Advertisement

The behaviour of soil stabilised with nanoparticles: an extensive review of the present status and its applications

  • Jiji KrishnanEmail author
  • Shruti Shukla
Review Paper
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

Due to the rapid growth of nanotechnology, many researchers from the field of science and engineering have expressed a keen interest to extend the research in this field. Soil is a complex material which is used for ecological and non-ecological functions. The increasing demands of improvement in geotechnical properties lead to different stabilization techniques such as chemical stabilization, electrical stabilization, and stabilization by geotextiles and fabrics. The theoretical and practical understanding of the variation in soil properties due to the addition of nanoparticles is yet to be explored. The present review is an attempt to summarise the applications of nanotechnology in geotechnical, construction, and transportation engineering. In the present paper, some common nano-imaging systems used in geotechnical engineering are also listed which are used for microstructural characterization of soils to investigate the pattern, bonding, and pores inside the soil. The research is limited in the field that is mainly because of the high cost and probably it will reduce in the near future due to a rise in large-scale demand for nanoparticles. The addition of a small amount of nanoparticles in the soil can result in extraordinary improvement in the soil properties. The present paper is an attempt to summarise the applications of nanotechnology in geotechnical engineering. In past, the researchers have observed an improvement in index properties as well as engineering properties of soil due to the addition of nanoparticles.

Keywords

Geotechnical engineering Nanoparticles Soil Stabilization Strength 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author would like to thank the Ministry of Human Resource and Development (MHRD), Govt. of India for providing fellowship and for funding the ongoing research. The authors would like to thank the Department of Applied Mechanics, SVNIT, Surat for all the support and encouragement.

References

  1. Alexandre M, Dubois P (2000) Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials. Mater Sci Eng R Rep 28:1–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-796X(00)00012-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alsharef JMA, Taha MR, Firoozi AA, Govindasamy P (2016) Potential of using Nanocarbons to stabilize weak soils. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2016:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5060531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aricò AS, Bruce P, Scrosati B et al (2010) Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. In: Materials for sustainable energy, pp 148–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avadhanulu MN, Kshirsagar PGA (1992) Textbook of engineering physics. S Chand PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  5. Azzam WR (2014) Behavior of modified clay microstructure using polymer nanocomposites technique. Alexandria Eng J 53:143–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2013.11.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babu S, Joseph S (2016) Effect of Nano materials on properties of soft soil. Int J Sci Res 5:634–637Google Scholar
  7. Bahari M, Nikookar M, Arabani M, et al (2013) Stabilization of Silt by Nano-clay. the Natl Congr Civ Eng 7–8Google Scholar
  8. Bahmani SH, Huat BBK, Asadi A, Farzadnia N (2014) Stabilization of residual soil using SiO2nanoparticles and cement. Constr Build Mater 64:350–359.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Banadaky YD, Niroumand H, Kassim KA (2014) A review on various nano imaging systems in geotechnical engineering. Electron J Geotech Eng 19:17433–17344Google Scholar
  10. Bennett KE, Fitzjohn JL, Harmon RA, Yates PC Jr. (1988) Colloidal Silica-Based Fluid Diversion, U.S. Patent 4,732,213, Mar. 22Google Scholar
  11. Boysen E, Muir NC, Dudley D, Peterson C (2011) Nanotechnology for dummies, 2nd edn. Wiley Publ. Inc., HobokenGoogle Scholar
  12. Cetin M, Sevik H (2016) Measuring the impact of selected plants on indoor CO2 concentrations. Pol J Environ Stud 25(3):973–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cetin M, Adiguzel F, Kaya O, Sahap A (2018a) Mapping of bioclimatic comfort for potential planning using GIS in Aydin. Environ Dev Sustain 20:361–375.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9885-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cetin M, Onac AK, Sevik H, Sen B (2018b) Temporal and regional change of some air pollution parameters in Bursa, air quality. Atmos Health Air Qual Atmos Health 12:311–316.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-00657-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cetin M, Sevik H, Canturk U, Cakir C (2018c) Evaluation of the recreational potential of Kutahya urban Forest. Fresenius Environ Bull 27:2629–2634Google Scholar
  16. Cetin M, Sevik H, Yigit N (2018d) Climate type-related changes in the leaf micromorphological characters of certain landscape plants. Environ Monit Assess 190:404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cetin M, Sevik H, Yigit N et al (2018e) The variable of leaf micromorphological characters on grown in distinct climate conditions in some landscape plants. Fresenius Environ Bull 27:3206–3211Google Scholar
  18. Cetin M, Zeren I, Sevik H, Cakir C, Akpinar H (2018f) A study on the determination of the natural park’s sustainable tourism potential. Environ Monit Assess 190:167.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6534-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chadha N, Lal S, Mishra AK, Pulicharla R, Cledon M, Brar SK, Surampalli RY (2016) Different analytical approaches for the determination of presence of engineered nanomaterials in natural environments. J Hazardous, Toxic Radioactive Waste 20:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Changizi F, Haddad A (2016) Effect of Nano-SiO2 on the geotechnical properties of cohesive soil. Geotech Geol Eng 34:725–733.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9962-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Changizi F, Haddad A (2017) Improving the geotechnical properties of soft clay with nano-silica particles. Proc Inst Civ Eng - Gr Improv 170:62–71.  https://doi.org/10.1680/jgrim.15.00026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Choo H, Larrahondo J, Burns SE (2015) Coating effects of Nano-sized particles onto sand surfaces: small strain stiffness and contact mode of Iron oxide–Coated Sands. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 141:4014077.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001188 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Christian P, Von Der Kammer F, Baalousha M, Hofmann T (2008) Nanoparticles: structure, properties, preparation and behaviour in environmental media. Ecotoxicology 17:326–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Conlee CT, Gallagher PM, Boulanger RW, Kamai R (2012) Centrifuge modeling for liquefaction mitigation using colloidal silica stabilizer. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 138:1334–1345.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000703 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coo JL, So ZPS, Ng CWW (2016) Effect of nanoparticles on the shrinkage properties of clay. Eng Geol 213:84–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Correia AAS, Rasteiro MG (2016) Nanotechnology applied to chemical soil stabilization. Procedia Engineering 143:1252–1259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Da Silva AGM, Rodrigues TS, Macedo A et al (2014) An undergraduate level experiment on the synthesis of au nanoparticles and their size-dependent optical and catalytic properties. Quim Nova 37:1716–1720.  https://doi.org/10.5935/0100-4042.20140235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dı’az-Rodrı’guez JA, Antonio-Izarraras VM (2004) Mitigation of liquefaction risk using colloidal silica stabilizer.13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6Google Scholar
  29. Díaz-Rodríguez JA, Antonio-Izarraras VM, Bandini P, López-Molina JA (2008) Cyclic strength of natural liquefiable sand stabilized with colloidal silica grout. Can Geotech J 45:1345–1355.  https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Engelmann W, von Hohendorff R (2016) Current scenario of nanotechnology in Brazil. J Hazardous, Toxic, Radioactive Waste 20:B4014002.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fakhri Z, Pour-Hosseini R, Fakhri M (2013) Examining effect of Nanoclay on basic geotechnical properties of kaolinite clay. In: Technology University of Isfahan (ed) 9th international congress on civil engineeringGoogle Scholar
  32. Faruqi M, Castillo L, Sai J (2015) State-of-the-art review of the applications of nanotechnology in pavement materials. J Civ Eng Res 5:59.  https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jce.20150502.01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fazeli A, Johari A, Davoodi F (2014) Rehabilitation of collapsible soil with nanoclay. In: Proc. of 8th National Congress on civil engineering. Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, MazandarananGoogle Scholar
  34. Ferkel H, Hellmig RJ (1999) Effect of nanopowder deagglomeration on the densities of nanocrystalline ceramic green bodies and their sintering behaviour. Nanostructured Mater 11:617–622.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9773(99)00348-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Feynman RP (1960) There’s plenty of room at the bottom. Eng Sci 23(1):22–36Google Scholar
  36. Gallagher PM (2000) In: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (ed) Passive site remediation for mitigation of liquefaction risk. Thesis (PhD), Blacksburg, VAGoogle Scholar
  37. Gallagher PM, Finsterle S (2004) Physical and numerical model of colloidal silica injection for passive site stabilization. Vadose Zo J 3:917–925.  https://doi.org/10.2113/3.3.917 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gallagher PM, Lin Y (2009) Colloidal silica transport through liquefiable porous media. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 135:1702–1712.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gallagher PM, Mitchell JK (2002) Influence of colloidal silica grout on liquefaction potential and cyclic undrained behavior of loose sand. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 22:1017–1026.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00126-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gallagher PM, Conlee CT, Rollins KM (2007a) Full-scale field testing of colloidal silica grouting for mitigation of liquefaction risk. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 133:186–196.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:2(186) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gallagher PM, Pamuk A, Abdoun T (2007b) Stabilization of liquefiable soils using colloidal silica grout. J Mater Civ Eng 19:33–40.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:1(33) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ganji H, Fazl-e-Owla R, Nowrooznejad A (2013) Examining changes of soil shear tension before and after using Nanoclays. 9th International Congress on Civil Engineering, Technology University of IsfahanGoogle Scholar
  43. Ge Y, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2011) Evidence for negative effects of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles on soil bacterial communities. Environ Sci Technol 45:1659–1664.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es103040t CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gelsefidi S, Alireza S (2013) Application of nanomaterial to stabilize a weak soil. In: Int Conf case Hist Geotech Eng - seventh Int Conf case Hist Geotech Eng AprGoogle Scholar
  45. Ghasabkolaei N, Janalizadeh A, Jahanshahi M, Roshan N, Ghasemi SE (2016) Physical and geotechnical properties of cement-treated clayey soil using silica nanoparticles: an experimental study. Eur Phys J Plus 131.  https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2016-16134-3
  46. Ghobadi MH, Abdilor Y, Babazadeh R (2014) Stabilization of clay soils using lime and effect of pH variations on shear strength parameters. Bull Eng Geol Environ 73:611–619.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-013-0563-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Grabar KC, Brown KR, Keating CD, Stranick SJ, Tang SL, Natan MJ (1997) Nanoscale characterization of gold colloid monolayers: a comparison of four techniques. Anal Chem 69:471–477.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac9605962 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Guney K, Cetin M, Sevik H, Güney KB (2016a) Chapter 4: Effects of Some Hormone Applications on Germination and Morphological Characters of Endangered Plant Species Lilium artvinense L. Seeds. "New Challenges in Seed Biology - Basic and Translational Research Driving Seed Technology". Intech Open, Eds: Araújo Susana, Balestrazzi Alma, ISBN: 978–953–51-2659-1, pp: 97–112 (210 p)Google Scholar
  49. Guney K, Cetin M, Sevik H, Guney KB (2016b) Influence of germination percentage and morphological properties of some hormones practice on Lilium martagon L. Seeds, Oxid CommunGoogle Scholar
  50. Guney K, Cetin M, Guney KB, Melekoglu A (2017) The effects of some hormone applications on Lilium martagon L. germination and morpholgical characters. Polish J Environ Stud 26:2533–2538.  https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/70895 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hamderi M, Gallagher PM (2013) An optimization study on the delivery distance of colloidal silica. Acad J 8:1314–1323.  https://doi.org/10.5897/SRE11.2034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hamderi M, Gallagher PM, Lin Y (2014) Numerical model for colloidal silica injected column tests. Vadose Zo J 13:0.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2013.07.0138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hameed Majeed Z, Taha MR (2012) Effect of nanomaterial treatment on geotechnical properties of a Penang soft soil. J Asian Sci Res 2:587–592Google Scholar
  54. Hameed Majeed Z, Taha MR (2013) A review of stabilization of soils by using nanomaterials. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 7(2):576–581Google Scholar
  55. Hareesh P, Vinothkumar R (2016) Assessment of nanomaterials on geotechnical properties of clayey soils. In: International conference on engineering innovations and solutions (ICEIS – 2016), pp 66–71Google Scholar
  56. Heckmann LH, Hovgaard MB, Sutherland DS, Autrup H, Besenbacher F, Scott-Fordsmand JJ (2011) Limit-test toxicity screening of selected inorganic nanoparticles to the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Ecotoxicology 20:226–233.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-010-0574-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Heiligtag FJ, Niederberger M (2013) The fascinating world of nanoparticle research. Mater Today 16:262–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Huang Y, Wang L (2016) Laboratory investigation of liquefaction mitigation in silty sand using nanoparticles. Eng Geol 204:23–32.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.01.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Huang Y, Wen Z (2014) Recent developments of soil improvement methods for seismic liquefaction mitigation. Nat Hazards 76:1927–1938.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1558-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Huang X, Jain PK, El-Sayed IH, El-Sayed MA (2007) Gold nanoparticles: interesting optical properties and recent applications in cancer diagnostics and therapy. Nanomedicine 2:681–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Imanaka N, Köhler J, Masui T, Adachi G-y, Taguchi E, Mori H (2000) Inclusions of nanometer-sized Al2O3 particles in a crystalline (Sc,Lu)2(WO4)3 matrix. J Am Ceram Soc 83:427–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Iranpour B, Haddad A (2016) The influence of nanomaterials on collapsible soil treatment. Eng Geol 205:40–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.02.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Jahromi SG, Khodaii A (2009) Effects of nanoclay on rheological properties of bitumen binder. Constr Build Mater 23:2894–2904.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Jurinak JJ, Summer LE, Bennett LE (1991) Laboratory testing of colloidal silica gel for oilfield applications. Society of Petroleum Engineers JournalGoogle Scholar
  65. Kaya E, Agca M, Adiguzel F, Cetin M (2018) Spatial data analysis with R programming for environment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess:1–10Google Scholar
  66. Khalid N, Arshad MF, Mukri M et al (2015) Influence of nano-soil particles in soft soil stabilization. Electron J Geotech Eng 20:731–738.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1983.1.2.138 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Kodaka T, Oka F, Ohno Y, Takyu T, Yamasaki N (2003) Modeling of cyclic deformation and strength characteristics of silica treated sand. First Japan-U.S. workshop on testing, modeling, and simulation, Geomechanics, pp 205–216Google Scholar
  68. Kravkaz-Kuscu IS, Sariyildiz T, Cetin M et al (2018a) Evaluation of the soil properties and primary forest tree species in Taskopru (Kastamonu) district. Fresenius Environ Bull 27:1613–1617Google Scholar
  69. Kravkaz-Kuscu IS, Cetin M, Yigit N et al (2018b) Relationship between enzyme activity (urease-catalase) and nutrient element in soil use. Polish J Environ Stud 27:2107–2112.  https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/78475 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Kumar S, Curtin WA (2007) Crack interaction with microstructure. Mater Today 10:34–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lambe TW, Whitman RV (1969) Soil mechanics. Soil Mechanics, InGoogle Scholar
  72. Lees G, Abdelkader MO, Hamdani SK (1982) Effect of the clay fraction on some mechanical properties of lime-soil mixtures. J Inst High Engr 3–9Google Scholar
  73. Mahasneh BZ (2015) Assessment of using cement, Dead Sea sand and oil shale in treating soft clay soil. Eur J Sci Res 128(4):245–255Google Scholar
  74. Maleki YS, Sharafi H (2014) The exploration into the effect of nanoclay additive on soil geotechnical-engineering basic properties. Adv Environ Biol 8Google Scholar
  75. Mallampati SR, Mitoma Y, Okuda T, Sakita S, Kakeda M (2013) Cesium immobilization in soil by ball-milling treatment with Nanometallic ca/CaO additive. J Hazardous, Toxic, Radioact Waste 17:2–8.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Mitchell JK (1993) Fundamentals of soil behavior, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  77. Moayed RZ, Rahmani H (2017) Effect of Nano-SiO2 Solution on the Strength Characteristics of Kaolinite. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Vol: 4, No:1Google Scholar
  78. Mohammadi M, Niazian M (2013) Investigation of Nano-clay effect on geotechnical properties of Rasht clay. Int J Adv Sci-Tech Res 3:37–46Google Scholar
  79. Moradi G, Seyedi S (2015) Effect of sampling method on strength of stabilized Silty Sands with colloidal Nano silica. J Civ Eng Res 5:129–135.  https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jce.20150506.01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Moridis GJ, Apps J, Persoff P, Myer L, Muller S, Yen P, Pruess K (1996) A field test of a waste containment technology using a new generation of injectable barrier liquids. In: Spectrum, vol 96. WA, Seattle, pp 1–12Google Scholar
  81. Nasehi SA, Uromeihy A, Nikudel MR, Morsali A (2016) Use of nanoscale zero-valent iron and nanoscale hydrated lime to improve geotechnical properties of gas oil contaminated clay: a comparative study. Environ Earth Sci 75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5443-6
  82. National Research Council (2004) Investments in federal facilities. Report of the National Academies. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  83. Ng CWW, Coo JL (2015) Hydraulic conductivity of clay mixed with nanomaterials. Can Geotech J 52:808–811.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2014-0313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Nikookar, Mohammad, Bahari, Meisam, Nikookar, Hares, Arabani, Mahyar. (2013) .The strength characteristics of silty soil stabilized using Nano-Clay.7th SAS tech 2013, Bandar-AbbasGoogle Scholar
  85. Nohani E, Alimakan E (2015) The effect of nanoparticles on geotechnical properties of clay. Int J Life Sci 9:25–27.  https://doi.org/10.3126/ijls.v9i4.12670 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Noll MR, Bartlett C, Dochat TM (1992) In situ permeability reduction and chemical fixation using colloidal silica. In: Proceedings of the sixth National Outdoor Action Conference, Las Vegas, pp 443–457Google Scholar
  87. Ochoa-Cornejo F, Bobet A, Johnston CT et al (2014) Liquefaction 50 years after Anchorage 1964; how nanoparticles could help prevent it. Proc 10th Natl Conf Earthq Eng.  https://doi.org/10.4231/D3CC0TT8W
  88. Osterwalder N, Loher S, Grass RN, Brunner TJ, Limbach LK, Halim SC, Stark WJ (2007) Preparation of nano-gypsum from anhydrite nanoparticles: strongly increased Vickers hardness and formation of calcium sulfate nano-needles. J Nanopart Res 9:275–281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-006-9149-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Osula DOA (1991) Lime modification of problem laterite. Eng Geol 30:141–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(91)90040-R CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Ouhadi VR, Bakhshalipour H (2010) Impact of nano-clays on the behavior properties of collapsible soils. In: Karadeniz Technical University (ed) Proc. of 9th international congress on advanced in civil engineering, TrabzonGoogle Scholar
  91. Park CM, Chu KH, Heo J, Her N, Jang M, Son A, Yoon Y (2016) Environmental behavior of engineered nanomaterials in porous media: a review. J Hazard Mater 309:133–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Perloff WH (1976) Soil mechanics, principals and application. John Wily, & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  93. Persoff P, Finsterle S, Moridis GJ, et al (1995) Injectable barriers for waste isolation. doi:  https://doi.org/10.2172/106544
  94. Persoff P, Apps J, Moridis GJ, Whang JM (1999) Effect of dilution and contaminants on sand grouted with colloidal silica. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 125:461–469.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:6(461) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Ploeg Van Der MJ, Baveco JM, Hout Van Der A et al (2011) Effects of C60 nanoparticle exposure on earthworms (Lumbricus rubellus) and implications for population dynamics. Environ Pollut 159:198–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2010.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Pokropivny VV, Skorokhod VV (2007) Classification of nanostructures by dimensionality and concept of surface forms engineering in nanomaterial science. Mater Sci Eng C 27:990–993.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2006.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Poux M, Fayolle P, Bertrand J, Bridoux D, Bousquet J (1991) Powder mixing: some practical rules applied to agitated systems. Powder Technol 68:213–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-5910(91)80047-M CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Powrie W (1997) Soil mechanics: concept and application, soil mechanics BU 3245. The University of Sydney, SydneyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Priyadharshini R, Arumairaj PD (2015) Improvement of bearing capacity of soft clay using nanomaterials. IJSR - Int J Sci Res 4(6):218–221Google Scholar
  100. Reginatto C, Cecchin I, Carvalho RLR (2016) Influence of Iron nanoparticle concentration on the hydraulic conductivity of a residual clayey soil. Geotechnical Special PublicationGoogle Scholar
  101. Roduner E (2006) Size matters: why nanomaterials are different. Chem Soc Rev 35:583–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sanchez F, Sobolev K (2010) Nanotechnology in concrete - a review. Constr Build Mater 24:2060–2071.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sarsam SI, Husain A (2015) Influence of nanomaterials on the micro-crack healing of asphalt stabilized subgrade soil. Appl Res J 7:395–402Google Scholar
  104. Schmid G, Simon U (2005) Gold nanoparticles: assembly and electrical properties in 1-3 dimensions. Chem Commun:697–710Google Scholar
  105. Schwirn K, Tietjen L, Beer I (2014) Why are nanomaterials different and how can they be appropriately regulated under REACH? Environ Sci Eur 26:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Sevik H, Cetin M (2015) Effects of water stress on seed germination for select landscape plants. Polish J Environ Stud 24:689–693.  https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/30119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Sevik H, Cetin M, Kapucu O, Aricak B, Canturk U (2017) Effects of light on morphologic and stomatal characteristics of Turkish fir needles (Abies nordmanniana subsp. Bornmulleriana Mattf.). Fresenius Environ Bull 26:6579–6587Google Scholar
  108. Seyed Z, Ali M, Shabnam M, Armina S (2016) The Potential Use of Nanoclayto Increa Strength of Contaminated Soil. 67:2010.  https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20166702010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Shadfan H, Dixon JB, Calhoun FG (1985) Iron oxide properties versus strength of ferruginous crust and iron-glaebules in soils. Soil Sci 140(5):317–325.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-198511000-00001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sharo AA, Alawneh AS (2016) Enhancement of the strength and swelling characteristics of expansive clayey soil using Nano-clay material. Geotechnical Special PublicationGoogle Scholar
  111. Shevchenko VY, Madison AE (2002) Structure of nanoparticles: II. Magic numbers of zirconia nanoparticles. Glas Phys Chem 28:44–49.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014253514099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Siddiqui MH, Al-Whaibi MH (2014) Role of nano-SiO2 in germination of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum seeds mill.). Saudi J Biol Sci 21:13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Siegel RW (1994) Nanophase materials. In: Trigg GL (ed) Encyclopedia of applied physics, vol 11. VCH, Weinheim, pp 1–27Google Scholar
  114. Steyn WJ (2009) Potential applications of nanotechnology in pavement engineering. J Transp Eng 135:764–772.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2009)135:10(764) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Subramani V (2016) Soil stabilization using Nano materials. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol 4:641–645Google Scholar
  116. Sun Y (2013) Controlled synthesis of colloidal silver nanoparticles in organic solutions: empirical rules for nucleation engineering. Chem Soc Rev 42:2497–2511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Taha MR (2009) Geotechnical properties of soil-ball milled soil mixtures. In: Nanotechnology in construction 3, pp 377–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Taha MR, Taha OME (2012) Influence of nano-material on the expansive and shrinkage soil behavior. J Nanopart Res 14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-012-1190-0
  119. Teizer J, Venugopal M, Teizer W, Felkl J (2012) Nanotechnology and its impact on construction: bridging the gap between researchers and industry professionals. J Constr Eng Manag 138:594–604.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Tiwari A, Mishra AK, Kobayashi H, Turner APF (2012a) Intelligent Nanomaterials. Processes, Properties, and ApplicationsGoogle Scholar
  121. Tiwari JN, Tiwari RN, Kim KS (2012b) Zero-dimensional, one-dimensional, two-dimensional and three-dimensional nanostructured materials for advanced electrochemical energy devices. Prog Mater Sci 57:724–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Tourinho PS, van Gestel CAM, Lofts S, Svendsen C, Soares AM, Loureiro S (2012) Metal-based nanoparticles in soil: fate, behavior, and effects on soil invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:1679–1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Turkyilmaz A, Sevik H, Cetin M, Ahmaida Saleh EA (2018) Changes in heavy metal accumulation depending on traffic density in some landscape plants. Pol J Environ Stud 27(5):2211–2284.  https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/78620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Ugwu OO, Arop JB, Nwoji CU, Osadebe NN (2013) Nanotechnology as a preventive engineering solution to highway infrastructure failures. J Constr Eng Manag 139:987–993.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000670 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Vipulanandan C, Harendra S (2008) Remediation of PCE contaminated soil using nanoparticles. GeoCongress 2008:455–462Google Scholar
  126. Waalewijn-Kool PL, Ortiz MD, Van Gestel CAM (2012) Effect of different spiking procedures on the distribution and toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles in soil. Ecotoxicology 21:1797–1804.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-012-0914-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Wong C, Pedrotti M, El Mountassir G, Lunn RJ (2018) A study on the mechanical interaction between soil and colloidal silica gel for ground improvement. Eng Geol 243:84–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2018.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Yigit N, Sevik H, Cetin M, Gul L (2016a) Clonal variation in chemical wood characteristics in Hanönü (Kastamonu) Günlüburun black pine (Pinus nigra Arnold. Subsp. Pallasiana (lamb.) Holmboe) seed orchard. J Sustain For 35:515–526.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2016.1225512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Yigit N, Sevik H, Cetin M, Kaya N (2016b) Chapter 3: Determination of the effect of drought stress on the seed germination in some plant species. "Water Stress in Plants". Intech Open, Eds: Ismail Md. Mofizur Rahman, Zinnat Ara Begum, Hiroshi Hasegawa, ISBN: 978–953–51-2621-8, pp: 43–62 (126)Google Scholar
  130. Yonekura R, Kaga M (1992) Current chemical grout engineering in Japan. Conference proceedings, in proc. grouting, soil improvement and Geosynthetics, pp 725–736Google Scholar
  131. You Z, Mills-Beale J, Foley JM, Roy S, Odegard GM, Dai Q, Goh SW (2011) Nanoclay-modified asphalt materials: preparation and characterization. Constr Build Mater 25:1072–1078.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Zahedi M, Sharifipour M, Jahanbakhshi F, Bayat R (2014) Nanoclay performance on resistance of clay under freezing cycles. J Appl Sci Environ Manag 18:427–434.  https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v18i3.9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Zhang G (2007) Soil nanoparticles and their influence on engineering properties of soils. In: Geo-Denver 2007: advances in measurement and modeling of soil behavior, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  134. Zhang G, Germaine JT, Whittle AJ (2003) Effects of Fe-oxide cementation on the deformation characteristics of a weathered old alluvium in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Soils Found 43(4):119–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Mechanics DepartmentSV National Institute of TechnologySuratIndia

Personalised recommendations