Advertisement

Feedstock-induced changes in composition and stability of biochar derived from different agricultural wastes

  • Tayyba Kanwal Choudhary
  • Khalid Saifullah KhanEmail author
  • Qaiser Hussain
  • Munir Ahmad
  • Muhammad Ashfaq
S. I. BIOCHAR
  • 22 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Implications of Biochar Application to Soil Environment under Arid Conditions

Abstract

Biochar is a carbon-rich organic amendment often used to sequester carbon and sustain soil productivity. The characteristics and the potential benefits of biochars depend upon their feedstock type. Therefore, changes in stability and composition of biochars derived from different agricultural wastes viz. sugarcane filter cake (SF), farmyard manure (FM), and rice husk (RH) were investigated in this study. The feedstocks were pyrolyzed at 350 °C, and the resultant biochars (SF-BC, FM-BC, and RH-BC) were characterized for yield, proximate (moisture, volatile matter, fixed carbon, ash content) and ultimate (CEC & elemental composition) analyses, surface area (BET), surface morphology (SEM), structural and functional groups (FTIR), and thermal stability (TG-DTA). Results revealed that SF-BC exhibited the highest yield (42.18%), lower bulk density and particle density (0.131 g cm−3 and 0.583 g cm−3, respectively), and higher porosity (76.56%) while the FM-BC had highest contents of fixed carbon (46.83%). The pH was slightly neutral for SF-BC and RH-BC but alkaline for FM-BC. The electrical conductivity and TDS were considerably higher in FM-BC while the CEC was higher in RH-BC (28.24 cmol kg−1). The recalcitrance index (R50) showed that all the biochars were minimally degradable (0.7 ˃ R50 ≥ 0.5). The SF-BC exhibited highest stability with R50 value of 0.64 and also showed highest C sequestration potential (43.68%). Hence, it is concluded that thermal conversion of sugarcane filter cake waste into biochar might serve as a potential candidate to increase soil organic C pool if applied as soil amendment.

Keywords

Biochar properties Carbon sequestration Feedstock types Persistence Soil productivity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Institute of Soil Science, PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan and the Soil Science Department, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia for providing research opportunities, analysis, and characterization of the biochar materials.

References

  1. Abrishamkesh S, Gorji M, Asadi H, Bagheri-Marandi GH, Pourbabaee AA (2015) Effects of rice husk biochar application on the propertiesof alkaline soil and lentil growth. Plant Soil Environ 61(11):475–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmad M, Ahmad M, Usman ARA, Al-Faraj AS, Abduljabbar A, Ok YS, Al-Wabel MI (2017) Date palm waste-derived biochar composites with silica and zeolite: synthesis, characterization and implication for carbon stability and recalcitrant potential. Environ, Geochem. HealthCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Standard of Testing Material (2001) Standard test method for chemical analysis of wood charcoal ASTM-D. 1762–84Google Scholar
  4. Arif M, Ilyas M, Riaz M, Ali K, Shah K, Haq IU, Fahad S (2017) Biochar improves phosphorus use efficiency of organic-inorganic fertilizers, maize-wheat productivity and soil quality in a low fertility alkaline soil. Field Crop Res 214:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandoz TJ, Jagiello J, Contescu C, Schwarz JA (1993) Characterization of the surface of activated carbon in terms of their acidity constant distribution. Carbon 31:1193–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bashir S, Hussain Q, Akmal M, Riaz M, Hu HQ, Ijaz SS, Iqbal M, Abro S, Mehmood S, Ahmad M (2017) Sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar reduces the cadmium and chromium bioavailability to mash bean and enhances the microbial activity in contaminated soil. J Soils Sediments 18:874–886.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-017-1796-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattarai B, Neupane J, Dhakal AP, Nepal J, Gnyawali B, Timalsina R, Poudel A (2015) Effect of biochar from different origin on physio-chemical properties of soil and yield of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) at Paklihawa, Rupandehi, Nepal. World J Agric Res 3(4):129–138Google Scholar
  8. Bird MI, Ascough PL, Young IM, Wood CV, Scott AC (2008) X-ray microtomographic imaging of charcoal. J Archaeol Sci 35:2698–2706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blake GR, Hartge KH (1986) Bulk density. In Klute, A., (ed.), Methods of soil analysis, part 1, 2nd ed., Agron.Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI 363-375Google Scholar
  10. Boehm HP (1999) Chemical identification of surface groups. In: Eley, D.D., Pines, H., Weisz, P.B., (eds.), Advances in Catalysis, Academic Press, New York, 16, 176Google Scholar
  11. Brake JD (1992) A practical guide for composting poultry litter. MAFES Bulletin 981, June. Deptt. Of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, USA. 265Google Scholar
  12. Brewer CE, Schmidt-Rohr K, Satrio JA, Brown RC (2009) Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and gasification systems. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 28(3):386–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruges J (2010) The biochar debate: charcoal’s potential to reverse climate change and build soil fertility. Chelsea Green Publisher, The Schumacher BriefingGoogle Scholar
  14. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cantrell KB, Hunt PG, Uchimiya M, Novak JM, Ro KS (2012) Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour Technol 107:419–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cao X, Harris W (2010) Properties of dairy-manure-derived biochar pertinent to its potential use in remediation. Bioresour Technol 101:5222–5228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cely P, Gasco G, Paz-Ferreiro J, Mendez A (2015) Agronomic properties of biochars from different manure wastes. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 111:173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cernansky R (2015) Agriculture: state-of-the-art soil. Nature 517:258–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen Y, Shinogi Y, Taira M (2010) Influence of biochar use on sugarcane growth, soil parameters, and groundwater quality. Aust J Soil Res 48:526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen Y, Liu S, Li H, Li XF, Song CY, Cruse RM, Zhang XY (2011) Effects of conservation tillage on corn and soybean yield in the humid continental climate region of Northeast China. Soil Tillage Res 115(116):56–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coomes OT, Miltner BC (2016) Indigenous charcoal and biochar production: potential for soil improvement under shifting cultivation systems. Land Degrad DevGoogle Scholar
  22. Crombie K, Ondrej M, Saran SP, Peter B, Andrew C (2013) The effect of pyrolysis conditions on biochar stability as determined by three methods. GCB Bioenergy 5:122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Das O, Sarmah AK, Bhattacharyya D (2015) A novel approach in organic waste utilization through biochar addition in wood/polypropylene composites. Waste Manag 38:132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Downie A, Crosky A, Munroe P (2009) Physical properties of biochar. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, London, pp 13–32Google Scholar
  25. Dutta B, Raghavan VGS, Orsat V, Ngadi M (2015) Surface characterisation and classification of microwave pyrolysed maple wood biochar. Biosyst Eng 131:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Enders A, Lehmann J (2012) Comparison of wet-digestion and dry-ashing methods for total elemental analysis of biochar. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 43:1042–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Enders A, Hanley K, Whitman T, Joseph S, Lehmann J (2012) Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance. Bioresour Technol 114:644–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eykelbosh AJ, Johnson MS, Santos de Queiroz E, Dalmagro HJ, Guimarães Couto E (2014) Biochar from sugarcane filtercake reduces soil CO2 emissions relative to raw residue and improves water retention and nutrient availability in a highly-weathered tropical soil. PLoS ONE 9:e98523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Firestone MK, Firestone RB, Tiedje JM (1980) Nitrous oxide from soil denitrification: factors affecting its biological production. Sci 208:51–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fungai NDM, Zhang X, Silva LCR, Six J, Parikh SJ (2013) Use of chemical and physical characteristics to investigate trends in biochar feedstocks. J Agric Food Chem 61(9):2196–2204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Harris K, Das KC, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Trans ASABE 51:2061–2069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. George PAO, Eras JJC, Gutierrez AS, Hens L, Vandecasteele C (2010) Residue from sugarcane juice filtration (filter cake): energy use at the sugar factory. Waste Biomass Valor 1:407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gisladottir G, Stocking M (2005) Land degradation control and its global environmental benefits. Land Degrad Dev 16:99–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gray M, Johnson MG, Dragila MI, Kleber M (2014) Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenergy 6(1):196–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hale L, Luth M, Crowley D (2015) Biochar characteristics relate to its utility as an alternative soil inoculum carrier to peat and vermiculite. Soil Biol Biochem 81:228–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harvey OR, Kuo LJ, Zimmerman AR, Louchouarn P, Amonette JE, Herbert BE (2012) An index-based approach to assessing recalcitrance and soil carbon sequestration potential of engineered black carbons (biochars). Environ Sci Technol 46:1415–1421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heikkinen J, Ketoja E, Nuutinen V, Regina K (2013) Declining trend of carbon in Finnish cropland soils in 1974-2009. Glob Chang Biol 19:1456–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jindarom C, Meeyoo V, Kitiyanan B, Rirksomboon T, Rangsunvigit P (2007) Surface characterization and dye adsorptive capacities of char obtained from pyrolysis/ gasification of sewage. J Chem Eng 133:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jindo K, Mizumoto H, Sawada Y, Sanchez-Monedero MA, Sonoki T (2014) Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosciences 11:6613–6621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Joseph S, Lehmann J (2015) Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation, 2nd ed., Taylor & Francis Ltd, London,United Kingdom, 976Google Scholar
  41. Kalderis D, Kotti MS, Mendez A, Gasco G (2014) Characterization of hydrochars produced by hydrothermal carbonization of rice husk. Solid Earth 5:477–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kameyama K, Miyamoto T, Shiono T, Shinogi Y (2012) Influence of sugarcane bagasse-derived biochar application on nitrate leaching in calcaric dark red soil. J Environ Qual 41:1131–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kameyama K, Iwata Y, Miyamoto T (2017) Review: biochar amendment of soils according to their physicochemical properties. JARQ. 51(2):117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Karaosmanoglu F, Isigigur-Ergundenler A, Sever A (2000) Biochar from the strawstalk of rapeseed plant. Energy Fuel 14:336–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kassama LS, Ngadi MO (2005) Pore development and moisture transfer in chicken meat during fat frying. Dry Technol 23(4):907–923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Keiluweit M, Nico PS, Johnson MG, Kleber M (2010) Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44(4):1247–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kim WK, Shim T, Kim YS, Hyun S, Ryu C, Park YK, Jung J (2013) Characterization of cadmium removal from aqueous solution by biochar produced from a giant Miscanthus at different pyrolytic temperatures. Bioresour Technol 138:266–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kjeldahl J (1883) A new method for nitrogen determination of organic matter. Z Anal Chem 22:366–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kloss S, Zehetner F, Dellantonio A, Hamid R, Ottner F, Liedtke V, Soja G (2012) Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties. J Environ Qual 41:990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kwapinski W, Byrne CMP, Kryachko E, Wolfram P, Adley C, Leahy JJ, Novotny EH, Hayes MHB (2010) Biochar from biomass and waste. Waste and Biomass Valorization 1:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Laird DA, Fleming P, Davis DD, Horton R, Wang B, Karlen DL (2010) Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158:443–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lal R (2006) Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degrad Dev 17:197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lehmann J (2007) A handful of carbon. Nature 447(7141):143–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. In: Earthscan. UK, LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Leite JCSP, Freeman PA (1991) Requirements validation through view point resolution. IEEE T Software Eng 17(12):1253–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Letey J, Carrillo MLK, Pang XP (2000) Approaches to characterize the degree of water repellency. J Hydrol 231:61–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Li M, Liu Q, Guo L, Zhang Y, Lou Z, Wang Y, Qian G (2013) Cu (II) removal from aqueous solution by Spartina alterniflora derived biochar. Bioresour Technol 141:83–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Li H, Dong X, da Silva EB, de Oliveira LM, Chen Y, Ma LQ (2017a) Mechanisms of metal sorption by biochars: biochar characteristics and modifications. Chemosphere 178:466–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Li Y, Hu S, Chen J, Muller K, Li Y, Fu W (2017b) Effects of biochar application in forest ecosystems on soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions. A review. In J Soils Sediments 202-203 (Part 2), 183Google Scholar
  60. Liu Z, Dugan B, Masiello CA, Barnes RT, Gallagher ME, Gonnermann H (2016) Impacts of biochar concentration and particle size on hydraulic conductivity and DOC leaching of biochar-sand mixtures. J Hydrol 533:461–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lowell S, Shields JE, Thomas MA, Thommes M (2004) Characterization of porous solids and powders: surface area, pore size and density. In Scarlett, B., (ed.), Practicle Technology series. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Springer 16, 350Google Scholar
  62. Mandal A, Singh N, Purakayastha TJ (2017) Characterization of pesticide sorption behaviour of slow pyrolysis biochars as low cost adsorbent for atrazine and imidacloprid removal. Sci Total Environ 577:376–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Manolikaki II, Mangolis A, Diamadopoulos E (2016) The impact of biochars prepared from agricultural residues on phosphorus release and availability in two fertile soils. J Environ Manag 181:536–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. McLaughlin H (2010) Characterizing biochars prior to addition to soils – version I, PhD, PE. Alterna Biocarbon Inc.Google Scholar
  65. Meszaros E, Jakab E, Varhegyi G, Bourke J, Manley-Harris M, Nunoura T, Antal MJ (2007) Do all carbonized charcoals have the same chemical structure? Implications of thermogravietry-mass spectrometry measurements. Ind Eng Chem Res 46:5943–5953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Mimmo T, Panzacchi P, Baratieri M, Davies CA, Tonon G (2014) Effect of pyrolysis temperature on miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus) biochar physical, chemical and functional properties. Biomass Bioenergy 62:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mishra A, Taing K, Hall MW, Shinogi Y (2017) Effects of Rice husk and rice husk charcoal on soil physicochemical properties, rice growth and yield. Agric Sci 8:1014–1032Google Scholar
  68. Mukherjee A, Zimmerman AR, Harris W (2011) Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory produced biochars. Geoderma 163:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Mukome FND, Zhang X, Silva LCR, Six J, Parikh SJ (2013) Use of chemical and physical characteristics to investigate trends in biochar feedstocks. J Agric Food Chem 6 61(9):2196–2204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mulvaney RL, Yaremych SA, Khan SA, Swiader JM, Horgan BP (2004) Use of diffusion to determine soil cation-exchange capacity by ammonium saturation. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 35:51–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Nartey OB, Zhao B (2014) Biochar preparation, characterization, and adsorptive capacity and its effect on bioavailability of contaminants: an overview. Adv Mater Sci Eng 1-12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ndor E, Jayeoba OJ, Ogara JI (2016) Effect of biochar amendment on heavy metals concentration in dumpsite soil and their uptake by Amaranthus (Amaranthus cruentus). J Appl Life Sci Int 9(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Nishio M (1996) Microbial fertilizers in Japan. ASPAC, Food & Fertilizer Technology Center. Extension Bulletin No. 430, 13Google Scholar
  74. Novak JM, Ro K, Ok YS, Sigua G, Spokas K, Uchimiya S (2015) Biochars multifunctional role as a novel technology in the agricultural, environmental, and industrial sector. ChemosphereGoogle Scholar
  75. Ok YS, Chang SX, Gao B, Chung HJ (2015) SMART biochar technology—a shifting paradigm towards advanced materials and healthcare research. Environ Technol Innov 4:206–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ozcimen D, Karaosmanolu F (2004) Production and characterization of bio-oil and biochar from rapeseed cake. Renew Energy 29:779–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Prado RM, Caione G, Campos CNS (2013) Filter cake and vinasse as fertilizers contributing to conservation agriculture. Applied and Environmental Soil Science 3: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Prakongkep N, Gilkes RJ, Wiriyakitnateekul W, Duangchan A, Darunsontaya T (2013) The effects of pyrolysis conditions on the chemical and physical properties of rice husk biochar. IJMSA. 3(3):97–103Google Scholar
  79. Saby NPA, Arrouays D, Antoni V, Lemercier B, Follain S, Walter C, Schvartz C (2008) Changes in soil organic carbon in a mountainous French region, 1990-2004. Soil Use Manag 24:254–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Santin C, Doerr SH, Merino A, Bucheli TD, Bryant R, Ascough P, Gao X, Masiello CA (2017) Carbon sequestration potential and physicochemical properties differ between wildfire charcoals and slow-pyrolysis biochars. Sci Rep 7:11233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Satpathy SK, Tabil LG, Meda V, Naik SN, Prasad R (2014) Torrefaction of wheat and barley straw after microwave heating. Fuel 124:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Schlesinger W (1984) Soil organic matter: a source of atmospheric CO2. In: The role of terrestrial vegetation in the global carbon cycle: measurements by remote sensing, SCOPE (ed. Wood-well GM). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, NY, pp 111–127Google Scholar
  83. Shareef TME, Zhao B (2017) Review paper: the fundamentals of biochar as a soil amendment tool and management in agriculture scope: an overview for farmers and gardeners. J Agric Chem Environ 6:38–61Google Scholar
  84. Silber A, Levkovitch I, Graber ER (2010) pH-dependent mineral release and surface properties of cornstraw biochar: agronomic implications. Environ Sci Technol 44:9318–9323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen H, Kumar P, McCarl B, Ogle S, Mara FO, Rice C, Scholes B, Sirotenko O (2007) Agriculture. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Mayer LA (eds) Climate change 2007: mitigation. New York, Cambridge University Press, Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  86. Sohaimi KSA, Ngadi N, Mat H, Inuwa IM, Wong S (2017) Synthesis, characterization and application of textile sludge biochars for oil removal. JECE 5:1415–1422Google Scholar
  87. Sohi S (2012) Carbon storage with benefits. Sci 338:1034–1035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Spokas KA (2010) Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O:C molar ratios. Carbon Manag 1:289–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Spokas KA, Koskinen WC, Baker JM, Reicosky DC (2009) Impacts of woodchip biochar additions on greenhouse gas production and sorption/degradation of two herbicides in a Minnesota soil. Chemosphere 77:574–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Subedi R, Taupe N, Pelissetti S, Petruzzelli L, Bertora C, Leahy J, Grignani C (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions and soil properties following amendment with manure-derived biochars: influence of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock type. J Environ Manag 166:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna AM, Dallmeyer I, Garcia-Perez M (2016) Influence of feedstock source and pyrolysis temperature on biochar bulk and surface properties. Biomass Bioenergy 84:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sun Y, Geo B, Yao Y, Fang J, Zhang M, Zhou Y, Chen H, Yang I (2014) Effects of feedstock type, production method and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar properties. Chem Eng J 240:574–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tag AT, Duman G, Ucar S, Yanik J (2016) Effect of feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature on potential application of biochar. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 120:200–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Taherymoosavi S, Joseph S, Munroe P (2016) Characterization of organic compounds in a mixed feedstock biochar generated from Australian agricultural residues. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 120:441–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tan C, Yaxin Z, Hongtao W, Wenjing L, Zeyu Z, Yuancheng Z, Lulu R (2014) Influence of pyrolysis temperature on characteristics and heavy metal adsorptive performance of biochar derived from municipal sewage sludge. Bioresour Technol 164:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Theeba M, Robert TB, Illani ZI, Zulkefli M, Husni MHA, Samsuri AW (2012) Characterization of local mill rice husk charcoal and its effect on compost properties. MJSS. 16:89–102Google Scholar
  97. Uchimiya M, Chang S, Klasson KT (2011) Screening biochars for heavy metal retention in soil: role of oxygen functional groups. J Hazard Mater 190:432–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Usman ARA, Abduljabbar A, Vithanage M, Ok YS, Ahmad M, Ahmad M (2015) Biochar production from date palm waste: charring temperature induced changes in composition and surface chemistry. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 115:392–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Van Zwieten L, Kammann C, Cayuela ML, Pal Singh B, Joseph S, Kimber K, Donne S, Clough T, Spokas K (2015) Biochar effects on nitrous oxide and methane emissions from soil. 2nd ed. In: Lehmann, J., Joseph, S., (eds.), Biochar for Environmental Management 2nd ed. Earth Scan. 487-518Google Scholar
  100. Villegas JP, Duran-Valle CJ, Valenzuela-Calahorro C, Gomez-Serrano V (1998) Organic chemical structure and structural shrinkage of chars prepared from rockrose. Carbon 36:1251–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wang Y, Yin R, Liu R (2014) Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and its effect on chemical properties of the tea garden soil. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 110:375–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Waters, D., Van Zwieten, L., Singh, B.P., Downie, A., Cowie, A.L., Lehmann, J., 2011. Biochar in soil for climate change mitigation and adaptation. In: Soil Health and Climate Change. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 345–368Google Scholar
  103. Windeatt JH, Ross AB, Williams PT, Forster PM, Nahil MA, Singh S (2014) Characteristics of biochars from crop residues: potential for carbon sequestration and soil amendment. J Environ Manag 146:189–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Yadav A, Ansari KB, Simha P, Gaikar VG, Pandit AB (2016) Vacuum pyrolysed biochar for soil amendment. Resource-Efficient Technologies 2: S177-S185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Yakout SM (2017) Physicochemical characteristics of biochar produced from rice straw at different pyrolysis temperature for soil amendment and removal of organics. Proc Natl Acad Sci, India, Sect A Phys Sci 87(2):207–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Yang H, Yan R, Chen H, Lee DH, Cheng C (2007) Characteristics of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin pyrolysis. Fuel 86: 1781–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Yao Y, Gao B, Fang J, Zhang M, Chen H, Zhou Y, Creamer A, Sun Y, Yang I (2014) Characterization and environmental applications of clay-biochar composities. Chem Eng J 242:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Yargicoglu EN, Sadasivam BY, Reddy KR, Spokas K (2015) Physical and chemical characterization of waste wood derived biochars. Waste Manag 36:256–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zhang M, Ok YS (2014) Biochar soil amendment for sustainable agriculture with carbon and contaminant sequestration. Carbon Manag 5:255–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Zhang M, Gao B, Yao Y, Xue YW, Inyang M (2012) Synthesis, characterization, and environmental implications of grapheme-coated biochar. Sci Total Environ 435:567–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Zhang G, Guo X, Zhu Y, Han Z, He Q, Zhang F (2017) Effect of biochar on the presence of nutrients and ryegrass growth in the soil from an abandoned indigenous coking site: the potential role of biochar in the revegetation of contaminated site. Sci Total Environ 601-602:469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zhao L, Cao X, Masek O, Zimmerman A (2013) Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures. J Hazard Mater 256-257:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Zhao L, Zheng W, Cao X (2014) Distribution and evolution of organic matter phases during biochar formation and their importance in carbon loss and pore structure. Chem Eng 250:240–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Zhao SX, Ta N, Wang XD (2017) Effect of temperature on the structural and physicochemical properties of biochar with apple tree branches as feedstock material. Energies 10:1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Zimmermann M, Bird MI, Wurster C, Saiz G, Goodrick I, Barta J (2012) Rapid degradation of pyrogenic carbon. Glob Chang Biol 18:3306–3316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Zornoza R, Moreno-Barriga F, Acosta JA, Munoz MA, Faz A (2016) Stability, nutrient availability and hydrophobicity of biochars derived from manure, crop residues, and municipal solid waste for their use as soil amendments. Chemosphere 144:122–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tayyba Kanwal Choudhary
    • 1
  • Khalid Saifullah Khan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Qaiser Hussain
    • 1
  • Munir Ahmad
    • 2
  • Muhammad Ashfaq
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Soil SciencePir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture UniversityRawalpindiPakistan
  2. 2.Soil Sciences Department, College of Food & Agricultural SciencesKing Saud UniversityRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  3. 3.Department of Plant PathologyPir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture UniversityRawalpindiPakistan

Personalised recommendations