Advertisement

Method for determining the critical velocity of paste-like slurry filling into goaf using computational fluid dynamics

  • Hao WangEmail author
  • Chengwei Zhao
  • Sicheng Chen
Original Paper
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

The coal mining mode of paste-like slurry fill shows the connotation and characteristics of green mining both in the resource recycle and waste reuse. Test by intelligent torque sensor, fitted by the ORIGIN software, the following relationships were obtained: (1) rheological parameters versus slurry mass fraction, (2) rheological parameters versus component ratio. Based on the relationships, the recommended ratio of paste-like slurry was determined. The mass concentration of slurry is no more than 78%, which is composed by coal gangue (diameter < 20 mm), fly ash (diameter < 30 μm), and gelling agent with the weight ratio of 8:3:1. The pipe flow dynamic characteristics of paste-like slurry have been analyzed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and CFD-POST. By simulating the flow behavior of the slurry at different velocities under a stable state in the horizontal pipe, the analysis of the paste-like slurry’s non-silting velocity has been done. Combined with the laboratory test data and mechanical models, the different concentrations and the velocities of the paste-like slurry in pipelines under different inlet velocities were introduced. The critical velocity is about 1 m/s corresponding to a pipe diameter of 150 mm. The results provide a better insight into the process of transportation of paste-like slurry, as well as to more cost-effective engineering designs of sustainable development of the environment and coal mines.

Keywords

Coal mining Paste-like slurry Critical velocity 

Notes

Author contributions

Hao Wang conceived and designed the numerical simulations; Hao Wang and Chengwei Zhao performed the experiments and analyzed the data; Hao Wang wrote the paper; and Hao Wang and Sicheng Chen made the revision of the grammar.

References

  1. Bitter JGA (1963) A study of erosion phenomena part I. Wear 1(6):169–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cao B, Zou Y, Xia J (2017) Experimental study on the behavior of coarse particles in two phases flow during water hammer. Adv Water Sci 28(03):356–363Google Scholar
  3. Doron P, Barnea D (1996) Flow pattern maps for solid-liquid flow in pipes. Int J Multiphase Flow 4(22):273–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doronzo DM, Valentine GA, Dellino P, de Tulliod MD (2010) Numerical analysis of the effect of topography on deposition from dilute pyroclastic density currents. Earth Planet Sci Lett 11(15):164–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doronzo DM, Khalaf EA, Dellino P, de Tullio MD, Dioguardi F, Gurioli L, Mele D, Pascazio G, Sulpizio R (2015) Local impact of dust storms around a suburban building in arid and semi-arid regions: numerical simulation examples from Dubai and Riyadh, Arabian Peninsula. Arab J Geosci 9(8):7359–7369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fei X (1994) Slurry and granular materials conveying hydraulics. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, p 17Google Scholar
  7. Finnie I (1978) On the velocity dependence of the erosion of ductile metals by solid particles at low angles of incidence. Wear 5(48):181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huang Y (2014a) Mine filling theory and technology. Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  9. Huang Y (2014b) Mine filling theory and technology. Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing, pp 91–98Google Scholar
  10. Jayasundara CT, Yang RY, Guo BY (2009) Effect of slurry properties on particle motion in IsaMills. J Min Eng 10(22):886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kalekudithi E, Sanders SR, Nandakumar K, Masliyah JH (2009) Hydrodynamic simulation of horizontal slurry pipeline flow using ANSYS-CFX. J Ind Eng Chem 8(48):8159–8171Google Scholar
  12. Kaushal DR, Tomita Y (2002) Solids concentration profiles and pressure drop in pipeline flow of multi-sized particulate slurries. Int J Multiphase Flow 10(28):1697–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuriqi A, Ardiçlioǧlu M (2018) Investigation of hydraulic regime at middle part of the Loire River in context of floods and low flow events. Pollack Period 13(1):145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin T (2016) Research on the flow properties of the gangue paste-like slurry. China University of Mining & Technology, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  15. Mansouri A, Arabnejad H, Shirazi SA, McLaury BS (2015) A combined CFD/experimental methodology for erosion prediction. Wear 5(332–333):1090–1097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mbabazi JG, Sheer TJ, Shandu R (2004) A model to predict erosion on mild steel surfaces impacted by boiler fly ash particles. Wear 9(257):612–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mehmet AK, Mustafa G (2001) Critical flow velocity in slurry transporting horizontal pipelines. J Hydraul Eng 127(9):763–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mehmet A., Agim S., Serkan Ö., Alban K., Onur G (2011) Investigation of average shear stress in natural stream. In: International Balkans Conference on Challenges of Civil Engineering, BCCCE. Epoka University, Tirana, Albania, p. 5Google Scholar
  19. Miao X, Qian M (2009) Research on green mining of coal resources in China: current status and future prospects. J Min Saf Eng 26(1):1–14 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  20. Qian M (2010) On sustainable coal mining in China. J China Coal Soc 4(35):529–534 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  21. Risa O, Zhang Y, McLaury BS, Shirazi SA (2012) Experimental and computational investigations to evaluate the effects of fluid viscosity and particle size on erosion damage. Fluids Eng 134(6):061301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sattar AMA, Bonakdari H, Gharabaghi B, Radecki-Pawlik A (2019) Hydraulic modeling and evaluation equations for the incipient motion of sandbags for levee breach closure operations. Water 11(2):279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Senapati PK, Mishra BK, Parida A (2013) Analysis of friction mechanism and homogeneity of suspended load for high concentration fly ash & bottom ash mixture slurry using rheological and pipeline experimental data. Powder Technol 12(250):154–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shi X, Stefan F, Zhang K, Dan L (2018) Advances in multiphase flow and transport in the subsurface environment. Geofluids 3:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Soete J, Claes S, Claes H, Janssens N, Cnudde V, Huysmans M, Swennen R (2017) Lattice Boltzmann simulations of fluid flow in continental carbonate reservoir rocks and in up scaled rock models generated with multiple-point geostatistics. Geofluids 9(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sommerfeld M (2017) Numerical methods for dispersed multiphase flows. Advances in Mathematical Fluid Mechanics. Birkhäuser 7:327–396Google Scholar
  27. Tetsuji Y, Katsuyuki K (2011) Downscaling mesoscale meteorological models for computational wind engineering applications. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 99(4):199–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vahid A, Rasool M (2013) CFD modeling of particulates erosive effect on a commercial scale pipeline bend. ISRN Chem Eng 6:105912Google Scholar
  29. Varghese M, Neut MWM, van der Poel EP, Sun C (2016) Translational and rotational dynamics of a large buoyant sphere in turbulence. Exp Fluids 4(57):51Google Scholar
  30. Wang H, Jiao J, Wang Y, Du W (2018) Feasibility of using gangue and fly ash as filling slurry materials. Processes 11(6):232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wasp EJ, Kenny JP, Gandhi RL (1977) Solid-liquid flow slurry pipeline transportation. Trans. Publication, Berlin, pp 108–109Google Scholar
  32. Yuan R, Ma D, Zhang H (2017) Flow characteristics and grain size distribution of granular gangue mineral by compaction treatment. Adv Mater Sci Eng 5(2017):2509286Google Scholar
  33. Zhang LR, Ge SR (2007) A steady numerical analysis of a fluid-solid coupling model in aortic artificial bileaflet heart valves. J Clin Rehab Tissue Eng Res 11(40):8107–8110 (Chinese)Google Scholar
  34. Zhang Q, Zheng J, Wang X, Wang X (2009) A study of the abrasion form and mechanism of backfilling pipelines. Metal Mine 05:115–118Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Energy & Mining EngineeringChina University of Mining & TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground EngineeringBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations