Advertisement

Ground motion acceleration and response spectra of Al-Mashair area, Makkah Al-Mukarramah, Saudi Arabia

  • Kamal AbdelrahmanEmail author
  • Abdullah Al-Amri
  • Naif Al-Otaibi
  • Mohammed Fnais
  • Enayat Abdelmonem
Original Paper
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

The residential buildings of Makkah Al-Mukarramah constructed mostly on a soft Quaternary deposits with various thicknesses reaching to more than 30 m in most districts. The spatial variation of ground motion in Al-Mashair area has been assessed by synthetic ground motion acceleration using a point source model coupled by a site response analysis. The bedrock level acceleration time histories have been generated at 27 sites within Al-Mashair area generated by earthquake of 5.0 moment magnitude, using a synthetic ground motion model. While, the ground surface response spectral curves with 5% of the critical damping were assessed using shear-wave velocity profiles of multichannel analysis of surface waves besides the earthquake time histories. Surface ground response spectra were mapped using the ArcGIS platform for 1.5 Hz, 3.0 Hz, 5.0 Hz, 8 Hz, and 10 Hz where this frequency range includes the range of natural frequencies of tall to single story buildings. The surface ground motion maps display that the hazard level ranges from low to moderate, where peak spectral acceleration varies between 13 cm/s2 and 124 cm/s2. The maximum surface ground motion values are calculated with 5% damped horizontal spectral acceleration at 10 Hz, which is equal to the natural frequency of low-rise buildings. These results should be taken into consideration from decision-makers, urban planners, and civil engineers during the design of earthquake-resistant structures in Makkah Al-Mukarramah city in general and Al-Mashair zone in particular.

Keywords

Microtremor MASW Site class Site response Al-Mashair area Makkah city 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Deep thanks are extending to the reviewers for their beneficial review and valuable comments.

Funding information

Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funded this work through research group no. RGP-1436-011.

Supplementary material

12517_2019_4526_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (348 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 347 kb)

References

  1. Aki K (1988) Local site effects on strong ground motion. In: von Thun JL (ed.) Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II – Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation. Geotechnical Special Publication, vol. 20: pp 103–155Google Scholar
  2. Al Furaih AA, Al Aswad AA, Kebeasy RM (1994) New aspects on estimating risk around the Makkah region. Abstract 2nd Annual Meeting Saudi Society of Earth SciencesGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Noury S, Ali S (1986) Seismic risk analysis of western Saudi Arabia. Econ Geol 23:95–108Google Scholar
  4. Al-Garni M (2009) Geophysical investigations for groundwater in a complex subsurface terrain, Wadi Fatima, KSA: a case history. Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering 3(2)Google Scholar
  5. Ambraseys NN, Melville CP, Adams RD (1994) The seismicity of Egypt, Arabia and the Red Sea: a historical review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 181PCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anbazhagan P, Sitharam TG, Divya C (2007) Site response analysis based on site specific soil properties using geotechnical and geophysical tests: correlations between Gmax and N60. 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, une 25-28, paper No. 1286.Google Scholar
  7. Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1995) Ground-motion relations for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:17–30Google Scholar
  8. Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1998) Evaluation of models for earthquake source spectra in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88(4):917–934Google Scholar
  9. Azzedine B, Ritz J, Philip H (1998) Drainage diversions as evidence of propagating faults: example of the El Asnam and Thenia faults, Algeria. Terra Nova 10:236–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bard PY, Riepl-Thomas J (2000) Wave propagation in complex geological structures and their effects on strong ground motion. In: Kause E, Manolis G (eds) Wave Motion in Earthquake Engineering. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 37–95Google Scholar
  11. Boore DM (1983) Stochastic simulation of high-frequency ground motions based on seismological models of the radiated spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 73:1865–1894Google Scholar
  12. Boore DM (2003) Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method. Pure Appl Geophys 160:635–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boore DM (2004a) Can site response be predicted? J Earthq Eng 8:1–41Google Scholar
  14. Boore DM (2004b) Estimating Vs (30) (or NEHRP Site Classes) from shallow velocity models (depths < 30 m). Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:591–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boore DM, Boatwright J (1984) Average body wave radiation coefficients. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74:1615–1621Google Scholar
  16. Boore DM, Atkinson GM (1987) Stochastic prediction of ground motion and spectral response parameters at hard-rock sites in eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 77(2):440–467Google Scholar
  17. Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work (with 2005 erratum). Seismol Res Lett 68:128–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brune J (1970) Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes. J Geophys Res 75:4997–5009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chandler AK, Lam NTK, Tsang HH (2006) Near-surface attenuation modeling based on rock shear-wave velocity profile. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26:1004–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DMMR (1995) Annual report of the USGS Mission, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, FY 1994Google Scholar
  21. El-Dakheel ARM, Sadek HS, El-Saeed MM, Filali EY (1997) Groundwater Resources in Misfalaf area – Southern Makkah Al Mukarramah. Fakeeh Center for Research and Development.Google Scholar
  22. Endo E, Seismic Center Staff (2007) National Center for Earthquakes and Volcanoes, Earthquake Magnitude Calculations-2006. Technical Report SGS-TR-2007-1.Google Scholar
  23. Fnais M, Al-Amri A, Abdelrahman K, Abdelmonem E, El-Hady S (2015) Seismicity and seismotectonics of Jeddah-Makkah region, West-Central Saudi Arabia. J Earth Sci 26(5):746–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grünthal, G. (1997): Compilation of the global seismic hazard assessment program (GSHAP). Regional seismic hazard for Europe, Africa and the Middle East http://seismo.ethz.ch/GSHAP/. Accessed 15 Dec 2018
  25. Herrmann RB (1985) An extension of random vibration theory estimates of strong ground motion to large distances. Bull Seismol Soc Am 75:1447–1453Google Scholar
  26. Hwang H, Huo J-R (1997) Attenuation relations of ground motion for rock and soil sites in eastern United States. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 16:363–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kawase H (2003) Site effects on strong ground motions. In: WHK L et al (eds) International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 1013–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merghelani HM, Gallanthine SK (1981) Microearthquakes in the Tihamat-Asir region of Saudi Arabia. Bull Seismol Soc Am 70:2291–2293Google Scholar
  29. Raju LG, Ramana GV, Rao CH, Sitharam TG (2004) Site-specific ground response analysis. Curr Sci 87:1354–1362Google Scholar
  30. Saudi Geological Survey (2004) Geological map of the Greater Makkah area; 1:50,000. In: Engineering geological mapping of the Greater Makkah Al Mukarramah area, SGS-OF-2005-17, A-A M. Solami and others (2006).Google Scholar
  31. Seed HB, Idriss IM, Arango I (1983) Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data. J Geotech Eng 109:458–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Singh SK, Ordaz M, Dattatrayam RS, Gupta HK (1999) A spectral analysis of the 21 May 1997, Jabalpur, India, earthquake (Mw = 5.8) and estimation of ground motion from future earthquakes in the Indian Shield region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:1620–1630Google Scholar
  33. Sitharam TG, Anbazhagan P, Mahesh GU, Bharathi K, Nischala Reddy P (2005) Seismic hazard studies using geotechnical borehole data and GIS, symposium on seismic hazard analysis and microzonation. Roorkee.Google Scholar
  34. Skempton AW (1986) Standard penetration test procedures. Geotechnique 36:425–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sonbul AR (1995) Engineering geology as applied to urban development of the north-western area of the Holy City of Makkah. Dissertation, King Abdul Aziz UniversityGoogle Scholar
  36. Swolfs HS (1994) In search of intraplate seismicity in the Arabia-Nubian shield and basement complex. In: Topical investigations in geohazards in Saudi Arabia and adjacent areas. DMMR-OFR, USGS-OF-94-4, pp 3–17Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kamal Abdelrahman
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Abdullah Al-Amri
    • 1
  • Naif Al-Otaibi
    • 1
  • Mohammed Fnais
    • 1
  • Enayat Abdelmonem
    • 3
  1. 1.Geology and Geophysics DepartmentKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Seismology Dept.National Research Institute of Astronomy and GeophysicsCairoEgypt
  3. 3.Alfarabi CollegesRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations