Advertisement

Land Cover/Land Use Mapping of LISS IV Imagery Using Object-Based Convolutional Neural Network with Deep Features

  • S. RajeshEmail author
  • T. Gladima Nisia
  • S. Arivazhagan
  • R. Abisekaraj
Open Access
Research Article
First Online:
  • 112 Downloads

Abstract

The paper proposes a new method for classifying the LISS IV satellite images using deep learning method. Deep learning method is to automatically extract many features without any human intervention. The classification accuracy through deep learning is still improved by including object-based segmentation. The object-based deep feature learning method using CNN is used to accurately classify the remotely sensed images. The method is designed with the technique of extracting the deep features and using it for object-based classification. The proposed system extracts deep features using pre-defined filter values, thus increasing the overall performance of the process compared to randomly initialized filter values. The object-based classification method can preserve edge information in complex satellite images. To improve the classification accuracy and to reduce complexity, object-based deep learning technique is used. The proposed object-based deep learning approach is used to drastically increase the classification accuracy. Here, the remotely sensed images were used to classify the urban areas of Ahmadabad and Madurai cities. Experimental results show a better performance with the object-based classification.

Keywords

Convolutional neural network (CNN) Deep learning LISS IV image Image classification Multi-resolution segmentation 

Introduction

Classifying different areas of remote sensing image has a wide variety of applications in fields such as land cover mapping and detection, water resource detection, agricultural usage, wetland mapping, geological information and urban and regional planning. However, the classification of remote sensing images remains a tedious task due to its complexity. Feature extraction plays an important role in classification. When features are chosen manually with human intervention, the efficiency of the classification process decreases. So, in order to improve the efficiency, we adopt an automatic feature learning method such as deep learning.

Deep learning is one of the excellent methods in artificial intelligence to learn discriminative features without human intervention. The work by LeCun et al. (2015) shows how deep learning is applied for classification. Unlike low-level feature representations, deeply learned features are generally more robust, and it has great effectiveness in image classification, such as face recognition (Sun et al. 2014) and scene classification (Li et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2016a, b). In the remote sensing field, several researches are done for image classification using deep learning models, such as stacked autoencoder (SAE) and convolutional neural network (CNN). But, the original SAE extracts only one-dimensional spectral features which probably is not sufficient for high-resolution image classification. Therefore, another work is proposed (Chen et al. 2014b), which improved the SAE model by introducing spatial features for the efficient classification of hyperspectral images.

The CNN algorithm is popular for high-resolution image classification due to its effectiveness in spatial feature exploration (Zhao and Du 2016a, b; Zhao et al. 2015; Yue et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2014a). However, deep features are usually learned from local images patches and are pixel based, which sometimes may lead to misinterpretations. Also, deep feature extraction does not provide clear information about boundary and edges. So, to overcome the difficulty, the object-based classification is used instead of pixel-based classification. The object-based approach can be used to efficiently delineate and classify high-resolution imagery (Duveiller et al. 2008). Object-based classification method considers each image segments as building blocks for the further image analysis.

Now, let us look about the earlier works carried out for the classification of LISS IV images. The wavelet packet transform for texture analysis is presented for LISS IV image (Rajesh et al. 2011). Here, the statistical and co-occurrence features of the input patterns are first extracted and those features are used for classification. The Daubechies (DB2) wavelet filter is used for decomposition, and Mahalanobis distance classifier is used as the classifier. Since the methodology results in many features, some of which are found to be not useful, the best among the wavelet packet statistical and wavelet packet co-occurrence textural feature sets is selected using genetic algorithm (Rajesh et al. 2013). It outperforms the other feature reduction techniques like principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis. Here, multilayer perceptron (MLP) layer is used for classification. The classification outperforms when the MLP for classification is replaced by adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) trained with backpropagation gradient descent method in combination with the least squares method (Rajesh and Arivazhagan 2014).

Our proposed system replaces the so-far carried-out works for classification of LISS IV image with a deep learning approach. CNN is used as a feature extractor, and deep features are obtained from LISS IV image. In order to still increase the efficiency, the obtained deep features are combined with the object-based textural features.

The organization of this paper is as follows: “Study Area and Data Used” section presents the study data and area. “Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)” section gives a simple introduction to convolutional neural network (CNN). “Proposed Method” section describes briefly about the proposed work and implementation. “Experimental Study and Results” section discusses the experimental study and results obtained. The conclusions are presented in “Conclusion” section.

Study Area and Data Used

For a supervised method of classification, the ground truth data are very important and it should be part of the training dataset, on the basis of which the real classification can be performed and tested. From the ground truth image of Ahmadabad shown in Fig. 1, the regions of bench mark data shown in Fig. 2 are labeled as 4 classes—, urban area, water and land area. The vegetation class includes the heavy and sparse vegetation areas in the image. The urban area class includes buildings, concrete and roads. The water class includes water in the given image. Land area class includes any area like barren farms, land areas between buildings, etc.
Fig. 1

Ground truth of Ahmadabad city

Fig. 2

Ahmadabad LISS IV image (300 × 300)

The multi-temporal satellite sensor images used in this study are of Madurai city in Tamil Nadu, state of India, and are shown in Fig. 3. Madurai is identified as one of the 12 heritage cities of India. The land cover features of this study area include urban, vegetation, water body, waste land and hilly region. The scene details of the area are as follows:
Fig. 3

Madurai city (size 400 × 400)

Satellite/sensor:

IRS P6/LISS IV

Resolution:

5.8 m

Band 2 (green):

0.52–0.59 µm

Band 3 (red):

0.62–0.68 µm

Band 4 (near-infrared):

0.77–0.86 µm

Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)

CNN is a deep, feed-forward neural network (Goodfellow et al. 2016). It consists of input and output layers; between them there are several multiple hidden layers. It is used primarily to classify images, cluster them by similarity and perform object recognition within scenes. They are algorithms that can identify many aspects of visual data. The architecture of the CNN is shown in Fig. 4.
Fig. 4

Architecture of convolutional neural network

In our proposed system, the CNN is used to extract high-level features automatically from the image with the help of manually initialized filters. The building blocks for CNN include convolutional layer, pooling layer, ReLU layer and fully connected layer. Usually, the CNN randomly initializes the filters and performs convolution operation. But the proposed system uses filters such as mean filter, Gaussian filter, Sobel filter, disk filter, log filter, Prewitt filter, Laplacian filter as initial filters. The CNN has two important concepts: Locally connected network and parameter sharing. If we use the fully connected network, then there will be large number of parameters required. So locally connected networks are used through which parameter requirement is reduced. Also, by using parameter sharing, instead of using new parameters every time the already used parameters are utilized.

Proposed Method

The proposed method is introduced to classify objects in high-resolution images using object-based deep learning classification. The flowchart for object-based image classification combined with deep features is shown in Fig. 5. The proposed method is explained in the following sections.
Fig. 5

Flowchart for object-based image classification combined with deep features

Multi-resolution Segmentation

Object-based classification method improves the efficiency of classifying remotely sensed images. Segmentation groups the similar regions, and also it preserves the boundary information. The proposed system utilizes multi-resolution segmentation algorithm (Li et al. 2014) to segment image object. Scale, shape and compactness are important in segmenting image object. Scale, shape and compactness determine the size, shape and color of the image object, respectively. Objects of interest appear on different scales in an image. Therefore, the scale of resulting image objects should be freely adaptable to fit to the scale of task. Here, each pixel is considered as one image object. The image objects are merged based on local homogeneity, which describes the similarity of adjacent image objects, and larger image objects are obtained. The main components of multi-resolution segmentation are decision heuristics and definition of homogeneity of image objects. The decision heuristics determines the objects going to be merged at each stage, and definition of homogeneity of image objects is to compute the degree of fitting for a pair of image objects.

