Advertisement

Inter-annual variability in the inherent optical properties along the southeastern Arabian Sea from 2009 to 2015

  • Vakkat Poonat Souda
  • Punathil Minu
  • Aneesh Anand Lotliker
  • Sudheesan Sushama Shaju
  • Pachareentavita Muhamed AshrafEmail author
Original Paper
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

A study was performed on the coastal waters of the southeastern Arabian Sea to understand the changes in the inherent properties of optically active substances (OAS). The objective of this study was to obtain insight into the temporal dynamics of OASs for various remote sensing applications. Both the absorption of light by phytoplankton (aph(440)) and detritus (ad(440)) varied the 2nd orders of magnitude, whereas the absorption of light by chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM; aCDOM(440)) exhibited an increasing trend over the years. aCDOM(440) increased from 2009 to 2015 at a rate 0.012 m−1 year−1. The validation of the satellite data with in situ data indicated that ad(443) underestimated the in situ ad(443) when the in situ ad(443) was less than 0.3 m−1. The ternary analysis of ocean-colour-climate-change initiative (OC-CCI)–derived inherent optical properties (IOP) during the postmonsoon season indicated increased contribution by ad(443). Detritus was the primary light absorber in the coastal waters of Kochi followed by phytoplankton and CDOM. These long-term data sets and their seasonal variation will enable development of seasonal specific regional algorithms for chlorophyll-a, which are employed in potential fishing zone advisories and other applications.

Keywords

Phytoplankton CDOM Detritus Chlorophyll Annual variation Arabian Sea 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Director, Central Institute of Fisheries Technology for the support and encouragement to complete the work. The Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS) and Ministry of Earth Sciences supported this study under Satellite Coastal Oceanographic Research (SATCORE) programme. We are also grateful to Boson and crew of MV Bharath Darshan, for the support during the cruises.

Funding information

The project was funded by the Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS) and Ministry of Earth Sciences under Satellite Coastal Oceanographic Research (SATCORE) programme. Sanction No. INCOIS: F&A:XII:D2:021 dt. 19-03-2013.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aksnes DL, Ohman MD (2009) Multi-decadal shoaling of the euphotic zone in the southern sector of the California current system. Limnol Oceanogr 54:1272–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alonso A, González-Muñoz N, Castro-Díez P (2010) Comparison of leaf decomposition and macro invertebrate colonization between exotic and native trees in a freshwater ecosystem. Ecol Res 25:647–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arrigo KR, Brown CW (1996) Impact of chromophoric dissolved organic matter on UV inhibition of primary productivity in the sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 140:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balachandran KK, Joseph T, Nair KKC, Nair M, Joseph PS (2002) The complex estuarine formation of six rivers (Cochin backwater system on west coast of India)—Sources and distribution of trace metals and nutrients. In: Symposium on ‘Assessment of Material Fluxes to the Coastal Zone in Southeast Asia and Their Impacts’, APN/SASCOM/LOICS Regional Workshop, Negombo, Sri Lanka, pp 103–113Google Scholar
  5. Beckler JS, Jones ME, Taillefert M (2015) The origin, composition, and reactivity of dissolved iron (III) complexes in coastal organic-and iron-rich sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 152:72–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bricaud A, Bédhomme AL, Morel A (1988) Optical properties of diverse phytoplanktonic species: experimental results and theoretical interpretation. J Plankton Res 10(5):851–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chakraborty S, Lohrenz SE, Gundersen K (2017) Photophysiological and light absorption properties of phytoplankton communities in the river-dominated margin of the northern Gulf of Mexico. J Geophys Res Oceans 122:4922–4938.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleveland JBS, Weidemann AD (1993) Quantifying absorption by aquatic particles: a multiple scattering correction for glass-fiber filters. Limnol Oceanogr 38:1321–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D’Silva MS, Anil AC, Naik RK, D’Costa PM (2012) Algal blooms: a perspective from the coasts of India. Nat Hazard Rev 63(2):1225–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dong Q, Shang S, Lee Z (2013) An algorithm to retrieve absorption coefficient of chromophoric dissolved organic matter from ocean color. Remote Sens Environ 128:259–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guo L, Hunt B, Santschi P (2001) Effect of dissolved organic matter on the uptake of trace metals by American oysters. Environ Sci Technol 35:885–893.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es001758l CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvey ET, Kratzer S, Andersson A (2015) Relationships between colored dissolved organic matter and dissolved organic carbon in different coastal gradients of the Baltic Sea. AMBIO 44(Suppl 3):392–401.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0658-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hieber M, Gessner MO (2002) Contribution of stream detritivores, fungi, and bacteria to leaf breakdown based on biomass estimates. Ecology 83:1026–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoepffner N, Sathyendranath S (1992) Bio-optical characteristics of coastal waters: absorption spectra of phytoplankton and pigment distribution in the western North Atlantic. Limnol Oceanogr 37:1660–1679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Joseph VP, Gokulapalan B, Nair A, Sheela Wilson S (2013) Variability of summer monsoon rainfall in India on inter-annual and decadal time scales. Atmos Oceanic Sci Lett 6(5):398–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiefer DA, SooHoo JB (1982) Spectral absorption by marine particles of coastal waters of Baja California. Limnol Oceanogr 27:492–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirk JTO (2011) Light and photosynthesis in aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Kishino M, Takahashi M, Okami N, Ichimura S (1985) Estimation of the spectral absorption coefficients of phytoplankton in the sea. Bull Mar Sci 37:634–642Google Scholar
  19. König R, Hepp LU, Santos S (2014) Colonisation of low-and high-quality detritus by benthic macroinvertebrates during leaf breakdown in a subtropical stream. Limnologica-Ecology and Management of Inland Waters 45:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kowalczuk P, Kaczmark S (1996) Analysis of temporal and spatial variability of yellow substance absorption in the southern Baltic. Oceanologia 1:3–32Google Scholar
  21. Kumar PVH, Kumar NM (1996) On the flow and thermohaline structure off Cochin during pre-monsoon season. Cont Shelf Res 16(4):457–468.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4343(95)00017-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kyewalyanga MN, Platt T, Sathyendranath S, Lutz VA, Stuart V (1998) Seasonal variations in physiological parameters of phytoplankton across the North Atlantic. J Plankton Res 20:17–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lutz VA, Sathyendranath S, Head EJH (1996) Absorption coefficient of phytoplankton: regional variations in the North Atlantic. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 135:197–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madhupratap M, Gopalakrishnan TC, Haridas P, Nair KKC (2001) Mesozooplankton biomass, composition and distribution in the Arabian Sea during the fall intermonsoon: implications of oxygen gradients. Deep-Sea Res II 48:1345–1368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Menon HB, Sangekar NP, Lotliker A, Vethamony P (2011) Dynamics of chromophoric dissolved organic matter in Mandovi and Zuari estuaries – a study through in situ and satellite data. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 66(4):545–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Minu P, Lotliker AA, Shaju SS, SanthoshKumar B, Ashraf PM, Meenakumari B (2014a) Effect of optically active substances and atmospheric correction schemes on remote-sensing reflectance at a coastal site off Kochi. Int J Remote Sens 35:5434–5447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Minu P, Shaju SS, Ashraf PM, Meenakumari B (2014b) Phytoplankton community characteristics in the coastal waters of the southeastern Arabian Sea. Acta Oceanol Sin 33:170–179.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-014-0571-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Minu P, Shaju SS, Souda VP, Usha B, Ashraf PM, Meenakumari B (2015) Hyperspectral variability of phytoplankton blooms in coastal waters off Kochi, south-eastern Arabian Sea. Fish Technol 52(4):218–222Google Scholar
  29. Minu P, Lotliker AA, Shaju SS, Ashraf PM, Kumar TS, Meenakumari B (2016) Performance of operational satellite bio-optical algorithms in different water types in the southeastern Arabian Sea. Oceanologia 58: 317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mitchell BG (1990) Algorithms for determining the absorption coefficient of aquatic particulates using the quantitative filter technique (QFT). Ocean Optics 1302:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitchell BG, Kiefer BA (1984) Determination of absorption and fluorescence excitation spectra for phytoplankton. In: Holm-Hansen O, Bolis L, Giles R (eds) Marine phytoplankton and productivity. Springer- Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morel A, Maritorena S (2001) Bio-optical properties of oceanic waters- a reappraisal. J Geophys Res 106(C4):7163–7180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Munnooru K, Dash SK, Rao GD, Karri R, Rao VR (2019) Estimation of inherent optical properties using quasi-analytical algorithm along the coastal waters of southeast Arabian Sea. Ocean Dyn 69(8):925–937Google Scholar
  34. Nair A, Sathyendranath S, Platt T, Morales J, Stuart V, Forget MH, Devred E, Bouman H (2008) Remote sensing of phytoplankton functional types. Remote Sens Environ 112(8):3366–3375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Naqvi SWA, Jayakumar DA, Narvekar PV, Naik H, Sarma VS, D’Souza W, Joseph T, George MD (2000) Increased marine production of N2O due to intensifying anoxia on the Indian continental shelf. Nature 408:346–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nelson NB, Siegel DA (2013) The global distribution and dynamics of chromophoric dissolved organic matter. Annu Rev Mar Sci 5:447–476.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100751 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rao NG, Kumar KA, Jagadeesh PSV, Anand P (2014) Characteristics of Bay of Bengal water mass in south eastern Arabian Sea 2001–2002. Indian J Geo-Marine Sciences 43:27–32Google Scholar
  38. Rossi L, di Lascio A, Carlino P, Calizza E, Costantini ML (2015) Predator and detritivore niche width helps to explain biocomplexity of experimental detritus-based food webs in four aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol Complexity 23:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Santschi P, Lenhart J, Honeyman B (1997) Heterogeneous processes affecting trace contaminant distribution in estuaries: the role of natural organic matter. Mar Chem 58:99–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(97)00029-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sathyendranath S, Krasemann H (2014) Climate assessment report: ocean colour climate change initiative (OC-CCI)–phase one. Technical report, ESA OC-CCI, (2014). Available online: http://www.esa-oceancolour-cci.org
  41. Seidel M, Manecki M, Herlemann DP, Deutsch B, Schulz-Bull D, Jürgens K, Dittmar T (2017) Composition and transformation of dissolved organic matter in the Baltic Sea. Front Earth Sci 5:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shaju SS, Minu P, Srikanth AS, Ashraf PM, Vijayan AK, Meenakumari B (2015) Decomposition study of in vivo phytoplankton absorption spectra aimed at identifying the pigments and the phytoplankton group in complex case 2 coastal waters of the Arabian Sea. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 44(3):282–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sugimoto T, Tadokoro K (1997) Inter annual-inter decadal variations in zooplankton biomass, chlorophyll concentration and physical environment in the subarctic Pacific and Bering Sea. Fish Oceanogr 6:74–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Twardowski MS, Boss E, Sullivan JM, Donaghay PL (2004) Modeling the spectral shape of absorption by chromophoric dissolved organic matter. Mar Chem 89:69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Urtizberea A, Dupont N, Rosland R, Aksnes DL (2013) Sensitivity of euphotic zone properties to CDOM variations in marine ecosystem models. Ecol Model 256:16–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vishnu PS, Shaju SS, Tiwari SP, Menon N, Nashad M, Joseph CA, Raman M, Hatha M, Prabhakaran MP, Mohandas A (2018) Seasonal variability in bio-optical properties along the coastal waters off Cochin. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinformation 66:184–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Welschmeyer NA (1994) Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll-a in the presence of chlorophyll- b and pheopigments. Limnol Oceanogr 39:1985–1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yentsch CS (1962) Measurement of visible light absorption by particulate matter in the ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 7:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ylöstalo P, Kallio K, Seppälä J (2014) Absorption properties of in-water constituents and their variation among various lake types in the boreal region. Remote Sens Environ 148:190–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ylöstalo P, Seppälä J, Kaitala S, Maunula P, Simis S (2016) Loadings of dissolved organic matter and nutrients from the Neva River into the Gulf of Finland–biogeochemical composition and spatial distribution within the salinity gradient. Mar Chem 186:58–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries TechnologyKochiIndia
  2. 2.Indian National Centre for Ocean Information Services (INCOIS)HyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations