Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Hostility Dimensions and Metabolic Syndrome in a Healthy, Midlife Sample

Abstract

Objective

Evidence links trait hostility with components of the metabolic syndrome (MetS), a clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors, but which hostility dimensions (e.g., expressive or cognitive hostility) relate to MetS are not well known. Further, there may be age and sex differences in the extent to which hostility dimensions relate to MetS. The present study evaluated associations between dimensions of hostility and the metabolic syndrome and its individual components as well as the moderating effects of sex and age.

Methods

In a cross-sectional sample of 478 employed adults, a principal component analysis from common trait hostility questionnaires yielded a two-factor solution: expressive hostility (anger and aggression) and cognitive hostility (cynicism). Each of these two components of hostility was examined as predictors of each of two aggregated MetS outcomes: a dichotomous measure of MetS, based upon the NCEP-ATP III definition, and a continuous measure based upon the average of standardized scores for each component; and they were examined as predictors of individual MetS components as well.

Results

Expressive hostility was associated with MetS severity (b = 0.110, p = 0.04) and waist circumference (b = 2.75, p = 0.01). Moderation analyses revealed that elevated expressive hostility was associated with elevated waist circumference in women but not men. Cognitive hostility was not related to any metabolic syndrome component or aggregated outcome, and no moderation was observed.

Conclusions

Among multiple individual components and two aggregated scores, only trait dispositions to expressed hostile affect and behavior were associated with MetS severity and waist circumference. The effects were small but statistically significant. The association between cognitive hostility and metabolic syndrome measures may not be robust in a large sample of healthy, midlife adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Martin R, Watson D, Wan CK. A three-factor model of trait anger: dimensions of affect, behavior, and cognition. J Pers. 2000;68(5):869–97.

  2. 2.

    Kamarck TW, Haskett RF, Muldoon M, Flory JD, Anderson B, Bies R, et al. Citalopram intervention for hostility: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009;77(1):174–88.

  3. 3.

    Miller TQ, Smith TW, Turner CW, Guijarro ML, Hallet AJ. Meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychol Bull. 1996;119(2):322–48.

  4. 4.

    Chida Y, Steptoe A. The association of anger and hostility with future coronary heart disease: a meta-analytic review of prospective evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(11):936–46.

  5. 5.

    Smith TW, Glazer K, Ruiz JM, Gallo LC. Hostility, anger, aggressiveness, and coronary heart disease: an interpersonal perspective on personality, emotion, and health. J Pers. 2004;72(6):1217–70.

  6. 6.

    Goldbacher EM, Matthews KA. Are psychological characteristics related to risk of the metabolic syndrome? A review of the literature. Ann Behav Med. 2007;34(3):240–52.

  7. 7.

    Gami AS, Witt BJ, Howard DE, Erwin PJ, Gami LA, Somers VK, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk of incident cardiovascular events and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(4):403–14.

  8. 8.

    Galassi A, Reynolds K, He J. Metabolic syndrome and risk of cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2006;119(10):812–9.

  9. 9.

    Elovainio M, Merjonen P, Pulkki-Råback L, Kivimäki M, Jokela M, Mattson N, et al. Hostility, metabolic syndrome, inflammation and cardiac control in young adults: the young Finns study. Biol Psychol. 2011;87(2):234–40.

  10. 10.

    Nelson TL, Palmer RF, Pedersen NL. The metabolic syndrome mediates the relationship between cynical hostility and cardiovascular disease. Exp Aging Res. 2004;30(2):163–77.

  11. 11.

    Gremigni P. Cynical hostility and the metabolic syndrome: a case-control study. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2006:66(3).

  12. 12.

    Ravaja N, Keltikangas-Järvinen L, Keskivaara P. Type A factors as predictors of changes in the metabolic syndrome precursors in adolescents and young adults: a 3-year follow-up study. Health Psychol. 1996;15(1):18.

  13. 13.

    Räikkönen K, Matthews KA, Kuller LH. Depressive symptoms and stressful life events predict metabolic syndrome among middle-aged women: a comparison of World Health Organization, Adult Treatment Panel III, and International Diabetes Foundation definitions. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(4):872–7.

  14. 14.

    Räikkönen K, Matthews KA, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Kuller LH. Trait anger and the metabolic syndrome predict progression of carotid atherosclerosis in healthy middle-aged women. Psychosom Med. 2004;66(6):903–8.

  15. 15.

    Räikkönen K, Matthews KA, Kuller LH. The relationship between psychological risk attributes and the metabolic syndrome in healthy women: antecedent or consequence? Metabolism-Clinical and Experimental. 2002;51(12):1573–7.

  16. 16.

    Boylan JM, Ryff CD. High anger expression exacerbates the relationship between age and metabolic syndrome. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013;70(1):77–82.

  17. 17.

    Cohen BE, et al. Psychological risk factors and the metabolic syndrome in patients with coronary heart disease: findings from the heart and soul study. Psychiatry Res. 2010;175(1–2):133–7.

  18. 18.

    Lemche AV, Chaban OS, Lemche E. Aggressivity and hostility traits affect different cardiovascular risk profiles in the metabolic syndrome. Int J Cardiol. 2014;171(3):e76–7.

  19. 19.

    Lemche AV, Chaban OS, Lemche E. Anger traits associated with cardiovascular risk biomarkers in the metabolic syndrome. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016;31(4):336–42.

  20. 20.

    D'Antono B, Moskowitz D, Nigam A. The metabolic costs of hostility in healthy adult men and women: cross-sectional and prospective analyses. J Psychosom Res. 2013;75(3):262–9.

  21. 21.

    Peterson LM, Miller KG, Wong PM, Anderson BP, Kamarck TW, Matthews KA, et al. Sleep duration partially accounts for race differences in diurnal cortisol dynamics. Health Psychol. 2017;36(5):502–11.

  22. 22.

    Smith TW, Frohm KD. What’s so unhealthy about hostility? Construct validity and psychosocial correlates of the cook and medley ho scale. Health Psychol. 1985;4(6):503.

  23. 23.

    Forgays DG, Forgays DK, Spielberger CD. Factor structure of the state-trait anger expression inventory. J Pers Assess. 1997;69(3):497–507.

  24. 24.

    Grundy SM, et al. Diagnosis and management of the metabolic syndrome: an American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute scientific statement. Circulation. 2005;112(17):2735–52.

  25. 25.

    Grundy SM. Metabolic syndrome update. Trends in cardiovascular medicine. 2016;26(4):364–73.

  26. 26.

    Räikkönen K, Matthews K, Kuller L. Anthropometric and psychosocial determinants of visceral obesity in healthy postmenopausal women. Int J Obes. 1999;23(8):775–82.

  27. 27.

    Wing RR, Matthews KA, Kuller LH, Meilahn EN, Plantinga P. Waist to hip ratio in middle-aged women. Associations with behavioral and psychosocial factors and with changes in cardiovascular risk factors. Arterioscl Thromb. 1991;11(5):1250–7.

  28. 28.

    Räikkönen K, et al. Anger, hostility, and vesceral adipose tissue in healthy postmenopausal women. Metabolism. 1999;48(9):1146–51.

  29. 29.

    Després JP. Is visceral obesity the cause of the metabolic syndrome? Ann Med. 2006;38(1):52–63.

  30. 30.

    Després J-P, Lemieux I. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2006;444(7121):881–7.

  31. 31.

    Bunde J, Suls J. A quantitative analysis of the relationship between the cook-medley hostility scale and traditional coronary artery disease risk factors. Health Psychol. 2006;25(4):493.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge and thank Dr. Barbara Anderson and the AHAB staff for their roles in data collection and preparation.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL040962, 4T32HL007560).

Author information

Correspondence to Thomas W. Kamarck.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

No conflicts of interest were declared.

Statement of Informed Consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, M.C., Kamarck, T.W., Wright, A.G.C. et al. Hostility Dimensions and Metabolic Syndrome in a Healthy, Midlife Sample. Int.J. Behav. Med. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-020-09855-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Hostility
  • Cynicism
  • Anger
  • Aggression
  • Metabolic syndrome
  • Sex differences