Biomechanical Comparison of Nucleotomy with Lumbar Spine Fusion versus Nucleotomy Alone: Vibration Analysis of the Adjacent Spinal Segments
- 29 Downloads
This study aimed to investigate the effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) on dynamic responses of the adjacent spinal segments to whole body vibration (WBV) after nucleotomy. A previously validated finite element model of an intact L1-sacrum lumbar spine was modified to simulate nucleotomy with and without TLIF and BPSF at L4–L5. Transit dynamic analyses were conducted on the nucleotomy alone and the fusion models under a vertical vibration load. The computed dynamic responses for the two models at adjacent levels were recorded and compared. The results showed that at level (L5–S1) below the denucleated disc, maximum response values of the disc bulge, annulus stress and intradiscal pressure decreased due to the fusion by 5.6%, 5.2% and 7.2%, and their vibration amplitudes decreased by 30.5%, 25.7% and 24.3%. At levels (L1–L2, L2–L3 and L3–L4) above the denucleated disc, maximum response values and vibration amplitudes of the strains and stresses also produced 5.2–8.9% and 25.9–29.7% deceases due to the fusion. It implies that after nucleotomy, application of the TLIF with BPSF might be helpful to prevent negative effects of the vertical WBV on adjacent disc levels.
KeywordsFinite element Lumbar spine Nucleotomy Pedicle screw fixation Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Whole body vibration
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.Drazin, D., Ugiliweneza, B., Al-Khouja, L., Yang, D., Johnson, P., Kim, T., and Boakye, M., “Treatment of Recurrent Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review,” Cureus, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2016.Google Scholar
- 8.Mobbs, R. J., Phan, K., Malham, G., Seex, K., and Rao, P. J., “Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Techniques, Indications and Comparison of Interbody Fusion Options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF,” Journal of Spine Surgery, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 2–8, 2015.Google Scholar
- 9.Ambati, D. V., Wright, E. K., Lehman, R. A., Kang, D. G., Wagner, S. C., and Dmitriev, A. E., “Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation Provides Superior Biomechanical Stability in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study,” The Spine Journal, Vol. 15, No. 8, pp. 1812–1822, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Kang, K.-T., Kim, H.-J., Son, J., Yeom, J. S., and Chun, H.-J., “Comparing an Instrumented Posterior Fixation System with Rigid and Semi-Flexible Rods Using Finite Element Analysis,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 163–170, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Etebar, S. and Cahill, D. W., “Risk Factors for Adjacent-Segment Failure Following Lumbar Fixation with Rigid Instrumentation for Degenerative Instability,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 90, No. 2, pp. 163–169, 1999.Google Scholar
- 23.Kim, Y.-H., Jung, T.-G., Park, E.-Y., Kang, G.-W., Kim, K.-A., and Lee, S.-J., “Biomechanical Efficacy of a Combined Interspinous Fusion System with a Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage,” International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 997–1001, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Lee, C.-H., Kim, Y. E., Lee, H. J., Kim, D. G., and Kim, C. H., “Biomechanical Effects of Hybrid Stabilization on the Risk of Proximal Adjacent-Segment Degeneration Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion Using an Interspinous Device or a Pedicle Screw-Based Dynamic Fixator,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 643–649, 2017.Google Scholar
- 32.Wilder, D. G., “On Loading of the Human Lumbar Intervertebral Motion Segment (Spine, Viscoelasticity, Vibration, Stiffness, Seating),” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Vermont, 1985.Google Scholar
- 33.Guo, L.-X. and Teo, E.-C., “Influence Prediction of Injury and Vibration on Adjacent Components of Spine Using Finite Element Methods,” Clinical Spine Surgery, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 118–124, 2006.Google Scholar