Advertisement

Assessment of River Morphological Change for Co Chien Estuary Applying the CCHE2D Model

  • Seung Kyu Lee
  • Truong An DangEmail author
  • Van Tuan Le
Research Article

Abstract

Two-dimensional (2D) numerical models are useful tools for studying river morphology. Frequently, 2D numerical models are often applied to predict the impacts of the artificial changes to rivers and estuaries. These changes may be caused by altered watershed hydrology, variations in the sediment supply and the construction of artificial works such as dams, embankments and tidal gutters. The aim of this study was to apply the CCHE2D model in simulating riverbed morphological variation in the Co Chien Estuary of Vietnam with complex morphology under the combined impacts of hydrodynamic processes such as waves, flow field, tidal currents and sediment transport. First, the proposed model was calibrated using water surface level and current speed data during dry and flood seasons in 2010. Calibrated results showed satisfactory coefficients (root mean square error smaller than 0.10 and Brier skill score (BSS) criteria varying between 0.63 and 0.94). Second, the proposed model is applied to simulate riverbed level variation for Co Chien Estuary after the 6-year flood (2010–2015). The results were evaluated comparing deviations between simulated and measured elevations at multiple monitoring cross sections and longitudinal bed profiles after the 6-year flood. Compared results confirmed that the proposed model is suitable for simulating hydrodynamic processes and riverbed morphological changes in the study area with BSS criteria greater than 0.68. The proposed model is a useful tool to help efficiently manage resources and minimizing the unwanted influences of wave, current, tide and sediment transport process.

Keywords

CCHE2D Sediment transport Morphological Aggradation Degradation 

Notes

References

  1. Carr, K. J., Tu, T. B., Ercan, A., & Kavvas, M. L. (2017). Evaluating the applicability of a two-dimensional flow model of a highly heterogeneous domain to flow and environmental management. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12602.Google Scholar
  2. Chao, Y. C., Li, H. C., Liou, J. J., & Chen, Y. M. (2016). Extreme bed changes in the Gaoping River under climate change. Terrestrial, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 27(5), 717–727.Google Scholar
  3. Dang, T. A., & Park, S. D. (2016). Experimental analysis and numerical simulation of bed elevation change in mountain rivers. SpringerPlus.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2714-3.Google Scholar
  4. Ding, Y., & Wang, S. S. Y. (2008). Development and application of coastal and estuarine morphological process modeling system. Journal of Coastal Research, 52, 127–140.Google Scholar
  5. Ding, Y., Zhang, Y. X., & Jia, Y. F. (2016). CCHE2D-Coast: Model description and graphical user interface. NCCHE technical report, The University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, March, 2016, p. 88.Google Scholar
  6. Duan, J. G., & Julien, P. Y. (2010). Numerical simulation of meandering evolution. Journal of Hydrology, 391, 34–46.Google Scholar
  7. Duan, J. G., Wang, S. S. Y., & Jia, Y. F. (2001). The applications of the enhanced CCHE2D model to study the alluvial channel migration processes. Journal of Hydraulic Research.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221686.2001.9628272.Google Scholar
  8. Duvoy, P., & Toniolo, H. (2012). HYDROKAL: A module for in-stream hydrokinetic resource assessment. Computers & Geosciences, 39, 171–181.Google Scholar
  9. Fathi, M., & Honarbakhsh, A. (2013). Morphological simulation of bank erosion in a natural river. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 4(11), 3292–3300.Google Scholar
  10. Guan, M., Wright, N. G., Sleigh, P. A., Ahilan, S., & Lamb, R. (2016). Physical complexity to model morphological changes at a natural channel bend. Water Resources Research, 52(8), 6348–6364.Google Scholar
  11. Hafezparast, M., Araghinejad, S., Fatemi, S. E., & Bressers, H. (2013). A conceptual rainfall-runoff model using the auto calibrated NAM models in the Sarisoo River. Hydrology, 4(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
  12. Hanington, P., Toan, T. Q., Tri, V. P. D., Vu, D. N. A., & Kiem, A. S. (2017). A hydrological model for interprovincial water resource planning and management: a case study in the Long Xuyen Quadrangle, Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Journal of Hydrology, 547, 1–9.Google Scholar
  13. Hasan, Z. A., Ghani, A. A., & Zakaria, N. A. (2007). Application of 2D modelling for Muda River using CCHE2D. In 2nd international conference on managing rivers in the 21st century: Solution towards sustainable river basins.Google Scholar
  14. Jia, Y., & Wang, S. (2001). CCHE2D verification and validation tests documentation. National Center for Computational Hydro-science and Engineering. Technical Report No. NCCHE-TR-2001-2.Google Scholar
  15. Jia, Y., Wang, S. Y. Y., & Xu, Y. C. (2002). Validation and application of a 2D model to channels with complex geometry. International Journal of Computational Engineering Science, 3(1), 57–71.Google Scholar
  16. Kamanbedas, A. A., Nasrollahpour, R., & Mashal, M. (2013). Estimation of sediment transport in rivers using CCHE2D model (Case study Karkheh River). Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 6(2), 4112–4115.Google Scholar
  17. Kasvi, E., Alho, P., Lotsari, E., Wang, A., Kukko, H., & Hyyppä, J. H. (2015). 2D and 3D computational models in hydrodynamic and morpho-dynamic reconstructions of a river bend: Sensitivity and functionality. Hydrological Processes, 29(6), 1604–1629.Google Scholar
  18. Langendoen, E. J. (2001). Evaluation of the effectiveness of selected computer models of depth-averaged free surface flow and sediment transport to predict the effects of hydraulic structures on river morphology. Project Report, USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford M.S.Google Scholar
  19. Langendoen, E. J., & Alonso, C. V. (2008). Modeling the evolution of incised streams: I. Model formulation and validation of flow and streambed evolution components. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(6), 749–762.Google Scholar
  20. Lee, S. K., & Dang, T. A. (2018). Experimental investigation and numerical simulation of morphological changes in natural channel bend. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics, 11(3), 721–731.Google Scholar
  21. Nash, J. E., & Sutclife, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part 1: A discussion on principals. Journal Hydrology, 10, 282–290.Google Scholar
  22. Nassar, M. A. (2011). Multi-parametric sensitivity analysis of CCHE2D for channel flow simulations in Nile River. Journal of Hydro-environment Research.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jher.20.Google Scholar
  23. Ostfeld, R. (2011). Bedform formation in the Glastonbury meanders of the Connecticut river. Master thesis. Wesleyan University.Google Scholar
  24. Sánchez, A., Wu, W., Li, H., Brown, M. E., Reed, C. W., Rosati, J. D., & Demirbilek, Z. (2014). Coastal modeling system: Mathematical formulations and numerical methods. Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Technical Report ERDC/CHL-TR-14-2. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.Google Scholar
  25. Scott, S. H., & Jia, Y. (2008). Simulation of sediment transport and channel morphology change in large river systems. In USA-China workshop on advanced computational modelling in hydro-science and engineering. Oxford, Mississippi, USA.Google Scholar
  26. van Rijn, L. C. (1984). Sediment transport, Part II: suspended load transport. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 110(11), 1613–1641.Google Scholar
  27. Wang, D. P., Tassi, K. E., Abderrezzak, A., Mendoza, A., Abad, J. D., & Langendoen, A. (2014). 2D and 3D numerical simulations of morpho-dynamics structures in large-amplitude meanders. River Flow.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b17133-149.Google Scholar
  28. Waters, K. A., & Curran, J. C. (2015). Linking bed morphology changes of two sediment mixtures to sediment transport predictions in unsteady flows. Water Resources Research, 51(4), 2724–2741.Google Scholar
  29. Wu, W. M. (2001). CCHE2D sediment transport model. Technical Report No. NCCHE-TR-2001-3, National Center for Computational Hydro-science and Engineering, The University of Mississippi.Google Scholar
  30. Zhang, Y. X. (2013). CCHE-gui-graphical users interface for NCCHE models user’s manualVersion 4.x. Technical Report No. NCCHE-TR-2013-01.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sustainable Management of Natural Resources and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Environment and Labour SafetyTon Duc Thang UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  2. 2.VNU-HCM, University of ScienceHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  3. 3.Institute of Coastal and offshore Engineering (ICOE)Ho Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations