Advertisement

The role of construction and demolition materials in swelling of a clay

  • Ali Firat CabalarEmail author
  • Muhamd Dafer Abdulnafaa
  • Haluk Isik
Technical Note
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the swelling of a clay treated with various construction and demolition materials (CD) (i.e., crushed brick, dragged asphalt, and crushed concrete paving slab), which are recycled and used for new engineering applications, thereby reducing their potential impact on environment. A comprehensive laboratory evaluation was carried out to examine the swelling of clay mixed with the CD materials at different mix ratios in both California Bearing Ratio (CBR) and oedometer testing equipments. The study has indicated that plasticity index for all mixtures decreases with an increase in the amount of CD materials. The testing procedure employed has an influence on swelling of the specimens. The swelling values obtained in the oedometer testing machines were higher than those obtained in the CBR apparatus. Furthermore, swelling behavior of the clay with different CD materials tested was found to be different from each other. The clay mixed with dragged asphalt pieces had the highest swelling value for all mix ratios tested in both testing equipments, while the clay with crushed brick grains had the lowest swelling.

Keywords

Swelling Clay CD materials CBR Oedometer 

References

  1. Aatheesan T, Arulrajah A, Bo MW, Vuong B, Wilson J (2010) Crushed brick blends with crushed rock for pavement systems. Proc Inst Civ Eng Waste Resour Manag 163(1):29–35.  https://doi.org/10.1680/warm.2010.163.1.29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Rawas AA, Taha R, Nelson JD, Al-Shab BT, Al-Siyabi H (2002) A comparative evaluation of various additives used in the stabilization of expansive soils. Geotech Test J 25(2):199–209.  https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ11363J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arulrajah A, Piratheepan J, Aatheesan T, Bo MW (2011) Geotechnical properties of recycled crushed brick in pavement applications. J Mater Civ Eng 23(10):1444–1452.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arulrajah A, Piratheepan J, Disfani M, Bo M (2013) Geotechnical and geoenvironmental properties of recycled construction and demolition materials in pavement subbase applications. J Mater Civ Eng 25(8):1077–1088.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arulrajah A, Piratheepan J, Disfani MM (2014) Reclaimed asphalt pavement/recycled concrete aggregate blends in pavement subbases: laboratory and field evaluation. J Mater Civ Eng 26(2):349–357.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000850 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabalar AF, Abdulnafaa MD, Karabash Z (2016) Influences of various construction and demolition materials on the behavior of a clay. Environ Earth Sci 75(9):841.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-5631-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter M, Bentley SP (1991) Correlation of soil properties, vol 130. Pentech Press Ltd, London ISBN: 978-0727303172Google Scholar
  8. Chen FH (1988) Foundations on expansive soils. American Elsevier Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Chidiroglou I, Goodwin AK, Laycock E, O'Flaherty F (2008) Physical properties of demolition waste material. Proc Inst Civ Eng Construction Mater 161(3):97–103.  https://doi.org/10.1680/coma.2008.161.3.97 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Day RW (1999) Geotechnical and foundation engineering design and construction. McGraw- Hill Companies, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Delville A, Laszlo P (1990) The origin of the swelling of clays by water. AmChem Soc Langmuir 6(7):1289–1294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ene E, Okagbue C (2009) Some basic geotechnical properties of expansive soil modified using pyroclastic dust. Eng Geol 107:61–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2009.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Erzin Y, Erol O (2007) Swell pressure prediction by suction methods. Eng Geol 92:133–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Firat S, Yilmaz G, Comert AT, Sumer M (2012) Utilization of marble dust, fly ash and waste sand (silt-quartz) in road subbase filling materials. KSCE J Civ Eng 16(7):1143–1151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-012-1526-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gens A, Alonso EE (1992) A framework for the behavior of unsaturated expansive clays. Can Geotech J 29:1013–1032.  https://doi.org/10.1139/t92-120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holtz WG, Gibbs HJ (1956) Engineering properties of expansive clays. Trans Am Soc Civ Eng 121:641–677Google Scholar
  17. Jones DE, Holtz WG (1973) Expansive soils-the hidden disaster. Civ Eng Am Soc Civ Eng 43(8):49–51 ISSN: 0885-7024Google Scholar
  18. Kjellander R, Marcelja S, Pashley RM, Quirk JP (1988) Double-layer ion correlation forces restrict calcium-clay swelling. J Phys Chem 92:6489–6492.  https://doi.org/10.1021/j100334a005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Likos WJ, Lu N (2006) Pore scale analysis of bulk volume change from crystalline swelling in Na+- and Ca2+-smectite. Clay Clay Miner 54(4):516–529.  https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2006.0540412 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lloret A, Villar MV, Sanchez M, Gens A, Pintado X, Alonso EE (2003) Mechanical behaviour of heavily compacted bentonite under high suction changes. Geotechnique 53(1):27–40.  https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2003.53.1.27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Madsen FT, Muller-Vonmoos M (1989) The swelling behavior of clays. Appl Clay Sci 4:143–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-1317(89)90005-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Melbouci B (2009) Compaction and shearing behavior study of recycled aggregates. Constr Build Mater 23(8):2723–2730.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Melton JS, Clark CJ, Regis PT (2012) Feasibility study on building-derived concrete debris for use in highway construction. J ASTM Int 9(2):95–110 Paper ID JAI103753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitchell JK (1993) Fundamentals of soil behavior. John Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  25. Modarres A, Nosoudy YM (2015) Clay stabilization using coal waste and lime- technical and environmental impacts. Appl Clay Sci 116(117):281–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2015.03.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rao AS, Phanikumar BR, Sharma RS (2004) Prediction of swelling characteristics of remoulded and compacted expansive soils using free swell index. Q J Eng Geol Hydrogeol 37(3):217–226.  https://doi.org/10.1144/1470-9236/03-052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seed HB, Woodward RJ Jr., Lundgren R (1962) Prediction of swelling potential for compacted clays. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE 88(No. SM-3, Part I):53–87Google Scholar
  28. Warner JD (2007) The beneficial reuse of asphalt shingles in roadway construction. M.Sc. thesis, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  29. Yong RN (1999) Soil suction and soil-water potentials in swelling clays in engineered clay barriers. Geoenvironmental Engineering Research Centre, Cardiff School of Engineering, University of Wales, Cardiff, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhu J, Wu S, Zhong J, Wang D (2012) Investigation of asphalt mixture containing demolition waste obtained from earthquake-damaged buildings. Constr Build Mater 29:466–475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.09.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Firat Cabalar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Muhamd Dafer Abdulnafaa
    • 1
  • Haluk Isik
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of GaziantepGaziantepTurkey

Personalised recommendations