Extraction of Texture Feature

In texture training, the known texture features are mean, standard deviation, root mean square, energy, cluster shade, cluster prominence, correlation. Those features are calculated from the co-occurrence matrix C(i,j) using Eqs. (1)–(9). The spectral feature NDVI is calculated using Eq. (10). The proposed system aims at obtaining the object-based texture features. So, the object-based segmented image is given as input and features are obtained using Eqs. (1)–(10):
$$ {\text{Mean}}\,\bar{x} = \frac{1}{{N^{2} }}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N} {x_{i,j} } } $$
(1)
$$ {\text{Variance}}\,V = \frac{1}{{N^{2} }}\sum\limits_{i = 0}^{N} {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N} {(x_{i,j} - \overline{x} )} }^{2} $$
(2)
$$ {\text{Entropy}} = - \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N} {(C(i,j))} } \log (C(i,j)). $$
(3)
$$ \text{Contrast} = \sum\limits_{i,j = 0}^{N} {(i - j)^{2} } C(i,j) $$
(4)
$$ \text{Energy} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} {C(i - j)^{2} } } $$
(5)
$$ \text{Local}\,\text{homogeneity} = \sum\limits_{{i\text{,}j = 0}}^{n} {1/(1 + (i - j)^{2} )C(i\text{,}j)} $$
(6)
$$ {\text{Cluster}}\,{\text{shade}} = \sum\limits_{i,j = 0}^{n} {(i - M_{x} + j - M_{y} )^{3} C(i,j)} $$
(7)
$$ {\text{Cluster}}\,{\text{prominence}} = \sum\limits_{i,j = 0}^{n} {(i - M_{x} + j - M_{y} )^{4} C(i,j)} $$
(8)
where \( M_{x} = \sum\limits_{i,j = 0}^{n} {iC(i,j)} \) and \( M_{y} = \sum\limits_{i,j = 0}^{n} {jC(i,j)} \)
$$ {\text{Correlation}} = \frac{{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N} {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N} {\left[ {ijC(i,j)} \right]} - \mu_{x} \mu_{y} } }}{{\sigma_{x} \sigma_{y} }}. $$
(9)
where
$$ \begin{aligned} \mu_{x} & = \sum\limits_{i}^{N} {i\sum\limits_{j}^{N} {C(i,j)} } \\ \mu_{y} & = \sum\limits_{j}^{N} {j\sum\limits_{i}^{N} {C(i,j)} } \\ \end{aligned} $$
$$ \sigma_{x}^{2} = \sum\limits_{i}^{N} {(a - \mu_{x} )^{2} } \sum\limits_{j}^{N} {C(i,j)} \quad \sigma_{y}^{2} = \sum\limits_{j}^{N} {(b - \mu_{y} )^{2} } \sum\limits_{i}^{N} {C(i,j)} $$
$$ {\text{NDVI}} = ({\text{near}}\,{\text{IR}}\,{\text{band}} - {\text{red}}\,{\text{band}}) /({\text{near}}\,{\text{IR}}\,{\text{band}} + {\text{red}}\,{\text{band}}). $$
(10)

These features are extracted, and thus, the feature set is formed. The obtained feature set represents the object-based texture feature since the segmented image is given as input for feature extraction.

Deep Feature Extraction

Deep features consist of n-number of convolution and pooling. The illustration of convolutional neural network-based framework is shown in Fig. 6 . The main reason for using convolution in the proposed system is to extract deep features from the input LISS IV image. The convolutional layer applies the convolution operator to the input image and passes its output to the next layer. Here, a filter is made to slide or convolve around the input image. Every unique location on the input produces a value. The weight matrix helps in extracting important information from image matrix. The output matrix obtained is called the ‘convolved feature’ or ‘activation map.’
$$ f({\mathbf{X}};\theta ) = W \cdot H $$
(11)
where W represents filters, X represents training samples, the filters and biases are collectively referred as θ, and H represents hidden layers. The filters are used to extract features. The size of the activation map is controlled by two parameters; they are depth and stride.
Fig. 6

Illustration of convolutional neural network

  • Depth It refers to the number of filters used for the convolution operation.

  • Stride It refers to the number of pixels sliding the weight matrix over the input matrix.

Pooling is to reduce the dimensionality of the activation map. It can be of different types, namely max, average, sum:
$$ h = {\text{pool}}\,(g(W \cdot H)). $$
(12)

The final pooling, h, represents the deep feature, and g represents a point-wise nonlinear tanh activation function. Thus, the final deep features are obtained.

The extracted texture features (from Eqs. 1 to 10) such as mean, standard deviation, root mean square, energy, cluster shade, cluster prominence, correlation and deep features are combined and used for classification.

Object-Based Classification with Deep Features

An image I contains N image objects Oi, i ∈ {1, 2,…,N}, and there are M pixels Ij, j ∈ {1, 2,…,M} inside object Oi. For each pixel Ij, the deep features are denoted as Fj. Similarly, the object-based texture features (such as NDVI) are represented as Rj. For feature combination purpose, the deep features are combined with object-based properties Uj= [Fi,Rj] for joint feature classification of the original imagery at the pixel level. Then, the label of an object Oi is predicted from the majority statistics of feature vectors Uj using gaussian function in CNN (Zhao et al. 2017). The obtained Uj is used for calculating the predicted label:
$$ {\text{Predicted}}\,{\text{label}} = \exp \left( { - \frac{1}{2}\left( {U_{j}^{i} } \right)^{2} } \right). $$
The CNN training is carried out with one or multiple layers. The training is carried out by applying methods such as backpropagation methods and steepest gradient descent method. Algorithm for backpropagation is as follows:

The trained CNN is then used to classify the test image. Thus, the different portions of the remotely sensed image are classified and labeled efficiently.

Experimental Study and Results

The proposed method is implemented using Matlab R2018b. The section presents the performance analysis of the proposed method to classify the remotely sensed LISS IV images. Two satellite images captured by Indian Remote Sensing satellite IRS-P6 are taken for analysis. These images are subjected to geometric correction with the help of ground control points (GCPS). As mentioned above, we combine deep feature and object-based classification method for accurate high-resolution image interpretation.

Performance of Proposed Method to Ahmadabad LISS IV Image

The satellite imagery used corresponds to areas in and around Ahmadabad city. The image is a part of IRS P6 LISS IV imagery which has a spatial resolution of 5.8 meters. For Ahmadabad city, we have 4 different classes such as urban area, Vegetation, Water body and Land cover. The size of Ahmadabad LISS IV image is 300 × 300 pixels. For the input training samples, the size of training sample is 7 × 7 pixel. The testing is carried for different layers of configuration CNN. The one-layer CNN only has a single convolution layer. Similarly, the two-layer CNN, three-layer CNN and four-layer CNN have two convolution layers, three convolution layers and four convolution layers, respectively. Thus, the classification accuracy for different CNNs is calculated as shown in Table 1. The performance of different configuration CNNs is shown in Table 2. The Ahmadabad dataset is a multispectral image, where the first convolutional layer has 20 filters of 3 * 3 (3 * 3 * 3). The output of convolutional layer is passed through max pooling (2 * 2), and it is moved through second convolutional layer with 50 filters (3 * 3 * 20) and in third convolutional layer with 70 filters (3 * 3 * 40) and in fourth layer with 100 filters (3 * 3 * 60). The input image of size 7 * 7 pixel, after the first convolution the output size of the image is 10 * 10 pixel with 20 filters and after the second convolution, the output size of the image is 13 * 13 pixel with 50 filters and after the third convolution, the output size of the image is 16 * 16 pixel with 70 filters and after the fourth convolution, the output size of the image is 19 * 19 pixel with 100 filters.
Table 1

Classification accuracy of Ahmadabad dataset

CNNs

WB

VEG

UB

LC

One-layer

89

70

84

78

Two-layer

89

78

88

82

Three-layer

91

84

88

86

Four-layer

92

90

92

90

Table 2

Performance of different configuration CNNs—Ahmadabad dataset

CNNs

Precision (%)

Recall (%)

Accuracy (%)

F1 (%)

One-layer

80

82

80.5

81

Two-layer

86

86

84.5

86

Three-layer

88

87

87

87

Four-layer

90

90

90.5

90

To demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed technique, a total of 3550 sample image regions were taken for training. The sampling strategy followed is random sampling. The entire image of Fig. 2 is given for testing, and the output is shown as multispectral image in Fig. 7. The performance analysis of these techniques has been carried out in terms of overall, producer, user and Kappa coefficient accuracy indices. The accuracy indices are carried for all the labels of Ahmadabad city. Producer accuracy, user accuracy and Kappa coefficient are calculated for the classified output image. Producer accuracy is the ratio between number of correctly classified pixels in each category to the number of training pixels used for the category. Water body has the highest producer accuracy of 98%, and vegetation, urban area and land cover have 97%, 96% and 96%, respectively. User accuracy is the ratio between number correctly classified pixels to the total number of pixels belonging to that particular class in the confusion matrix. Water body, land cover, vegetation and urban area have the user accuracy of 98%, 96%, 95% and 95%, respectively. Kappa coefficient has been calculated, and it results with water body (0.85), vegetation (0.62), urban area (0.89) and land cover (0.75). The overall accuracy for Ahmadabad city is 90.25%. Table 3 shows the confusion matrix results obtained by comparing the reference map with the classified map, for the proposed system.
Fig. 7

Classified output of Ahmadabad using CNN

Table 3

Confusion matrix for Ahmadabad city image

Performance of Proposed Method to Madurai LISS IV Image

Madurai dataset has different classes such as waste land, water body, urban area, vegetation and saline land. The size of Madurai LISS IV image is 400X400 pixels. For the input training samples, the size of training sample is 7 × 7 pixel. Here, 300 samples are taken for training and 500 samples are taken for testing. The testing is carried for different layers of configuration CNN. The classification accuracy is calculated and is shown in Table 4. The performance of different configuration CNNs is shown in Table 5. The Madurai dataset is a colored image, where the first convolutional layer has 20 filters of 3 * 3 (3 * 3 * 3). The output of convolutional layer is passed through max pooling (2 * 2), and it is moved through second convolutional layer with 50 filters (3 * 3 * 20) and in third convolutional layer with 70 filters (3 * 3 * 40) and in fourth layer with 100 filters (3 * 3 * 60). The input image of size 7 * 7 pixel, after the first convolution the output size of the image is 10 * 10 pixel with 20 filters and after the second convolution, the output size of the image is 13 * 13 pixel with 50 filters and after the third convolution, the output size of the image is 16 * 16 pixel with 70 filters and after the fourth convolution, the output size of the image is 19 * 19 pixel with 100 filters.
Table 4

Classification accuracy of Madurai dataset

CNNs

UB

VEG

WB

WL

SL

One-layer

91.1

88.8

100

80

71.3

Two-layer

93

93

100

80

77

Three-layer

95

93

100

86

86

Four-layer

95

93

100

91

84

Table 5

Performance of different configuration CNNs—Madurai dataset

CNNs

Precision (%)

Recall (%)

Accuracy (%)

F1 (%)

One-layer

86

87

86

87

Two-layer

90

87

88

89

Three-layer

93

91

89

92

Four-layer

94

92

92

93

The classified output of Madurai LISS IV image is shown in Fig. 8. The experimental study was carried for LISS IV Madurai image. The sampling strategy followed here is random sampling. The number of training samples was chosen based on the heuristic Ni * x (Ni + 1) given by Kavzoglu and Mather, where Ni is the number of neurons. To test the efficiency, 500 samples were selected randomly from the study area. The 500 samples (pixels) chosen are 131, 216, 66, 59 and 4 pixels of urban, vegetation, water body, waste land and saline land samples, respectively. About 500 Ground Control Points (GCPs) were used to create the reference dataset for the assessment using e-Trex venture global positioning system device. Some of the GCPs collected during field survey of Madurai city. Few of the GCPs are listed out in Table 6.
Fig. 8

Classified output of Madurai using CNN

Table 6

Ground control points of Madurai city

Name of the area

Latitude

Longitude

Elevation (Feet)

Accuracy (Feet)

Features

Kudhal nagar tank

9°57′03.9″

78°06′14.8″

138

24

Vegetation

Sellur tank

9°56′26.4″

78°07′06.3″

148

27

Water body

Malar nagar

9°57′25.2″

78°06′52.3″

140

25

Waste land

Alangulam tank

9°57′25.6″

78°07′14.4″

138

24

Water body

Reserve line

9°56′49.8″

78°07′56.1″

140

26

Urban

Burma colony

9°51′20.5″

78°06′07.1″

148

21

Urban

Perungudi

9°50′33.9″

78°05′33.2″

134

24

Waste land

Ring road 1

9°51′23.4″

78°07′08.5″

127

22

Waste land

Ring road 2

9°51′31.7″

78°07′15.0″

125

22

Waste land

Chinthamani

9°53′14.8″

78°08′37.8″

133

26

Urban

Melamadai

9°55′38.9″

78°09′06.7″

135

25

Waste land

Anna nagar

9°55′04.4″

78°08′55.3″

140

29

Urban

Vandiyur stop

9°54′35.3″

78°09′36.5″

122

26

Urban

Vandiyur extend

9°54′24.0″

78°09′47.3″

126

24

Waste land

Vaigai river

9°54′45.3″

78°09′20.1″

122

23

Water body

The performance analysis of these techniques has been carried out in terms of overall, producer, user and Kappa coefficient accuracy indices. The accuracy indices are carried for all the labels of Madurai city. Producer accuracy is calculated for LISS IV Madurai image. Water body and Urban area have the producer accuracy of 97%. Vegetation, waste land and saline land have the accuracy of 96%. User accuracy is also calculated. Water body and urban area have the accuracy of 97%. Vegetation, waste land and Saline land have the accuracy of 96%, 93% and 90%, respectively. Kappa coefficient calculated produced the results such as water body (0.95), waste land (0.89), urban area (0.83), vegetation (0.75) and saline land (0.8). The overall accuracy for Madurai city is 92%. Table 7 shows the confusion matrix results obtained by comparing the reference map with the classified map, for the proposed system.
Table 7

Confusion matrix for Madurai image

To compare the accuracy of different algorithms, classified output of Madurai LISS IV image with DB2, DB2 with GA and ANN, DB2 with GA and ANFIS and object-based deep learning methods is shown in Fig. 9. When comparing all the algorithms, object-based deep learning technique has classified the image more accurately. From Table 7, which shows the classification results of different algorithms, it is evident that object-based deep learning technique produces the best results.
Fig. 9

a Object-based deep learning technique, b DB2, c DB2 with GA and ANN, d DB2 with GA and ANFIS

Table 8

Classification results of different algorithms

 

Overall

Producer

User

Kappa

DB2 with ANN

83.62

84.00

83.10

0.80

DB2 with ANFIS

86.01

85.19

84.28

0.80

DB2

87.60

89.57

82.02

0.82

Object-based deep learning

92

96.4

94.6

0.85

Conclusion

The system utilized the CNN for the effective classification of high-resolution LISS IV images using object-based strategy. Feature extraction is one of the toughest tasks in the analysis of the images. The challenge was efficiently handled by choosing CNN for automatic feature learning with the help of pre-defined filter values. We propose an effective way to classify high-resolution LISS IV images by combining deep features with image objects. The deep features are evaluated by testing the CNN framework with five different layer configurations for the classification of images. The proposed approach significantly reduces the complexity of the feature set and also improves the classifier performance when compared to earlier approaches. The results obtained by the proposed method on Ahmadabad City remotely sensed image and Madurai city remotely sensed image demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms other studied methods.

Notes

References

  1. Chen, X., Xiang, S., Liu, C. L., & Pan, C. H. (2014a). Vehicle detection in satellite images by hybrid deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters,11(10), 1797–1801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, Y., Lin, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, G., & Gu, Y. (2014b). Deep learning-based classification of hyperspectral data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing,7(6), 2094–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Duveiller, G., Defourny, P., Desclée, B., & Mayaux, P. (2008). Deforestation in Central Africa: Estimates at regional, national and landscape levels by advanced processing of systematically-distributed landsat extracts. Remote Sensing of Environment,112(5), 1969–1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature,521(7553), 436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Li, H., Tang, Y., Liu, Q., Ding, H., Jing, L., Lin, Q. (2014). A novel multi-resolution segmentation algorithm for high resolution remote sensing imagery based on minimum spanning tree and minimum heterogeneity criterion. In Proceedings of IEEE international geoscience remote sensing symposium (vol. 3, pp. 2850–2854).Google Scholar
  7. Li, L.-J., Su, H., Fei-Fei, L., & Xing, E. P. (2010). Object bank: A high-level image representation for scene classification and semantic feature sparsification. In Proceedings of the neural information processing systems conference (pp. 1378–1386).Google Scholar
  8. Rajesh, S., & Arivazhagan, S. (2014). adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system based land cover/land use mapping of LISS IV imagery using wavelet packet transform. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing,42(2), 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rajesh, S., Arivazhagan, S., Pradeep Moses, K., & Abisekaraj, R. (2011). Land cover/land use mapping using different wavelet packet transforms for LISS IV Madurai imagery. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing,40(2), 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rajesh, S., Arivazhagan, S., Pradeep Moses, K., & Abisekaraj, R. (2013). Genetic algorithm based feature subset selection for land cover/land use mapping using wavelet packet transform. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing,41(2), 237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sun, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, X., & Tang, X. (2014). Deep learning face representation by joint identification- verification. In Proceedings of advances neural information processing system conference (pp. 1988–1996).Google Scholar
  12. Yue, J., Zhao, W., Mao, S., & Liu, H. (2015). Spectral–spatial classification of hyperspectral images using deep convolutional neural networks. Remote Sensing Letters,6(6), 468–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang, F., Du, B., & Zhang, L. (2016a). Scene classification via a gradient boosting random convolutional network framework. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,54(3), 1793–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang, F., Du, B., Zhang, L., & Xu, M. (2016b). Weakly supervised learning based on coupled convolutional neural networks for aircraft detection. IEEE Transaction Geoscience and Remote Sensing,54(9), 5553–5563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhao, W., & Du, S. (2016a). Spectral-spatial feature extraction for hyperspectral image classification: A dimension reduction and deep learning approach. IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,54(8), 4544–4554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhao, W., & Du, S. (2016b). Learning multiscale and deep representations for classifying remotely sensed imagery. ISPRS Journal Photogrammetry Remote Sensing,113, 155–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhao, W., Guo, Z., Yue, J., Zhang, X., & Luo, L. (2015). On combining multiscale deep learning features for the classification of hyperspectral remote sensing imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing,36(13), 3368–3379.  https://doi.org/10.1080/2150704X.2015.1062157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhao, W., Shihong, D., & Emery, W. J. (2017). Object-based convolutional neural network for high-resolution imagery classification. IEEE Journal of Selected topics in Applied Earth observation and Remote Sensing,10(7), 3386–3396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Rajesh
    • 1
    Email author
  • T. Gladima Nisia
    • 2
  • S. Arivazhagan
    • 3
  • R. Abisekaraj
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyMepco Schlenk Engineering CollegeSivakasiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringAAA College of Engineering and TechnologySivakasiIndia
  3. 3.Department of ECEMepco Schlenk Engineering CollegeSivakasiIndia
  4. 4.Naval Science and Technological LaboratoryDRDOVishakapatanamIndia

Personalised recommendations