Aster Mapping of Limestone Deposits and Associated Lithounits of Parts of Chikkanayakanahalli, Southern Part of Chitradurga Schist Belt, Dharwar Craton, India
- 44 Downloads
Economically viable limestone deposits are mostly formed by calcite minerals, and these minerals are widely used in manufacturing of cement, mortar, fertilizer and flux for smelting of iron ores, and mapping of such deposits is significant and important in scientific research. This study examines the capability of Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) with the wavelength range visible–near-infrared and short-wave infrared spectral bands to map such limestone carbonate deposits and associated lithounits occurred in and around of Chikkanayakanahalli, southern part of the Chitradurga schist belt using minimum noise fraction (MNF) and decorrelation stretching methods. The study results that (1) the RGB image of MNF (R: B1; G: B2; B: B3) of ASTER is capable of discriminating the limestones and associated different rock types, namely banded magnetite quartzites (BMQ), graywackes, Mn- and Fe-rich cherts, metabasalts, granitic gneisses, granitoids and migmatites and (2) the decorrelation stretch image of ASTER bands 8, 3, 1 of the ASTER delineated clearly the limestones and associated rocks of the study area. Study of spectral signatures of field samples of such economic limestones in the wavelength of 350–2500 nm using Fieldspec3 Spectroradiometer showed the spectral absorption near 2.32 μm due to the presence of calcite minerals in the rocks. The results of study are cross-verified in the study area and confirmed through petrological and chemical analyses of the samples. This study bespeaks the potential of ASTER sensor and application of image processing methods to map the economic limestone deposits and associated rocks of the study area.
KeywordsASTER Chikkanayakanahalli MNF Decorrelation Limestone Spectroradiometer
We thank the Japan Space Systems and ERSDAC (Japan) for providing ASTER data and UGC RGNF funding agency for the financial support to do this research. Authors are very much thankful to the Chairman, Department of Studies in Earth Science, Center for Advance Studies in Precambrian geology, University of Mysore.
- Ali, M. Q., Basavarajappa, H. T., & Ranjbar, H. (2009). Application of principal component analysis to ASTER and ETM + data for mapping the alteration zones in North East of Hajjah, Yemen. Asian Journal of Geoinformatics, 9(2), 15–21.Google Scholar
- Anantha Murthy, K. S. (1980) Carbonates, iron formation, iron and manganese ore deposits of the chiknayakanhalli schist belt Tumkur District, Karnataka. A thesis from Karnataka University.Google Scholar
- ASD Inc. (2012). Field spec specification. http://www.asdi.com/products/fieldspecspectroradiometers/fieldspec-3-portable-spectroradiometer. Accessed on September 3, 2012.
- Boardman, J. W., Kruse, F. A., & Green, R. O. (1995). Mapping target signatures via partial unmixing of AVIRIS data. In Summaries, Proceedings of the 5th JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop (95-1, 1: 23–26), January 23–26, Pasadena, California: JPL Publ.Google Scholar
- Chen, C. M. (2000). Comparison of principal component analysis and Minimum Noise Fraction transformation for reducing the dimensionality of hyperspectral imagery. Geographical Research, 33, 163–178.Google Scholar
- Clark, R. N. (1999). Spectroscopy of rock and minerals and principles of spectroscopy. In A. N. Rencz (Ed.), Remote sensing for the earth sciences: Manual of remote sensing (3rd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 3–58). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Clark, R. N., Swayze, G. A., Heidebrecht, K., Green, R. O., & Goetz, A. F. H. (1995) Calibration to surface reflectance of terrestrial imaging spectrometry data: Comparison of methods. In Summaries of the 5th Annual JPL Airborne Geosciences Workshop (pp. 41–42). Jet Propulsion Laboratory Special Publication.Google Scholar
- Devaraju,T. C., & Anathmurthy, K. S. (1977) Iron and manganese ores of C.N. halli schist belt, Tumkur district. In C. Naganna & B. Somashekar (Eds.) Proceedings of the first symposium on the geology, exploration, mining processing and metallurgy of ferrous and ferro-alloy minerals (pp. 22–31).Google Scholar
- Devaraju, T. C., & Anathmurthy, K. S. (1984). Carbonates of Chikkanayakanahalli schist belt, Karnataka. The Journal of the Geological Society of India, 25, 162–174.Google Scholar
- ENVI. (2009). Atmospheric Correction Module: QUAC and FLAASH User’s Guide. http://www.exelisvis.com/portals/0/pdfs/envi/Flaash_Module.pdf2009.
- Gaffey, S. J. (1986a). Spectral reflectance of carbonate minerals in the visible and near infrared (0.35–2.55 microns): Calcite, aragonite, and dolomite. American Mineralogist, 71, 151–162.Google Scholar
- Gaffey, S. J. (1986b). Spectral reflectance of carbonate minerals in the visible and near infrared (0.35–2.55 microns): Calcite, aragonite, and dolomite. American Mineralogist, 71, 151–162.Google Scholar
- Garrels, R. M. (1960). Mineral Equilibria (p. 254). Newyork: Harper and brothers.Google Scholar
- Ghosh, S. K., & Chatterjee, B. K. (1990). Paleoenvironment reconstruction of early Proterozoic Kolhan siliciclastic rocks, Keonjhar districts, Orissa, India. Journal Geological Society of India, 35, 273–286.Google Scholar
- Guha, A., Rao, A., Ravi, S., Vinod Kumar, K., & Dhananjaya Rao, E. N. (2012a). Analysis of the potential of kimberlite rock spectra as spectral end member using samples from Narayanpet kimberlite Field (NKF), Andhra Pradesh. Current Science, 103(9), 1096–1104.Google Scholar
- Hamilton, W. R., Wolley, A. R., & Bishop, A. C. (1995). Hamlyn guide: Minerals, rocks and fossils. Hong Kong: Mandarin Offset.Google Scholar
- Hunt, G. R., & Salisbury, J. W. (1970). Visible and near-infrared spectra of minerals and rocks. Modern Geology, 1, 283–300.Google Scholar
- Jensen, J. R. (2005). Introductory digital image processing. Upper Saddle River: Person Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Kalinowski, A., & Oliver, S. (2004). ASTER mineral index processing manual. http://www.ga.gov.au/image_cache/GA7833.pdf.
- Mukhopadhyay, D., Baral, M. C., & Ghosh, D. (1981). A tectonostratigraphic model of the Chitradurga schist belt, Karnataka, India. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 22, 22–31.Google Scholar
- Mukhopadhyay, D., & Ghosh, D. (1983). Superposed deformation in the Dharwar rocks of the Southern part of the Chitradurga schist belt near Dodguni, Karnataka. Geological Science India Memoir, 4, 275–292.Google Scholar
- Pour, A. B., & Hashim, M. (2011a). Spectral transformation of ASTER data and the discrimination of hydrothermal alteration minerals in a semi-arid region, SE Iran. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 6(8), 2037–2059.Google Scholar
- Pour, B. A., & Hashim, M. (2011b). Application of advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER) data in geological mapping. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 6, 7657–7668.Google Scholar
- Radhakrishna, B. P. (1952). Proceedings of the Indian Science Congress 39th Session, IV (p 181).Google Scholar
- Rajendran, S., Hersi, O. S., Al-Harthy, A., et al. (2011). Capability of advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER) on discrimination of carbonates and associated rocks and mineral identification of eastern mountain region (Saih Hatat window) of Sultanate of Oman. Carbonates and Evaporites, 26, 351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-011-0071-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ramakrishna, B. P., & Vaidyanadhan, R. (2008). Geology of Karnataka. India: Geol Soc.Google Scholar
- Sanjeevi, S. (2008). Targeting limestone and bauxite deposits in southern India by spectral unmixing of hyperspectral image data. In The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences ISPRS congress Beijing, Vol. XXXVII, Part B8, Commission VIII, Beijing, p. 1189.Google Scholar
- Srinivasan, R., & Srinivas, B. L. (1972). Dharwar stratigraphy. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 13, 72–83.Google Scholar
- Swaminath, J., Ramakrishnan, M., & Viswanatha, M. N. (1976). Dharwar stratigraphic model and Karnataka craton evolution. Records of the Geological Survey of India, 107(2), 149–175.Google Scholar