Advertisement

Electronic Markets

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 211–224 | Cite as

The influence of information overload on the development of trust and purchase intention based on online product reviews in a mobile vs. web environment: an empirical investigation

  • Christopher P. Furner
  • Robert A. Zinko
Research Paper

Abstract

Information overload has been studied extensively by decision science researchers, particularly in the context of task-based optimization decisions. Media selection research has similarly investigated the extent to which task characteristics influence media choice and use. This paper outlines a study which compares the effectiveness of web-based online product review systems for facilitation of trust and purchase intention to those of mobile product review systems in an experiential service setting (hotel services). Findings indicate that the extensiveness of information in the review increases trust and purchase intention until that information load becomes excessive, at which point trust and purchase intention begin to decrease. The magnitude of this decline is smaller in web-environments than in mobile environments, suggesting that web-based systems are more effective in fostering focus and are less prone to navigation frustration, thus reducing information overload.

Keywords

Mobile reviews Mobile commerce Word of mouth Information overload 

JEL classification

M31 

Notes

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this study was presented at the 2015 Wuhan International Conference on e-Business in June 2015 (Furner et al., 2015b). The version presented at the conference was a theory paper and did not report results.

References

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (1967). Management misinformation systems. Management Science, 14(4), 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agnew, J. R., & Szykman, L. R. (2005). Asset allocation and informtion overload, the influence of information display, asset choice, and investor experience. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(2), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albert, L. J., Aggarwal, N., & Hill, T. R. (2014). Influencing customer’s purchase intentions through firm participation in online consumer communities. Electronic Markets, 24(4), 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartikowski, B., & Walsh, G. (2014). Attitude contagion in consumer opinion platforms: posters and lurkers. Electronic Markets, 24(3), 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial interaction: uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. Language and. Social Psychology, 122–144.Google Scholar
  6. Botha, R. A., Furnell, S. M., & Clarke, N. L. (2009). From desktop to mobile: Examining the security experience. Computers & Security, 28(3–4), 130–137. doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2008.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Browne, J., Drego, V. L., & Petterson, J. (2012). Mobile interactive design agencies emerge.  Retrieved from Forrester Research database. https://www.forrester.com/report/Mobile+Interactive+Design+Agencies+Emerge/-/E-RES60272.
  8. Buhalis, D. (2003). eTourism: information technology for strategic tourism management. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, J. M. (2000). Five reasons for scenario-based design. Interacting with Computers, 13(1), 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chervany, N. L., & Dickson, G. W. (1974). An experimental evaluation of information overload in a production environment. Management Science, 20(10), 1355–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheung, M., Luo, C., Sia, C., & Chen, H. (2009). Credibility of electronic word-of-mouth: information and normative determinants of online consumer recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13(4), 9–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1977). The ecology of adolescent activity and experience. Journal of Youth and Adolescense, 6, 181–202.Google Scholar
  13. Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X., & Awad, N. (2007). Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dellarocas, C., Gao, G., & Narayan, R. (2010). Are consumers more likely to contribute online reviews for hit or niche products? Journal of Management Information Systems, 27(2), 127–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eppler, M. J., & Mengis, J. (2004). The concept of information overload: A review of literature from organization science, accounting, marketing, MIS, and related disciplines. The Information Society, 20(5), 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Furner, C. P., Racherla, P., & Zhu, Z. (2012). Uncertainty, trust and purchase intention based on online product reviews: An introduction to an international study. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organizations, 11(3–4), 260–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Furner, C. P., Racherla, P., & Babb, J. (2014). Mobile application stickiness (MASS) and mobile interactivity: A conceptual model. The Marketing Review, 14(2), 163–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Furner, C. P., Racherla, P., & Babb, J. (2015a). What we know and do not know about mobile app usage and stickiness: A research agenda. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications, 7(3), 48–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Furner, C. P., Zinko, R. A., & Zhu, Z. (2015b). The influence of information overload on the development of trust and purchase intention based on online product reviews in a mobile vs. web environment: a research proposal. Proceedings of the Wuhan International Conference on e-Business, Wuhan, PR China (p. 245–252). AIS.Google Scholar
  20. Gao, H., & Liu, D. (2014). Relationship of trustworthiness and relational benefit in electronic catalog markets. Electronic Markets, 24(1), 67–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gastwirth, J. L., Gel, Y. R., & Miao, W. (2009). The impact of Levene’s test of equality of variances on statistical theory and practice. Statistical Science, 343–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hair, J. F. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed). New York: Prentice Hall International.Google Scholar
  24. Hu, N., Liu, L., & Zhang, J. (2008). Do online reviews affect product sales? The role of reviewer characteristics and temporal effects. Information Technology and Management, 9(3), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacoby, J., Speller, D. E., & Berning, C. K. (1974). Brand choice behavior as a function of information load: Replication and extension. Journal of Consumer Research, 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Staples, D. S. (2001). Exploring perceptions of organizational ownership of information and expertise. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 151–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeong, M., & Lambert, C. U. (2001). Adaptation of an information quality framework to measure customers’ behavioral intentions and use of lodging Web sites. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 20(2), 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Juliana, S., Elia, P., Tan, C. H., & Phang, C. W. (2013). Adressing the personalization-privacy paradox: An emperical assessment from a field experiment on smartphone users. MIS Quarterly, 37(4), 1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Keith, M., Babb, J., Lowrey, P., Furner, C. P., & Abdullat, A. (2015). The role of mobile-computing self-efficacy in consumer information disclosure. Information Systems Journal, 25(6), 637–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kugler, L. (2014). Keeping online reviews honest. Communications of the ACM, 57(11), 20–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee, Y. E., & Benbasat, I. (2004). A framework for the study of customer interface design for mobile commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3), 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, J., Lee, J. N., & Shin, H. (2011). The long tail or the short tail? The category-specific impact of eWOM on sales distribution. Decision Support Systems, 51(3), 466–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lipowski, Z. (1975). Sensory and information inputs overload: behavioral effects. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 16(3), 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu, Y. (2006). Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu, Y., & Sutanto, J. (2012). Buyers’ purchasing time and herd behavior on deal-of-the-day group-buying websites. Electronic Markets, 22(2), 83–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Liu, S. H., Liao, H. L., & Chen, C. H. (2013). Marketing for remote area using an experience-based tourism website destination. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 19(4/5/6), 294–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ludwig, S., Ruyter, K., Friedman, M., Brüggen, E. C., Wetzels, M., & Pfann, G. (2013). More than words: The influence of affective content and linguistic style matches in online reviews on conversion rates. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Malhorta, N. K. (1984). Reflections on the information overload paradigm in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), 436–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meier, R. L. (1963). Communications overload: proposals from the study of a university library. Administrative Science Quarterly, 521–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mudambi, S., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of consumer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Park, D.-H., & Kim, S. (2008). The effects of consumer knowledge on message processing of electronic word-of-mouth via online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 399–410. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2007.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Park, D.-H., & Lee, J. (2008). eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 386–398. doi: 10.1016/j.elerap.2007.11.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Patil, M. S., & Bagade, A. (2012). Online Review Spam Detection using Language Model and Feature Selection. International Journal of Computer Applications, 59(7), 33–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Potts, C. (1995). Using schematic scenarios to understand user needs. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, & Techniques, University of Michigan (p. 247–256). ACM.Google Scholar
  47. Qiu, L., Pang, J., & Lim, K. H. (2012). Effects of conflicting aggregated rating on eWOM review credibility and diagnosticity: The moderating role of review valence. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 631–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Racherla, P., & Friske, W. (2012). Perceived ‘usefulness’ of online consumer reviews: An exploratory investigation across three services categories. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 548–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, 2(1), 21–33.Google Scholar
  50. Realmuto, G., Begleiter, H., Odencrantz, J., & Porjesz, B. (1993). Event-related potential evidence of dysfunction in automatic processing in abstinent alcoholics. Biological Psychiatry, 33(8–9), 594–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rhee, H. T., & Yang, S.-B. (2015). How does hotel attribute importance vary among different travelers? An exploratory case study based on a conjoint analysis. Electronic Markets, 25, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richins, M. L. (1983). Negative word-of-mouth by dissatisfied consumers: a pilot study. The Journal of Marketing, 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schmidt-Rauch, S., & Schwabe, G. (2014). Designing for mobile value co-creation—the case of travel counselling. Electronic Markets, 24(1), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Serino, C. M., Furner, C. P., & Smatt, C. S. (2005). Making it personal: How personalization affects trust over time. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.Google Scholar
  55. Sotiriadis, M. D., & van Zyl, C. (2013). Electronic word-of-mouth and online reviews in tourism services: the use of twitter by tourists. Electronic Commerce Research, 13(1), 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stantchev, V., & Tamm, G. (2012). Reducing information asymmetry in cloud marketplaces. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), 3(4), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tan, W. T., & Thoen, W. (2000). Toward a generic model of trust for electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(2), 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vera-Baquero, A., Colomo Palacios, R., Stantchev, V., & Molloy, O. (2015). Leveraging big-data for business process analytics. The Learning Organization, 22(4), 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vicente, K. J. (2000). HCI in the global knowledge-based economy: designing to support worker adaptation. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 7(2), 236–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vollmann, T. E. (1991). Cutting the Gordian knot of misguided performance measurement. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 91(1), 24–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang, Y. S., Lin, H. H., & Luarn, P. (2006). Predicting consumer intention to use mobile service. Information Systems Journal, 16(2), 157–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1994). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Whitehead, J. C., Groothuis, P. A., & Blomquist, G. C. (1993). Testing for non-response and sample selection bias in contingent valuation: analysis of a combination phone/mail survey. Economics Letters, 41(2), 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilson, J. W., & Carry, L. R. (1969). Homogeneity of regression. Its rationale, computation and use. American Educational Research Journal, 80–90.Google Scholar
  65. Wurman, R. S. (2001). Information Anxiety. Indianapolis, IN: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  66. You, W., Xia, M., Liu, L., & Liu, D. (2012). Customer knowledge discovery from online reviews. Electronic Markets, 22(3), 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhang, X., Luo, J., & Li, Q. (2012). Do different reputation systems provide consistent signals of seller quality: a canonical correlation investigation of Chinese C2C marketplaces. Electronic Markets, 22(3), 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Applied Informatics at University of Leipzig 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.East Carolina UniversityGreenvilleUSA
  2. 2.College of Business and LawUniversity of NewcastleSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations