Advertisement

Effects of Cutting Speed on Surface Integrity and Fatigue Performance of Hard Machined Surfaces

  • Youngsik ChoiEmail author
Regular Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The study investigates the effects of cutting speed on the surface integrity and fatigue performance of hard machined surfaces. The results demonstrated that a higher cutting speed induces more compressive residual stresses and results in an increasingly softened layer. Crack initiation and crack propagation lives were extended by up to 192% and 168%, respectively, relative to increases in the cutting speed. Consequently, the fatigue life was extended by up to 174% with increases in the cutting speed. The fatigue tests demonstrated that the cutting speed significantly influences fatigue life and that the effect further increases with decreases in the level of loading.

Keywords

Hard machining Cutting speed Residual stress Microhardness Fatigue life 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (Grant No. 2017R1A2B4009202).

References

  1. 1.
    König, W., Klinger, M., & Link, R. (1990). Machining hard materials with geometrically defined cutting edges—Field of applications and limitations. CIRP Annals, 39, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Capello, E. (2005). Residual stresses and surface roughness in turning. Part I: Influence of process parameters. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 160, 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, M., Takagi, J., & Tsukuda, A. (2004). Effect of tool nose radius and tool wear on residual stress distribution in hard turning of bearing steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 150, 234–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li, W., Withers, P. J., Axinte, D., Preuss, M., & Andrews, P. (2009). Residual stresses in face finish turning of high strength nickel-based superalloy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209, 4896–4902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agha, S. R., & Liu, C. R. (2000). Experimental study on the performance of superfinish hard turned surfaces in rolling contact. Wear, 244, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guo, Y. B., & Yen, D. W. (2004). Hard turning versus grinding: The effect of process-induced residual stress on rolling contact. Wear, 256, 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guo, Y. B., & Barkey, M. E. (2004). Modeling of rolling contact fatigue for hard machined components with process-induced residual stress. International Journal of Fatigue, 26, 605–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Angseryd, J., & Andrén, H. O. (2011). An in-depth investigation of the cutting speed impact on the degraded microstructure of worn PCBN cutting tools. Wear, 271, 2610–2618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Suresh, R., Basavarajappa, S., & Samuel, G. L. (2012). Predictive modeling of cutting forces and tool wear in hard turning using response surface methodology. Procedia Engineering, 38, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chinchanikar, S., & Choudhury, S. K. (2013). Effect of work material hardness and cutting parameters on performance of coated carbide tool when turning hardened steel: An optimization approach. Measurement, 46, 1572–1584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elmunafi, M. H. S., Noordin, M. Y., & Kurniawan, D. (2015). Tool life of coated carbide cutting tool when turning hardened stainless steel under minimum quantity lubricant using castor oil. Procedia Manufacturing, 2, 563–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bhokse, V., Chinchanikar, S., Anerao, P., & Kulkarni, A. (2015). Experimental investigationson chip formation and plowing cutting forces during hard turning. Materials Today: Proceedings, 2, 3268–3276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Revel, P., Jouini, N., Thoquenne, G., & Lefebvre, F. (2016). High precision hard turning of AISI 52100 bearing steel. Precision Engineering, 43, 24–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pawar, S., Salve, A., Chinchanikar, S., Kulkarni, A., & Lamdhade, G. (2017). Residual stresses during hard turning of AISI 52100 steel: Numerical modelling with experimental validation. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4, 2350–2359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gassner, M., Schalk, N., Tkadletz, M., Pohler, M., Czettl, C., & Mitterer, C. (2018). Influence of cutting speed and workpiece material on the wear mechanisms of CVD TiCN/α-Al2O3 coated cutting inserts during turning. Wear, 398–399, 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, X., Li, S., Chen, T., & Wang, D. (2018). Research on the surface characteristics of hardened steel with variable chamfer edge PCBN insert by high-speed hard turning. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 19, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agha, S. R. (2000). Fatigue performance of superfinish hard turned surfaces in rolling contact. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Noyan, I. C., & Cohen, J. B. (1987). Residual stress: Measurement by diffraction and interpretation. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choi, Y., & Liu, C. R. (2006). Rolling contact fatigue life of finish hard machined surfaces—Part 1. Model development. Wear, 261, 485–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu, C. R., & Choi, Y. (2008). A new methodology for predicting crack initiation life for rolling contact fatigue based on dislocation and crack propagation. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 50, 117–123.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tanaka, K., & Mura, T. (1981). Dislocation model for fatigue crack initiation. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 48, 97–103.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nelias, D., Dumont, M. L., Champiot, F., Vincent, A., Girodin, D., Fougeres, R., et al. (1999). Role of inclusions, surface roughness and operating conditions on rolling contact fatigue. Journal of Tribology, 121, 240–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, Q. Y., Bathias, C., Awagoishi, N., & Chen, Q. (2002). Effect of inclusion on subsurface crack initiation and gigacycle fatigue strength. International Journal of Fatigue, 24, 1269–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leng, X., Chen, Q., & Shao, E. (1988). Initiation and propagation of case crushing cracks in rolling contact fatigue. Wear, 122, 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Paris, P., & Erdogan, F. (1963). A critical analysis of crack propagation laws. Journal of Basic Engineering, 85, 528–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen, Q., Leng, X., & Shao, E. (2009). Influence of microstructure and residual stress on the stages of case crushing. Wear, 122, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Choi, Y., & Liu, C. R. (2007). Spall progression life model for rolling contact verified by finish hard machined surfaces. Wear, 262, 24–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Precision Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringChung-Ang UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations