Force of Habit: the Role of Routinized, Automatic Behaviors along the Path of Self-Regulation and Alcohol-Related Problems
Dual-Process models of self-regulation suggest different facets of self-regulation predict adaptive (e.g., academics, exercise) and maladaptive (e.g., drinking) behaviors. Engagement in these behaviors may ultimately result in automatic habits that either promote or inhibit alcohol use and related problems.
This study tested a structural equation model of relationships between self-regulation constructs, health and drinking habits and automaticity, effortful inhibition, and alcohol problems in a college student sample (N = 405).
As expected, effortful control was positively associated with health habits, which were positively associated with health automaticity. Automaticity was inversely associated with effortful inhibition. Thus, effortful control was indirectly associated with less effortful inhibition, as hypothesized. Contrary to hypothesis, effortful inhibition was inversely associated with alcohol-related problems, which resulted in a positive indirect association between effortful control and alcohol problems. Reactivity was positively associated with drinking automaticity via drinking habits and positively associated with effortful inhibition and alcohol problems.
Results indicate effortful control and reactivity exhibit unique associations with health and drinking habits, automaticity, and effortful inhibition. Results suggest a somewhat paradoxical process whereby effortful control achieves its ends via decreased effort to engage in adaptive behaviors. Validity of using self-report and word association measures of automaticity was supported by the observed associations with predictors and outcomes.
KeywordsHabits Automaticity Alcohol Effortful inhibition Self-regulation
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Force of Habit
The role of routinized, automatic behaviors along the path of self-regulation and alcohol-related problems.
- 10.Lieberman MD. The X-and C-systems. Social neuroscience: Integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior; 2007. p. 290–315.Google Scholar
- 14.DeYoung CG. Impulsivity as a personality trait. Handbook of self-regulation. Res Theory Appl. 2010;2:485–502.Google Scholar
- 18.American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5., ed. Washington, D.C: A.P.A; 2013.Google Scholar
- 25.Gardner B. Habit as automaticity, not frequency. Eur Health Psychol. 2012;14(2):32–6.Google Scholar
- 34.Eagly AH, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers; 1993.Google Scholar
- 38.Marks RM, et al. Temperament in the prediction of proximal versus distal expectancies: an acquired preparedness model. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019.Google Scholar
- 45.Kendall PC, Williams CL. Assessing the cognitive and behavioral components of children's self-management. Self-management and behavior change; 1982. p. 240–84.Google Scholar
- 53.Dimeff LA, et al. Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS): a harm reduction approach. New York: Guilford Press; 1999. 200-Chapter xii, 200 PagesGoogle Scholar
- 58.Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus Statistical Modeling Software: Release 8.3. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén; 2019.Google Scholar
- 59.Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications; 2015.Google Scholar
- 61.Browne MW, Cudeck R. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Alternative ways of assessing model fit in testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: Sage; 1993. p. 136–62.Google Scholar
- 62.StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 14. College Station: StataCorp LP; 2018.Google Scholar
- 81.Gardner B. Modelling habit formation and itds determinants. In: Verplanken B, editor. The psychology of habit. Cham: Springer; 2018.Google Scholar