Advertisement

Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted MRI for imaging synovitis in pediatric patients with inflammatory conditions of the knee joint

  • Mengxia Li
  • Alexander Sauer
  • Annette Holl-Wieden
  • Thomas Pabst
  • Henning NeubauerEmail author
Original Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of synovitis has been suggested as a possible non-invasive alternative to contrast-enhanced T1w imaging (ce-T1w). We aimed to study DWI for diagnosing synovitis in the knee joint of pediatric patients, to quantify inter-observer agreement on DWI and ce-T1w and to calculate quantitative measures of synovial diffusivity and conspicuity.

Methods

Forty consecutive patients with known or suspected arthritis of the knee (25 girls, median age 12 years) underwent routine 1.5T MRI with ce-T1w and transverse DWI with b values 50 and 800 s/mm2. Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and signal intensity of inflamed synovium, joint effusion and muscle were measured with regions of interest retrospectively. Post-contrast T1w images (diagnostic standard) and diffusion-weighted images at b = 800 s/mm2 with ADC map were separately rated by three independent and blinded readers with different levels of expertise for the presence and degree of synovitis along with the level of diagnostic confidence.

Results

Thirty-one (78%) patients showed at least some synovial contrast enhancement, 17 (43%) children were diagnosed with synovitis on ce-T1w. Ratings by the 1st reader on ce-T1w and on DWI for synovitis showed very good agreement (kappa = 0.90). Inter-observer agreement on DWI ranged from moderate to substantial with kappa values between 0.68 and 0.79 (all P < 0.001). Agreement and diagnostic confidence were generally lower in patients with mild and without synovial enhancement, compared to patients with synovitis. DWI yielded higher signal of inflamed synovium vs. muscle tissue, but lower signal vs. joint effusion, compared to ce-T1w (all P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Diffusion-weighted imaging is a promising, though reader-dependent alternative to contrast-enhanced imaging in patients with arthritis of the knee, based on our preliminary findings. It holds potential for increasing patient safety and comfort.

Keywords

Diffusion-weighted imaging Knee joint Magnetic resonance imaging Pediatric Synovitis 

Notes

Author contributions

ML conceived, designed and performed the study, and performed imaging analysis and collected imaging data. AS performed imaging analysis and collected imaging data. AHW contributed clinical patient data. TP set up the MR imaging study protocol. HN conceived, designed and performed the study, performed imaging analysis and collected imaging data, and conducted the statistical analysis of study data. All the authors contributed to drafting the manuscript and they revised and approved of the final version of the manuscript. HN serves as the guarantor of the study.

Funding

This study was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) (No. NE1953/1-1).

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the study and/or their legal guardians for all diagnostic procedures. A waiver was granted by our Institutional Review Board for the retrospective analysis of anonymised imaging data as presented in this study.

Conflict of interest

No financial or nonfinancial benefits have been received or will be received from any party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2205–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ravelli A, Martini A. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet. 2007;369:767–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, Baum J, Glass DN, Goldenberg J, et al. International league of associations for rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:390–2.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hemke R, Maas M, van Veenendaal M, Dolman KM, van Rossum MA, van den Berg JM, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI compared with the physical examination in the evaluation of disease activity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:327–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Damasio MB, Malattia C, Martini A, Tomà P. Synovial and inflammatory disease in childhood: role of new imaging modalities in the assessment of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40:985–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hemke R, Kuijpers TW, van den Berg JM, van Veenendaal M, Dolman KM, van Rossum MA, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced MRI in the assessment of joint abnormalities in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:1998–2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Neubauer H, Evangelista L, Morbach H, Girschick H, Prelog M, Köstler H, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of bone marrow oedema, soft tissue oedema and synovitis in paediatric patients: feasibility and initial experience. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2012;10:20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neubauer H, Holl-Wieden A, Hassold N, Pabst T. Diffusion-weighted MRI in paediatric patients with gonarthritis: a novel approach to imaging of synovitis. Radiological Society of North America 2014 scientific assembly and annual meeting VSPD21-06; Chicago, IL; 2014. http://archive.rsna.org/2014/14010339.html. Accessed 20 Oct 2018.
  9. 9.
    Barendregt AM, Nusman CM, Hemke R, Lavini C, Amiras D, Kuijpers TW, et al. Feasibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis on 1.0-T open-bore MRI. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44:1805–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bammer R. Basic principles of diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2003;45:169–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stojanov DA, Aracki-Trenkic A, Benedeto-Stojanov D. Gadolinium deposition within the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus after repeated administrations of gadolinium-based contrast agents—current status. Neuroradiology. 2016;58:433–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roberts DR, Holden KR. Progressive increase of T1 signal intensity in the dentate nucleus and globus pallidus on unenhanced T1-weighted MR images in the pediatric brain exposed to multiple doses of gadolinium contrast. Brain Dev. 2016;38:331–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boss A, Martirosian P, Fritz J, Kötter I, Henes JC, Claussen CD, et al. Magnetic resonance spin-labeling perfusion imaging of synovitis in inflammatory arthritis at 3.0T. MAGMA. 2009;22:175–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hemke R, van Rossum MA, van Veenendaal M, Terra MP, Deurloo EE, de Jonge MC, et al. Reliability and responsiveness of the Juvenile Arthritis MRI Scoring (JAMRIS) system for the knee. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:1075–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sauer A, Li M, Holl-Wieden A, Pabst T, Neubauer H. Readout-segmented multi-shot diffusion-weighted MRI of the knee joint in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017;15:73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology. 1988;168:497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hilbert F, Holl-Wieden A, Sauer A, Koestler H, Neubauer H. Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47:681–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospital WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity Hospital WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of PediatricsUniversity Hospital WürzburgWürzburgGermany
  4. 4.Department of Diagnostic and Interventional RadiologyUniversity Hospital UlmUlmGermany
  5. 5.SRH Clinic of RadiologySuhlGermany

Personalised recommendations