Advertisement

Evolving Systems

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 273–284 | Cite as

A hybrid fuzzy-PID controller based on gray wolf optimization algorithm in power system

  • Mobin GhanamijaberEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

This paper addresses a grey wolf optimizer to optimally set the PID controller with low pass filter for simulating multi area restructured power system with considered superconducting magnetic energy storage plant that works under various loading conditions and uncertainties. To make a real model, the reheat effect nonlinearity of the steam turbine and governor is considered into automatic generation control (AGC) model. The proposed AGC model is formulated as a nonlinear constrained optimization problem which is solved by an intelligent algorithm so that it shows powerful search in optimization problem especially the proposed AGC. The effectiveness of the proposed technique is demonstrated on a deregulated power system with possible contracted scenarios under large load demand and area disturbances in comparison with other method through several performance indices. Obtained results show that the proposed control strategy achieves good robust performance for a wide range of system parameters and load changes in the presence of system nonlinearities and is superior to the other controllers.

Keywords

PID controller Multi area GWO algorithm SMES Nonlinear power system 

Notes

References

  1. Abedinia O, Naderi MS, Ghasemi A (2011a) Robust LFC in deregulated environment: fuzzy PID using HBMO. In: Proceeding of the IEEE international power and energy society power systems conference and exposition, Italy, Rome (EEEIC), pp 74–77Google Scholar
  2. Abedinia O, Shayanfar HA, Wyns B, Ghasemi A (2011b) Design of robust PSS to improve stability of composed LFC and AVR using ABC in deregulated environment. In: Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, pp 82–88Google Scholar
  3. Abedinia O, Amjady N, Shayanfar HA, Ghasemi A (2012a) Robust LFC in deregulated environment: multi-stage fuzzy PID based on FA. 8th international conference on “technical and physical problems of power engineering”, Norway, pp 125–129Google Scholar
  4. Abedinia O, Kiani K, Amjady N, Shayanfar HA (2012b) Fuzzy PID based on firefly algorithm: load frequency control in deregulated environment. In: Proceedings of the international conference on artificial intelligence, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, pp 59–65Google Scholar
  5. Abedinia O, Amjady N, Naderi MS (2012c) Multi-stage fuzzy PID load frequency control via SPHBMO in deregulated environment, environment and electrical engineering (EEEIC), 2012 11th, pp 473–478Google Scholar
  6. Abedinia O, Amjady N, Ghadimi N (2017) Solar energy forecasting based on hybrid neural network and improved metaheuristic algorithm. Comput Intell 34:241MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang C, Fu W (1997) Area load frequency control using fuzzy gain scheduling of PI controllers. Elect Power Sys Res 42:145–152Google Scholar
  8. Deepak M (2014) Improving the dynamic performance in load frequency control of an interconnected power system with multi source power generation using superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) 2014 international conference on advances in green energy (ICAGE), 17–18 December 2014, TrivandrumGoogle Scholar
  9. Escobedo JO, Nosov V, Meda JA (2016) Minimum number of controls for full controllability of linear time-invariant systems. IEEE Latin Am Trans 14(11):4448–4453Google Scholar
  10. Firouz MH, Ghadimi N (2016) Concordant controllers based on FACTS and FPSS for solving wide-area in multi-machine power system. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 30(2):845–859Google Scholar
  11. Ghadimi N (2015) A new hybrid algorithm based on optimal fuzzy controller in multimachine power system. Complexity 21(1):78–93MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Ghadimi N, Afkousi-Paqaleh A, Emamhosseini A (2014) A PSO-based fuzzy long-term multi-objective optimization approach for placement and parameter setting of UPFC. Arab J Sci Eng 39(4):2953–2963zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghadimi N et al (2017) A new prediction model based on multi-block forecast engine in smart grid. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 2017:1–16Google Scholar
  14. Grande A, Hernandez T, Curtidor AV, Paramo LA, Tapia R, Cazares IO, Meda JA (2017) Analysis of fuzzy observability property for a class of ts fuzzy models. IEEE Latin Am Trans 15(4):595–602Google Scholar
  15. Hernández Cortés T, Curtidor López AV, Rodríguez Valdez J, Meda JA, Campaña R, Tapia, Herrera, de Jesús Rubio J (2015) Synchronization of discrete-time chaotic fuzzy systems by means of fuzzy output regulation using genetic algorithm. Math Probl Eng 2015:18 (Article ID 198371) MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Karaboga D, Basturk B (2007) A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. J Glob Optim 39:459–471MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Khodabakhshian A, Hooshmand R (2010) A new PID controller design for automatic generation control of hydro power systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 32(5):375–382Google Scholar
  18. Lal DK, Barisal AK, Tripathy M (2016) Grey wolf optimizer algorithm based Fuzzy PID controller for AGC of multi-area power system with TCPS. 2nd international conference on intelligent computing, communication and convergence (ICCC-2016). Procedia Comput Sci 92:99–105Google Scholar
  19. Leng H et al (2018) A new wind power prediction method based on ridgelet transforms, hybrid feature selection and closed-loop forecasting. Adv Eng Inform 36:20–30Google Scholar
  20. Mech LD (1999) Alpha status, dominance, and division of labor in wolf packs. Can J Zool 77(8):1196–1203Google Scholar
  21. Mittal N, Singh U, Singh Sohi B (2016) Modified grey wolf optimizer for global engineering optimization. Appl Comput Intell Soft Comput 2016:1–16Google Scholar
  22. Mohammadi M, Ghadimi N (2015) Optimal location and optimized parameters for robust power system stabilizer using honeybee mating optimization. Complexity 21(1):242–258MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Mohammadi M et al (2017) Small-scale building load forecast based on hybrid forecast engine. Neural Process Lett 2017:1–23Google Scholar
  24. Mosaad MI, Salem F (2014) LFC based adaptive PID controller using ANN and ANFIS techniques. J Electr Syst Inf Technol 1(3):212–222Google Scholar
  25. Parsian A, Ramezani M, Ghadimi N (2017) A hybrid neural network-gray wolf optimization algorithm for melanoma detection. Biomed Res 28:8Google Scholar
  26. Rubio JJ, Soriano E, Juarez CF, Pacheco J (2017) Sliding mode regulator for the perturbations attenuation in two tank plants. IEEE Access 5(1):20504–20511Google Scholar
  27. Rubio JJ, Lopez J, Pacheco J, Encinas R (2018) Control of two electrical plants. Asian J Control 20(5):1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.1640 MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Shakarami MR, Faraji I, Davoudkhani (2016) Wide-area power system stabilizer design based on grey wolf optimization algorithm considering the time delay. Electr Power Syst Res 133:149–159Google Scholar
  29. Shamel A, Ghadimi N (2016) Hybrid PSOTVAC/BFA technique for tuning of robust PID controller of fuel cell voltage. Indian J Chem Technol 23(3):171–178Google Scholar
  30. Sheikh MRI, Muyeen SM, Takahashi R, Murata T, Tamura J (2008) Improvement of load frequency control with fuzzy gain scheduled SMES unit considering governor dead-band and GRC. 5th international conference on electrical and computer engineering, ICECE 2008, pp 20–22Google Scholar
  31. Yeşil E, Güzelkaya M, Eksin İ (2004) Self tuning fuzzy PID type load and frequency controller. Energy Convers Manag 45(3):377–390Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering, Ardabil BranchIslamic Azad UniversityArdabilIran

Personalised recommendations