Advertisement

Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

, Volume 11, Issue 7, pp 3549–3559 | Cite as

How reliable is the assessment of Porotic Hyperostosis and Cribra Orbitalia in skeletal human remains? A methodological approach for quantitative verification by means of a new evaluation form

  • Natascia Rinaldo
  • Nicoletta ZeddaEmail author
  • Barbara BramantiEmail author
  • Irene Rosa
  • Emanuela Gualdi-Russo
Original Paper

Abstract

Intra vitam porous lesions of the skull (Cribra Orbitalia and Porotic Hyperostosis) are pathological conditions due to genetic or acquired chronic anaemia. They are the most reported skeletal lesions in human skeletal remains and are routinely used to assess health, hygiene and nutritional status of past populations. Despite the existence of a number of proposed classifications, there is no generally accepted classification system used by all, with clear advantages over the others. Here, we propose a new evaluation form (BoPLE-Bone Porous Lesion Evaluation) that takes in consideration all the observable features of bone porous lesions, integrating existing qualitative criteria for the evaluation of severity and healing’s conditions with a new quantitative analysis based on the count of pores per square centimetre. Porotic Hyperostosis and Cribra Orbitalia were investigated using the newly developed evaluation forms on 189 cranial bones from several distinct archaeological sites. Reliability and reproducibility of both existing qualitative scoring criteria and the new quantitative method were statistically tested. We believe that the new proposed classification system, which takes into consideration diverse parameters like surface area of lesion, location of lesion on cranial vault, and number of pits per surface area, represents a progress in the objective evaluation of porous bone lesions. Its use will allow the determination of the severity of the lesion and thus provide data to assess conditions of frailty in past populations.

Keywords

Porotic Hyperostosis Cribra Orbitalia Bone porous lesions Scoring standards Evaluation form 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Filippo Scianò for his contributions and Roberta Neilson for her participation in the data collection.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

12520_2019_780_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (922 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 922 kb)

