Ground Based Bistatic Scatterometer Measurement for the Estimation of Growth Variables of Ladyfinger Crop at X-Band

  • Ajeet Kumar Vishwakarma
  • Rajendra PrasadEmail author
  • Dileep Kumar Gupta
  • Pradeep Kumar
  • Varun Narayan Mishra
Research Article


The present study describes the ground based bistatic scatterometer measurements of ladyfinger crop at its various growth stages in the specular direction with the azimuthal angle (\( \phi = 0 \)) for the angular incidence angle ranging from 20° to 60° at the interval of 10° at HH and VV polarization. An outdoor ladyfinger crop bed of an area 4 × 4 m2 was specially prepared for the ground based bistatic scatterometer measurements. The crop growth variables like vegetation water content, leaf area index, fresh biomass, and plant height were also measured at the time of each bistatic scatterometer measurement. The specular bistatic scattering coefficients were found to be decreasing with the crop growth variables up to the maturity stage and then after it increased slightly. The linear regression analysis was carried out between specular bistatic scattering coefficient and crop growth variables at all the incidence angles for HH and VV polarization to select the optimum angle of incidence and polarization for the estimation of crop growth variables. The potential of subtractive clustering based adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system was applied for the estimation of crop growth variables. The estimated values for different crop growth variables were found almost close to the observed values.


Specular bistatic scattering coefficients S-ANFIS VWC LAI Ladyfinger crop 


  1. Attema, E., & Ulaby, F. T. (1978). Vegetation modeled as a water cloud. Radio Science, 13, 357–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bouman, B. (1991). Crop parameter estimation from ground-based X-band (3-cm wave) radar backscattering data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brogioni, M., Pettinato, S., Macelloni, G., Paloscia, S., Pampaloni, P., Pierdicca, N., Ticconi, F. (2010). Sensitivity of bistatic scattering to soil moisture and surface roughness of bare soils. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31, 4227–4255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chiu, S. L. (1994). Fuzzy model identification based on cluster estimation. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2, 267–278.Google Scholar
  5. Cookmartin, G., Saich, P., Quegan, S., Cordey, R., Burgess-Allen, P., & Sowter, A. (2000). Modeling microwave interactions with crops and comparison with ERS-2 SAR observations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38, 658–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dixon, B., & Candade, N. (2008). Multispectral landuse classification using neural networks and support vector machines: One or the other, or both? International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, 1185–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Drake, J. T. (2000). Communications phase synchronization using the adaptive network fuzzy inference system (anfis). Las Cruces: New Mexico State University.Google Scholar
  8. Ferrazzoli, P., Guerriero, L., & Schiavon, G. (1999). Experimental and model investigation on radar classification capability. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37, 960–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferrazzoli, P., Guerriero, L., & Solimini, D. (2000). Simulating bistatic scatter from surfaces covered with vegetation. Journal of electromagnetic waves and applications, 14, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gupta, D. K., Kumar, P., Mishra, V. N., Prasad, R., Dikshit, P. K. S., Dwivedi, S. B., Ohri, A., Singh, R. S., Srivastavac, V. (2015). Bistatic measurements for the estimation of rice crop variables using artificial neural network. Advances in Space Research, 55, 1613–1623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gupta, H. V., Sorooshian, S., & Yapo, P. O. (1999). Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: Comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jang, J.-S. (1993). ANFIS: Adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23, 665–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jensen, R. R., Hardin, P. J., & Yu, G. (2009). Artificial neural networks and remote sensing. Geography Compass, 3, 630–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jiang, D., Yang, X., Clinton, N., & Wang, N. (2004). An artificial neural network model for estimating crop yields using remotely sensed information. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25, 1723–1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson, J. T., & Ouellette, J. D. (2014). Polarization features in bistatic scattering from rough surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 52, 1616–1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumar, P., Gupta, D. K., Mishra, V. N., & Prasad, R. (2015). Comparison of support vector machine, artificial neural network, and spectral angle mapper algorithms for crop classification using LISS IV data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 36, 1604–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Le Toan, T., Ribbes, F., Wang, L.-F., Floury, N., Ding, K.-H., Kong, J. A., Fujita, M., Kurosu, T. (1997). Rice crop mapping and monitoring using ERS-1 data based on experiment and modeling results. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 35, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Macelloni, G., Paloscia, S., Pampaloni, P., Marliani, F., & Gai, M. (2001). The relationship between the backscattering coefficient and the biomass of narrow and broad leaf crops. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39, 873–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mas, J. F., & Flores, J. J. (2008). The application of artificial neural networks to the analysis of remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, 617–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mishra, V. N., Prasad, R., Kumar, P., Gupta, D. K., & Srivastava, P. K. (2017a). Dual-polarimetric C-band SAR data for land use/land cover classification by incorporating textural information. Environmental Earth Sciences, 76, 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mishra, V. N., Prasad, R., Kumar, P., Srivastava, P. K., & Rai, P. K. (2017b). Knowledge-based decision tree approach for mapping spatial distribution of rice crop using C-band synthetic aperture radar-derived information. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 11(4), 046003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mittal, G., & Singh, D. (2010). Critical analysis of microwave specular scattering response on roughness parameter and moisture content for bare periodic rough surfaces and its retrieval. Progress In Electromagnetics Research, 100, 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moran, M. S., Vidal, A., Troufleau, D., Inoue, Y., & Mitchell, T. A. (1998). Ku-and C-band SAR for discriminating agricultural crop and soil conditions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 36, 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nashashibi, A. Y., & Ulaby, F. T. (2007). MMW polarimetric radar bistatic scattering from a random surface. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45, 1743–1755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oh, Y., Hong, S.-Y., Kim, Y., Hong, J.-Y., & Kim, Y.-H. (2009). Polarimetric backscattering coefficients of flooded rice fields at L-and C-bands: Measurements, modeling, and data analysis. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, 47, 2714–2721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pan, L., Pierce, L. E., & Moghaddam, M. (2005). Radiative transfer model for microwave bistatic scattering from forest canopies. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43, 2470–2483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pandey, A. (2011). Crop signature studies by microwave remote sensing using soft computing techniques, Ph.D. Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), VaranasiGoogle Scholar
  28. Picard, G., Le Toan, T., & Mattia, F. (2003). Understanding C-band radar backscatter from wheat canopy using a multiple-scattering coherent model. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41, 1583–1591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, J. A. (1993). LAI inversion using a back-propagation neural network trained with a multiple scattering model. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 31, 1102–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Taconet, O., Benallegue, M., Vidal-Madjar, D., Prevot, L., Dechambre, M., & Normand, M. (1994). Estimation of soil and crop parameters for wheat from airborne radar backscattering data in C and X bands. Remote Sensing of Environment, 50, 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Takagi, T., & Sugeno, M. (1985). Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-15, 116–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Toure, A., Thomson, K. P. B., Edwards, G., Brown, R. J., & Brisco, B. G. (1994). Adaptation of the MIMICS backscattering model to the agricultural context-wheat and canola at L and C bands. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 32, 47–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ulaby, F. T., & EI-Rays, M. (1987). Microwave dielectric spectrum of vegetation-Part II: Dual-dispersion model. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 25, 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ulaby, F. T., Van Deventer, T., East, J., Haddock, T., & Coluzzi, M. (1988). Millimeter-wave bistatic scattering from ground and vegetation targets. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 26, 229–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wegmuller, U. (1990). Remote sensing signature studies on agricultural fields with ground-based radiometry and scatterometry. Ph.D. University of Bern, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang, Y.-Y., & Wu, Z.-S. (2016). Bistatic scattering characteristics of wheat and soybean by radiative transfer model in L band and C band. Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, 67, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ajeet Kumar Vishwakarma
    • 1
  • Rajendra Prasad
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dileep Kumar Gupta
    • 1
  • Pradeep Kumar
    • 1
  • Varun Narayan Mishra
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University)VaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations