Advertisement

Hybrid Band Combination for Discriminating Lithology of Dunite in Ultramafic Rocks

  • Önder GürsoyEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

In recent years, satellite image and other data provided by the terrestrial component of remote sensing technology have been used for detecting hydrothermal alteration minerals and regional geology mappings. Existing rock detection methods and algorithms in remote sensing can only be used to determine main rock groups such as ultramafic, granitoid, metamorphic and sedimentary. The use of new remote sensing methods in the determination of subgroups of these rocks (i.e. ultramafic rocks consist of harzburgite, dunite and lherzolite) is important for geological mapping. In particular, the mapping of dunite is necessary for the exploration of chromite deposits. In this study, it was aimed to determine the spectral behaviour of dunite in a new band ratio and to adopt a new hybrid band combination for geological mapping and exploration of new chromite mineralization areas. Due to the presence of the complex units it holds, it is composed mainly of ultramafic rocks, and Eskikarahisar Region, Sivas City (Turkey), where it is located on the South of Sivas, was selected as study area. Ultramafic rock samples were collected in the study area. To determine the types and mineral contents of the samples, petrographic investigations of the samples were conducted for identifying the samples that contain dunite. Spectral measurements of the representative dunite samples were taken to combine the averages of spectral signatures. After merging spectral signatures and the ASTER SWIR band regions, ASTER SWIR bands that could be used for rationing were determined for adopting a new ASTER band rationed image and band with enhanced images data. This article focuses on the adopting a hybrid combination with gamma transform applied, which contains the rationed image and enhanced ASTER SWIR components, leading to effective mapping of dunite rocks exposed on the study area.

Keywords

Mineral exploration Hybrid band combination Dunite Chromite Ultramafic 

Notes

Acknowledgements

CUBAP (Unit for Scientific Research Projects of Cumhuriyet University) is sincerely thanked for supporting this work as Project No. M-523. I extent my gratitude to Assist. Prof. Taner Ekici, Research Assist. Oktay Canbaz, Hüseyin Duman and Mehmet Demirel for their contributions.

References

  1. Askari, G., Pour, A. B., Pradhan, B., Sarfi, M., & Nazemnejad, F. (2018). Band ratios matrix transformation (BRMT): A sedimentary lithology mapping approach using ASTER satellite sensor. Sensors, 18, 3213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bedini, E. (2009). Mapping lithology of the Sarfartoq carbonatite complex, southern West Greenland, using HyMap imaging spectrometer data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 1208–1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhandari, A. K., Kumar, A., Singh, G. K., & Soni, V. (2016). Dark satellite image enhancement using knee transfer function and gamma correction based on DWT–SVD. Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing, 27, 453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Canbaz, O., Atun, R., Gürsoy, Ö., Gökce, A., Türk, T., & Birdal, A. C. (2018a). Comparison of lithologic mapping with ASTER and Hyperion data: A case study in the Northern of Zara (Sivas), Turkey. In Extended abstract book of 4th international scientific conference geobalcanica, May 163–166 Macedonia. Google Scholar
  5. Canbaz, O., Gürsoy, Ö., & Gökce, A. (2017). Determination of hydrothermal alteration areas by Aster satellite images: Ağmaşat Plato-Zara (Sivas)/Turkey sample. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 38, 419–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canbaz, O., Gürsoy, Ö., & Gökce, A. (2018b). Detecting clay minerals in hydrothermal alteration areas with integration of ASTER image and spectral data in Kösedag-Zara (Sivas), Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 91(4), 483–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, R. N., King, T. V. V., Klejwa, M., & Swayze, G. A. (1990). High spectral resolution reflectance spectroscopy of minerals. Journal Geophysical Research, 95, 12653–12680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crósta, A. P., De Souza Filho, C. R., Azevedo, F., & Brodie, C. (2003). Targeting key alteration minerals in epithermal deposits in Patagonia, Argentina, using ASTER imagery and principal component analysis. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24, 4233–4240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crowley, J. K., Brickey, D. W., & Rowan, L. C. (1989). Airborne imaging spectrometer data of the Ruby Mountains, Montana: Mineral discrimination using relative absorption band-depth images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 29, 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gad, S., & Kusky, T. (2007). ASTER spectral rationing for lithological mapping in the Arabian-Nubian shield, the Neoproterozoic Wadi Kid area, Sinai, Egypt. Gondwana Research, 11, 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillespie, A. R., Kahle, A. B., & Walker, R. E. (1986). Color enhancement of highly correlated images. II. Channel ratio and “chromaticity” transformation techniques. Remote Sensing of Environment, 22, 343–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gökçe, A. (2013). Maden Yatakları (5th ed., p. 88). Sivas: Cumhuriyet University.Google Scholar
  13. Gürsoy, Ö., Canbaz, O., Gökce, A., & Atun, R. (2017a). Spectral classification in lithological mapping: A case study of matched filtering. Cumhuriyet Science Journal, 38(4), 731–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gürsoy, Ö., & Ekici, T. (2015). Görüntü Zenginleştirme Analizleri Ve Spektral Ölçmeler Kullanılarak Ultramafik Kayaçlarin Tespit Edilmesi. TUFUAB VIII. Teknik Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı. May 21–23, Konya, Turkey.Google Scholar
  15. Gürsoy, Ö., & Kaya, Ş. (2017). Detecting of lithological units by using terrestrial spectral data and remote sensing image. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote, 1, 1–11.Google Scholar
  16. Gürsoy, Ö., Kaya, Ş., Çakır, Z., Tatar, O., & Canbaz, O. (2017b). Determining lateral offsets of rocks along the eastern part of the North Anatolian fault zone (Turkey) using spectral classification of satellite images and field measurements. Geomatics Natural Hazards and Risk, 8, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iwasaki, A., & Tonooka, H. (2005). Validation of a crosstalk correction algorithm for ASTER/SWIR. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43, 2747–2751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kasar, S., Mishra, A., & Gore, R. (2018). Mineral mapping and lithological discrimination using remote sensing in Indian region: A review. In Innovations in engineering, technology and sciences (ICIETS 2018), 20–21 September 2018, Mysore, India.Google Scholar
  19. Khan, S. D., Mahmood, K., & Casey, J. F. (2007). Mapping of Muslim Bagh ophiolite complex (Pakistan) using new remote sensing, and field data. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 30, 333–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koptagel, O., & Gökce, A. (1993). Main component chemistry and genesis of chromites in the Başçayır- Dağönü (Ulaş-Sivas) area. Cumhuriyet Earth Sciences, 15(16), 1–19.Google Scholar
  21. Kumar, K., & Singh, J. (2017). Analysis of image enhancement algorithms. i-manager’s Journal on Information Technology, 6, 25–35.Google Scholar
  22. Mahanta, P., & Maiti, S. (2018). Regional scale demarcation of alteration zone using ASTER imageries in South Purulia Shear Zone, East India: Implication for mineral exploration in vegetated regions. Ore Geology Reviews, 102, 846–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mars, J. C., & Rowan, L. C. (2010). Spectral assessment of new ASTER SWIR surface reflectance data products for spectroscopic mapping of rocks and minerals. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 2011–2025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mazhari, N., Shafaroudi, A. M., & Ghaderi, M. (2017). Detecting and mapping different types of iron mineralization in Sangan mining region, NE Iran, using satellite image and airborne geophysical data. Geosciences Journal, 21, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mwaniki, M., Möller, M., & Schellmann, G. (2015). A comparison of Landsat 8 (OLI) and Landsat 7 (ETM +) in mapping geology and visualising lineaments: A case study of central region Kenya. In 36th international symposium on remote sensing of environment. The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, (Vol. XL-7/W3, 7). doi:10.5194,Google Scholar
  26. Nair, A., & Mathew, G. (2012). Lithological discrimination of the Phenaimata felsic–mafic complex, Gujarat, India, using the advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER). International Journal of Remote Sensing, 33, 198–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Okay, A. I., & Tüysüz, O. (1999). Tethyan sutures of northern Turkey. In The mediterranean basins: Tertiary extension within the Alpine, (pp. 515). Special Publication, London: Geological Society.Google Scholar
  28. Pour, A. B., & Hashim, M. (2011). Identification of hydrothermal alteration minerals for exploring of porphyry copper deposit using ASTER data, SE Iran. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 42, 1309–1322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rajendran, S., & Nasir, S. (2014). Hydrothermal altered serpentinized zone and a study of Ni-magnesioferrite–magnetite–awaruite occurrences in Wadi Hibi, Northern Oman Mountain: Discrimination through ASTER mapping. Ore Geology Reviews, 62, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rowan, L. C., Mars, J. C., & Simpson, C. J. (2006). Lithologic mapping of the Mordor, NT, Australia ultramafic complex by using the advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER). Remote Sensing of Environment, 99, 105–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Şengör, A. M. C., & Yılmaz, Y. (1981). Tethyan evolution of Turkey: A plate tectonic approach. Tectonophysics, 75, 181–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Son, Y. S., Kang, M. K., & Yoon, W. J. (2014). Pyrophyllite mapping in the Nohwa deposit, Korea, using ASTER remote sensing data. Geosciences Journal, 18(3), 295–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van der Meer, F. D., Van der Werff, H. M. A., Van Ruitenbeek, F. J. A. T., Checker, C. A., Bakker, W. H., Noomen, M. F., et al. (2012). Multi- and hyper- spectral geologic remote sensing: A review. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 14, 112–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yılmaz, A., & Yılmaz, H. (2004). Geology and structural evolution of the Tokat Massif (Eastern Pontides, Turkey). Turkish Earth Science, 13, 231–246.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeomaticsSivas Cumhuriyet UniversitySivasTurkey

Personalised recommendations