Advertisement

Shale resource potential of the Silurian Dadas Formation in Diyarbakır (SE Anatolia of Turkey) and its surroundings

  • Muhammet Akif Inan
  • Orhan KavakEmail author
Original Paper
  • 6 Downloads

Abstract

More than 70% of the estimated producible unconventional oil and gas reserves of Turkey are reported to be in the Dadas Formation located in Southeastern Anatolia. In this study, shale resource potential of the Dadas Formation was examined with samples taken from the A2 well which were analyzed in terms of mineralogy, organic geochemistry. These data were placed into context using a composite log obtained from the wells that penetrated the Dadas Formation. TOC contents of the formation range from 1.1 to 4.92 wt%, and Tmax values range from 431 to 451 °C. XRD mineral analysis has shown that the samples contain 73.07% illite, 3.28% smectite, 19.53% kaolinite, and 4.14% chlorite on average. The kerogen type of samples are in the fair oil origin zone. Although the Dadas Formation has low values of silica content and brittleness, these values make it valuable for consideration of the Dadas Formationability to produce shale gas. According to analysis, the Dadas shale may have limited shale oil potential.

Keywords

Shale gas Dadas Formation SE Anatolia Organic geochemistry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Oytun Ors for helping with log interpretations and Mursel Tekiner and Adil ÖZDEMİR for helping in drawing figures. We would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable contributions. This study is a product derived from the first author’s master thesis named “Assessment of Diyarbakır (SE Anatolia of Turkey) and Its Surroundings In Terms Of Shale Gas Potential”, Dicle University, Institute of Science, Mining Engineering Department, Diyarbakir, Turkey. This study was carried out with the contribution of the Project Numbers: DUBAP MUHENDISLIK.17.013. The authors would also like to thank Abdullah M. Al-Amri, Editor-in-Chief, and Barry Jay Katz, Associate Editor of Arabian Journal of Geosciences and reviewer Dr. Şamil ŞEN for providing helpful suggestions which have an important impact on improving the quality of this manuscript.

References

  1. Aydemir A (2011) Comparison of Mississippian Barnett shale, northern-central Texas, USA and Silurian Dadas Formation in southeast Turkey. J Pet Sci Eng 80(2011):81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilgen S, Sarıkaya I (2016) New horizon in energy: shale gas. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 35:638–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bozdoğan, NA, Karabulut T, Erten YH, İztan A, Çubukçu M, Korucu (1994) Stratigraphy and petroleum potential of the Paleozoic secession in the Diyarbakır Region of S.E Anatolia. Proceeding of 10th Petroleum Congress and Exhibition of the Turkey, p 125–139Google Scholar
  4. EIA (2011) Energy conference: the future of domestic onshore oil and gas US, 44 pGoogle Scholar
  5. EIA (2013) Technically recoverable shale gas and shale oil resources: an assessment of 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside US, 730 pGoogle Scholar
  6. EIA (2015) Technically recoverable shale oil and shale gas resources. Turkey, pp 10–12Google Scholar
  7. Espitalié J (1982) Institut Françaisdu Petrole, Syntheses Geologiques et GeochimieGoogle Scholar
  8. Espitalié J, Madec M, Tisssot B ( 1977) Source rock characterization. In: 9th offshore technology conference, pp. 439–444Google Scholar
  9. İztan YH (2003) Geochemical evolution of southeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Petroleum unpublished report, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  10. Jackson KS, Hawkins PJ, Bennett AJR (1985) Regional facies and geochemical evolution of southern Denision trough. APEA J 20:143–458Google Scholar
  11. Jarvie DM (1991) Total organic carbon (TOC) analysis; in, Source migration processes and evaluation techniques. Merrill RK (ed) American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Treatise of Petroleum Geology Handbook of Petroleum Geology, pp 113-118Google Scholar
  12. Jones RW (1984) Comparison of carbonate and shale source rocks. In: AAPG studies in geology 18, Petroleum geochemistry and source rock potential of carbonate rocks, J Palacas (ed)Google Scholar
  13. Kozlu H, Sachanski V, Günay Y (2002) Güneydoğu Anadoluda ve Toros Kusağında Yer Alan Alt Silüriyen İstifinin Stratigrafisi ve Biostratigrafisi, TPAO Arama Grubu. Rapor no. 4355. AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  14. Murray AM, Hoşgör I (2013) Late Miocene fishes from the Eurasian/Afro Arabian contact zone in Eastern Anatolia, Turkey. J Vertebr Paleontol 33:1293Google Scholar
  15. Öztürk SS, Demirel IH, Günay Y (2016) Petroleum source rock potential of the Silurian Dadas shales in the Hazro And Korudag regions of Southeast Anatolia, Turkey. Mar Pet Geol 75:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sen S (2012) Shale gas assessment of the Silurian formations of Turkey. Paleozoic of Northern Gondwana and its Petroleum Potential. A field Workshop, pp. 128–131, Kayseri, TurkeyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TPAO Batman District Management, Production ManagementBatmanTurkey
  2. 2.Institute of Science, Mining Engineering DepartmentDicle UniversityDiyarbakirTurkey
  3. 3.Faculty of Engineering Department of Mining Engineering, Division of General GeologyDicle UniversityDiyarbakirTurkey

Personalised recommendations