Mechanomyography for the Measurement of Muscle Fatigue Caused by Repeated Functional Electrical Stimulation
- 6 Downloads
An attempt at utilizing mechanomyography (MMG) to quantify muscle fatigue, which occurs on account of repeated functional electrical stimulations (FES), is presented. Twenty-one subjects participated in the experiment, wherein a constant electrical stimulation was repeatedly applied to the tibialis anterior muscle. MMG signals were measured simultaneously, as the stimulations were applied, and subsequently quantified using 8 different methods. Muscle fatigue was confirmed by observing linearly decreasing ankle-joint torque with the repetition of the electrical stimulation (r2 = 0.7823). The convex-hull area and volume along with peak-to-peak MMG signals were found to demonstrate significant linear relationships with muscle fatigue in spite of the weakness in motion artifacts. Use of the Lempel-Ziv algorithm, based on three symbols, provided the most accurate correlations for muscle fatigue. However, frequency-based characteristics as well as mean and median frequencies did not demonstrate any significant linearity with muscle fatigue.
KeywordsMechanomyography Muscle fatigue Functional electrical stimulation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Liberson, W., “Functional Electrotherapy: Stimulation of the Peroneal Nerve Synchronized with the Swing Phase of the Gait of Hemiplegic Patients,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 42, pp. 101–105, 1961.Google Scholar
- 3.Lee, J., “Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES): Part 1,” Physical Therapy Korea, Vol. 2, No. (1), pp. 62–70, 1995.Google Scholar
- 5.Wang, J., Chen, S., Lan, C., Wong, M., and Lai, J., “Neuromuscular Electric Stimulation Enhances Endothelial Vascular Control and Hemodynamic Function in Paretic Upper Extremities of Patients with Stroke 1,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vol. 85, No. (7), pp. 1112–1116, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kim, C., Kazunori, H., Kang, G., and Eom, G., E., “Control of FES Cycling Considering Muscle Fatigue,” Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering, Vol. 22, No. (6), pp. 207–212, 2005.Google Scholar
- 18.Kim, G.-W. and Kim, J., “Analysis of Surface EMG Power Spectrum and Muscle Fatigue Depending on the Variable of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation,” The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy, Vol. 26, No. (5), pp. 280–289, 2014.Google Scholar
- 19.Yochum, M., Binczak, S., Bakir, T., Jacquir, S., and Lepers, R., “A Mixed FES/EMG System for Real Time Analysis of Muscular Fatigue,” Proc. of Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology, pp. 4882–4885, 2010.Google Scholar
- 22.Ma, M., “MMG Sensor for Muscle Activity Detection: Low Cost Design, Implementation and Experimentation,” M.Sc. Thesis, Massey University, 2010.Google Scholar
- 23.Beck, T. W., Housh, T. J., Johnson, G. O., Weir, J. P., Cramer, J. T., et al., “Mechanomyographic Amplitude and Mean Power Frequency Versus Torque Relationships during Isokinetic and Isometric Muscle Actions of the Biceps Brachii,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, Vol. 14, No. (5), pp. 555–564, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Krueger, E., Scheeren, E. M., Nogueira–Neto, G. N., and Nohama, P., “Mechanomyography Energy Decreases during Muscular Fatigue in Paraplegicsm,” Proc. of the 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE in Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 5824–5827, 2014.Google Scholar
- 30.Orizio, C. and Gobbo, M., “Mechanomyography,” Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering, 2006.Google Scholar