References

  1. Angel JL (1966) Porotic hyperostosis, anemias, malarias, and marshes in the prehistoric Eastern Mediterranean. Science (80- ) 153:760–763.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.153.3737.760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brickley MB (2018) Cribra orbitalia and porotic hyperostosis: a biological approach to diagnosis. Am J Phys Anthropol 167:896–902.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brickley M, Ives R (2006) Skeletal manifestations of infantile scurvy. Am J Phys Anthropol 129:163–172.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.20265 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6(4):284–290Google Scholar
  5. Facchini F, Rastelli E, Brasili P (2004) Cribra orbitalia and cribra cranii in Roman skeletal remains from the Ravenna area and Rimini (I-IV century AD). Int J Osteoarchaeol 14:126–136.  https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaudio D, Betto A, Vanin S, de Guio A, Galassi A, Cattaneo C (2015) Excavation and study of skeletal remains from a world war I mass grave. Int J Osteoarchaeol 25:585–592.  https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.2333 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hengen OP (1971) Cribra orbitalia: pathogenesis and probable etiology. HOMO- J comp. Hum Biol 22:57–75Google Scholar
  8. Jacobi KP, Danforth ME (2002) Analysis of interobserver scoring patterns in porotic hyperostosis and cribra orbitalia. Int J Osteoarchaeol 12:248–258.  https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Keenleyside A, Panayotova K (2006) Cribra orbitalia and porotic hyperostosis in a Greek colonial population (5th to 3rd centuries BC) from the Black Sea. Int J Osteoarchaeol 16:373–384.  https://doi.org/10.1002/oa.831 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15:155–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lallo JW, Armelagos GJ, Mensforth RP (1977) The role of diet, disease, and physiology in the origin of porotic hyperostosis. Hum Biol 49:471–483Google Scholar
  12. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marklein KE, Leahy RE, Crews DE (2016) In sickness and in death: assessing frailty in human skeletal remains. Am J Phys Anthropol 161:208–225.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin DL, Goodman AH (2002) Health conditions before Columbus: paleopathology of native north Americans. West J Med 176:65–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Masson M, Bereczki Z, Molnár E, Donoghue HD, Minnikin DE, Lee OYC, Wu HHT, Besra GS, Bull ID, Pálfi G (2015) 7000 year-old tuberculosis cases from Hungary—osteological and biomolecular evidence. Tuberculosis 95:S13–S17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tube.2015.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mensforth RP, Lovejoy CO, Lallo JW, Armelagos GJ (1978) Part two: the role of constitutional factors, diet, and infectious disease in the etiology of porotic hyperostosis and periosteal reactions in prehistoric infants and children. Med Anthropol 2:1–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mittler DM, Van Gerven DP (1994) Developmental, diachronic, and demographic analysis of cribra orbitalia in the medieval Christian populations of Kulubnarti. Am J Phys Anthropol 93:287–297.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330930302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nathan H, Haas N (1966) On the presence of cribra orbitalia in apes and monkeys. Am J Phys Anthropol 24:351–359.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330240307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ortner DJ (2003) Identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains. Academic Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Oxenham MF, Cavill I (2010) Porotic hyperostosis and cribra orbitalia: the erythropoietic response to iron-deficiency anaemia. Anthropol Sci 118:199–200.  https://doi.org/10.1537/ase.100302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Polo-Cerdá M, Miquel-Feucht M, Villalaín-Blanco JD (2001) Experimental cribra orbitalia in Wistar rats: an etiopathogenic model of porotic hyperostosis and other porotic phenomena. In: La Verghetta M, Capasso L (eds) Proceedings of XIIIth European meeting of the Palepathology association. Edigrafital S.p.A., Chieti, pp 253–259Google Scholar
  22. Rivera F, Mirazón Lahr M (2017) New evidence suggesting a dissociated etiology for cribra orbitalia and porotic hyperostosis. Am J Phys Anthropol 164:76–96.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23258 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rothschild B (2012) Extirpolation of the mythology that porotic hyperostosis is caused by iron deficiency secondary to dietary shift to maize. Adv Anthropol 2:157–160.  https://doi.org/10.4236/aa.2012.23018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saint-Martin P, Dedouit F, Rérolle C, Guilbeau-Frugier C, Dabernat H, Rougé D, Telmon N, Crubézy E (2015) Diagnostic value of high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in the qualitative assessment of cribra orbitalia—a preliminary study. HOMO 66:38–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2014.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salvadei L, Ricci F, Manzi G (2001) Porotic hyperostosis as a marker of health and nutritional conditions during childhood: studies at the transition between imperial Rome and the early middle ages. Am J Hum Biol 13:709–717.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.1115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Steckel RH, Larsen CS, Sciulli PW, Walker PL (2006) Data collection codebook. The Ohio State University, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  27. Stuart-Macadam P (1985) Porotic hyperostosis: representative of a childhood condition. Am J Phys Anthropol 66:391–398.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330660407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stuart-Macadam P (1989) Porotic hyperostosis: relationship between orbital and vault lesions. Am J Phys Anthropol 80:187–193.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330800206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tosi A, Badino P, Pezzoni B (2017) Medical conditions observed in osteoarchaeological remains: arthropathies, traumatic lesions, tumours, metabolic diseases and dental pathologies. Med Hist 1:29–34Google Scholar
  30. Walker PL, Bathurst RR, Richman R, Gjerdrum T, Andrushko VA (2009) The causes of porotic hyperostosis and cribra orbitalia: a reappraisal of the iron-deficiency-anemia hypothesis. Am J Phys Anthropol 139:109–125.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wapler U, Crubézy E, Schultz M (2004) Is Cribra Orbitalia synonymous with anemia? Analysis and interpretation of cranial pathology in Sudan. Am J Phys Anthropol 123:333–339.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.10321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weatherall DJ (2010) Thalassaemias. In: Thalassaemia: the biography. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Webb S (1982) Cribra Orbitalia: a possible sign of Anaemia in pre- and post-contact Crania from Australia and Papua New Guinea. Archaeol Ocean 17:148–156.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1834-4453.1982.tb00059.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wood JW, Milner GR, Harpending HC, Weiss KM, Cohen MN, Eisenberg LE, Hutchinson DL, Jankauskas R, Cesnys G, Katzenberg MA, Lukacs JR, McGrath JW, Roth EA, Ubelaker DH, Wilkinson RG (1992) The osteological paradox: problems of inferring prehistoric health from skeletal samples [and comments and reply]. Curr Anthropol 33:343–370.  https://doi.org/10.1086/204084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zuckerman MK, Garofalo EM, Frohlich B, Ortner DJ (2014) Anemia or scurvy: a pilot study on differential diagnosis of porous and hyperostotic lesions using differential cranial vault thickness in subadult humans. Int J Paleopathol 5:27–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPP.2014.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biomedical and Specialty Surgical SciencesUniversity of FerraraFerraraItaly

Personalised recommendations