Advertisement

Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, 12:545 | Cite as

Sedimentological impact on reservoir quality of Es1 sandstone of Shahejie formation, Nanpu Sag, East China

  • Muhammad KashifEmail author
  • Yingchang CaoEmail author
  • Guanghui Yuan
  • Muhammad Asif
  • Wang Jian
  • Wang Zhukhun
  • Saif Ur Rehman
  • Atif Zafar
  • Muhammad Kamran
  • Orkhan Isgandarov
  • Asim Falak Naz
Review Paper
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Comprehensive sedimentological studies regarding different facies types and the factors persuading their development were carried out at Eocene (Es1) member of Shahejie formation of Nanpu Sag. To evaluate the sedimentary facies, lithofacies, and reservoir quality, wireline log analysis, a petrographic thin-section study, SEM, grain size analysis, XRD, and CL analysis were used. The Es1 consists of five sedimentary facies and seven lithofacies. Sandstone is classified on the basis of standard rock classification scheme as feldspathic litharenite and lithic arkose. Quartz grains are abundant detrital constituent and feldspars are subordinate followed by mica, chert, rock fragments, and iron oxide as a minor constituent. Primary intergranular pores, as well as secondary dissolution pores and fracture pores, are also present that enhance the reservoir quality. Grain size varies from conglomerate to clay size, with massive bedding, cross-bedding, and fine-grained ripple laminated sandstone, which predicts that formation is deposited in lacustrine and fluvial channel or channel bar environment. XRD and SEM analysis show various clay minerals that reduced the reservoir characteristics. The present study discloses the deposition and distribution of lacustrine, braided, meandering river delta, and delta front sand bodies of Es1 member as well as provides some support for reservoir quality of the correlative sedimentary system that has great significance for further exploration.

Keywords

Sedimentology  Sedimentary structures  Lithofacies  Sedimentary facies  Reservoir quality  Diagenesis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the China University of Petroleum, and China scholarship council (CSC) for granting me a full scholarship (2015–2018) to carry out the research. The authors would also like to thank the Jidong Oil Field Company for their cooperation to provide the research data and help to complete the research without loss of time. The authors would like to thanks the anonymous reviewers as well as Editor-in-Chief for their constructive comments that helps in improving the current manuscript.

Funding information

This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China Project (No. 41602138), National Science and Technology Special Grant (No. 2016ZX05006-007), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation–funded project (2015M580617; 2017T100524), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (15CX08001A).

References

  1. Ajdukiewicz JM, Lander RH (2010) Sandstone reservoir quality prediction: the state of the art. AAPG Bull 94(8):1083–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Ramadan K, Morad S, Proust JN, Al-Aasm I (2005) Distribution of diagenetic alterations in siliciclastic shoreface deposits within a sequence stratigraphic framework: evidence from the Upper Jurassic, Boulonnais, NW France. J Sediment Res 75:943–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anketell JM, Mriheel IY (2000) Depositional environment and diagenesis of the Eocene Jdeir Formation, Gabes-Tripoli Basin, Western Offshore, Libya. J Pet Geol 23:425–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armitage PJ, Worden RH, Faulkner DR, Aplin AC, Butcher AR, Iliffe J (2010) Diagenetic and sedimentary controls on porosity in Lower Carboniferous fine-grained lithologies, Krechba field, Algeria: a petrological study of a caprock to a carbon capture site. Mar Pet Geol 27:1395–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arribas J, González-Acebrón L, Omodeo-Salé S, Mas R (2013) The influence of the provenance of arenite on its diagenesis in the Cameros Rift Basin (Spain). Geol Soc Lond, Spec Publ 386:SP386–SP312Google Scholar
  6. Barclay SA, Worden RH (2000) Effects of reservoir wettability on quartz cementation in oil fields. Quartz cementation in sandstones:103–117Google Scholar
  7. Bjørlykke K (2011) Open-system chemical behavior of Wilcox Group mudstones. How is large scale mass transfer at great burial depth in sedimentary basins possible? A discussion. Mar Pet Geol 28:1381–1382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bjørlykke K (2014) Relationships between depositional environments, burial history and rock properties. Some principal aspects of diagenetic process in sedimentary basins. Sediment Geol 301:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bjørlykke K, Jahren J (2012) Open or closed geochemical systems during diagenesis in sedimentary basins: constraints on mass transfer during diagenesis and the prediction of porosity in sandstone and carbonate reservoirs. AAPG Bull 96:2193–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bloch S, Lander RH, Bonnell L (2002) Anomalously high porosity and permeability in deeply buried sandstone reservoirs: origin and predictability. AAPG Bull 86:301–328Google Scholar
  11. Cao Y, Yuan G, Li X, Wang Y, Xi K, Wang X, Yang T (2014) Characteristics and origin of abnormally high porosity zones in buried Paleogene clastic reservoirs in the Shengtuo area, Dongying Sag, East China. Pet Sci 11:346–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caracciolo L, Arribas J, Ingersoll RV, Critelli S (2013) The diagenetic destruction of porosity in plutoniclastic petrofacies: the Miocene Diligencia and Eocene Maniobra formations, Orocopia Mountains, southern California, USA. Geol Soc Lond, Spec Publ 386:SP386–SP389Google Scholar
  13. Chamley H (1989) Clay sedimentology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, p 623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Changming C, Jiakuan H, Jingshan C, Xingyou T (1984) Depositional models of Tertiary rift basins, eastern China, and their application to petroleum prediction. Sediment Geol 40:73–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crossey LJ, Larsen D (1992) Authigenic mineralogy of sandstones intercalated with organic-rich mudstones: integrating diagenesis and burial history of the Mesaverde Group. Piceance Basin, NW ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  16. Curtis CD (1978) Possible links between sandstone diagenesis and depth-related geochemical reactions occurring in enclosing mudstones. J Geol Soc 135:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dong Y, Xiao L, Zhou H, Wang C, Zheng J, Zhang N, Huang H (2010) The Tertiary evolution of the prolific Nanpu Sag of Bohai Bay Basin, China: Constraints from volcanic records and tectono-stratigraphic sequences. Geological society of American Bulletin 122:609–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dott RH Jr, Bourgeois J (1982) Hummocky stratification: significance of its variable bedding sequences. Geol Soc Am Bull 93:663–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dutton SP (2008) Calcite cement in Permian deep-water sandstones, Delaware Basin, west Texas: Origin, distribution, and effect on reservoir properties. AAPG Bull 92(6):765–787.  https://doi.org/10.1306/01280807107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dutton SP, Loucks RG (2010) Reprint of: Diagenetic controls on evolution of porosity and permeability in lower Tertiary Wilcox sandstones from shallow to ultra-deep (200–6700 m) burial, Gulf of Mexico Basin, USA. Mar Pet Geol 27:1775–1787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gier S, Worden RH, Johns WD, Kurzweil H (2008) Diagenesis and reservoir quality of Miocene sandstones in the Vienna Basin, Austria. Mar Pet Geol 25:681–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gluyas J, Cade CA (1997) Prediction of porosity in compacted sands. AAPG Mem 69:19–28Google Scholar
  23. Gong ZS (1997) Giant offshore oil and gas fields in China. Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing (article in Chinese with an abstract in English)Google Scholar
  24. Guo X, Liu K, He S, Song G, Wang Y, Hao X, Wang B (2012) Petroleum generation and charge history of the northern Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China: insight from integrated fluid inclusion analysis and basin modelling. Mar Pet Geol 32:21–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guo S, Tan L, Lin C, Li H, Lü X, Wang H (2014) Hydrocarbon accumulation characteristics of beach-bar sandstones in the southern slope of the Dongying Sag, Jiyang Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Pet Sci 11:220–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hammer E, Mørk MBE, Næss A (2010) Facies controls on the distribution of diagenesis and compaction in fluvial-deltaic deposits. Mar Pet Geol 27:1737–1751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henares S, Caracciolo L, Cultrone G, Fernández J, Viseras C (2014) The role of diagenesis and depositional facies on pore system evolution in a Triassic outcrop analogue (SE Spain). Mar Pet Geol 51:136–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hongwei K, Yanxue L, Xianghua M (2005) The geochemical features and its environmental significance of the Sinian carbonates in the Jilin-Liaoning area. Nat Gas Geosci 16:54–58Google Scholar
  29. Islam MA (2009) Diagenesis and reservoir quality of Bhuban sandstones (Neogene), Titas gas field, Bengal Basin, Bangladesh. J Asian Earth Sci 35:89–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kashif M, Cao YC, Yuan G, Jian W, Cheng X, Sun P, Hassan S (2018) Diagenesis impact on a deeply buried sandstone reservoir (Es1 Member) of the Shahejie Formation, Nanpu Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, East China. Aust J Earth Sci:1–19Google Scholar
  31. Ketzer JM, Morad S, Amorosi A (2003) Predictive clay mineral distribution within a sequence stratigraphic framework of siliciclastic sequences. In: Worden RH, Morad S (eds) Clay mineral cements in Sandstone,34, International Association of Sedimentologists. Special Publication, Thousand Oaks, pp 43–61Google Scholar
  32. Li H (1995) Interpretation of stratigraphic inclination logging data in sedimentary studies [J]. J Sediment 1:82–87Google Scholar
  33. Li S, Zhao G, Dai L, Zhou L, Liu X, Suo Y, Santosh M (2012) Cenozoic faulting of the Bohai Bay Basin and its bearing on the destruction of the eastern North China Craton. J Asian Earth Sci 47:80–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liangqing X, Galloway WE (1991) Fan –delta, Braid delta and the classification of delta systems [J]. Acta Geol Sin 2Google Scholar
  35. Luo JL, Morad S, Salem A, Ketzer JM, Lei XL, Guo DY, Hlal O (2009) Impact of diagenesis on reservoir-quality evolution in fluvial and lacustrine-deltaic sandstones: evidence from Jurassic and Triassic sandstones from the Ordos basin, China. J Pet Geol 32:79–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ma Z (1982) Interpretation of sedimentary environment by natural potential logging curve [J]. Pet Nat Gas Geol 1:25–40Google Scholar
  37. Makeen YM, Abdullah WH, Ayinla HA, Hakimi MH, Sia SG (2016) Sedimentology, diagenesis and reservoir quality of the upper Abu Gabra Formation sandstones in the Fula Sub-basin, Muglad Basin, Sudan. Mar Pet Geol 77:1227–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mansurbeg H, Morad S, Salem A, Marfil R, El-Ghali MAK, Nystuen JP, La Iglesia A (2008) Diagenesis and reservoir quality evolution of palaeocene deep-water, marine sandstones, the Shetland-Faroes Basin, British continental shelf. Mar Pet Geol 25:514–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miall AD (1990) Principal of sedimentary basin analysis, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlg, New York 668pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moore DM, Reynolds RC Jr (1997) X-ray diffraction and the identification and analysis of clay minerals, 2nd edn. Oxford University press, Inc, Oxford, p 371Google Scholar
  41. Morad S, Ketzer M Jr, De Ros LF (2000) Spatial and temporal distribution of diagenetic alterations in siliciclastic rocks: implications for mass transfer in sedimentary basins. Sedimentology 47:95–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Morad S, Al-Ramadan K, Ketzer JM, De Ros LF (2010) The impact of diagenesis on the heterogeneity of sandstone reservoirs: a review of the role of depositional facies and sequence stratigraphy. AAPG Bull 94:1267–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mork MBE (2013) Diagenesis and quartz cement distribution of low-permeability Upper Triassic–Middle Jurassic reservoir sandstones, Longyearbyen CO2 lab well site in Svalbard, Norway. AAPG Bull 97:577–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Okoro AU, Igwe EO (2014) Lithofacies and depositional environment of the Amasiri Sandstone, southern Benue Trough, Nigeria. J Afr Earth Sci 100:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ozkan A, Cumella SP, Milliken KL, Laubach SE (2011) Prediction of lithofacies and reservoir quality using well logs, Late Cretaceous Williams Fork Formation, Mamm Creek field, Piceance Basin, Colorado. AAPG Bull 95:1699–1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peltonen C, Marcussen Ø, Bjørlykke K, Jahren J (2009) Clay mineral diagenesis and quartz cementation in mudstones: the effects of smectite to illite reaction on rock properties. Mar Pet Geol 26:887–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Perri F, Cirrincione R, Critelli S, Mazzoleni P, Pappalardo A (2008) Clay mineral assemblages and sandstone compositions of the Mesozoic Longobucco Group, northeastern Calabria: implications for burial history and diagenetic evolution. Int Geol Rev 50:1116–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rossi C, Marfil R, Ramseyer K, Permanyer A (2001) Facies-related diagenesis and multiphase siderite cementation and dissolution in the reservoir sandstones of the Khatatba Formation, Egypt’s Western Desert. J Sediment Res 71(3):459–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rossi C, Kälin O, Arribas J, Tortosa A (2002) Diagenesis, provenance and reservoir quality of Triassic TAGI sandstones from Ourhoud field, Berkine (Ghadames) Basin, Algeria. Mar Pet Geol 19:117–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rustichelli A, Tondi E, Agosta F, Di Celma C, Giorgioni M (2013) Sedimentologic and diagenetic controls on pore-network characteristics of Oligocene–Miocene ramp carbonates (Majella Mountain, central Italy). AAPG Bull 97:487–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saiag J, Brigaud B, Portier E, Desaubliaux G (2016) Sedimentological control on the diagenesis and reservoir quality of the tidal sandstone of the Upper Cap Hay Formation (Permian, Bonaparte Basin, Australia). Mar Pet Geol 77:597–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Salem AM, Morad S, Mato LF, Al-Aasm IS (2000) Diagenesis and reservoir-quality evolution of fluvial sandstones during progressive burial and uplift: evidence from the Upper Jurassic Boipeba Member, Recôncavo Basin, Northeastern Brazil. AAPG Bull 84:1015–1040Google Scholar
  53. Selley RC (1992) Petroleum seepages and impregnations in Great Britain. Mar Pet Geol 9:226–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tang M, Liu-Zeng J, Hoke GD, Xu Q, Wang W, Li Z, Wang W (2017) Paleoelevation reconstruction of the Paleocene-Eocene Gonjo basin, SE-central Tibet. Tectonophysics 712:170–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thyne G (2001) A model for diagenetic mass transfer between adjacent sandstone and shale. Mar Pet Geol 18:743–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tucker ME (2003) Sedimentary rocks in the field. John Wiley & Sons, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  57. Walker RG, Cant DG (1984) Sandy fluvial system. In: Walker RG (ed) Facies Models, vol 1, 2nd edn, Geoscience Canada reprint series, pp 71–89Google Scholar
  58. Wang H, Wang FZ, Zhou HM, Dong YX, Wang JH, Ceng GC, Chen L (2002) Evolutionary dynamics and formation-deposition dynamics of Nanpu sag, Bohaiwan basin. China University of Geosciences Press, Wuhan, p 182 (Article in Chinese with an abstract in English)Google Scholar
  59. Worden RH, Morad S (2003) Clay minerals in sandston: control on formation, distribution and evolution, In: Worden. R.H., Morad, S, (Eds.), Clay minerals in sandstone. Int Assoc Sedimentol Spec Publ 43:3–41Google Scholar
  60. Xi K, Cao Y, Liu K, Wu S, Yuan G, Zhu R, Kashif M, Zhao Y (2019) Diagenesis of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation, southwestern Ordos Basin, China. Mar Pet Geol 99:548–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Xu A, Dong Y, Zou C, Wang Z, Zheng H, Wang X, Ying C (2008) Division and evaluation of oil-gas prolific zones for litho-stratigraphic reservoirs in the Nanpu Sag. Petroleum Exploration and Development 35:272–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang R, Fan A, Han Z, Wang X (2012) Diagenesis and porosity evolution of sandstone reservoirs in the East II part of Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin. Int J Min Sci Technol 22:311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yuan G, Cao Y, Zan N, Schulz HM, Gluyas J, Hao F, Jin Q, Liu K, Wang Y, Chen Z, Jia Z (2019a) Coupled mineral alteration and oil degradation in thermal oil-water-feldspar systems and implications for organic-inorganic interactions in hydrocarbon reservoirs. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 248:61–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yuan G, Cao Y, Schulz HM, Hao F, Gluyas J, Liu K, Yang T, Wang Y, Xi K, Li F (2019b) A review of feldspar alteration and its geological significance in sedimentary basins: from shallow aquifers to deep hydrocarbon reservoirs. Earth-sci RevGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang J, Qin L, Zhang Z (2008) Depositional facies, diagenesis and their impact on the reservoir quality of Silurian sandstones from Tazhong area in central Tarim Basin, western China. J Asian Earth Sci 33:42–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang Q, Zhu X, Steel RJ, Zhong D (2014) Variation and mechanisms of clastic reservoir quality in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation of the Dongying Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, China. Pet Sci 11:200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhou H, Dong Y, Liu Y, Fan W, Xie Z (2003) Precise exploration practice and results of Nanpu depression in Jidong oilfield. China Petroleum Exploration 8:11–16Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019
corrected publication 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Kashif
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yingchang Cao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Guanghui Yuan
    • 1
  • Muhammad Asif
    • 4
  • Wang Jian
    • 1
  • Wang Zhukhun
    • 1
  • Saif Ur Rehman
    • 2
  • Atif Zafar
    • 3
  • Muhammad Kamran
    • 5
  • Orkhan Isgandarov
    • 1
  • Asim Falak Naz
    • 1
  1. 1.School of GeosciencesChina University of PetroleumQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of SargodhaSargodhaPakistan
  3. 3.School of Petroleum EngineeringChina University of PetroleumQingdaoChina
  4. 4.Institute of GeologyUniversity of the PunjabLahorePakistan
  5. 5.School of Earth Sciences and ResourcesChina university of GeosciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations