared to a cycloidal reducer using free rollers. We also proposed a subcarrier structure that distributes the load and allows the cycloidal reducer to respond robustly to impacts that may occur during the locomotion of the legged robot. The subcarrier increases the stiffness, which improves the mechanical bandwidth. A cycloidal reducer was manufactured with > 90% efficiency in most operating ranges; it weighs 766 g and can withstand a torque of more than 155 Nm. The cycloidal reducer module coupled with the motor indicated a torque control bandwidth of 72 Hz, so it can be used for legged robots with agile motions.

Keywords

Cycloidal reducer Efficiency Impact resistance Legged robot Subcarrier 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the project of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea entitled “Development of core technologies and a standard platform for humanoid robot [10060103].”

References

  1. 1.
    Seok, S., Wang, A., Otten, D., & Kim, S. (2012). Actuator design for high force proprioceptive control in fast legged locomotion. In Proceedings in 2012 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Vilamoura (pp. 1970–1975).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pratt, G. A., & Williamson, M. M. (1995). Series elastic actuators. In Proceedings in 2012 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems. Human robot interaction and cooperative robots, Pittsburgh, PA (pp. 399–406).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hutter, M., Gehring, C., Jud, D., Lauber, A., Bellicoso, C. D., Tsounis, V., et al. (2016). ANYmal—A highly mobile and dynamic quadrupedal robot. In Proceedings in 2016 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Daejeon (pp. 38–44).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Radford, N. A., Strawser, P., Hambuchen, K., Mehling, J. S., Verdeyen, W. K., Donnan, A. S., et al. (2015). Valkyrie: NASA’s first bipedal humanoid robot. Journal of Field Robotics, 32(3), 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ott, C., Baumgärtner, C., Mayr, J., Fuchs, M., Burger, R., Lee, D., et al. (2010). Development of a biped robot with torque controlled joints. In Proceedings in 2010 10th IEEE-RAS international conference on humanoid robots, Nashville, TN (pp. 167–173).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsagarakis, N. G., Caldwell, D. G., Negrello, F., Choi, W., Baccelliere, L., Loc, V. G., et al. (2017). WALK-MAN: A high-performance humanoid platform for realistic environments. Journal of Field Robotics, 34(7), 1225–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yoshiike, T., Kuroda, M., Ujino, R., Kaneko, H., Higuchi, H., Iwasaki, S., et al. (2017). Development of experimental legged robot for inspection and disaster response in plants. In Proceedings in 2017 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Vancouver, BC (pp. 4869–4876).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, K., Sim, O., Jeong, H., Oh, J., Bae, H., Hong, S., et al. (2018). Implementing full-body torque control in humanoid robot with high gear ratio using pulse width modulation voltage. In Proceedings in 2018 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Madrid (pp. 726–732).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Del Prete, A., Mansard, N., Ramos, O. E., Stasse, O., & Nori, F. (2016). Implementing torque control with high-ratio gear boxes and without joint-torque sensors. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 13(1), 1550044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wensing, P. M., Wang, A., Seok, S., Otten, D., Lang, J., & Kim, S. (2017). Proprioceptive actuator design in the MIT Cheetah: Impact mitigation and high-bandwidth physical interaction for dynamic legged robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 33(3), 509–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hwangbo, J., Tsounis, V., Kolvenbach, H., & Hutter, M. (2018). Cable-driven actuation for highly dynamic robotic systems. In Proceedings in 2018 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Madrid (pp. 8543–8550).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sensinger, J. W., & Lipsey, J. H. (2012). Cycloid vs. harmonic drives for use in high ratio, single stage robotic transmissions. In Proceedings in 2012 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, St. Paul, MN (pp. 4130–4135).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nabtesco. https://precision.nabtesco.com. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
  14. 14.
    Sumitomo Drive Technologies. https://us.sumitomodrive.com/en/fine-cyclo-drive. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
  15. 15.
    Nidec. http://www.nidec-shimpo.co.jp/. Accessed March 1, 2019.
  16. 16.
    Onivo. https://www.onviollc.com. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
  17. 17.
    DYNAMIXEL Cycloidal reducer. http://emanual.robotis.com/docs/en/dxl/pro_plus/h54p-200-s500-r/. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
  18. 18.
    Cassie. http://www.agilityrobotics.com/robots. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
  19. 19.
    Sensinger, J. W. (2013). Efficiency of high-sensitivity gear trains, such as cycloid drives. Journal of Mechanical Design, 135(7), 071006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li, X., Li, C., Wang, Y., Chen, B., & Lim, T. C. (2017). Analysis of a cycloid speed reducer considering tooth profile modification and clearance-fit output mechanism. Journal of Mechanical Design, 139(3), 033303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu, L. X., Chen, B. K., & Li, C. Y. (2019). Dynamic modelling and contact analysis of bearing-cycloid-pinwheel transmission mechanisms used in joint rotate vector reducers. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 137, 432–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shin, J.-H., & Kwon, S.-M. (2006). On the lobe profile design in a cycloid reducer using instant velocity center. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 41(5), 596–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tran, T. L., Pham, A. D., & Ahn, H.-J. (2016). Lost motion analysis of one stage cycloid reducer considering tolerances. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 17(8), 1009–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blanche, J. G., & Yang, D. C. H. (1989). Cycloid drives with machining tolerances. Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, 111(3), 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yan, H.-S., & Lai, T.-S. (2002). Geometry design of an elementary planetary gear train with cylindrical tooth-profiles. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 37(8), 757–767.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ye, Z., Zhang, W., Huang, Q., & Chen, C. (2006). Simple explicit formulae for calculating limit dimensions to avoid undercutting in the rotor of a cycloid rotor pump. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 41(4), 405–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hwang, Y.-W., & Hsieh, C.-F. (2007). Geometric design using hypotrochoid and nonundercutting conditions for an internal cycloidal gear. Journal of Mechanical Design, 129(4), 413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mimmi, G. C., & Pennacchi, P. E. (2000). Non-undercutting conditions in internal gears. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 35(3), 477–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sensinger, J. W. (2010). Unified approach to cycloid drive profile, stress, and efficiency optimization. Journal of Mechanical Design, 132(2), 024503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Malhotra, S., & Parameswaran, M. (1983). Analysis of a cycloid speed reducer. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 18(6), 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Blagojevic, M., Marjanovic, N., Djordjevic, Z., Stojanovic, B., & Disic, A. (2011). A new design of a two-stage cycloidal speed reducer. Journal of Mechanical Design, 133(8), 085001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    igus cycloidal gear. https://www.igus.eu/info/news-2017-rl-c. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
    Oh, J., Bae, H., Jeong, H., Lee, K., & Oh, J.-H. (2017). BLDC motor current control using filtered single DC link current based on adaptive extended Kalman filter. In Proceedings 2017 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, Vancouver, BC (pp. 2213–2218).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lim, J., & Oh, J.-H. (2016). Backward ladder climbing locomotion of humanoid robot with gain overriding method on position control. Journal of Field Robotics, 33(5), 687–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jung, T., Lim, J., Bae, H., Lee, K. K., Joe, H., & Oh, J.-H. (2018). Development of the humanoid disaster response. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 34(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kaneko, K., Kaminaga, H., Sakaguchi, T., Kajita, S., Morisawa, M., Kumagai, I., et al. (2019). Humanoid robot HRP-5P: An electrically actuated humanoid robot with high-power and wide-range joints. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 4(2), 1431–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Humanoid Research Center, School of Mechanical, Aerospace & Systems Engineering, Department of Mechanical EngineeringKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyDaejeonKorea

Personalised recommendations