Exploring how enrolling in an online organic chemistry preparation course relates to students’ self-efficacy
Self-efficacy has a strong influence on the learning and motivation of science students at the postsecondary level, especially in upper division science classes, which are key to student success in science majors. This empirical mixed methods research study (N = 205) examines the associations between students’ participation in an online preparation course and student self-efficacy in organic chemistry. Qualitative content analysis indicated that students benefited from the online preparatory course in the subsequent organic chemistry course series. The analysis of students’ clickstream data indicated that students with self-efficacy ratings in the top 10th percentile exhibited more frequent and consistent engagement with relevant course materials compared to students in the bottom 10th percentile. Notably, linear regression models indicated that participation in the online preparatory course was associated with higher long-term self-efficacy for first-generation college students. These results suggest that online preparatory courses may benefit some students’ self-efficacy in demanding science courses.
KeywordsSelf-efficacy Higher education Distance education Gateway courses Science education
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation through the EHR Core Research Program (Award 1535300) and the UCI Teaching and Learning Research Center. Also, we would like to thank the student research assistants, Lizethe Arce, Andrea Marella and Yucheng Zhu, who contributed to the data coding of the qualitative part of the analysis. The views contained in this article are those of the authors and not of their institutions or the National Science Foundation.
Funding was provided by Directorate for Education and Human Resources (Grant No. 1535300).
- Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review,84(2), 191–215.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (2011). Social cognitive theory. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of social psychological theories (pp. 349–373). London: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Bankel, J., Berggren, K.-F., Engström, M., Wiklund, I., Crawley, E. F., Soderholm, D., et al. (2005). Benchmarking engineering curricula with the CDIO syllabus*. International Journal of Engineering Education,21(1), 121–133.Google Scholar
- Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education,84(6), 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X%28200011%2984%3A6%3C740%3A%3AAID-SCE4%3E3.0.CO%3B2-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Chen, X. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields. National Center for Education Statistics,1(1), 1–49.Google Scholar
- Cicchinelli, A., Veas, E., Pardo, A., Pammer-Schindler, V., Fessl, A., Barreiros, C., et al. (2018). Finding traces of self-regulated learning in activity streams. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on learning analytics and knowledge—LAK’18, 191–200. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=3170358.3170381.
- Daymont, T., Blau, G., & Campbell, D. (2011). Deciding between traditional and online formats: Exploring the role of learning advantages, flexibility, and compensatory adaptation. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management,12, 156–175.Google Scholar
- Fischer, C., Eisenkraft, A., Fishman, B., Hübner, N., & Lawrenz, F. (2018). Adapting to the large-scale Advanced Placement Chemistry reform: An examination of teachers’ challenges and instructional practices. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(10), 1701–1710. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fischer, C., Xu, D., Rodriguez, F., Denaro, K., & Warschauer, M. (2019). Effects of course modality in summer session: Enrollment patterns and student performance in face-to-face and online classes. The Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100710 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hirschheim, R. (2005). The internet-based education bandwagon: Look before you leap. Communications of the ACM - Designing for the Mobile Device,48(7), 97–101.Google Scholar
- Horowitz, G., Rabin, L. A., & Brodale, D. L. (2013). Improving student performance in organic chemistry: Help seeking behaviors and prior chemistry aptitude. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,13, 120–133.Google Scholar
- Hutchison, M. A., Follman, D. K., Sumpter, M., & Bodner, G. M. (2006). Factors influencing the self-efficacy beliefs of first-year engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education,95(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00876.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2013). Introduction to linear regression analysis (5th ed.). International Statistical Review,81(2), 1–3.Google Scholar
- Park, Y., & Sung, J. (2017). Exploring online learning profiles of in-service teachers in a professional development course. Educational Technology International,18(2), 193–213.Google Scholar
- Park, J., Yu, R., Rodriguez, F., Baker, R., Smyth, P., & Warschauer, M. (2018). Understanding student procrastination via mixture models. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on educational data mining, 187–197.Google Scholar
- Qi, J., & Reid, B. (2017). Analytics in instructional design: Learner content access analytics. Retrieved August 29, 2018, from https://sites.dartmouth.edu/learninganalytics/2017/01/09/canvas-content-access-analytics/.
- Roby, D. E. (2003). 4 Research on school attendance and student achievement: A study of Ohio schools. Educational Research Quarterly,28, 3–16.Google Scholar
- Rodriguez, F., Yu, R., Park, J., Rivas, M. J., Warschauer, M., & Sato, B. K. (2019). Utilizing learning analytics to map students’ self-reported study strategies to click behaviors in STEM courses. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 456–460). ACM.Google Scholar
- Santos, J. R. A. (1999). Cronbach’s alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of Extension, 37(2), 1–5.Google Scholar
- Schunk, D. H., & Meece, J. L. (2006). Self-efficacy development in adolescence. Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents,5, 71–96.Google Scholar
- Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2012). Social cognitive theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (Vol. 1). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Snyder, T. D., de Brey, C., & Dillow, S. A. (2016). Digest of Education Statistics 2015, 51st Edition. NCES 2016-014. National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
- Watson, J., & Gemin, B. (2008). Using online learning for at-risk students and credit recovery. Promising Practices in Online Learning, 1–16.Google Scholar